'Urgent review' needed after mental health patient commits second killing
Photo:
RNZ
The Chief Victims Advisor is calling for an "urgent review" of all mental health patients who have had their status changed, after it was revealed a man who was ruled insane after killing someone two decades ago has killed again.
RNZ has revealed
a man who was made a special patient under the Mental Health Act after his first killing was recently found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity for a second time, after killing someone he believed was possessed.
Releasing a person into the community after they have been designated a special patient requires the sign off of the minister of health, the attorney general and the director of mental health. The man was released more than a decade ago, and later had his status changed to being a patient under the Mental Health Act.
At the time of his second killing, he was subject to a Community Treatment Order.
RNZ is unable to publish details regarding either killings as the decision to lift name suppression has now been taken to the Court of Appeal, meaning the man and his victim can not be identified until the appeal has been determined.
Chief Victims Advisor Ruth Money told RNZ the case was "my worst fear", adding she felt "physically sick" when she read the article today.
"It's pretty hard to see how this could be any worse."
Money wants an "urgent review" for any patient who has had their status changed.
"Clearly something is seriously wrong with how these people have chosen to re-classify their status," she said.
"It's getting to the point where we need a Royal Commission to find out what's happening in these facilities."
Ruth Money.
Photo:
Stephanie Creagh Photography
Money said there would be many patients who had the correct classification.
"But at this point I don't think the public can have any faith that the allocations or the classifications have been done safely.
"We have got people killing members of the community who have been classified by the senior people in mental health as safe, clearly we have a significant problem because the community wasn't safe."
Mental health patient Elliot Cameron pleaded guilty earlier this month to murdering Faye Phelps at her Christchurch home in October last year.
Nearly three years ago, in June 2022, Hillmorton Hospital forensic mental health patient Zakariye Mohamed Hussein stabbed Laisa Waka Tunidau to death as she walked home from work. Hussein was on community leave at the time of the killing.
RNZ revealed earlier this week
that Phelps, and others who employed Cameron to do their gardening, were unaware he was actually a mental health patient who had been living at Hillmorton Hospital for many years.
After RNZ's story about Cameron, Money wrote to director of mental health Dr John Crawshaw.
In her email - seen by Phelps' daughter - Money wrote she was "both extremely concerned and outraged" to read about Phelps' death.
"This is not the first time it has happened, but it needs to be the last."
Money said she wanted to understand what support was being offered to Phelps' family, what he was doing to expedite the reports, and what support was being offered to Waka Tunidau's family.
She also asked when the investigation of Canterbury District Mental Health Services - launched after Tunidau's murder - was going to be released.
Money told RNZ she was "very concerned" from a victim's perspective about the "systemic issues" around victims of mental health patients.
"This isn't the first innocent death at the hands of someone from this mental health facility, and it seems that we are waiting an inordinate amount of time for reports that have been promised that could have prevented unnecessary assaults."
She wants Health New Zealand to commit to timelines so that the families are updated.
"They need to be transparent with the care that is being offered to the families, but also the staff in these institutions. And importantly, there needs to be an urgent and long, lasting review and change so that this doesn't happen again," she said.
"How many more people need to die? How many more victims do we need to create before systemic change happens? This must be prevented at all costs."
In a statement to RNZ, Dr Crawshaw said he had replied to Money's email, and offered an opportunity to meet and discuss broader issues relevant to both their roles.
He said reviews specific to serious events were undertaken by Health New Zealand.
Dr Crawshaw's report investigates wider concerns about the mental health service provision in the Canterbury district of Health New Zealand.
He said the investigation looks into the service at a systemic level: its general and clinical governance, its resourcing and overarching care model.
"All of which take some considerable time to review, analyse and report."
The broader review was scheduled to be completed mid-year, he said.
In a statement, Minister for Mental Health Matt Doocey said he had been "very clear that we can and must do better to improve mental health and addiction outcomes and services in New Zealand".
"Within mental health there is a range of services available that are focused on addressing the mental health and addiction issues that many people face. In addition, we have specialised forensic services who provide rehabilitation to special patients, with the aim of protecting the public and keeping patients safe.
