US Bolsters Military Options for Trump with Refueling Aircraft, Officials Say
The US military has moved a large number of refueling aircraft to Europe to provide options to President Donald Trump as Middle East tensions soar, two US officials told Reuters on Monday, speaking on condition of anonymity.
AirNav systems, a flight tracking website, said that on Sunday evening more than 31 US Air Force refueling aircraft -- primarily KC-135s and KC-45s -- left the United States, heading east.
The officials declined to comment on the number of aircraft but said the US aircraft carrier Nimitz was heading to the Middle East, in what one of them said was a pre-planned deployment. The Nimitz can hold 5,000 personnel and more than 60 aircraft, including fighter jets.
Taken together, the deployments suggest the United States is greatly strengthening its air power for potentially sustained operations as Iran and Israel trade blows, in unprecedented open warfare that is seeing civilian casualties mount on both sides.
"The sudden eastward deployment of over two dozen US Air Force tankers is not business as usual. It's a clear signal of strategic readiness," said Eric Schouten at Dyami Security Intelligence.
"Whether it's about supporting Israel, preparing for long-range operations, logistics is key, this move shows the US is positioning itself for rapid escalation if tensions with Iran spill over."
The United States has been cautious so far, helping Israel knock down incoming missiles. But Trump vetoed an Israeli plan in recent days to kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, two US officials told Reuters on Sunday.
One of them said the United States did not support going after Iran's political leadership as long as Americans weren't being targeted.
A third US official, speaking on condition of anonymity, declined to comment on the tanker movement but stressed that US military activities in the region were defensive in nature.
The Pentagon referred Reuters to the White House, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
25 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Jury Finds MyPillow Founder Defamed Former Employee for a Leading Voting Equipment Company
A federal jury in Colorado on Monday found that one of the nation's most prominent election conspiracy theorists, MyPillow founder Mike Lindell, defamed a former employee for a leading voting equipment company after the 2020 presidential election. The employee, Eric Coomer, sued after Lindell called him a 'traitor' and accusations about him stealing the election were streamed on Lindell's online media platform. Coomer was the security and product strategy director at Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems, whose voting machines became the target of elaborate conspiracy theories among allies of President Donald Trump, who continues to falsely claim that his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in 2020 was due to widespread fraud. Dominion won a $787 million settlement in a defamation lawsuit it filed against Fox News over its airing of false claims against the company and has another lawsuit against the conservative network Newsmax. Newsmax apologized to Coomer in 2021 for airing false allegations against him. Coomer said during the two-week Lindell trial that his career and life were destroyed by the statements. His lawyers said Lindell either knew the statements were lies or conveyed them recklessly without knowing if they were true. Lindell's lawyers denied the claims and said his online platform, formerly known as Frankspeech, is not liable for statements made by others. Lindell said he went to trial to draw attention to the need to get rid of electronic voting machines that have been targeted in a web of conspiracy theories. He said he used to be worth about $60 million before he started speaking out about the 2020 election and is now $10 million in debt. Reviews, recounts, and audits in the battleground states where Trump contested his loss in 2020 all affirmed Democrat Joe Biden's victory. Trump's attorney general at the time said there was no evidence of widespread fraud, and Trump and his allies lost dozens of court cases seeking to overturn the result. Lindell stuck by his false claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen during the trial but did not call any experts to present evidence of his claims. Lindell said his beliefs that the 2020 election was tainted by fraud were influenced by watching the 2020 HBO documentary 'Kill Chain' and by the views of Trump's former national security adviser Michael Flynn. In an interview for a documentary Lindell made in 2021, Flynn said foreign interference was going to happen in US elections, and Lindell said he had no reason to doubt the claim since Flynn had worked for both political parties in intelligence. Lindell distanced himself from an account by a Colorado podcaster who claimed to have heard a conference call from the extremist group Antifa before the 2020 election. The podcast claimed that on the call someone named 'Eric' from Dominion said he would make sure that Trump would not win – a story that was recounted on Frankspeech during a 2021 event. Lindell said he only learned about that during the trial. Lindell said he never accused Coomer of rigging the election, but he did say he was upset because he said Newsmax blocked him from being able to go on air to talk about voting machines after it apologized to Coomer. Coomer denied there was any such deal to block Lindell under his agreement with the network. Coomer's lawyers tried to show how their client's life was devastated by the conspiracy theories spreading about him. Lindell was comparatively late to seize on Coomer, not mentioning him until February 2021, well after his name had been circulated by other Trump partisans. Coomer said the conspiracy theories cost him his job, his mental health, and the life he'd built and said Lindell's statements were the most distressing of all. He specifically pointed to a statement on May 9, 2021, when Lindell described what he believed Coomer had done as 'treason.' Lindell's attorneys argued that Coomer's reputation was already in tatters by the time Lindell mentioned him. They said that was partly because of Coomer's own Facebook posts disparaging Trump, which the former Dominion employee acknowledged were hyperbolic and had been a mistake.
