Trump overshadows Supreme Court as ruling season begins
WASHINGTON — The beginning of June marks the start of the traditional monthlong ruling season at the Supreme Court, when the justices hand down decisions in their biggest and most contentious cases.
But this year is different.
President Donald Trump's second term has disrupted the court calendar, with the nine justices now spending as much time, if not more, juggling consequential emergency cases that need to be handled quickly as they do on the regular docket of cases that have gotten months of attention and deliberation.
'It underscores the degree to which Donald Trump and the Trump administration are sucking all of the oxygen out of the room,' said Leah Litman, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School and the author of a new book about the court, 'Lawless.'
This can affect the public's knowledge and understanding of what the court is doing in part because media organizations are used to devoting additional resources to coverage during June that are not necessarily available at other times of the year, she added.
It also changes the normal rhythms of the court's operations. The court announces ahead of time when rulings in argued cases are expected, and they are always issued at 10 a.m. But emergency decisions can drop at any time of day, with no advance notice. One recent decision was released in the early hours of a Saturday morning.
Nearly all the emergency cases are related to the administration's aggressive interpretations of federal law in executive orders that have regularly been blocked by federal judges.
As June begins, the Supreme Court has 33 cases to decide out of 62 on the so-called merits docket. Those are the cases in which the justices heard arguments in the current nine-month term, which started in October, and would be expected to decide by issuing lengthy written decisions. The next scheduled ruling day is Thursday.
In the meantime, the court since January has already issued rulings of some description in 11 Trump-related emergency cases via what has been dubbed the 'shadow docket,' and it has several others pending. These are cases in which the justices do not generally hear oral arguments, and they are often decided by brief court orders without the lengthy, detailed reasoning associated with major Supreme Court decisions.
But the shadow docket decisions can be just as practically important as the cases decided on the merits docket, sparking concerns about transparency and process.
This term's big Supreme Court decisions
Via the shadow docket, the court has already allowed Trump's ban on transgender people in the military to go into effect, given a green light to the firing of independent agency members, and approved the administration's removal of legal protections for thousands of Venezuelan immigrants.
The justices have also put the brakes on an attempt by the administration to use a wartime law to deport Venezuelans it claims are gang members and ordered Trump to 'facilitate' the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was wrongly sent to El Salvador.
On Friday, the court allowed the Trump administration to revoke legal protections for more than 500,000 immigrants.
In the meantime, the docket of merits cases has a relatively small number of headline-grabbing cases compared with previous years.
Of those cases yet to be decided, the biggest is a challenge to a Tennessee law that bans gender transition care for minors. The court is also set to rule on a conservative religious objection to LGBTQ-themed books in a Maryland county's schools and an effort by Texas to restrict access to pornographic websites.
By comparison, last June, the court's rulings included one granting Trump broad immunity from prosecution for events that took place during his first term as president, a trio of rulings that weakened federal agency power, a decision upholding a law that bars domestic abusers from possessing guns, and another rejecting a challenge to the Food and Drug Administration's approval of the abortion pill mifepristone.
In the summer of 2023, the court within a matter of days ended affirmative action in college admissions and killed President Joe Biden's student loan debt relief plan.
And the previous summer, the court overturned Roe v. Wade, the landmark abortion rights decision.
How the shadow docket is changing the court
'The emergency docket seems to have almost swallowed the court's merits docket over the past month or so,' said Greg Garre, a Washington lawyer who regularly argues cases at the court. One case he argued, concerning Oklahoma's attempt to launch the first religious public charter school, was poised to be one of the biggest of the term. But it ended up fizzling when the court deadlocked 4-4.
In fact, some cases that arise as emergency applications have ended up being converted into merits cases, creating what some view as a 'rocket docket' — that is, major cases zooming immediately to the high court instead of taking months or years to navigate the normal appeals process.
'In a few years, we may no longer be able to say that the emergency docket is an 'irregular' procedure. It might become the normal procedure for all high-stakes litigation,' said William Baude, a University of Chicago Law School professor who coined the 'shadow docket' phrase.
One high-profile example was the court's January decision upholding a law that was intended to ban TikTok if its Chinese owner did not immediately sell it. The Supreme Court resolved the entire case within weeks after it reached the court via an emergency appeal.
The court also elected to hear oral arguments in a trio of shadow docket cases concerning nationwide injunctions issued by judges that blocked Trump's plan to end birthright citizenship, in a further blurring of the regular merits docket and the fast-moving shadow docket.
Some Supreme Court watchers have speculated that the justices deliberately kept their merits docket relatively light this term, knowing that there was the possibility of election-related cases in the fall and a potential wave of Trump-related cases if he won the election, based on what happened in his first term.
