China's Ambassador to South Africa celebrates International Day for Dialogue among Civilizations
China's Ambassador to South Africa, Wu Peng said the International Day for Dialogue among Civilizations aims to enhance global awareness of the vital importance of civilization, diversity and intercultural exchanges.
Image: Supplied
Dialogue among civilizations is a bond of peace, a driver for development, and a bridge of friendship.
This was the message conveyed by the People's Republic of China's Ambassador to South Africa, Wu Peng, on celebrating the First International Day for Dialogue among Civilizations. The Ambassador spoke about this landmark achievement during an event hosted at the embassy in Pretoria on Thursday, which was attended by a delegation from the Government, including Dr Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma and other dignitaries.
In June last year, the 78th United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution by consensus, which was initiated by China. It was co-sponsored by over 80 countries, including South Africa. Ambassador Wu said the establishment of this international day echoes the common aspiration of people from all countries for promoting dialogue among civilizations and progress of humanity.
'The world today is faced with turbulence and transformation. How different civilizations coexist harmoniously represents a critical issue of our era.'
The ambassador added that more dialogue means less confrontation and greater inclusion reduces estrangement.
The International Day for Dialogue among Civilizations aims to enhance global awareness of the vital importance of civilization, diversity and intercultural exchanges, to encourage the international community to strengthen mutual learning and solidarity, and to jointly explore solutions to global challenges, Wu said.
He stressed that China has constantly upheld a civilization outlook, mutual learning, dialogue, and inclusiveness and has always been an active champion of inter-civilization dialogue.
'What has sustained Chinese civilization across 5,000 years is no accident. It is our ancestral conviction that harmony breeds prosperity, that diversity is strength…'
The Ambassador added that true progress comes from mutual learning and enlightened integration.
He said South Africa's success to a large extent lies in the traditional spirit of Ubuntu.
'This African wisdom teaches us that 'I am because we are', forging national unity through shared dignity. The Ambassador said this cultural affinity and convergence have established an essential framework of common values, facilitating intellectual and cultural dialogue not only between China and South Africa but also among all nations.
'Our world comprises over 200 countries and regions, 2,500 ethnic groups, and diverse religions. In this era of interconnected destinies, all nations and people should respect differences, embrace harmony in diversity, and pursue peaceful coexistence.'
He said China stands ready to work with South Africa and the international community to actively implement the Global Civilization initiative.
'Together we can foster inclusive co-existence and mutual learning among civilizations and use dialogue to promote world peace and shared development, thus jointly composing a new chapter for building a community with a shared future for mankind,' Wu said.
Dlamini-Zuma meanwhile hailed China, calling for the 10th of June to be known as the International Day for Dialogue among Civilizations.
'As we move faster and faster into a multipolar world, the international community must welcome this initiative by China to ensure dialogue among civilizations and peoples.'
She pointed out that the Freedom Charter is emphatic: 'There shall be peace and friendship".
She said the Freedom Charter speaks clearly to the principles and values of dialogue between civilizations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
21 minutes ago
- Mail & Guardian
UN credibility crisis: The US veto shields Israel's destruction of Gaza
The United Nations Security Council in session. Photo: Reuters Once again, the United States has used its veto power at the United Nations Security Council to protect Israel from international accountability. Amid growing global concern over civilian suffering in Gaza, allegations of war crimes and the devastation caused by Israeli military operations, resolutions calling for ceasefires, humanitarian access and independent investigations have been struck down not by a lack of international consensus, but by a single vote from Washington. It's an old pattern, and a deeply troubling one. Since 1946, the US has exercised its veto more than 80 times, many of those to block resolutions critical of Israel. From the 1981 veto of a resolution condemning Israel's bombing of Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor, to the 2001 rejection of international observers in the West Bank, and the 2011 veto of a resolution denouncing settlement expansion, the US has repeatedly used its exceptional power to exempt its ally from scrutiny. This raises urgent questions about the credibility of the Security Council itself. If one country can obstruct the collective will of the world even in matters involving alleged breaches of humanitarian law, what is the purpose of multilateralism? How can the law have meaning if it does not apply equally to all? The veto power, granted to the five permanent members of the Council (the US, United Kingdom, France, Russia and China), was designed to ensure post-World War II stability. But it has become an instrument of selective justice. It allows powerful nations and their allies to avoid accountability, while weaker states face sanctions, interventions, or condemnation for far less. The Security Council's paralysis in the face of human suffering in Gaza isn't just a failure of leadership, it's a systemic failure. It reinforces a rules-based order that applies rigorously to some, and not at all to others. And that breeds resentment, weakens global cooperation and damages the very idea of international law. This is where South Africa's role matters. With a history shaped by colonialism, apartheid and a long liberation struggle, South Africa's voice carries moral weight. The country has long drawn parallels between apartheid-era South Africa and the treatment of Palestinians under Israeli occupation. The ANC has consistently endorsed Palestinian self-determination as a policy position, with its 2017 national conference resolving to downgrade South Africa's embassy in Tel Aviv, a move later implemented. More recently, South Africa took bold legal action by instituting proceedings against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), accusing it of genocide in Gaza. Whatever one's view on the merits of the case, it signals a powerful shift: a Global South nation using international law to challenge impunity where diplomacy has failed. But this cannot be the end of South Africa's engagement. Our government must: Continue building global and regional coalitions that push for reform of the Security Council, particularly the limitation of veto use in cases of mass atrocity; Encourage African states to take coordinated action in solidarity with Palestine, whether through diplomacy, trade, or civil society partnerships; and Mobilise Global South alliances to demand the equal application of international law, especially in forums outside the UNSC where veto power does not apply. The UN is in a credibility crisis. Its effectiveness depends not only on its resolutions, but on its moral authority. Right now, that authority is being eroded not by those violating the law alone, but by those enabling that violation through silence, paralysis or political convenience. If we are serious about a fair and just international order, one where law applies equally and no state is above accountability, then reform must follow. That reform will not come from the powerful. It must come from voices like South Africa's, speaking clearly and persistently not out of charity or sentiment, but out of principle and shared historical understanding. The veto must no longer be allowed to block justice. And silence must no longer be mistaken for neutrality. Nkosinathi Mtshali is a Bachelor of Laws student at University of the Free State.
