
EDITORIAL: Let's take the idea of satellite libraries for a spin
Apr. 12—We journalists are a bookish lot.
As kids, we couldn't wait for the annual book fair at school. Remember book order forms? We actually took the form home and begged our parents to buy us a few paperbacks. Book reports weren't just easy for us — they were fun. When told to read the first chapter of "Lord of the Flies" or "Treasure Island," we read the whole book that same night (and probably spoiled it for the rest of the class the next day).
We loved books as kids, and we still love them as adults.
Therefore, it should come as no surprise that we're intrigued by the possibility of the Rochester Public Library opening one or more satellite locations.
Don't look for such a facility in your neighborhood anytime soon, but it is a possibility that the Rochester City Council will consider during a study session on Monday. Satellite sites are among the recommendations proposed by MSR Design, a Minneapolis-based consulting firm that was hired last summer to determine how the Rochester Public Library could adapt to the changing needs of a growing community.
That's not to say that the Rochester Public Library is a dinosaur (although it has a LOT of books about dinosaurs). Actually, it's fairly cutting-edge. Tech-savvy users can tap nearly limitless library materials from the comfort of their living room recliner. Avid readers can stock up on e-books and audio books without venturing into "the stacks" — and without any need to drive downtown to return them.
It's trends like that (and a 20% drop in foot traffic at the library since 2017) that make us glad that Rochester didn't go all-in on library expansion in 2016. The idea back then was to add another floor, perhaps two, to the downtown library, but the plan never gained much traction — largely due to its projected $55 million cost. We now see that as money well-saved. While the need for more library space hasn't gone away — in fact, we presume it has only increased — the fiscal caution of nine years ago should give the city some financial flexibility now as it considers the future of the Rochester Public Library.
In light of what's happening in other communities, one could make a strong argument in favor of additional library sites in Rochester.
Duluth, for example, has three public libraries to serve 35,000 fewer residents than does Rochester's library. Waterloo, Iowa, has four library sites to serve a population roughly half the size of Rochester. Fargo, with a population almost identical to Rochester, has a main library and two smaller branches.
These examples not only suggest a need for such sites here, but they also make it clear that Rochester need not reinvent the wheel. If our elected leaders and professional library staff want to see how satellite sites work, they won't have to look very far.
While it's far too early to suggest possible locations in Rochester, we can envision the generic footprint of a satellite library. The city could rent all or part of an existing commercial building, perhaps in a strip mall, with easy access and plenty of free parking. Inside would be books for all ages, but with a special focus on young children and/or teens. Additionally, there would be a meeting room — a mini auditorium, if you will — for the kind of programming that has become so popular at the downtown library.
The start-up cost of such a facility wouldn't be minimal, but it would be pocket change compared to the cost of building a new library, buying and renovating an existing building, or adding floors to the downtown library. The city could start with one rented satellite location, and if it proves to be a smashing success, other locations could follow.
While the actual cost and potential funding sources for such facilities remain big unknowns, we are certain of one thing: A satellite branch of the public library would attract new patrons. There are people in Rochester who prefer to turn actual pages in a real book but aren't eager to drive downtown and use a parking ramp. They'd show up in droves at a smaller, more accessible library.
In that same vein, we suspect that some parents aren't thrilled about bringing their young kids (and perhaps a stroller) downtown, then playing beat-the-clock to avoid parking fees. Such families are missing out on one of the small-yet-meaningful (and free!) joys of parenthood: bringing kids to the public library and letting them aimlessly explore the children's section. There's something magical about watching a child pull a seemingly random book off the shelf, then sitting down in a comfy chair to look at the pictures or actually read it.
