10 things to know about POTUS push to curb gun rights in D.C.
HONOLULU (KHON2) — One of the most intense debates to characterize the United States for the last 26 years is regarding guns rights.
And while President George W. Bush's two terms and the first presidential term of Donald Trump was characterized with holding true to the Republican push to expand how the Second Amendment is interpreted, the second presidential term for Trump is taking a decidedly different position.
10 facts about Kelly Slater's $16.5M Hawaiʻi North Shore home for sale
According to the Washington Post, POTUS is marking certain people for prosecution. Here's what we know so far.
The interim United States Attorney General, Ed Martin, has launched a new initiative called 'Make D.C. Safe Again'. It's an initiative that involves federal prosecutors moving to focus heavily on all firearms cases in the city. According to Martin, it's meant to make the city safer, abandoning the 'guns don't kill people; people kill people' boilerplate response to gun violence.
Denise Cheung, who served as the chief of the Criminal Division in the office of the U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C., resigned after saying she was pressured to launch a criminal investigation and to freeze assets related to a grant awarded by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) during President Biden's tenure. She claims there was no evidence of a crime.
The current prosecutor for the Justice Department's Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section, Jonathan Hornok intends to step in to replace Denise Cheung as the chief of the office's Criminal Division.According to sources, federal prosecutors in Washington, D.C., have been ordered to pursue every firearms case referred to them. These prosecutors were also instructed to seek pretrial detention against every person charged with such an offense.
A memo from Ed Martin provides instructions to prosecutors that explains who, how and what to seek in pretrial detention cases for every person charged with a firearms offense. This move is meant to be applied to everyone regardless of what the circumstances are.
The memo stated that if a magistrate judge denies a request for pretrial detention in a firearms case, then the prosecutor is required to appeal that decision.
Ed Martin's memo stated, 'We will flood the federal district court with cases to make our City safe'. This is a reference to the new initiative's focus on increasing the number of firearms cases in court.
There are about a dozen agents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) who have been reassigned to support the 'Make D.C. Safe Again' initiative.
Last week, Ed Martin demoted more than half a dozen senior leaders in his office who were in charge of prosecutions related to fraud, public corruption, civil rights, firearms, narcotics trafficking and child exploitation.
New interim U.S. Attorneys are expected to be appointed. Amongst them include Kelly Hayes who was named Interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland.
You can click to read more about it.
Get news on the go with KHON 2GO, KHON's morning podcast, every morning at 8
With the Republican Party working diligently to ensure the unfettered expansion of Second Amendment interpretations, it's going to be interesting to see how all this plays out over the coming year.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
31 minutes ago
- Newsweek
If Clarence Thomas Resigns Under Trump, Here's Who Might Replace Him
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. There is speculation within the legal community over whether Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas will retire during Donald Trump's presidency, given he is currently 76 years old. Justice Samuel Alito is 75 years old, sparking similar speculation about his future as well. According to Supreme Court scholar Adam Feldman, there are six judges in the U.S. who are likely to be considered by President Trump if either justice resigns. Feldman told Newsweek that the possibility of either judge retiring is "unlikely but possible." "Neither are terribly old by Supreme Court standards, both are in their mid-70s, but Thomas will be 80 around the end of Trump's term. Neither have major health issues, at least those that have been made public. If they have confidence that the next president will be a Republican then they have incentive to stay," said Feldman. Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito, left, and Clarence Thomas look on during the 60th Presidential Inauguration in the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Monday, January, 20, 2025. Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito, left, and Clarence Thomas look on during the 60th Presidential Inauguration in the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Monday, January, 20, 2025. Chip Somodevilla/Pool Photo via AP Why It Matters President Trump has already picked three out of the nine justices on the Supreme Court. If he had the opportunity to pick two more justices, his presidency and worldview could have a lasting impact on the future of US law long beyond the next three and a half years. However, Justice Barrett has not always ruled in the Trump administration's favor recently, showing that appointing a judge does not guarantee their support from the bench. What To Know Supreme Court seats are lifetime and supposedly apolitical appointments, but justices occasionally retire during the term of a president who aligns with them politically in order to ensure their legacy is retained by the court. For example, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg declined to retire during the Obama administration before passing away under Trump, meaning her seat is now occupied by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who is significantly more conservative in her interpretation of the law than