Speaker Adrienne Adams raises $128,000 for NYC mayoral bid in 5 days
Speaker Adrienne Adams has raised over $128,000 for her mayoral bid, according to her campaign — but it's not enough to garner her matching funds.
Nearly 1,130 donors, including 875 donors in New York City, gave to her campaign in just five days, according to the campaign.
The speaker said at a press conference Wednesday that she didn't expect to meet the threshold for the city's 8-to-1 matching program, which requires candidates to reach $250,000 in matchable donations from 1,000 local donors.
'We have been aggressive fundraising for less than a week, so put that together as far as what we're doing on how we're working,' Adams said at a press conference. 'But we do expect to receive matching funds in time.'
The next matching funds payout, though, is not until late May — a potential hurdle for her campaign as she vies against candidates who have been fundraising for months and have already qualified for the matching funds.
The speaker, once considered an ally to Mayor Adams, launched her campaign against him earlier this month. She entered the race on the heels of ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
Adams filed paperwork to open a campaign account in late February, but that account couldn't accept donations until March 6, according to Lupe Todd-Media, her campaign spokesperson.
The campaign is aiming to employ a 'rose garden strategy' — emphasizing her accomplishments as leader of the City Council — to boost her candidacy, according to a campaign memo shared with the Daily News.
'As Speaker, she will continue to deliver real results while others are stuck campaigning,' the campaign memo reads, listing off her opposition to budget cuts, support for 3-K and CityFHEPS vouchers and work passing 'City of Yes.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Axon says it's no longer in talks with Scottsdale to expand its HQ
The Brief Tech company, Axon, known for its body cams and Tasers, is no longer working with the city of Scottsdale to expand its headquarters. Earlier this year, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs signed a bill that allowed for the company's expansion, but the city and residents fought back. The project, Axon says, will move forward, but won't be negotiating with the city to amend part of its plan. SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. - Axon ended its talks with Scottsdale regarding plans to expand its headquarters, citing a "toxic environment." Axon President Josh Isner met with Scottsdale Mayor Lisa Borowsky on Monday, June 9 and released a statement, saying, "Unfortunately, Axon is withdrawing from negotiations with the City of Scottsdale. The internal politics of the City Council currently make it impossible to reach an agreement. I have never seen such a toxic environment in my life. We put a great deal on the table and we tried our best." Mayor Borowsky responded by saying, "I appreciate Axon's efforts to come to the table and engage in meaningful dialogue regarding the future of their development. Their team was willing to make concessions to their existing plan, which I appreciate. Unfortunately, there were too many hurdles to overcome in order to move an agreement forward successfully. I remain hopeful that future negotiations result in a win-win agreement that work for the community and keeps this vital employer right where it belongs — in Scottsdale." Axon will stay in Scottsdale, and it will expand its HQ. It had been trying to come to some sort of agreement with the city to reduce the number of housing units it planned to build for its employees. But now, Axon says it will go back to its initial plan, which included nearly 2,000 units. The backstory In April, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs approved SB1543, giving the tech giant the go ahead to expand its headquarters. She said it would provide more than 5,500 jobs and is projected to generate an estimated $38 billion in economic impact in the next decade. On April 19, Mayor Borowsky posted to X, "I am disappointed with the way the Axon Bill has played out, culminating with the Governor signing this awful legislation—-without any discussion with representatives of #Scottsdale, knowing the impact it will have exclusively on our communities. I stand with the people of Scottsdale in opposition to the legislature's unconstitutional overreach. The city is evaluating all legal remedies in response. We must protect the character of our community and our voters' right to the legally obtained referendum process." When Gov. Hobbs approved the bill, it meant major companies that build corporate headquarters in Arizona would be entitled to build housing for its employees. Axon CEO Rick Smith said he wanted to build 1,900 new apartments for its employees. A group named Taxpayers Against Awful Apartment Zoning Exemptions (TAAAZE) were against the expansion from the very beginning. "It's not necessary for him to override the will of the Scottsdale voters and to basically put a thumb in their eye, when they have made it clear over the last couple of elections, both by who they elected, and by the referendums, that they don't want another 2,000 apartments," TAAAZE's Bob Littlefield previous told FOX 10.