Moments like that happen every time the Rochester Public Library opens its doors. We like the idea of more open doors, more comfy chairs, and more kids spending rainy summer afternoons exploring the wonderful world of books.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
See Purdue's 50-year plan to transform downtown Indianapolis campus with high-rises
Over the next 50 years, Purdue University plans to transform its downtown Indianapolis campus into an urban hub with high-rise buildings hosting up to 15,000 students, according to a new master plan. Today, Purdue's 28-acre sliver of land wedged between Indiana Avenue and Michigan Street on downtown's west side — roughly the same acreage as the parcel on which Lucas Oil Stadium and its south parking lot sit — is home to three parking garages and five expansive parking lots. A conceptual master plan approved by Purdue's Board of Trustees June 6 envisions 16 new buildings on that site, featuring 4.5 million square feet and about 3,500 student beds. With leasing agreements at nearby apartments, Purdue expects to offer students more than 5,300 beds downtown. The plan foresees an increase in Purdue's student enrollment in Indianapolis from about 2,800 in fall 2024 to 15,000 by fall 2075. Despite the dense development, the plan sets aside about 60% of the downtown acreage for open spaces where students can gather and walk, according to Maryland-based architecture firm Ayers Saint Gross, which designed the 50-year master plan. Construction on the campus' main building, the 15-story Academic Success Building near the intersection of West and Michigan streets, began this April. The $187 million facility with classrooms, lab space, dining halls and student housing will be complete around May 2027. The long-term plan comes as Purdue and Indiana University in Indianapolis jostle for position on the west side of downtown following the 2024 split of the two schools' joint urban campus, IUPUI. As Purdue updates its plans, IU has allotted hundreds of millions of dollars to build multiple major facilities, including an 11-story School of Medicine building and a 4,500-seat athletics center, on its downtown campus in the next few years. IUPUI split: Indiana Ave. fell as IUPUI rose. After Purdue and IU split, can they help renew the Avenue? After the IUPUI division, IU retains most of the 536-acre downtown campus and enrolled more than 25,000 students in fall 2024. IU also owns the 28-acre wedge of land where Purdue will expand between Indiana Avenue to the north, Michigan Street to the south and Blake Street to the west. Purdue has signed a 100-year lease to use the property. Purdue is expanding into Indiana's capital city in part to ease the strain on housing and other facilities at the West Lafayette campus, which now enrolls an all-time high of more than 55,000 students. University leaders have also announced partnerships with Indianapolis-based science and engineering firms like animal health company Elanco and race car manufacturer Dallara. 'Rather than a single hub, Purdue is weaving into the fabric of the city's innovation and industry corridors," David Umulis, Purdue's senior vice provost for Indianapolis, said in a statement, "expanding from downtown all the way to the northwest side of Indianapolis." Email IndyStar Reporter Jordan Smith at JTsmith@ Follow him on X: @jordantsmith09 This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: What's in Purdue's 50-year plan for downtown Indianapolis campus

Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Debate heats up as Ocean City wind farm moves forward
The Maryland Department of the Environment has made a final determination to approve permits for Baltimore-based US Wind Inc. to build the first large-scale offshore wind project near Ocean City. According to MDE, 'The proposed construction and commissioning of the offshore wind project would not cause violations of any applicable air pollution control regulations.' The decision, issued Friday, is the latest move in a multi-year, controversial effort to bring the plan to fruition. U.S. Wind has proposed 114 turbines that would be about 11 miles from shore at their closest, according to documents filed by the company with the Maryland Public Service Commission. The project would deliver 1,710 megawatts with turbines about 10 miles from Ocean City, according to its Maryland PSC application. The build-out would occur in several phases, with the first turbines intended for operation in 2028, according to the commission document. Opponents of the project, who include Ocean City Mayor Richard Meehan, argue that the wind farms could harm the environment and wildlife, degrade air quality and damage the region's tourism economy by marring the beach view. 'It is unconscionable to believe that the Maryland Department of Environment is ignoring pre-established permitting deadlines and fundamentally ignoring every shred of feedback offered by those who will be directly involved if this poorly conceived and potentially disastrous offshore wind project is allowed to move forward,' Meehan said in a statement Friday, following the MDE decision. 