logo
Lawmakers introduce ‘Momnibus 2.0' bill to address maternal health in New Hampshire

Lawmakers introduce ‘Momnibus 2.0' bill to address maternal health in New Hampshire

Yahoo20-02-2025

Julie Mudd, a doula from Bedford, speaks in support of the Momnibus bill while holding her son in Concord on Feb. 19, 2025. (Photo by William Skipworth/New Hampshire Bulletin)
Eleven maternity wards have closed in New Hampshire since 2000, and the leading cause of maternal mortality in the state is behavioral health, including substance abuse.
In an attempt to address these issues — which have been reported by the Bulletin and the New Hampshire Bureau of Family Health and Nutrition — and others related to motherhood, a bipartisan group of lawmakers has introduced Senate Bill 246, which they have dubbed the 'Momnibus 2.0' bill.
If enacted, the bill would require Medicaid to cover maternal depression screenings for new mothers at their well-child visits. It would also require health insurance policies to cover mothers' prenatal and postnatal depression screenings, as well as depression screenings for the mother at the child's 1-month, 2-month, 4-month, and 6-month well-child visits and home visits. This also extends to people who lost their pregnancy due to a stillbirth, miscarriage, or medical termination, as well as adoptive or foster parents within 12 months of assuming care of a child.
This comes as doctors and the general public become increasingly aware of how common prenatal and postpartum depression is.
The bill would also forbid employers from denying employees time off to attend fertility treatments, childbirth, pregnancy checkups, and postpartum care. And those employees can't be fired for attending these appointments under the bill.
The bill also seeks to establish a perinatal psychiatric provider consult line. It would authorize the state to spend $275,000 on that consult line and allocate $75,000 of state funds for rural EMS providers to spend on maternal health-related training. It also would instruct the state Insurance Department to examine what barriers are preventing the sustainability of maternity wards in New Hampshire and report their findings to the Legislature and governor's office by November 2026.
'Making sure moms and babies have the support they need is something everyone can get behind,' Sen. Denise Ricciardi, the bill's prime sponsor and a Bedford Republican, said at a rally in support of the bill in Concord Wednesday morning. 'Supporting out moms and families is a shared value across the state and across party lines.'
The legislators behind the bill have cast it as a successor to the so-called 'Momnibus 1.0,' a piece of legislation passed in 2023 as part of the budget. That legislation extended the time Medicaid will cover postpartum care from 60 days to a full year; required Medicaid to cover lactation services, donor breast milk, and doulas; allocated funding to family resource centers; and expanded mental health services for children.
'We are already seeing positive effects of this legislation with many more moms able to get the postpartum care that they need,' Ricciardi said. 'But the work is not done. Moms need support.'
Heather Martin, who spoke at the rally Wednesday, works as a maternal mental health advocate at Dartmouth Health. Martin's only sister died of a maternal suicide three weeks after the birth of her first child.
'No family should have to endure that pain, and no mother should have to suffer in silence.' she said. 'Right now, too many moms don't know where to turn for help.'
Martin said having these depression screenings at the child's appointments is crucial.
'By meeting moms where they already are, we can catch maternal mental health struggles early and connect them with help they need before a crisis,' she said. 'Moms in our state need help.'
'We are losing too many moms to preventative outcomes, like my sister,' she said.
At a hearing later on Wednesday, the Senate Health and Human Services Committee heard powerful testimony from a number of proponents of the bill, including Jessica Crowley, of Hampton, who spoke about the mental health challenges she faced during her challenging pregnancy. She explained that her first ultrasound visit came with the news that her baby may not be able to survive outside the womb.
'That day, and in the 10 days waiting for the test results, did any mental health professional check in with me to see how I was doing,' she asked rhetorically. 'No one did.'
Her baby survived but still required surgery and time in a neonatal intensive care unit, or NICU.
'When my baby was born, I spent the next five weeks by her bedside in the NICU alone,' she said. 'During that time, did one mental health professional check in with me to see how that lonely scared mom was doing. Not one for five long weeks.'
She said when nurses — which she noted had another pressing job to do — asked her how she was doing, she said she was fine. 'But I was not fine. How could I have been fine? I was watching my infant struggling to survive without being able to hold her.'
'My journey to motherhood was vastly different than I imagined it would be,' she continued. 'When I was a little girl I dreamed of being a mother to two, but the reality is that I felt abandoned and betrayed by the same society that told me my greatest value as a woman was becoming a mom. This bill would've helped me when I was that lonely, scared new mom and I know it will help New Hampshire families.'
The American College of OBGYNs and the New Hampshire Medical Society have endorsed the bill.
'When New Hampshire moms thrive and New Hampshire babies thrive, then New Hampshire families and the community that they live in thrive,' Sen. Suzanne Prentiss, a West Lebanon Democrat and co-sponsor of the new bill, said at the rally. 'They are the bedrock of the Granite State.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nevada health bill advances to Gov. Lombardo's desk
Nevada health bill advances to Gov. Lombardo's desk

