logo
Letters: It's time for the US to do the right thing and deliver food, shelter and medicine to Gaza

Letters: It's time for the US to do the right thing and deliver food, shelter and medicine to Gaza

Chicago Tribune3 days ago

As a fellow educator, I nodded sympathetically with Adam Patric Miller as he described the usual arbitrary administrative hoops he had to jump through at the end of another teaching semester ('A teacher's end-of-year reflection,' May 30). But his commentary took a surprise turn, and struck a nerve, when he honestly stated he doesn't have faith in either political party because they 'both fund a genocide in Gaza.'
Traveling through Gaza in 1983 as an infantry lieutenant in the 82nd Airborne, I was struck by the pervasive poverty and misery in this narrow strip of land. When I expressed concern to my Arabic translator, he told me they needed more support from the United Nations and the U.S. for food, shelter and medicine. Why aren't Americans doing more to help us?
I'm a tactician, not a politician, I naively responded, so that's a problem for our State Department. That is the problem, he persisted, your State Department and military supported the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982, which is driving refugees here and making a bad situation worse. I said the problem was above my pay grade but assured him the U.S. would eventually do the right thing.
Forty years later, I'm still waiting. The U.S. continues to spend American tax dollars supporting an Israeli government that is relentlessly bombing and starving the population of Gaza, even after defeating Hamas, while also bombing Lebanon, Syria and Yemen. Their ongoing ground invasion will complete the destruction of Gaza, after already killing more than 50,000, most of them women and children.
While this is happening, the U.S. rightfully condemns the ground invasion and killing of civilians by the Russian army in Ukraine. This Orwellian hypocrisy is the madness that develops from decades of greed, corruption, moral failure and cultural anomie.
My teacher reflection suggests little has changed since Shakespeare's power-hungry Macbeth lamented: 'And all our yesterdays have lighted fools the way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player, that struts and frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more. It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury signifying nothing.'
It's time for the U.S. to prove Macbeth was wrong, and do the right thing by delivering food, shelter and medicine to Gaza.As a father of three, I appreciate Mark Batinick's concern about the increasing cost of college in Illinois ('Illinois is paying top dollar to fail its college-age young adults', May 28). We need to do more to hold down the cost of college for middle-class families. Barring foreign students (who pay full tuition rates) and cutting billions of dollars in federal research money, as President Donald Trump is doing, will make the situation worse instead of better.
There is an attractive alternative for the 60% of students who choose not to pursue a four-year college education: our state's institutions for career and technical education. They lead to good jobs at a relative bargain price.
For the current academic year, the average Illinois community college tuition and basic fee for a full-time, in-district student is $4,813 (based on 30 semester hours). This is an increase of only 2.2% from the prior year, compared to 9.4% at public universities and 12.9% at private universities in Illinois.
Just as important, community colleges lead to real jobs. In Illinois, they work with 9,800 unique employers to provide workers with the skills they require. More than three-quarters of community college students who complete long-term certificate or Associate in Applied Science programs are employed in careers within a year of graduation. Their average salary, compared to someone with no CTE credential, is almost 40% higher.
To give more Americans a chance at career and technical education, I co-wrote the 2021 law that greatly expanded the federal investment in these valuable programs. Participation in these programs has increased, allowing over 11 million students to pursue vocational and technical education, which strengthens our economy and boosts our competitiveness.
While making a college education more affordable for those Americans who want one, we should continue investing in alternatives that can fill the jobs of tomorrow while providing millions of people with a path to the middle class.

Reading the Tribune article, 'Judge tosses lawsuit that threatened wetlands nationwide' (June 1), I was encouraged by the ruling that keeps in place a law that sets expectations on farmers to be good stewards of the land and not destroy wetlands on their farmland. Wetlands are an essential part of our environment and most certainly should be protected, for the benefit of all of us. I was greatly disturbed by investor James Conlan's intent to appeal the decision. He vowed to fight what he calls an 'unconstitutional law'. How arrogant! Every single one of us has a responsibility to be good stewards of the earth.In Sunday's editorial regarding foreign students at Harvard, the editorial board asked the question 'After all, what American argument could possibly be made for prohibiting international students, at least beyond the tiny percentage employed as some kind of spy?' ('Harvard defends itself in a way all Americans should understand', June 1) The answer is blindingly obvious. It's reported on the web that, in the current year, Harvard had 7,000 foreign students. That means that an equivalent number of our brightest children were denied the opportunity to study at Harvard.
And, since it is unlikely that all those foreign students will remain in the U.S. after graduation, many of those best educated minds will contribute nothing to our nation. The board presents that loss as a gain of 'soft power' in the countries they return to, but that seems a hollow argument given the current environment of campus protests decrying the U.S. as racist, as supporting Israeli genocide, as transphobic, etc..Thanks to Scott Stantis for his editorial cartoon (June 1) that animates truth to power. It accompanies an editorial about Harvard's defense against draconian government attacks on the value of independent academic institutions. There's a lot to criticize Harvard about, but in this case, they are on the vanguard for protecting pillars of education like my alma mater, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, which has a significant number of students from other countries. These students generally pay full price and help provide tuition and fees for qualified in-state students. Foreign students also have a beneficial impact by sharing diverse perspectives and preparing our students for the global workforce. Kudos to Stantis for his work based on 'thoughtful conservatism' that often takes a contrarian view in defense of freedom of speech and the rule of law.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know
Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know