"As a result of rehabilitation, special patients may progress to a point where it is appropriate for their legal status to be reviewed. Before this occurs, there is a transition period where the person remains a special patient but is granted progressive community leave with clinical supervision and family or wider support. If the patient is progressing well, they may be granted extended periods of approved leave. Leave may have specific conditions applied regarding treatment required, or activities or movement in the community."
Doocey said there were "multiple checks and balances in place when it came to special patient decisions.
"These include the Director of Mental Health who gives advice and a recommendation, the responsible clinician and in some instances the Special Patient Review Panel and the Mental Health Review Tribunal. It is only at the end of this process that a person's status as a special patient may be reviewed. A change in status will only be granted if specified criteria, including public safety, are met.
"Even when a person is changed from special patient status, they will usually progress to being a patient where care is provided under compulsory treatment orders. These orders are regularly reviewed. These are long standing processes used for many years and aligned with approaches used in countries similar to our own."
He said the Mental Health Bill currently before Parliament would set out a new approach to the decision-making around change of status from special patient.
"If passed, the Bill will establish a Forensic Review Tribunal responsible for determining long leave, reviewing the condition of these patients, and determining changes in legal status.
"Any serious incident, particularly where someone is tragically killed, is a cause of very serious concern. That is why it is important that investigations and reviews are triggered and recommendations for changes to services are acted on."
Labour mental health spokeswoman Ingrid Leary told RNZ it would be "inappropriate" to comment on either the Cameron case or the case involving the man found insane twice as they were each subject to review processes.
"I would expect the reviews to look at systems and information gaps to see whether existing processes were followed and whether there are systems gaps that need to change.
"Like everyone else, I want to ensure cases like this don't happen again and will keep close eyes as the reviews evolve."
Leary said it was "premature" to suggest a full review into the mental health system.
"While these cases are harrowing and deeply unfortunate it's important to allow the review process to occur and respond appropriately rather than taking a knee-jerk approach which might not actually lead to the best and whole solution based on all the evidence."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Killer of Christchurch real estate agent jailed for life
By Tim Brown of RNZ Chinese national Tingjun Cao will spend at least 17 years behind bars for murdering Christchurch real estate agent Yanfei Bao. Her family told the High Court at Christchurch of the unbearable absence of Bao from their lives since the 44-year-old disappeared from Hornby in July 2023. Bao's 11-year-old daughter told the court: "My family is sad and our house feels different. It is quieter and emptier." Cao killed Bao in July 2023 after luring her to a Hornby home she was selling. On Friday, Justice Lisa Preston sentenced Cao to life imprisonment with a non-parole period of 17 and a-half years. Cao was earlier removed from the court by Corrections officers after he regularly interjected and interrupted the hearing with outbursts. Immigration New Zealand said it would now consider enforcement action against Cao. 'You took my mummy away from me' In victim impact statements read to the court on their behalf, Bao's family called for the judge to impose the harshest possible sentence and outlined the immeasurable trauma and loss they had suffered. Bao's daughter, who had name suppression, told the killer: "You took my mummy away from me and my life has not been the same since". "I laugh less now because nothing feels as fun or as happy as it used to. "I miss my mummy every single day. I miss the way she used to do my hair, cook for me and make me feel safe. I miss her voice, her smell and the way she always knew how to make things better. "Since mummy has been gone, I feel lonely a lot. Even when I am with other people, it is not the same without her." Bao's husband, Paul Gooch, said he was still haunted by her final moments. "We find ourselves in a profound state of grief, grappling with the heart-wrenching questions that linger," he said. "When did she first sense the peril to her life? For how long did she endure the unimaginable suffering before her death? The deep sorrow of her pain continues to resonate within us all." Gooch paid tribute to his partner. "Nineteen months ago we were heartlessly deprived of Yanfei. She was a devoted wife and mother and now we are left with