What are the highest and lowest paying jobs in the UK?
The world of work is constantly changing. New professions are emerging, while others are disappearing. And salaries vary greatly across different roles. The UK is no exception. Some jobs offer significantly higher pay, while others fall well below the average earnings.
So, which jobs pay the most — and the least — in the UK? And what are the average annual salaries for these roles?
According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), the median gross annual earnings for full-time employees were £37,430 (€40,514) in April 2024, compared with £35,004 (€37,850) in April 2023, an increase of 6.9%.
The ONS's annual data on full-time gross earnings by occupation covers 381 roles. While we focus on the top 40 highest-paying and bottom 40 lowest-paying jobs, you can explore how other occupations rank in our full table below.
Then 7 out of the top 10 jobs are director or executive-level positions. These include CEOs, IT directors, marketing directors, and financial managers. Leadership positions carry both strategic responsibility and high pay.
Chief executives and senior officials ranked first in the median gross annual earnings for full-time employees at £88,056, followed by marketing, sales and advertising directors (£87,309) and information technology directors (£86,033). These are the only three roles with earnings exceeding €100,000. All salary figures in EUR are available in the charts.
Apart from director positions, other three jobs in the top 10 are aircraft pilots and air traffic controllers (£80,414), specialist medical practitioners (£74,979), and head teachers and principals (£71,064).
ONS data shows that not only air but also rail transport jobs pay well, with two roles appearing between ranks 11 and 20.
For example, train and tram drivers (£63,958) earn more than barristers and judges (£59,423).
Some other jobs in the top-paying 20 are: Senior police officers (£63,986) electrical engineers (£58,734), IT project managers (£58,213), rail and rolling stock builders and repairers (£56,984), business, research and administrative professionals (£56,605), and actuaries, economists and statisticians (£55,138).
Earning £52,727, rail transport operatives ranked 32nd, making them the third rail job to appear in the top 40 highest-paying roles.
Tech and IT roles are also well represented among the highest-paying jobs. The digital economy continues to drive strong demand for IT professionals with a range of specialisations. They include: IT managers (£54,997), IT business analysts, architects & systems designers (£54,905), programmers & software development professionals (£54,669) and information technology professionals (£52,305).
High earnings for medical practitioners, engineers, paramedics, scientists, and statisticians indicate that specialist and technical fields are well rewarded. For example, paramedics earn £54,638, aerospace engineers £52,432, and electronics engineers £52,012.
There's also a noticeable pay gap between top executive roles and the rest — even within the top 40. The highest median salary is £88,056, while the 40th-ranked job earns £50,853.
The lowest-paying job is school midday and crossing patrol occupations, with annual earnings of £19,860, followed by coffee shop workers at £19,990. These are the only two roles earning below the £20,000 mark — with the lowest being just 53% of the overall median salary of £37,430.
In addition to the lowest two roles above, hospitality and catering jobs are the lowest-paying category in the UK. These dominate the bottom of the entire chart: bar staff (£20,837), waiters and waitresses (£21,588), kitchen and catering assistants (£21,716), leisure and theme park attendants (£22,386), cooks (£22,282), and bar and catering supervisors (£23,421).
While childcare and early education play a vital role in shaping future generations, many of these jobs fall within the bottom 40 in terms of pay. Childminders (£20,189), early education and childcare practitioners (£22,060), early education and childcare assistants (£22,781), and early education and childcare services proprietors (£24,388) all earn significantly below the overall median salary.
Retail, front-line, and customer support roles also appear frequently in the bottom 40 for pay. This includes retail cashiers and check-out operators (£22,600), sales and retail assistants (£23,878), receptionists (£23,595), and call and contact centre occupations (£24,829).
Many manual trades, cleaning, and craft occupations also fall within the bottom 40 for pay. These include florists (£22,426), cleaners and domestics (£22,961), launderers, dry cleaners and pressers (£22,674), tailors and dressmakers (£24,797), and sewing machinists (£24,149).