'I definitely feel like the court is reserving space in its schedule for emergency docket cases involving Trump administration initiatives,' said John Elwood, another lawyer who argues cases at the court.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
A banana a day to keep the tariffs away? Howard Lutnick mocked during congressional hearing over plan to make more products in America
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was ridiculed in the House of Representatives over his proposed solution if Donald Trump's tariffs hit banana imports. Lutnick, one of the loudest cheerleaders for Trump's aggressive trade strategy, was testifying before the House Appropriations Committee when he found himself up against Pennsylvania Democratic Rep. Madeleine Dean. The congresswoman put it to Lutnick that the Trump administration lacked a fundamental understanding of how a trade deficit works, pointing out that the last time the United States had a trade surplus was during the Great Depression of the 1930s, a return to which is 'a direction none of us wants to go,' she said. Dean rebuked the secretary over the chaotic implementation of Trump's tariff policy after the president was forced to row back his imposition of steep levies on 100 countries on 'Liberation Day' (April 2) when they spooked the stock markets, forcing him to swiftly introduce a 90-day pause to allow for dealmaking. 'We are in the midst of negotiations with dozens of countries,' Lutnick raced to reassure her. 'We could sign deals but they're only going to get better as we negotiate them.' Dean then pivoted to her true subject, the cost of living, saying that residents of her suburban Philadelphia district were facing $2,000 a year increases to their grocery bills as a result of inflation, noting that Walmart, for one, had already raised the price of bananas by eight percent. 'Mr Trump promised to bring down the cost of goods, day one. And what he has done through his trade deficit fixation and his tariff chaos has nakedly increased the cost of goods,' she said. Brandishing a banana, Dean asked the secretary: 'What's the tariff on bananas? Americans, by the way, love bananas. We buy billions of them a year. I love bananas. What's the tariff on bananas?' 'The tariff on bananas would be representative of the countries that produce them,' Lutnick answered, estimating the rate at 10 percent when pushed. 'But the cost is on the American consumer now and on the businesses with the confusion now,' she hit back. 'Mr Secretary, I believe you know better. I believe you recognize that a trade deficit is not something to fear. I believe you know that predictability, stability is essential for businesses. I wish you would show that truth to this administration.' When Dean yielded her time, Lutnick asked for permission to respond to her and said: 'There's no uncertainty if you build in America and you produce your product in America. There will be no tariff.' 'We can't produce bananas in America,' she responded, incredulously. 'The concept of building in America and paying no tariffs is very, very clear,' said Lutnick. 'We cannot build bananas in America,' Dean repeated. 'Fighting for imports is not the same,' the secretary tried again. 'We cannot build bananas in America,' the representative repeated. While it is true that the United States cannot 'build' its own bananas and most are imported from Central American nations like Guatemala, Ecuador and Costa Rica, southern states like California, Florida, Arizona, Louisiana and Texas have the necessary climate to grow them but currently only do so in small quantities. Hawaii also grows bananas, as do the American territories of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the U.S. Virgin Islands and the Northern Mariana Islands but, again, not currently on a scale sufficient to meet domestic demand.
BreakingNews.ie
9 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
US Supreme Court asked to pause order reinstating Education Department staff
The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to pause a court order to reinstate Education Department employees who were fired in mass lay-offs as part of President Donald Trump's plan to dismantle the agency. The Justice Department's emergency appeal to the high court on Friday said US District Judge Myong Joun in Boston exceeded his authority last month when he issued a preliminary injunction reversing the lay-offs of nearly 1,400 people and putting the broader plan on hold. Advertisement Mr Joun's order has blocked one of Mr Trump's biggest campaign promises and effectively stalled the effort to wind down the department. A federal appeals court refused to put the order on hold while the administration appealed.
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Report: Trump may sell his brand-new Tesla
President Donald Trump may sell or give away the red Telsa he purchased from Elon Musk, according to a new report. Trump bought the Tesla - paying cash - in March after he let Musk park several of his vehicle on the South Lawn in a show of support. The move comes after he and Musk's bro-mance ended, loudly and spectacularly, on the social media on Thursday. It was both painful and fascinating to watch. Musk dropped the bombshell after bombshell tweet: that the Jeffrey Epstein files haven't been released because Trump was in them; he endorsed Trump's impeachment; and he declared the president's tariffs will bring about a recession. Trump is 'not interested' in speaking with him. In March, the president turned the South Lawn of the White House into a Tesla showroom with five different models - including the infamous cybertruck - on display on the driveway. The model Trump bought, which he said his staff at the White House would use, has a starting price of $76,880. Aides have taken selfies of themselves in the Tesla as it sat in its parking space outside the West Wing. It's unclear if any one has actually driven it. Trump held the event to support Musk's electronic car company. Tesla showrooms and vehicles became targets of the public's rage as they expressed their unhappiness with Musk and his government cutting work through the Department of Government Efficiency.