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Why attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities have placed Israel's own secret arsenal in the spotlight
LONDON: To this day, Israel maintains a policy of deliberate ambiguity in regard to its nuclear capabilities, but it is a fact accepted by experts worldwide that Israel has had the bomb since just before the Six Day War in 1967. And not just one bomb. Recent estimates by the independent Stockholm International Peace Institute, which has kept tabs on the world's nuclear weapons and the states that possess them since 1966, suggest Israel has at least 90 nuclear warheads. SIPRI believes that these warheads are capable of being delivered anywhere within a maximum radius of 4,500 km by its F-15, F-161, and F-35I 'Adir' aircraft, its 50 land-based Jericho II and III missiles, and by about 20 Popeye Turbo cruise missiles, launched from submarines. While Iran is a signatory to the international nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Israel is not, which begs the question: while Israel is wreaking havoc in Iran, with the declared aim of crippling a nuclear development program, which the International Atomic Energy Authority says is about energy, not weaponry, why is the international community not questioning Israel's? In March, during a meeting of the board of governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, Jassim Yacoub Al-Hammadi, Qatar's ambassador to Austria, announced that Qatar was calling for 'intensified international efforts' to bring all Israeli nuclear facilities 'under the safeguards of the International Atomic Energy Agency and for Israel to join the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons as a non-nuclear state.' Israel refuses to sign up to the NPT or cooperate with the IAEA. Furthermore, it is a little remembered fact that since 1981 Israel has been in breach of UN Resolution 487. This was prompted by an attack on a nuclear research facility in Iraq by Israel on June 7, 1981, which was condemned by the UN Security Council as a 'clear violation of the Charter of the UN and the norms of international conduct.' Iraq, as the Security Council pointed out, had been a party to the Non-Proliferation Treaty since it came into force in 1970. Like all states, especially those developing, Iraq had the 'inalienable sovereign right … to establish programmes of technological and nuclear development to develop their economy and industry for peaceful purposes in accordance with their present and future needs and consistent with the internationally accepted objectives of preventing nuclear-weapons proliferation.' The resolution, which remains in force, called on Israel 'urgently to place its nuclear facilities under the safeguards of the International Atomic Energy Agency.' Israel has never complied with Resolution 487. That ambiguity extends to Israel's only officially stated position on nuclear weapons, which it has repeated since the 1960s, that it 'won't be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into the Middle East.' Israeli policymakers, SIPRI says, 'have previously interpreted 'introduce nuclear weapons' as publicly declaring, testing or actually using the nuclear capability, which Israel says it has not yet done.' In November 2023, about a month after the Hamas-led attack on Israel triggered the war in Gaza, Israeli Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu, a member of the ultra-nationalist Jewish Power party, said Israel should drop 'some kind of atomic bomb' on Gaza, 'to kill everyone.' Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quickly suspended Eliyahu from the cabinet. Eliyahu's statements 'were not based in reality,' Netanyahu said, while Eliyah himself took to X to say that it was 'clear to all sensible people' that his statement was 'metaphorical.' Arsen Ostrovsky, an international human rights lawyer who on X describes himself as a 'proud Zionist,' replied: 'It is clear to all sensible people that you are a stupid idiot. Even if metaphorical, it was inexcusable. You need to know when to keep your mouth shut.' Israel has no nuclear electricity generating plants, but it does have what experts agree is a vast nuclear facility. The Shimon Peres Negev Nuclear Research Center — built in the late 1950s and early 1960s, allegedly with French assistance, and renamed for the former Israeli prime minister following his death in 2016 — is a heavily guarded complex in the Negev Desert barely 70 km from the border with Egypt. Iran has ballistic missiles that are capable of reaching the Negev Nuclear Research Center, approximately 1,500 km from Tehran. Why is Tehran hitting Israeli cities in retaliation to Israel's attempt to