Several health and wellbeing support roles, despite requiring training or certification, remain low-paid . These include pharmacy and optical dispensing assistants (£22,452), dental nurses (£23,727), and fitness and wellbeing instructors (£24,371).
The median gross annual earnings for full-time employees across all occupations in the ONS list are available in the table below. Find the roles you're curious about.
If you're not just thinking about salaries but also about job security and future prospects, don't miss our previous article: What are the best roles in the UK for 2025? It explores which jobs are currently in high demand, based on trends in job postings and market growth.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
40 minutes ago
- Forbes
Social Media Hotbed For Investment Scams, Romance Scams And More
AFP via Getty Images According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) more scams in the United States are started on social media than anywhere else at a cost of 1.9 billion dollars in 2024 and that figure is probably low because many victims, often out of embarrassment, do not report being victimized. A study done by the Fin Tech company Revolut found that 60% of all scams in the UK originated on the Meta platforms Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp with investment scams being the most common form of scam. Woody Malouf, Revolut's head of financial crime section said that Meta's platforms were 'being used as a hotbed for scams.' The most common types of scams originating on social media are online shopping scams, investment scams and romance scams which are often based on our trusting the people we encounter as friends on social media. Remember my motto, "trust me, you can't trust anyone." Frequently, social media accounts are hacked or cloned and the scammers, posing as your friends, leverage the trust that you have in your friends to lure you into phony investments, phony sales and romances. Further, even if a communication on social media comes from a real friend, that friend may be forwarding scams that they have been fooled into thinking are legitimate. Scammers use AI to harvest information about you that you post on social media to learn about your identity and interests and use that information to target you with a wide variety of scams. According to an investigation done by the Wall Street Journal, Meta with its 3 billion users is increasingly a cornerstone of the internet fraud economy. Meta accounted for almost half of all reported scams on Zelle for JPMorgan Chase between the summers of 2023 and 2024. The Wall Street Journal investigation noted that Meta's advertising revenues increased by 22% in 2024 to more than $160 billion and the company has been hesitant to add scam prevention measures for its ad-buying clients. The investigation referred to internal documents at Meta showed the company allowed advertisers to accrue between 8 and 32 automated 'strikes' for financial fraud before it banned their accounts. Making the matter worse, Meta's advertising algorithms and tools enable scammers placing paid for ads on Meta's platforms to specifically target their victims, such as older users with health scams, men between the ages of 25 and 45 with investment scams particularly those involving cryptocurrencies, and fans of celebrities with AI deepfake celebrity endorsement scams. For example, AI deepfake technology has been used to make it appear that Warren Buffet, Elon Musk, Andrew Sorkin and other public figures were promoting phony investments. Recently, 42 state attorneys general sent a letter to Meta urging it to take stronger action to reduce investment scam advertising appearing on Meta's platforms The attorneys generals recommended that Meta improve its ad review process and even stop taking investment advertising until better protections were in place. While Meta says it is taking actions to reduce fraud, its actions speak louder than its words. According to the WSJ investigation, Meta deprioritized scam enforcement and abandoned plans for advertiser verification requirements similar to what it mandates for political ads. Meta has further taken the position in Motions to Dismiss in various cases that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 provides that it has no duty to take any actions to reduce fraudulent advertisements placed by third parties on its platforms and cannot be held responsible for advertising placed by third parties on its platforms. This argument has been unsuccessful, most recently in a Motion to Dismiss a lawsuit brought by Australian billionaire Andrew Forrest who sued Meta following its failure to remove fraudulent investment ads using his image and AI cloned voice. Meanwhile, here are some things you can do to protect yourself from becoming a victim of a social media scam: Don't accept friend requests from everyone who asks to be your friend on social media and don't trust communications on social media merely because they appear to come from your friends. Recognize that personal information you post on social media can be harvested to target you for scams based on your interests. Use your privacy settings to limit who can see the information you post on social media. Remember it is good rule to never click on links that may appear on social media, text messages or emails unless you have absolutely confirmed that they are legitimate. Never invest in anything you do not fully understand and never invest unless you have vetted both the investment itself and the person or company offering it. Finally, B.S. Be skeptical whenever an offer of anything too good to be true appears on your social media.
Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
The Panel Company Going Green for the Planet Lawcris Levels Up Their Sustainability Practices
LEEDS, GB / ACCESS Newswire / June 21, 2025 / For companies across the globe, sustainability practices are increasing in importance, with global warming becoming an ever looming reality. For West Yorkshire-based panels company Lawcris, sustainability has been on their radar for years. With a policy that continues to develop their contribution to reducing carbon emissions, reducing waste and sourcing timber and non-timber related products responsibly, Lawcris have also introduced solar panels to their main site. The Power of Sunshine With the UK aiming to reach net zero emissions by 2050, a greater proportion of the grid's energy now comes from renewable sources rather than fossil fuels. Lawcris' commitment to producing renewable energy to be used and also given back to the grid cements their status as a company who is forward thinking about sustainability. 'Lawcris has made significant progress over recent years to improve the sustainability element of the business. Solar Panels support our Grid supply of electricity which is already zero carbon, and we have also accredited to ISO 14001 standard for our overall environmental management. We will continue to develop our environmental approach in support of a Net Zero target and to ensure that we are seen by all our stakeholders as being proactive in this area.' Lauren Barker, Marketing Manager Innovating Green Solutions in Business This is far from Lawcris' first rodeo with sustainability, and they are a force dedicated to providing innovative solutions for sustainability under their own roof. Currently, they have a biomass heating facility installed at their site in Leeds, less than 1% of their waste going to landfill, as well as promoting green alternative transport services to their staff. If you want to learn more about how Lawcris are pioneering sustainability in the panels industry, you can visit About Lawcris Established in 1982 in Wakefield, England by Chris Hopton and Simon Hall, Lawcris has vastly outgrown its humble beginnings. Focused on supplying the best quality panels, the business operates to the highest standards as one of the biggest decorative panel suppliers in the UK. Media Contact Organization: Lawcris Contact Person Name: Matthew Hines Website: Email: [email protected] Contact Number: +441132177177 Address: Knowsthorpe Gate, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS9 0NP City: Leeds Country: United Kingdom SOURCE: Lawcris press release
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Warren Buffett's Top 7 Money Mistakes (And What He Learned From Them)
Warren Buffett didn't build his more than $100 billion fortune by being perfect. In fact, the Oracle of Omaha has been surprisingly candid about his biggest financial flubs over the decades. The good news is his mistakes offer valuable lessons for anyone trying to build real, sustainable wealth. Plus, they prove that even legendary investors are just humans who get it wrong sometimes. Welcome to the club! Find Out: Read Next: Here are Buffett's top money mistakes and, more importantly, what he learned from them. Buffett's investment in U.K. grocer Tesco shows how hesitation can turn small problems into major losses. Berkshire owned 415 million shares by 2012, but when concerns about management surfaced, Buffett sold only part of his position for a $43 million profit. When Tesco later overstated profits and shares collapsed, his delayed action cost Berkshire $444 million in after-tax losses. 'An attentive investor, I'm embarrassed to report, would have sold Tesco shares earlier. I made a big mistake with this investment by dawdling,' Buffett said. Speed matters in damage control. When red flags are abundant, sometimes quick decisive action means you avert a financial disaster. Learn More: Believe it or not, Buffett has called Berkshire Hathaway 'the dumbest stock I ever bought.' He purchased what was, at the time, a failing textile company because he felt insulted during a sale negotiation. Instead of walking away from Berkshire Hathaway as planned, his wounded pride led him to buy the entire business and fire the previous owner. The financial cost was enormous. Buffett said his holding company would be 'worth twice as much as it is now' if he'd stuck to his original plan of investing in insurance companies instead. This single emotional reaction cost him decades of better returns. The takeaway is clear: Never let personal feelings influence money decisions. When you feel personally slighted in a financial deal, that's exactly when you need to step back, take a breath and think logically. In 1993, Buffett thought Dexter Shoes had lasting competitive advantages that would protect its profits. Within a