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Adams condemns LA anti-ICE riots and warns New Yorkers similar protests ‘would not be tolerated' if attempted in NYC
Mayor Eric Adams condemned the ongoing anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles and warned New Yorkers not to get any ideas about starting similar violent protests back home. 'The escalation of protests in Los Angeles over the last couple of days is unacceptable and would not be tolerated if attempted in our city,' Adams said during a press conference Monday alongside NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch. Adams and Tisch appeared as a united front as the mayor encouraged would-be protesters to 'choose peace and compassion over anger and retaliation.' Advertisement 4 Eric Adams condemned the anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles, calling them 'unacceptable.' 'I want to assure all New Yorkers that we have the best police department in the world. Men and women who are prepared to handle any issues that may arise, especially when we are faced with deep division in our society,' Adams said. Tisch added that the NYPD would do just fine without federal intervention — including the dispatch of National Guard members, which President Trump ordered to LA — if any destructive mass protests crop up in the Big Apple. Advertisement 'Let me be crystal clear: We have no tolerance for violence, none. We have no tolerance for property damage. We have no tolerance for people blocking entrances to buildings or blocking driveways or blocking cars from moving. And any attacks against law enforcement will be met with a swift and decisive response from the NYPD,' Tisch said. 'We are responsible for public safety and maintaining order in this city. And we will never abdicate that responsibility.' On Monday, an anti-ICE protest was held in the lobby of Trump Tower as dozens of demonstrators demanded the release of immigrants sent to El Salvador's megaprison. 4 The LA protests started last Friday and continued through the weekend. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement 4 President Donald Trump sent the National Guard to LA in spite of Gov. Gavin Newsom's orders. AFP via Getty Images 4 On Monday, anti-ICE protesters settled in the lobby of Trump Towers and demanded the return of migrants sent to El Salvador's hellish megaprison. Stephen Yang In late May, nearly two dozen protesters were arrested outside an ICE facility in Manhattan after ICE officials nabbed multiple migrants appearing at the Lower Manhattan courthouse. The Los Angeles protests, meanwhile, entered their fourth consecutive night Monday as thousands of participants took to the streets over ICE raids in the city. Advertisement Trump overrode California Gov. Gavin Newsom and ordered 2,000 National Guard troops to the LA riots as participants lit cars on fire and hurled rocks and fireworks at officers. On top of the 2,000 National Guard members, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth deployed 700 active-duty Marines to the LA protests, who are expected to arrive on Tuesday.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
In 2025 offseason, what should the Rockets pay Fred VanVleet and Steven Adams?
In a Houston Rockets offseason preview episode of the Game Theory Podcast, The Athletic's Sam Vecenie makes the case for what new contracts with Fred VanVleet and Steven Adams could look like. Vecenie believes a new VanVleet deal should come in at three years and between $90 and $100 million in total value, while Adams could be at the same length and between $42 and $45 million. Both players are now 31 years old, so a three-season deal could potentially carry each through the remainder of his prime NBA years. Advertisement 'Adams would basically take up the money you're saving by redoing Fred's deal,' Vecenie says of the combined figures and their impact on the Rockets. The Rockets currently have a team option for VanVleet at $44.9 million for the 2025-26 season, and it has been reported that Houston could look to negotiate a contract extension for more years and at a lower annual value. The upside to VanVleet would be locking in more guaranteed money in total, while the advantage to the Rockets would be lowering his payroll number next season. To Vecenie's point, should VanVleet's 2025-26 annual figure be reduced from $44.9 million to something just above $30 million, that gap would nearly match the starting salary in his proposed Adams deal. Adams made $12.6 million this season, and the NBA's non-taxpayer mid-level exception (NT-MLE) this offseason is expected to be in the range of a $14.1-million starting salary. Many teams have access to the NT-MLE, so a contract in that general vicinity would seem realistic, on an annual basis. And from Houston's perspective, it's unlikely they would ask or expect Adams to take a paycut after an elite playoff performance. Advertisement It's worth noting that VanVleet had a very strong playoff run, as well. However, his larger salary compared to Adams could make it more likely that he takes a paycut, and especially because there aren't many teams with significant salary cap space this offseason. In the absence of external market leverage, that could drive down his annual cost, on a relative basis. By lowering the combined figure of the VanVleet and Adams contracts, that could provide Houston with additional space (relative to the NBA's tax thresholds) to help fill out the rest of its roster. Relative to 2024-25, the Rockets will be a much more expensive team in 2025-26 due to salary increases for fifth-year players Alperen Sengun and Jalen Green — which makes saving money at other spots more of a priority. Teams can exclusively negotiate with their own pending free agents (in this case, VanVleet and Adams) immediately after the conclusion of the 2025 NBA Finals. Then, on June 30, negotiations between free agents and other teams can begin. In a perfect world, the Rockets would reach deals with VanVleet and Adams before that later date. The question will be if everyone is on the same financial page. Advertisement It has been widely reported that VanVleet and the Rockets want to stick together, and Houston has expressed optimism that Adams wants to return, as well. More: Rockets reportedly remain optimistic that Steven Adams wants to return This article originally appeared on Rockets Wire: 2025 offseason: What should Houston pay Fred VanVleet, Steven Adams?