destroy Iran's nuclear industry, when it could attack Israel's nuclear facility? The answer, most likely, comes down to the 'Samson Option.' The Samson Option is a protocol for mutual destruction, the existence of which Israel has never admitted, but has never denied. As Arab News reported in March, Israel is believed to have twice come close to using its nuclear weaponry. In 2017, a claim emerged that on the eve of the Arab-Israeli war in 1967 Israel had been on the cusp of unleashing a 'demonstration' nuclear blast designed to intimidate its enemies. The plan was revealed in interviews with retired general Itzhak Yaakov, conducted by Avner Cohen, an Israeli-American historian and leading scholar of Israel's nuclear history, and published only after Yaakov's death. In 2003, Cohen revealed that during the 1973 Yom Kippur War, when it again appeared that Israeli forces were about to be overrun, then Prime Minister Golda Meir had authorized the use of nuclear bombs and missiles as a last-stand defense. This doomsday plan, codenamed Samson, was named for the Israelite strongman who, captured by the Philistines, pulled down the pillars of their temple, destroying himself along with his enemies. Mordecha Vanunu, an Israeli nuclear technician and peace activist, revealed Israel's nuclear secrets back in 1986. Ensnared in the UK by a female Israeli agent, Mordechai was lured to Rome, where he was kidnapped by Mossad agents and taken back to Israel on an Israeli navy ship. Vanunu, charged with treason, was sentenced to 18 years in prison, much of which he spent in solitary confinement. Released in April 2004, he remains under a series of strictly enforced restrictions, which prevent him from leaving Israel or even speaking to any foreigner. 'We all believe that Israel has a nuclear capability,' Ahron Bregman, a senior teaching fellow in the Department of War Studies at King's College London's Institute of Middle East Studies, told Arab News in March. 'The fact that Israel found it necessary to catch Vanunu and put him in jail, and continues to impose strict limitations on him, just proves that it has probably got it.' The emergence of another Vanunu, especially in the current climate, is highly unlikely. 'Israelis are scared,' said Bregman, who served in the Israeli army for six years in the 1980s. 'Even if you believe it is a good idea to restrict Israel's behavior and make sure it doesn't do anything stupid, you are scared to act because you know they will abduct you and put you in jail. 'Israel is very tough on those who reveal its secrets.'
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Anti-domestic violence groups are suing over the Trump administration's grant requirements
Seventeen statewide anti-domestic and sexual violence coalitions are suing President Donald Trump's administration over requirements in grant applications that they don't promote 'gender ideology' or run diversity, equity and inclusion programs or prioritize people in the country illegally. The groups say the requirements, which Trump ushered in with executive orders, put them in 'an impossible position.' If they don't apply for federal money allocated under the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, they might not be able to provide rape crisis centers, battered women's shelters and other programs to support victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. But if the groups do apply, they said in the lawsuit, they would have to make statements they called 'antithetical to their core values' — and take on legal risk. In the lawsuit filed in US District Court in Rhode Island on Monday, the coalitions said that agreeing to the terms of grants could open them to federal investigations and enforcement actions as well as lawsuits from private parties. The groups suing include some from Democratic-controlled states, such as the California Partnership to End Domestic Violence, and in GOP-dominated ones, including the Idaho Coalition against Sexual and Domestic Violence. The groups say the requirements are at odds with federal laws that require them not to discriminate on the basis of gender identity, to aid underserved racial and ethnic groups, and to emphasize immigrants with some programs and not to discriminate based on legal status. The US Department of Justice, which is named as a defendant in the lawsuit, did not respond to a request for comment. The suit is one of more than 200 filed since January to challenge President Donald Trump's executive orders. There were similar claims in a suit over anti-DEI requirements in grants for groups that serve LGBTQ+ communities. A judge last week blocked the administration from enforcing those orders in context of those programs, for now.