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nevada health bill advances to Gov. Lombardo's desk

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) – Health bill SB 217 advanced in the Nevada legislature last week and is now on Governor Lombardo's desk awaiting his signature. The bill includes coverage for treatments like IVF, as well as fertility preservation for those who have been diagnosed with extreme illness. 'I had arthritis for most of my life. That drug that I was on, while helpful to my arthritis, was severely damaging to my egg reserves,' shared Stephanie Capellas-Glascock, who has been struggling with her infertility journey for years. 'I knew that it wasn't going to be something that I could accomplish on my own, so therefore I needed to look into fertility treatments for myself,' she explained. If signed, Nevada could become the first state in the nation to offer fertility coverage for Medicaid. However, the bill does face pushback for its cost and certain language in it. 'One of my concerns, just looking at it, so I may reserve my right to change my vote, is just the financial impact on our public employee benefit program that can go down to increasing premiums,' said Democratic Assembly Member Shea Backus, who did vote in favor. Meanwhile, the Nevada GOP party called on the governor to veto the bill. Their website cited their opposition because it 'declares embryos prior to implantation as non-human.' 'I don't think fertility treatments are a political issue. I think it's a health and medical issue,' Capellas-Glascock responded when asked about the opposition. 'We know that the GOP has some thoughts and feelings on that too, but I think the tremendous thing about IVF is that it is a miracle in medicine and science that really affords individuals the option to have a family, so when they're ready to start a family, they have that option.' When asked about the fiscal implications, she responded, 'There's always a cost associated. I think it's knowing that the pros supremely outweigh the cons.' The state estimated the cost would be about $38 million over the next two years. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