In February, President Donald Trump said he was considering a plan to pay out $5,000 stimulus checks to American taxpayers from the savings identified by billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Are they happening? No official plan or schedule for such a payout has been released, and a decision on the checks would have to come from Congress, which has so far been cool to the idea. And there have been questions as to how much DOGE has actually saved. The idea was floated by Azoria investment firm CEO James Fishback, who suggested on Musk's social media platform X that Trump and Musk should "should announce a 'DOGE Dividend'" from the money saved from reductions in government waste and workforce since it was American taxpayer money in the first place. He even submitted a proposal for how it would work, with a timeline for after the expiration of DOGE in July 2026. "At $2 trillion in DOGE savings and 78 million tax-paying households, this is a $5,000 refund per household, with the remaining used to pay down the national debt," he said in a separate post. Musk replied, "Will check with the President." "We're considering giving 20% of the DOGE savings to American citizens and 20% to paying down the debt," Trump said in a during the Saudi-sponsored FII PRIORITY Summit in Miami Beach the same month. DOGE has dismantled entire federal agencies, wiped out government contracts and led the firings of tens of thousands of federal workers, leaving many agencies struggling to continue operations. DOGE checks? Elon Musk dodges DOGE stimulus check question during Wisconsin rally: Here's what he said. Fishbeck suggested that the potential refund go only to households that are net-income taxpayers, or households that pay more in taxes than they get back. The Pew Research Center said that most Americans with an adjusted gross income of under $40,000 effectively pay no federal income tax. They would not be eligible. If DOGE achieves Musk's initial goal of stripping $2 trillion from U.S. government spending by 2026, Fishback's plan was for $5,000 per household, or 20% of the savings divided by the number of eligible households. If DOGE doesn't hit the goal, Fishback said the amount should be adjusted accordingly. 'So again, if the savings are only $1 trillion, which I think is awfully low, the check goes from $5,000 to $2,500,' Fishback said during a podcast appearance. 'If the savings are only $500 billion, which, again, is really, really low, then the [checks] are only $1,250.' However, while Musk talked about saving $2 trillion in federal spending during Trump's campaign, he lowered the goal to $1 trillion after Trump assumed office and said in March he was on pace to hit that goal by the end of May. At a Cabinet meeting in April, Musk lowered the projected savings further to $150 billion in fiscal year 2026. Musk left the White House at the end of May when his designation as a "special government employee" ended. DOGE, the advisory group he created, is expected to continue without him. That depends on who you ask. On its website, DOGE claims to have saved an estimated $175 billion as of May 30, "a combination of asset sales, contract and lease cancellations and renegotiations, fraud and improper payment deletions, grant cancellations, interest savings, programmatic changes, regulatory savings, and workforce reductions." The site says that works out to $1,086.96 saved per taxpayer. However, many of DOGE's claims have been exaggerated and several of the initiatives to slash agency workforces have been challenged in court. DOGE has been accused of taking credit for contracts that were canceled before DOGE was created, failing to factor in funds the government is required to pay even if a contract is canceled, and tallying every contract by the most that could possibly be spent on it even when nothing near that amount had been obligated. The website list has been changed as the media pointed out errors, such as a claim that an $8 million savings was actually $8 billion. On May 30, CNN reported that one of its reporters found that less than half the $175 billion figure was backed up with even basic documentation, making verification difficult if not impossible. Some of the changes may also end up costing taxpayers more, such as proposed slashes to the Internal Revenue Service that experts say would mean less tax revenue generated, resulting in a net cost of about $6.8 billion. Over the next 10 years, if IRS staffing stays low, the cumulative cost in uncollected taxes would hit $159 billion, according to the nonpartisan Budget Lab at Yale University. The per-taxpayer claim on the website is also inflated, CNN said, as it's based on '161 million individual federal taxpayers' and doesn't seem to include married people filing jointly. This article originally appeared on Florida Times-Union: DOGE dividends: Will American taxpayers get a $5,000 check?