Ginsburg. "Ginsburg's light on the risk of waiting too long to step down. Since both Thomas and Alito have a lot of sway on the direction of the Court's outcomes, I don't foresee either stepping down unless there is another reason, [for example] health or fear that a Democrat will win the next election, that motivates them," Feldman told Newsweek. According to Feldman, the six judges who are likely to be tapped for consideration are judges Patrick J. Bumatay, Aileen M. Cannon, James C. Ho, Andrew S. Oldham, Neomi J. Rao and Amul R. Thapar. Trump has said in the past that he wants to appoint "more justices like the ones I already picked," so Feldman, creator of the Empirical SCOTUS blog, analyzed decisions and written statements made by the prospective judges and compared them to Trump's picks: Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett. He also compared their decisions to those made by Thomas and Alito, examining the language and citations used in their work to determine how it would appeal to the president. According to Feldman's research, Judge Andrew Oldman, who currently is in a Trump-appointed role for the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, is the most similar to Trump's picks, whereas Judge James Ho is the most similar to Alito and Thomas. Despite ruling in the President's favor several times, including blocking lawmakers from reading the Jack Smith report into Trump's handling of classified documents, and currently being the presiding judge in the case surrounding the second assassination attempt on the president in 2024, Cannon appears to be the furthest away from the Trump appointees and Alito and Thomas. She is one of the most frequent users of "hot-button" words in her writing, including "tyranny," "culture," "elite," and "freedom." These are terms Feldman has singled out as appealing to Trump. However, she does not possess the same qualities as other potential candidates, such as clerking for a Supreme Court judge. Feldman told Newsweek: "My best guess is that Trump would appoint her to a federal appellate court first and nominate another judge (Ho for instance) if there is a SCOTUS vacancy soon although the Cannon likelihood goes up if there is a vacancy towards the end of Trump's term." According to Feldman's metrics, the most likely pick to replace Thomas is Ho, and the most likely pick to replace Alito is Oldham. U.S. Associate Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, Jr., U.S. Associate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh and U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts attend inauguration ceremonies in the... U.S. Associate Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, Jr., U.S. Associate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh and U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts attend inauguration ceremonies in the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. More Chip Somodevilla/Getty images picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images What People Are Saying Attorney Bradley P. Moss told Newsweek in a previous article: "I see absolutely no reason to believe Clarence Thomas will step away from the bench until either he physically is unable to continue with his work, or he is assured that a handpicked successor will be confirmed without incident." Adam Feldman told Newsweek: "With the recent news that Trump is unhappy with Barrett in particular I think he is likely to pick someone who has a more pronounced judicial track record (Barrett's was minimal) that conveys a more conservative bent. That is why my sense is that Judge Ho is the most likely nominee if there is a vacancy. He is about as much a surefire bet to fit the Alito/Thomas paradigm and he clerked for Thomas which adds to his pedigree." Adam Feldman wrote in his Legalytics Substack: "My sense still is that Judge Ho is the obvious pick if Justice Thomas is the next justice to step down and Judge Oldham likely gets the nod if Justice Alito is the first to leave SCOTUS as recent history has shown that presidents may look first to a justice's former clerk to as a replacement if possible." What Happens Next Neither Alito nor Thomas have said they are thinking about retiring. Early in his career, Thomas threatened to quit over his salary. However, that has now been raised. Were either justice to pass away or retire, the president will pick a replacement justice who will be voted on by the Senate.
an hour ago
Nevada GOP governor vetoes voter ID bill that he pushed for in a deal with Democrats
LAS VEGAS -- Nevada Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo unexpectedly vetoed a bill on Thursday that would have required voters in the swing state to show a photo ID at the polls — a conservative priority across the country and something that has long been on the governor's legislative wish list. The move brings a dramatic end to one of the legislative session's most surprising outcomes: A bipartisan deal that combined the requirement for voter identification with a Democratic-backed measure to add more drop boxes for mail ballots that Lombardo had initially vetoed. The bill came together in the final days of the session and passed mere minutes before the Democratic-controlled Legislature adjourned just after midnight on June 3. Lombardo had been expected to sign it. In his veto message, Lombardo said he 'wholeheartedly' supports voter ID laws but that he felt the bill fell short on addressing his concerns about ballots cast by mail, because such ballots could still be accepted 'solely on the basis of a signature match" under the bill. Because it 'would apply voter ID requirements unequally between in-person and mail ballot voters and fails to sufficiently guarantee ballot security, I cannot support it,' he said. The voter ID requirements in the bill mirrored a ballot initiative known as Question 7 that Nevada voters overwhelmingly approved last November. But voters would have to pass it again in 2026 to amend the state constitution. The requirement would then be in place by 2028. Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager, the Democrat who brokered the deal with Lombardo, said when he introduced the legislation that voters seemed poised to give the final approval, and that enacting a voter ID law would have given the state a head start on ensuring a smooth rollout before the next presidential election. In a scathing statement, Yeager called the governor's decision a 'breach of trust," saying that he believes Lombardo gave in to pressure around him to veto the bill, designated Assembly Bill 499. 'Lombardo was for AB499 before he was against it, encouraging all legislative Republicans to support it, which they did,' Yeager said. Voting rights groups condemned the legislation, saying it would have made it harder for some people to vote, including low-income or unhoused voters, people with disabilities and older voters. Let Nevadans Vote, which describes itself as a nonpartisan coalition, said Thursday in a statement that the governor's veto only temporarily stops what it called 'the misguided and ill-conceived implementation of voter ID in Nevada.' 'Come 2026, Question 7 will still be on the ballot," the group said while describing voter ID requirements as 'strict regimes' that 'decide who gets to exercise their constitutional right to vote and who cannot.' Polls have shown that most Americans support voter ID laws, and that has been consistent over the years and across party lines. A 2024 Gallup poll found 84% of Americans were in favor of requirements for a photo ID at voting places, consistent with Gallup findings from 2022 and 2016. That includes about two-thirds of Democrats, according to the 2024 survey. Voters are either required or requested to show ID when voting in person in 36 states, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Not all states require photo ID, though. Some accept documents such as a bank statement, and some allow voters without ID to vote after signing an affidavit. A few states allow poll workers to vouch for voters without an ID. Lombardo on Thursday also vetoed a bill that would have allowed the swing state's nonpartisan voters to cast ballots in Republican or Democratic primary races. The bill sought to include the more than 855,000 voters registered as nonpartisans — the state's largest voting bloc — in the process of nominating major-party candidates for congressional races and statewide offices. A ballot initiative to open up primaries for all registered voters was rejected by voters last November. The sweeping measure, which also attempted to implement ranked choice voting, faced intense opposition from party leaders on both sides who said it was too broad and confusing.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ex-NFL star Antonio Brown reportedly wanted for attempted murder in Miami
Authorities in Miami-Dade County have issued a warrant for the arrest of former NFL wide receiver Antonio Brown on a charge of attempted murder with a firearm, according to documents reviewed by the Washington Post. The charge stems from a 16 May shooting outside a celebrity boxing event in Miami. The warrant, signed Wednesday, alleges Brown punched a man during a brawl, then grabbed a firearm from a security officer and fired two shots as he chased the same individual. The alleged victim told police one bullet may have grazed his neck. Brown was not arrested at the time but now faces a felony charge requiring a $10,000 bond and house arrest if taken into custody. Related: Aaron Rodgers says joining Steelers is 'best for my soul' and reveals recent marriage Brown, 36, who last played in the NFL in 2021, has not responded publicly to the latest charge. His representation remains unclear. A spokesperson for the Miami-Dade State Attorney's Office declined to comment to the Post. Police were called to the scene just before midnight after reports of gunfire. An off-duty officer working security at the event told investigators he saw Brown engaged in a physical altercation. Witnesses named Brown as the shooter, according to the warrant cited by the Post. Officers later recovered two shell casings and an empty gun holster, but no weapon was found on Brown when he was initially detained. Brown later posted on social media that he had been 'jumped' by individuals attempting to rob him. He said police temporarily detained him to hear his account and released him the same night. Surveillance and cell phone video obtained by investigators reportedly shows Brown initiating the fight and later running toward the victim with a firearm. The alleged victim identified Brown in the footage and told police the two had known each other since 2022. The attempted murder charge adds to a growing list of legal troubles for the former Pro Bowl receiver, including prior arrests, domestic violence allegations and financial lawsuits. Once among the league's most productive players, Brown's post-NFL career has been marred by erratic behavior and repeated run-ins with the law. Brown has filed for bankruptcy and previously attributed some of his behavior to possible chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a degenerative brain disease linked to head trauma. The Miami native and sixth-round draft pick out of Central Michigan played 12 NFL seasons for the Pittsburgh Steelers, New England Patriots and Tampa Bay Buccaneers, becoming one of the most prolific receivers of his era. He caught 928 passes for 12,291 yards and 83 touchdowns over 146 career games and was named to the Pro Bowl seven times, earning first-team All-Pro honors in four consecutive seasons from 2014 to 2017. Brown won a Super Bowl with Tampa Bay in the 2020 season, catching a touchdown pass from Tom Brady in the game. His career ended in 2021 after he dramatically exited a game mid-play, removing his jersey and jogging off the field.