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
SA is regressing on the advancements in female leadership and localisation
The year 2015 marked a seismic shift in the story of South African enterprise. The then appointed Lottery Operator, was the first to be owned and led by a woman. That was a big moment. As a Black female entrepreneur committed to telling Africa's story through its people, its victories, and its integrity, I saw this as more than a business win — it was a symbol of what transformation should look like in South Africa. This leadership didn't just check boxes on a scorecard; it embodied the spirit of empowerment. The visionary headship of the black-woman-led operator steered the National Lottery into a new era defined by innovation, local technological excellence, and profound social impact. Today, that legacy is under threat. The recent appointment of Sizekhaya Holdings as the fourth National Lottery operator is not just disappointing, it is deeply troubling. It challenges the integrity of our procurement processes, undermines genuine gender empowerment, and raises pressing questions about foreign influence and compromised leadership. As Africans, we have long fought to reclaim our narrative. But reclaiming is not enough. We must now protect and own it — and that means ensuring that Africa's progress is authored by its own people. That means calling out tokenism when it disguises itself as transformation. It was disheartening to observe Sizekhaya Holdings' leadership structure seems to be a step backwards. While four women are listed in leadership positions, only two hold executive roles. The others are non-executive directors – titles that sound impressive but wield limited operational power. This performative inclusion dilutes the very progress women like Charmaine Mabuza made. Even more concerning are the glaring red flags surrounding the bidding process itself. How can we discuss a 'clean' tender when key members of the evaluation committee have direct ties to Sizekhaya's major shareholder, Goldrush? One committee member has financial interests linked to the same bidder. These are not mere oversights; they are breaches of trust that demand our immediate attention. Trust is the bedrock of any public institution. Instead of silence from the Ministry, we need transparency. We need accountability. The technology behind the new operator raises serious concerns. Why are we outsourcing such a critical national system to Genlot, a Chinese firm, when it has been proven that we have local capacity to deliver world-class innovation? This isn't just about software – it's about sovereignty. Almost half the National Lottery's revenue could now flow offshore. Is that the cost of ignoring local excellence that we are willing to pay as a nation? As a woman who has built from the ground up, I understand the power of being given a chance — but also the responsibility to honour that opportunity with service, not self-interest. The National Lottery is more than a contract. It is a vehicle for transformation, one that impacts millions of lives. We cannot afford to politicise it or hand it over to interests that do not serve the public good. This moment demands more than frustration. It demands action. The question South Africa must ask is this: Whose interests are we serving now? Because if we do not champion local excellence, we are handing our power away on a silver platter, and history has shown us how that ends. The National Lottery should remain a symbol of our ability to uplift ourselves, not a cautionary tale of how easily progress can be reversed. South Africa is not for sale. And neither is our story. Jabulile Buthelezi - Kalonji is a strategic communications and stakeholder relations management professional, public speaker, author and publisher.
TimesLIVE
3 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
China says it will remove all tariffs on African exports to boost trade
China will negotiate and sign a new economic pact with Africa that will get rid of all tariffs on the 53 African states it has diplomatic ties with, it said, a move that could benefit middle-income nations. The Asian economic giant offers duty- and quota-free market access to least developed countries (LDCs), including many in Africa, but the new initiative will level the playing field by also offering middle-income countries similar market access. "China is ready to ... welcome quality products from Africa to the Chinese market," China's foreign ministry said after a meeting of senior Chinese officials with African foreign ministers in Changsha to review implementation of commitments made during a summit in Beijing last September. In recognition of the significant disadvantages that businesses from LDCs like Tanzania or Mali could face from their more developed counterparts like South Africa once the market is fully opened, China pledged additional measures to support LDCs, including training and marketing promotion. Beijing's move could help relatively advanced countries, with significant manufacturing bases for value added products, to take advantage of the vast Chinese market, analysts said.