RFK Jr. ousts entire CDC vaccine panel
RFK Jr. ousts entire CDC vaccine panel

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

RFK Jr. ousts entire CDC vaccine panel

The Brief Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. removed all members of the CDC's vaccine advisory committee. He claimed the committee had too many conflicts of interest and plans to appoint new members. The panel's work has been in limbo since Kennedy took office, including a delayed February meeting. WASHINGTON - Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Monday announced he had removed every member of a scientific committee that advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on how to use vaccines and pledged to replace them with his own picks. What they're saying Kennedy, who was one of the nation's leading anti-vaccine activists before becoming the nation's top health official, has not said who he would appoint to the panel, but said it would convene in just two weeks in Atlanta. Although it's typically not viewed as a partisan board, the Biden administration had installed the entire committee. "Without removing the current members, the current Trump administration would not have been able to appoint a majority of new members until 2028," Kennedy wrote in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece. "A clean sweep is needed to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science. " Kennedy said the committee members had too many conflicts of interest. Committee members routinely disclose any possible conflicts at the start of public meetings. The other side Major physicians and public health groups criticized the move to oust all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Dr. Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, called Kennedy's mass ouster "a coup." "It's not how democracies work. It's not good for the health of the nation," Benjamin told The Associated Press. Benjamin said the move raises real concerns about whether future committee members will be viewed as impartial. He added that Kennedy is going against what he told lawmakers and the public, and the public health association plans to watch Kennedy "like a hawk." "He is breaking a promise," Benjamin said. "He said he wasn't going to do this." Dr. Bruce A. Scott, president of the American Medical Association, called the committee a trusted source of science- and data-driven advice and said Kennedy's move, coupled with declining vaccination rates across the country, will help drive an increase in vaccine-preventable diseases. "Today's action to remove the 17 sitting members of ACIP undermines that trust and upends a transparent process that has saved countless lives," Scott said in a statement. Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, a doctor who had expressed reservations about Kennedy's nomination but voted to install him as the nation's health secretary nonetheless, said he had spoken with Kennedy moments after the announcement. "Of course, now the fear is that the ACIP will be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion," Cassidy said in a social media post. "I've just spoken with Secretary Kennedy, and I'll continue to talk with him to ensure this is not the case. Dig deeper The 17-member Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices had been in a state of flux since Kennedy took over. Its first meeting this year had been delayed when the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services abruptly postponed its February meeting. RELATED: RFK Jr. orders review of baby formula: What to know The backstory Kennedy, who was one of the nation's leading anti-vaccine activists before becoming the nation's top health official, recently took the unusual step of changing COVID-19 recommendations without first consulting the panel. The committee had been in a state of flux since Kennedy took over. Its first meeting this year had been delayed when the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services abruptly postponed its February meeting. During Kennedy's confirmation, Cassidy had expressed concerns about preserving the committee, saying he had sought assurances that Kennedy would keep the panel's current vaccine recommendations. Kennedy did not stick to that. He recently took the unusual step of changing COVID-19 recommendations without first consulting the advisers. The webpage that featured the committee's members was deleted Monday evening, shortly after Kennedy's announcement. The Source The Associated Press contributed to this report. The information in this story comes from a Wall Street Journal opinion piece written by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as well as official records from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This story was reported from Los Angeles.

New York lawmakers approve bill that would allow medically assisted suicide for the terminally ill
New York lawmakers approve bill that would allow medically assisted suicide for the terminally ill

San Francisco Chronicle​

time3 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

New York lawmakers approve bill that would allow medically assisted suicide for the terminally ill

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Terminally ill New Yorkers would have the legal ability to end their own lives with pharmaceutical drugs under a bill passed Monday in the state Legislature. The proposal, which now moves to the governor's office, would allow a person with an incurable illness to be prescribed life-ending drugs if he or she requests the medication and gets approval from two physicians. A spokesperson for New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said she would review the legislation. The New York Senate gave final approval to the bill Monday night after hours of debate during which supporters said it would let terminally ill people die on their own terms. 'It's not about hastening death, but ending suffering,' said state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, a Democrat who sponsored the proposal. Opponents have argued the state should instead improve end-of-life medical care or have objected on religious grounds. 'We should not be in the business of state-authorized suicide,' said state Sen. George Borrello, a Republican. The state Assembly passed the measure in late April. The proposal requires that a terminally ill person who is expected to die within six month make a written request for the drugs. Two witnesses would have sign the request to ensure that the patient is not being coerced. The request would then have to be approved by the person's attending physician as well as a consulting physician. The legislation was first introduced in 2016, Hoylman-Sigal said, though it has stalled year after year in the New York statehouse. Dennis Poust, executive director of the New York State Catholic Conference, which has opposed the measure, said 'This is a dark day for New York State." Eleven other states and Washington, D.C., have laws allowing medically assisted suicide, according to Compassion & Choices, an advocacy organization that backs the policy. Corinne Carey, the group's local campaign director, said lawmakers had 'recognized how important it is to give terminally ill New Yorkers the autonomy they deserve over their own end-of-life experiences.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store