the unbearable absence of her presence," he said. "We can no longer share in the joy of her laughter, the fullness of our lives with her, or the comfort of her warmth and love. Her radiant light has been forever extinguished." Gooch's father, David Gooch, called Cao a "despicable monster". "You took Yanfei - a wife, a mother and daughter - for your own gratification and created a huge hole in all our hearts, which will never be filled. We are all heartbroken and are lost without Yanfei," he said. Bao's 74-year-old father, who had name suppression and spoke to the court via audio-visual link from China, said he wished he was present for the hearing. "What right did the defendant have to take my daughter's precious life. What right did they have to destroy our happiness and cause such a heinous impact on society?" prosecutor Cameron Stuart translated on the man's behalf. "In this case, the facts of the defendant's deliberate murder are clear and the evidence is irrefutable. I believe the perpetrator acted with deep malice, used particularly cruel means, caused especially severe consequences, and had a highly adverse social impact. "After being apprehended, the defendant demonstrated a poor attitude, evading responsibility and refusing to plead guilty, which greatly hindered the police and courts investigation. Furthermore, neither the defendant nor their family have ever apologised to the victim's family, showing no remorse whatsoever. Therefore, I solemnly request that the court, in order to uphold the dignity of the law, ensure judicial fairness and maintain social stability, convict and sentence the defendant to the highest penalty according to the law." He also described the immense suffering the family had suffered with the loss of a loved daughter and sister. "My heart at this moment is filled with immense sorrow which words cannot adequately convey," Bao's father said. "My daughter was an intelligent, kind, brave and resilient, modern Chinese woman, full of positivity. She was the light of my wife's and my life, the most brilliant colour in our ordinary days and the greatest spiritual support and source of motivation during our families tough times. "Every stage of her growth was the most precious memory in our hearts, and her laughter was the most melodious tune in our home. Filling it with love and hope throughout the seasons." As court began on Friday morning, Cao made protestations about evidence he claimed would demonstrate his innocence, leading to Justice Preston closing the court to the public to address the outbursts. Cao interrupts However, when court resumed, Cao again leapt to his feet and began interrupting. As Corrections officers escorted him from the court, he continued speaking loudly and gesticulating. His final protest came as he ripped up his papers, bundled them into a ball and threw them to the ground. Cao was forced to watch the remainder of the hearing from another courtroom. His seven-week jury trial last year was also marked by Cao's odd displays. He sacked his defence lawyers during the trial and represented himself with the help of a trio of interpreters. Justice Preston repeatedly warned Cao about asking irrelevant questions, making meandering and repetitive statements, and accusing witnesses of lying. The prosecution described the case against Cao as an "absolute slam dunk" with compelling and overwhelming evidence demonstrating his guilt. However, Cao claimed he was at the centre of a conspiracy and police officers had lied, fabricated, planted and doctored evidence to frame him. In delivering his closing argument he regularly turned and spoke to the glass panes of an empty dock and at other times rambled through measurements and minutiae which were difficult to link to his claims of innocence or the case. What happened to Bao? Cao lured the 44-year-old Yanfei Bao to the Hornby home on July 19, 2023 under the pretence of wanting to view the property. There he attacked her, bundled her into the boot of his car and drove her to a remote rural road near Lincoln where he killed her. He buried her in a shallow grave along the treeline of a farm in Greenpark where police found her remains almost a year later. Bao's husband reported her missing the day she vanished after discovering his wife had not collected her daughter from an after-school programme, had not come home for lunch and calls to her phone went unanswered. Police found Bao's phone in grass beside the southern motorway two days later. Cao was arrested on his way to Christchurch Airport in the days after her disappearance with a one-way ticket to Shanghai. He was initially charged with Bao's kidnapping but the charged was later dropped. Cao was charged with murder in September 2023. RNZ asked Immigration New Zealand if a deportation order had been sought for Cao, national manager compliance Damon Tredaway said: "we will consider any appropriate enforcement actions once the court proceedings have concluded". Cao would not be eligible for parole until 2041.
Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
'Despicable monster': Yanfei Bao killer jailed for life
By Tim Brown of RNZ Chinese national Tingjun Cao will spend at least 17 years behind bars for murdering Christchurch real estate agent Yanfei Bao. Her family told the High Court at Christchurch of the unbearable absence of Bao from their lives since the 44-year-old disappeared from Hornby in July 2023. Bao's 11-year-old daughter told the court: "My family is sad and our house feels different. It is quieter and emptier." Cao killed Bao in July 2023 after luring her to a Hornby home she was selling. On Friday, Justice Lisa Preston sentenced Cao to life imprisonment with a non-parole period of 17 and a-half years. Cao was earlier removed from the court by Corrections officers after he regularly interjected and interrupted the hearing with outbursts. Immigration New Zealand said it would now consider enforcement action against Cao. 'You took my mummy away from me' In victim impact statements read to the court on their behalf, Bao's family called for the judge to impose the harshest possible sentence and outlined the immeasurable trauma and loss they had suffered. Bao's daughter, who had name suppression, told the killer: "You took my mummy away from me and my life has not been the same since". "I laugh less now because nothing feels as fun or as happy as it used to. "I miss my mummy every single day. I miss the way she used to do my hair, cook for me and make me feel safe. I miss her voice, her smell and the way she always knew how to make things better. "Since mummy has been gone, I feel lonely a lot. Even when I am with other people, it is not the same without her." Bao's husband, Paul Gooch, said he was still haunted by her final moments. "We find ourselves in a profound state of grief, grappling with the heart-wrenching questions that linger," he said. "When did she first sense the peril to her life? For how long did she endure the unimaginable suffering before her death? The deep sorrow of her pain continues to resonate within us all." Gooch paid tribute to his partner. "Nineteen months ago we were heartlessly deprived of Yanfei. She was a devoted wife and mother and now we are left with the unbearable absence of her presence," he said. "We can no longer share in the joy of her laughter, the fullness of our lives with her, or the comfort of her warmth and love. Her radiant light has been forever extinguished." Gooch's father, David Gooch, called Cao a "despicable monster". "You took Yanfei - a wife, a mother and daughter - for your own gratification and created a huge hole in all our hearts, which will never be filled. We are all heartbroken and are lost without Yanfei," he said. Bao's 74-year-old father, who had name suppression and spoke to the court via audio-visual link from China, said he wished he was present for the hearing. "What right did the defendant have to take my daughter's precious life. What right did they have to destroy our happiness and cause such a heinous impact on society?" prosecutor Cameron Stuart translated on the man's behalf. "In this case, the facts of the defendant's deliberate murder are clear and the evidence is irrefutable. I believe the perpetrator acted with deep malice, used particularly cruel means, caused especially severe consequences, and had a highly adverse social impact. "After being apprehended, the defendant demonstrated a poor attitude, evading responsibility and refusing to plead guilty, which greatly hindered the police and courts investigation. Furthermore, neither the defendant nor their family have ever apologised to the victim's family, showing no remorse whatsoever. Therefore, I solemnly request that the court, in order to uphold the dignity of the law, ensure judicial fairness and maintain social stability, convict and sentence the defendant to the highest penalty according to the law." He also described the immense suffering the family had suffered with the loss of a loved daughter and sister. "My heart at this moment is filled with immense sorrow which words cannot adequately convey," Bao's father said. "My daughter was an intelligent, kind, brave and resilient, modern Chinese woman, full of positivity. She was the light of my wife's and my life, the most brilliant colour in our ordinary days and the greatest spiritual support and source of motivation during our families tough times. "Every stage of her growth was the most precious memory in our hearts, and her laughter was the most melodious tune in our home. Filling it with love and hope throughout the seasons." As court began on Friday morning, Cao made protestations about evidence he claimed would demonstrate his innocence, leading to Justice Preston closing the court to the public to address the outbursts. Cao interrupts However, when court resumed, Cao again leapt to his feet and began interrupting. As Corrections officers escorted him from the court, he continued speaking loudly and gesticulating. His final protest came as he ripped up his papers, bundled them into a ball and threw them to the ground. Cao was forced to watch the remainder of the hearing from another courtroom. His seven-week jury