
Boeing 787 Dreamliner is flawed: Whistleblower sounded alarm early on
In 2024, Boeing engineer Sam Salehpour raised serious concerns about the structural integrity of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner. He alleged that the American aircraft manufacturer took shortcuts while manufacturing the aircraft model's fuselage and warned it could lead to catastrophic failures over time. Following that, the US Federal Aviation Administration launched an investigation into the same.Almost a year later on Tuesday, an Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, operating as Flight AI171 from Ahmedabad to London, crashed shortly after take-off from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport. The aircraft, carrying 242 passengers and crew, plummeted into the city's Meghani Nagar area, killing more than 200.advertisementThe cause of the Air India crash is now under investigation by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) and there is no initial evidence linking it to the concerns raised by Salehpour. However, the tragedy has reignited scrutiny of the celebrated wide-body jet, the 787 Dreamliner, and the company Boeing itself.
Boeing Airplanes, in its statement on the Air India crash, said that it was "in contact with Air India regarding Flight 171", adding it stood "ready to support them"."Our thoughts are with the passengers, crew, first responders and all affected," the aircraft manufacturer said in the statement on Tuesday.The crash in Ahmedabad marks the first fatal accident involving a 787 since its commercial debut in 2011.WHISTLEBLOWER WARNED OF STRUCTURAL FLAWS IN 787 ASSEMBLYSalehpour, an engineer at Boeing for over a decade, in January 2024, claimed that improper fastening of fuselage sections during assembly posed risks to the aircraft's longevity. He claimed that the flawed manufacturing could potentially cause it to break apart mid-flight after thousands of trips.advertisementHis allegations, detailed in interviews with The New York Times and a formal complaint to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), prompted an ongoing FAA investigation into the 787's production processes.Salehpour's red flag also extended to Boeing's 777 jets.The whistleblower alleged that the gaps in fuselage joints and excessive force used to align parts, could lead to premature fatigue in the aircraft's composite materials.Salehpour's 2024 complaint detailed how Boeing's assembly process for the 787 involved forcing misaligned fuselage sections together, sometimes with workers physically jumping on parts to align them."I literally saw people jumping on the pieces of the airplane to get them to align... By jumping up and down, you're deforming parts so that the holes align temporarily... and that's not how you build an airplane," Salehpour was quoted as saying by CNN.He warned that these shortcuts, affecting over 1,000 Dreamliners, could compromise the aircraft's safety, which was designed to withstand long-term flight stresses.The FAA had previously investigated similar issues, halting 787 deliveries for nearly two years starting in 2021 due to gaps in fuselage joints.Boeing claimed that it had addressed these concerns, adding that the planes were safe and claimed that extensive testing showed no immediate safety risks.advertisementHowever, Salehpour's attorneys argued that the FAA was surprised to learn the gaps persisted, and he faced retaliation, including a transfer to the 777 program, where he identified similar issues.Boeing denied these allegations, and showed its confidence in the 787's safety, saying the physical manufacturing changes would have "no impact on the durability or safe longevity of the airframe", the New York Times reported in April 2024.Boeing spokesman, Paul Lewis, then said the company had done extensive testing on the Dreamliner and was "determined that this is not an immediate safety of flight issue".737 MAX'S DOOR PLUG BLOWOUT ADDED TO BOEING'S SAFETY WOESConcerns with the 787 and 777 came to light amid broader safety issues at Boeing, most notably involving its 737 Max jets.The 737 Max was grounded worldwide from March 2019 to December 2020 after two fatal crashes, Lion Air Flight 610 and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302, which killed 346 people. The move was linked to flaws in the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) of the aircrafts.Later in January 2024, the 737 Max 9 faced another grounding after a door plug blowout on an Alaska Airlines flight. It further exposed the ongoing quality control issues at Boeing.advertisementThese incidents, combined with whistleblower claims like those of Salehpour and the late John Barnett, who raised concerns about Boeing's South Carolina plant before his mysterious death in 2024, fuelled distrust in Boeing's manufacturing practices.The American manufacturer has since faced FAA restrictions, a leadership overhaul, and a criminal investigation by the Justice Department.Must Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
As Air India plane crash probe begins, key questions investigators likely to prioritise
As the investigation into the crash of Air India's Boeing 787-8 begins, the world has its sights set on the probe as scores of Boeing 787 aircraft are operating across the globe. Every serious aviation accident, however tragic, leaves in its trail critical lessons for the global aerospace and aviation industry to help avoid recurrence.


Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Huawei CEO makes a surprising admission that Americans are not sure how much to believe; says the US Huawei is not that ...
Huawei Technologies Co. founder Ren Zhengfei Huawei CEO Ren Zhengfei recently made a statement to the state media People's Daily that reportedly left many American analysts puzzled and some found it tough to believe. In an interaction with Chinese state media, Huawei Technologies' CEO said that the company's chips are one generation behind those of US peers. He went on to add that the company is finding ways to improve performance through methods such as cluster computing. The article, published on the front page of the newspaper, reportedly came just days ahead of the top U.S. and Chinese officials' trade talks in London where topics such U.S. tech restrictions on China were discussed. Huawei is just one of many Chinese chipmakers, Ren said in the interview, adding: "The United States has exaggerated Huawei's achievements. Huawei is not that great. We have to work hard to reach their evaluation." "Our single chip is still behind the U.S. by a generation. We use mathematics to supplement physics, non-Moore's law to supplement Moore's law and cluster computing to supplement single chips and the results can also achieve practical conditions. Software is not a bottleneck for us," he said. Ren's comments are the first ever from him or Huawei about the company's advanced chipmaking efforts, which have become a flashpoint in U.S.-China tensions. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo Why Huawei CEO's statement raised eyebrows Huawei CEO's statement surprised some analysts in the US. As an opinion piece in Bloomberg said, "Part of the reason that Ren's humble admission raised eyebrows is because of Nvidia Corp. Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang has spent the better part of this year heaping praise on Huawei's breakthroughs. Huang said China is 'not behind' in AI, and called the Shenzhen giant, specifically, 'one of the most formidable technology companies in the world.' At the same time it also added, that where Ren is very much correct is that the domestic alternatives in China aren't quite there yet. Huawei reportedly is not the top choice for Chinese tech companies. "There's a reason the likes of Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., ByteDance Ltd., and Tencent Holdings Ltd. have spent billions hoarding Nvidia chips before the onset of new restrictions rather than pivot to Huawei's to train and run their AI models," it added. Huawei CEO: No need to worry Huawei CEO said that the company is still a generation behind the US, he also added that is "no need to worry about the chip problem". He said the same addressing concerns stemming from U.S. export controls. Huawei is said to invest 180 billion yuan ($25.07 billion) in research annually and sees promise in compound chips. Since 2019, US export curbs have restricted Huawei and other Chinese firms from accessing high-end chips and the equipment needed to produce them from abroad.


Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
DGCA orders safety inspection on Boeing 787-8/9 fleet of Air India following deadly crash
Following a fatal crash near Ahmedabad airport, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has mandated enhanced safety inspections for Air India's Boeing 787-8/9 fleet. The directive includes pre-flight checks of fuel parameters, cabin air compressors, engine control systems, and hydraulic systems, commencing June 15, 2025. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Directorate General of Civil Aviation on Friday ordered enhanced safety inspection on Boeing 787-8/9 fleet of Air India, following the deadly crash near Ahmedabad airport that left nearly 265 dead."As a preventive measure DGCA hereby directs M/s Air India to carryout following additional maintenance actions on 8787-8/9 aircrafts equipped with Genx engines with immediate effect in coordination with the concerned regional DGCA offices," said the official statement of DGCA.1. One time check before departure of flight from India w.e.f 15.06.2025, (00:00) Hrs onwardsa) Inspection of Fuel Parameter Monitoring and associated system checks.b) Inspection of Cabin air compressor and associated systems.c) Electronic Engine Control-System Test.d) Engine Fuel Driven Actuator-Operational Test and oil system check.e) Serviceability check of Hydraulic system.f) Review of Take-off parameters.2. 'Flight Control Inspection' to be introduced in transit inspection till further notice.3. Power assurance checks to be carried out within two weeks.4. Closure of maintenance action based upon the review of repetitive snags during the last 15 days on B787-8/9 aircraft at the report of the above checks is to be submitted to DGCA for review.