
More white South Africans arrive in the US under a new refugee program
An initial group of 59 white South Africans arrived at Dulles International Airport in Virginia on a chartered flight last month under the new program announced by U.S. President Donald Trump in February. The Trump administration fast-tracked the resettlement of white South Africans after indefinitely suspending other U.S. refugee programs.
The Trump administration said it is offering refugee status to white South Africans it alleges are being persecuted by their Black-led government and are victims of racially motivated violence. The South African government has denied the allegations and said they are a mischaracterization of the country.
Advertisement
Trump has falsely claimed that white South African farmers are targeted in widespread attacks that amount to genocide and are having their land taken away. Trump confronted South African President Cyril Ramaphosa with those baseless claims during a meeting at the White House last month.
Ramaphosa has said the relatively small number of attacks on white farmers are part of South Africa's larger problems with violent crime, which affects all races.
Advertisement
The Trump administration initially said the refugee program was aimed at members of South Africa's Afrikaner minority, who are descendants of mainly Dutch and French colonial settlers. In new guidance published by the U.S. Embassy last month, applicants must be 'a member of a racial minority' in South Africa and 'must be able to articulate a past experience of persecution or fear of future persecution.'
There are approximately 2.7 million Afrikaners among South Africa's population of 62 million, which is more than 80% Black. They are not the only white minority. There are around 4.5 million whites in total, including those with British or other heritage.
The U.S. Embassy spokesperson said the U.S. 'continues to review inquiries from individuals who have expressed interest to the embassy in resettling to the United States and is reaching out to eligible individuals for refugee interviews and processing.'
While U.S. officials have not said how many South Africans have applied to be relocated, Kleynhans said there have been around 8,000 applications. Another group helping white South Africans apply for refugee status has said tens of thousands have applied.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk calls Trump's tax bill a 'disgusting abomination'
Elon Musk has hit out at President Donald Trump's signature tax and spending bill, describing it as a "disgusting abomination", in a widening rift between the two. The tech billionaire posted on X that the bill would add to the US budget deficit and saddle Americans with "crushing" debt. The budget, which includes huge tax breaks and more defence spending, was passed by the House of Representatives last month and is now being considered by senators. "Shame on those who voted for it," said Musk, hinting that he may try to unseat the politicians responsible at next year's midterm elections. The bill has the backing of President Donald Trump and would be the legislative linchpin of his second-term agenda if it passes Congress. Musk left the administration abruptly last week after 129 days working to cut costs with his team, known as Doge. The comments mark his first public disagreement with Trump since leaving government, after having previously called the plan "disappointing". The South African-born tech billionaire's time in the Trump administration came to an end on 31 May, although Trump said that "he will, always, be with us, helping all the way". In its current form, the bill - which Trump refers to as the "big beautiful bill" - has been estimated to increase the budget deficit - the difference between what the government spends and the revenue it receives - by about $600bn (£444bn) in the next fiscal year. It's Musk's last day - what has he achieved at the White House? In a series of posts on X on Tuesday, Musk said that the "outrageous, pork-filled" spending bill will "massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America [sic] citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt". In American politics "pork" refers to spending on projects in lawmakers' constituencies. Musk has previously vowed to fund campaign challenges against any Republican that votes against Trump's agenda. But on Tuesday he fired a warning to those who backed the bill. "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people," he wrote. Asked about Musk's comments soon after the first post, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said "the President already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill". "This is one, big, beautiful bill," she added. "And he's sticking to it." The legislation also pledges to extend soon-to-expire tax cuts passed during the first Trump administration in 2017, as well as an influx of funds for defence spending and to fund the administration's mass deportations of undocumented immigrants. To the dismay of fiscal conservatives, it would lift the limit on the amount of money the government can borrow, known as the debt ceiling, to $4tn. The comments from Musk reflect wider tensions among Republicans over the plan, which faced stiff opposition from different wings of the party as it worked its way through the House. The Senate has now taken it up, and divisions are already emerging in that chamber, which is also narrowly controlled by Republicans. Kentucky Senator Rand Paul has said over the last few days he will not support the bill if it raises the debt ceiling. "The GOP [the Republican Party] will own the debt once they vote for this," he told CBS News, the BBC's US partner, over the weekend. Trump responded to Paul with a series of social media posts, accusing him of having "very little understanding of the bill" and saying that the "people of Kentucky can't stand him". "His ideas are actually crazy," Trump wrote. Republican lawmakers pushed back on Musk's comments, with Senate majority leader John Thune telling reporters the party plans to "proceed full speed ahead" despite "a difference of opinion". "We have an agenda that everybody campaigned on, most notably the president," he said. Mike Johnson - the Republican Speaker who has ushered the legislation through the House - told reporters on Capitol Hill that "my friend Elon is terribly wrong". "It's a very important first start. Elon is