few years, those advantages evaporated and the company became worthless. Buffett explained: 'What I had assessed as a durable competitive advantage vanished within a few years.' This loss taught him that 'a truly great business must have an enduring 'moat' that protects excellent returns on invested capital.' Companies need permanent moats — like unbeatable brands, exclusive technology or cost advantages — that competitors can't easily copy. Without sustainable protection, any successful business will eventually attract competitors who'll drive profits to zero. The key is finding businesses whose advantages will last decades, not just a few good years. This mistake still haunts Buffett. Despite owning Geico insurance, which spent millions on Google advertising, he completely missed the search giant's investment potential. He had firsthand evidence of Google's business model working but failed to connect the dots. 'I made the mistake in not being able to come to a conclusion where I really felt that at the present prices, the prospects were far better than the prices indicated,' Buffett admitted. His reluctance to venture beyond familiar territory cost him one of the greatest investment opportunities in history. The lesson here is about missed opportunities. Sometimes the best investments are hiding in plain sight, but we ignore them because they seem too complicated or unfamiliar. Buffett's $9 billion acquisition of Lubrizol Corporation became an issue when it emerged that David Sokol, a Berkshire executive who recommended the deal, secretly owned stock in the company. Sokol made $3 million from the transaction without disclosing his conflict of interest. The oversight violated insider-trading rules and hurt Berkshire's reputation. At the 2011 annual meeting, Buffett said he should have asked better, more direct questions about Sokol's involvement. The lesson? Trust but verify, especially when large sums are involved. Even with people you've worked with (or simply known) for years, asking uncomfortable questions can prevent you from making mistakes. When crude oil hit $100+ per barrel in 2008, Buffett jumped into ConocoPhillips stock expecting energy prices to keep climbing. Instead, he bought at the peak and watched the investment lose billions as oil crashed. This demonstrates how even smart investors can get caught up in market excitement. 'When investing, pessimism is your friend, euphoria the enemy,' Buffett has said. When everyone is optimistic about a sector, prices often reflect that optimism, leaving little room for profit. Buffett learned that great companies can still be terrible investments if you pay the wrong price. Market euphoria creates expensive stocks, while pessimism creates bargains. The best time to buy is when others are selling, not when everyone else is buying too. U.S. Air's impressive revenue numbers looked very attractive in 1989, so Buffett bought preferred shares. Bad news for Buffett, those revenues came with a hidden cost. Airlines need constant capital to grow, buying new planes and expanding routes, leaving little for shareholders. By the time the airline achieved meaningful profits, debt payments ate up most of the returns. The company couldn't even pay dividends on Buffett's preferred stock. He got lucky selling at a profit later, but knew it was pure chance. This taught him to distinguish between real growth and expensive growth. As Buffett said, 'Investors have poured money into a bottomless pit, attracted by growth when they should have been repelled by it.' Some businesses need to spend huge amounts just to increase sales, leaving shareholders with nothing. The lesson is: If it looks too good to be true, it just might be. What makes Buffett extraordinary isn't his perfect track record, it's his willingness to admit errors publicly and extract valuable lessons from them. Each mistake became a teaching moment that improved his future decisions. His Google miss made him more open to technology investments, eventually leading to major positions in Apple. His ConocoPhillips overpayment reinforced his discipline about buying only at attractive prices. His Dexter Shoes loss sharpened his focus on truly durable competitive advantages. The real wisdom isn't avoiding all mistakes. Unfortunately, that's impossible. It's learning from failures quickly and adjusting your approach. Buffett's biggest errors became steppingstones to better investing, not permanent setbacks. For the rest of us, it's a lesson in endurance. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 10 Used Cars That Will Last Longer Than an Average New Vehicle 8 Common Mistakes Retirees Make With Their Social Security Checks This article originally appeared on Warren Buffett's Top 7 Money Mistakes (And What He Learned From Them) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