Trump admin officials blast LA Mayor Karen Bass' response to ICE raids — as cops clash with violent protesters
Trump admin officials blast LA Mayor Karen Bass' response to ICE raids — as cops clash with violent protesters

New York Post

time26 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump admin officials blast LA Mayor Karen Bass' response to ICE raids — as cops clash with violent protesters

Several Trump administration officials fired back at Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass Friday after she pledged to oppose federal efforts to nab illegal immigrants — as cops in her city had to use flash bangs to disperse the violent mob of protesters who descended on the arrest sites. 'We will not stand for this,' Bass said in a statement released after federal immigration authorities arrested 44 people in raids across Los Angeles. 'I am deeply angered by what has taken place,' the Democrat mayor fumed, noting that her office 'is in close coordination with immigrant rights community organizations.' Advertisement 4 Bass slammed the Los Angeles immigration enforcement raids in a social media post. AFP via Getty Images White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller quickly dismissed Bass' declaration. 'You have no say in this at all,' Miller shot back on social media. Advertisement 'Federal law is supreme and federal law will be enforced,' he noted on X. Miller was one of several Trump administration officials that took issue with Bass' statements. 'They're Illegals. Not 'immigrants.' One just tried to burn Americans alive in Boulder,' White House adviser Sebastian Gorka wrote on X, referring to Colorado terror suspect Mohamed Soliman. The Egyptian national overstayed his tourist visa before allegedly firebombing a peaceful march for Israeli hostages still held by Hamas on Sunday in a heinous antisemitic attack. Advertisement 'If you're aiding and abetting them you're a criminal too,' Gorka said in response to the LA mayor's comments. 'Are you ready to be treated as a criminal? 'Because we are ready to treat you as one if you commit a crime,' he warned. 4 Miller noted that Bass has 'no say' in federal immigration enforcement. Chris Kleponis – CNP / MEGA 4 Miller was one of several Trump administration officials who reacted strongly to Bass' statement on the ICE raids. Stephen Miller, /X Advertisement Justice Department official Harmeet K. Dhillon was stunned by Bass' understanding of the law. 'It's amazing the number of elected officials who don't grasp the basics of federalism, or federal sovereignty over immigration issues, or the First Amendment,' Dhillon tweeted. The Los Angeles immigration raids sparked protests at the arrest sites, and at least one person was taken into custody for allegedly obstructing federal law enforcement. 'Federal agents were executing a lawful judicial warrant at a LA worksite this morning when David Huerta deliberately obstructed their access by blocking their vehicle,' US Attorney Bill Essayli said in a statement. 'He was arrested for interfering with federal officers and will face arraignment in federal court on Monday.' 'Let me be clear: I don't care who you are — if you impede federal agents, you will be arrested and prosecuted.' Huerta is president of the California branch of the influential Service Employees International Union. 4 The raids sparked protests in Los Angeles. AP Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin decried the city's response to protesters' clashes with federal agents – which escalated hours after the raids. Advertisement 'Assaulting ICE enforcement officers, slashing tires, defacing buildings. 800 protestors have surrounded and breached the first layer of a federal law enforcement building in LA,' McLaughlin wrote on X. '@LAPD has not responded.' 'This violence against @ICEgov must stop.' Richard Grenell, President Trump's envoy for special missions, blamed Bass for the unrest. 'Karen Bass whipped all of this up. She attacked the rule of law. She undermined democracy,' Grenell wrote on X, sharing images of protesters attempting to block federal law enforcement vehicles. Advertisement 'The @MayorOfLA is creating chaos in LA,' he fumed. With Post wires

Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs
Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs

EDMONTON — Alberta is buying American alcohol and gambling machines again, three months after Premier Danielle Smith announced restrictions aimed at fighting back against U.S. tariffs. Service Alberta Minister Dale Nally says the move signals a "renewed commitment to open and fair trade" with the United States. Smith said in March that the province would no longer buy U.S. alcohol and video lottery terminals, or sign contracts with American companies. That came a day after U.S. President Donald Trump slapped heavy tariffs on Canadian goods and energy. Nally says the decision to resume buying U.S. alcohol and gambling machines "sets the stage for more constructive negotiations" ahead of a renewal of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade agreement. The minister says Albertans are encouraged to continue supporting local producers, even as more U.S. options return to store shelves. Nally said in April that the province was pausing its policy around procurement from U.S. companies "in the spirit of diplomacy." He said since the province's retaliatory measures were first announced in early March, the Trump administration had put a hold on further tariffs. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 6, 2025. The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store