trial last year was also marked by Cao's odd displays. He sacked his defence lawyers during the trial and represented himself with the help of a trio of interpreters. Justice Preston repeatedly warned Cao about asking irrelevant questions, making meandering and repetitive statements, and accusing witnesses of lying. The prosecution described the case against Cao as an "absolute slam dunk" with compelling and overwhelming evidence demonstrating his guilt. However, Cao claimed he was at the centre of a conspiracy and police officers had lied, fabricated, planted and doctored evidence to frame him. In delivering his closing argument he regularly turned and spoke to the glass panes of an empty dock and at other times rambled through measurements and minutiae which were difficult to link to his claims of innocence or the case. What happened to Bao? Cao lured the 44-year-old Yanfei Bao to the Hornby home on July 19, 2023 under the pretence of wanting to view the property. There he attacked her, bundled her into the boot of his car and drove her to a remote rural road near Lincoln where he killed her. He buried her in a shallow grave along the treeline of a farm in Greenpark where police found her remains almost a year later. Bao's husband reported her missing the day she vanished after discovering his wife had not collected her daughter from an after-school programme, had not come home for lunch and calls to her phone went unanswered. Police found Bao's phone in grass beside the southern motorway two days later. Cao was arrested on his way to Christchurch Airport in the days after her disappearance with a one-way ticket to Shanghai. He was initially charged with Bao's kidnapping but the charged was later dropped. Cao was charged with murder in September 2023. RNZ asked Immigration New Zealand if a deportation order had been sought for Cao, national manager compliance Damon Tredaway said: "we will consider any appropriate enforcement actions once the court proceedings have concluded". Cao would not be eligible for parole until 2041.
Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
Mental Health Response Change Programme Phase Two Update
Phase Two of the Police Mental Health Response Change Programme is set to be extended with implementation across a third and final group of districts from Monday. This includes: • Health NZ districts: Northland, Taranaki, Whanganui, and MidCentral • Police districts: Northland, Central • Health NZ specific areas: Tokoroa and Taumarunui (Waikato), Taupō (Lakes), Wairoa (Hawke's Bay), and Waitaki and Southern Lakes (Southern) • Police specific areas within districts: Taupo and Tokoroa (Bay of Plenty), Wairoa (Eastern), and Central Lakes and Waitaki (Southern) Police Assistant Commissioner Mike Johnson says we remain committed to our joint efforts towards making sure people have access to the right help at the right time, which works best for them. 'Police have always, and will always, respond when there is an immediate risk to life or change is about an increased health-led response, enabling our staff more time to get back into our communities do the work that only Police can. Health NZ Director of Specialist Mental Health and Addiction Karla Bergquist says a range of mental health support is available for those who need it. 'This change is about ensuring people requiring mental health support receive the right care at the right time, while maintaining the safety and wellbeing of patients and our staff. 'I'd like to assure the public there is a range of services to help people in mental distress or those who are concerned about the mental health of whānau. 'If a person is in serious mental distress or crisis, support is available from their local crisis team [1]. If it's a life-threatening situation or someone is in immediate danger of harming themselves or others, contact emergency services on 111.' Karla added, 'I'd like to acknowledge all our teams for their work to prepare for and implement these changes across the motu. It has been positive to hear from our districts that there are strong local partnerships between police and health to support Phase Two implementation, which has generally gone well.' Notes: Phase Two of the mental health response changes began on 14 April and have been implemented in stages. Phase two changes include: 60-minute handover of detained persons in EDs – Police who have detained a person under section 109 of the Mental Health Act and transported them for an assessment, or are responding at the request of health staff for an assessment under section 41 or 110c, will remain in the ED for a maximum of one hour before departing – unless there is an immediate risk to life or safety. Changes to mental health assessments in custody will ensure people in distress are assessed appropriately, preferably in a health setting. If someone is placed under the Mental Health Act while in a Police custody suite, they will need to be taken to a health facility within 30 minutes. NZ Police and Health NZ districts are not the same (Police has 12, Health has 20), so there are some parts of a Police district which are not included in the comparable Health NZ district or vice versa.