'The entire economy of our coastal resort town is dependent on tourism, our eco system, and commercial fishing, all of which will be significantly impacted if hundreds of these giant eyesores are constructed 10 miles from our beaches.' In October, the town of Ocean City filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging the wind farm that is closest to beginning construction along its shoreline. The ongoing suit alleges that the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management violated federal law when it approved the construction plan for US Wind's project. There are several groups circulating petitions against the wind farms, including nonprofit Save Ocean City and Indian River High School Engineering Students Class Of 2025 & 2026. Ocean City resident Spencer Rowe said he is concerned about the environmental impact of the wind farms. 'In my experience, more and more people are starting to question the proposed wind farms, although many of them are not motivated enough to sign [petitions],' Rowe said in an email to The Baltimore Sun. 'Traveling [around] town, one sees a lot of bumper stickers and restaurant signs displaying opposition messages. I talk to a lot of people about this, and nearly everyone is opposed now that they are learning more about all the detrimental impacts, both to the offshore environment and to our priceless viewshed.' Maryland has made significant investments in wind energy in recent years. The US Wind project is projected to create 13,000 jobs and net more than $6 billion in economic benefits. For fiscal year 2025 alone, $5 million was allocated to build a wind energy workforce and supply chain. Under state law, Maryland must reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2045. The state also aims to develop up to 8,500 megawatts of offshore wind energy by 2031. Despite some expressing environmental and economic concerns, others continue to support the development of offshore wind farms. In a letter to The Sun, Berlin resident Larry Austin Ryan outlined 10 reasons why people should not sign a petition recently sponsored by the Town of Ocean City to push wind turbines more than 26 miles off Maryland's coast. 'Wind power is the fastest growing energy industry in the world! Jobs in wind turbine technology are also one of the fastest growing areas of employment in living wage jobs,' Ryan wrote. 'The Ocean City area is guaranteed 60 jobs and there will be many more jobs in Salisbury and Baltimore in the manufacture and distribution of wind turbines and their components. With the addition of this many jobs, more visitors will have more discretionary income allowing them to enjoy the fruits of their labor in Ocean City.' 'Electricity produced by offshore wind will supply more than 750,000 homes and businesses on the Eastern shore,' Ryan added. 'It will ensure a large-scale improvement of our already inadequate electrical grid here on the shore and avoid a surcharge to Maryland ratepayers for having to import electricity from out of state. This will allow continued economic growth for all the shore in the 21 st century.' A petition to review MDE's decision must be filed by July 14 in the circuit court for the county where the permit application indicates the proposed activity will occur. 'The permits were issued after a thorough review of US Wind's application and following a public process,' an MDE spokesperson said in an email Saturday. 'Due to significant public interest, the Department of the Environment extended the time for the public to provide input. All feedback was carefully reviewed.' Aside from public debate, US Wind's project is facing legal and political hurdles. On May 5, Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown sued President Donald Trump's administration for freezing the development of offshore wind energy projects. Brown and a coalition of 17 attorneys general allege that the executive order threatens states' abilities to secure affordable energy sources, meet the increasing electricity demand, meet climate goals and disrupt billions of dollars in infrastructure and supply chain investments, according to the lawsuit. 'The president's actions violate federal law and will make it harder for us to help Marylanders keep the money they make. One of the best strategies for driving down utility costs is ramping up clean energy production through wind power,' Gov. Wes Moore said in a statement at the time. 'At a moment when families are feeling the strain of high energy bills, we should focus on cutting red tape, not halting critical infrastructure projects.' Have a news tip? Contact Todd Karpovich at tkarpovich@ or on X as @ToddKarpovich.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Road near bottlenecked I-77 Lake Norman exit to close for highway widening
Crews will temporarily close a road near a Lake Norman-area retail center anchored by Belk, Kohl's and Big Lots for the $249 million N.C. 150 widening project, state highway officials said Friday. Portestowne Way in Mooresville will be closed 8 a.m.-4 p.m. Monday, June 9, through Thursday, June 12, so crews can safely install a storm drain at the N.C. 150 intersection, according to the N.C. Department of Transportation. That's just east of Interstate 77 exit 36. Drivers will be detoured from Portestowne Way to Forester Street and Corporate Center Drive, and back onto N.C. 150. Crews plan to widen 15 miles of N.C. 150 from just west of the U.S. 21/N.C. 150 interchange in Mooresville to N.C. 16 Bypass in Catawba County. A 5.5-mile stretch from Greenwood Road in Terrell on the lake to U.S. 21 in Mooresville is under construction. Charlotte-based contractor Blythe Development LLC is expanding the highway from four to six lanes, officials said. Part of the stretch includes the old two-lane bridge over the lake. An additional bridge will carry westbound traffic, from Mooresville into Catawba County. Improvements to the bottlenecked I-77/N.C. 150 exit 36 interchange are planned.