missing it," Johnson said. Johnson said he had a 20-minute phone call with the tycoon about the bill on Monday, adding that its phasing out of electric vehicle tax credits could "have an effect" on Tesla, Musk's firm. "I lament that," Johnson said, expressing surprise that Musk criticised the bill despite their call. "I just deeply regret he's made this mistake.' Among the issues that upset Musk involved air traffic control at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), according to Axios. Musk was hoping it would be run on his Starlink satellite system, but he was denied because of issues relating to the technology and the appearance of a conflict of interest, the political outlet reported. Some Democrats welcomed Musk's comments despite their previous criticism of him and the work of Doge. "Even Elon Musk, who's been part of the whole process, and is one of Trump's buddies, said the bill is bad," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said. "We can imagine how bad this bill is." Trump and Republicans in Congress have set a deadline of 4 July to get the measure passed and signed into law. Musk supported Trump in last year's November election with donations of more than $250m. To make peace with spending hawks, Trump is also asking Congress to pass a plan that would reduce current spending by $9.4bn, a figure derived from Doge's work. It would mainly slash funding for foreign aid, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and for broadcasters NPR and PBS. It's Musk's last day - what has he achieved at the White House? Elon Musk plans to cut back political spending Musk 'disappointed' by Trump's tax and spending bill Follow the twists and turns of Trump's second term with North America correspondent Anthony Zurcher's weekly US Politics Unspun newsletter. Readers in the UK can sign up here. Those outside the UK can sign up here.

Wall Street Journal
19 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Podcast: U.S. Doubles Steel and Aluminum Tariffs to 50%
President Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminum imports jumped to 50% overnight. Industry players have warned the move could result in price increases and shortages. 🎧 Listen here to this What's News podcast, which also covers the Federal Reserve's move to lift the cap on Wells Fargo's assets.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Whitmer: Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' could cost Michigan $900 million a year for food stamps
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's office released a report indicating Republican-led efforts in Congress to cut federal spending on food assistance by shifting some of the burden onto the states could cost Michigan taxpayers nearly $900 million a year or require reductions in that program or others to make up for that amount. Whitmer, who has continued to criticize congressional efforts in the same bill to reduce federal spending on Medicaid, which provides health care to low-income and disabled individuals and families, said those cuts and those proposed for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, could upend programs that provide benefits to millions of Michigan families. "In Michigan, we will fight to make sure our kids and families are fed, but we need Republicans in our congressional delegation to step up for their own constituents who need SNAP and Medicaid to survive," Whitmer said in a statement made public June 4th. "If these cuts are signed into law, more Michiganders will go to bed with a pit in their stomach. That's unacceptable.' With her statement, Whitmer released a report on how the SNAP reductions could hit Michigan government from the State Budget Office, which said "The magnitude of the proposed cost shifts would place a significant burden on Michigan's budget, and it is unlikely that the state could backfill these federal cuts without severely impacting other programs including education, public safety and Medicaid." Republicans, including President Donald Trump, who has urged the Senate to quickly pass what he has called his "big, beautiful bill" to extend and increase tax cuts by slashing spending, claim Democrats, including Whitmer, are exaggerating the societal effects of the plan, saying only people who shouldn't be receiving benefits may lose them. The sweeping legislation passed by the U.S. House on May 22 by a single-vote margin and now being considered by the U.S. Senate includes several changes that would impact Michigan residents, including those to tighten Medicaid eligibility and change the rules regarding SNAP, which provides food assistance benefits to nearly 1.48 million state residents. Among the changes approved by the House to SNAP were those expanding the population of adults who must meet work or training requirements to remain on the program from age 55 to 64 and those who aren't caregivers for children under the age of 7. It would also limit the ability of states to provide waivers from work requirements other than those in areas of extremely high unemployment. Also, rather than the federal government continuing to reimburse states for the full cost of SNAP benefits and half of the administrative costs, states under the legislation would have to pick up at least 5% of the benefit costs and reduce the federal match on administrative costs from 50% to 25%. The state share of the benefit costs would also increase depending on its error rates in payments, rising as high as 25%. Michigan's error rate − which includes overpayments and underpayments and can include benefit amounts pay due administrative errors, improperly filed paperwork or fraud − in fiscal year 2023 was over 10% according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data. In the report, the State Budget Office said the proposed changes could force the state, which saw the federal government cover $3.2 billion in SNAP costs in Michigan last year, to pay up to $800 million a year to cover benefits and $90 million a year on administrative costs. Republicans who hold the majority in the Senate are expected to make some changes to the legislation, but it is not known whether the SNAP spending cuts will be reconsidered. Senate leaders are trying to pass the legislation before July 4. Contact Todd Spangler: tspangler@ Follow him on X @tsspangler. This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Whitmer: Trump's bill costs Michigan some $900 million for food stamps