logo
500 families in Oxford call for maternity unit to be investigated

500 families in Oxford call for maternity unit to be investigated

Sky News5 hours ago

Hours after giving birth, with her son rushed away to a high dependency unit, as she lay broken and bleeding, Morgan Joines overheard a midwife blaming her.
Her son had been born with wet lung after an emergency and traumatic caesarean section.
"I overheard [the midwife] tell a student nurse I was the reason my son was ill, because I was too lazy to push," she told Sky News.
"I was broken. I genuinely believed for ages afterwards that I had failed my son.
"I thought I was the reason he was ill."
Her son was born at John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford, part of the Oxford University's Hospital Trust. Morgan is one of more than 500 families who say they have been harmed by maternity care at the Trust.
On Monday, the health secretary, Wes Streeting, announced a .
A taskforce, chaired by Mr Streeting and made up of experts and bereaved families, will first investigate up to ten of the most concerning maternity and neonatal units.
And campaigners - calling themselves the Families Failed by OUH Maternity Services - are calling for Oxford to be on that initial list.
The unit was rated "requires improvement" in its last inspection by the government's watchdog, the Care Quality Commission, in April 2023.
The CQC flagged issues around maintaining patient dignity, and said medicines were not always safely stored and managed. The unit did not manage the control of infection consistently it said, and wards were not always kept clean.
One mum told the campaign group she thought she was going to die after being left alone while in labour and denied pain relief.
Another said she is reluctant to consider having another child and feels a "profound loss of trust in the NHS".
Trust to meet campaign group
Yvonne Christley, Chief Nursing Officer at OUH, said she apologised "for not being able to respond in detail about individual patient cases".
"We regret any instance where we fail to provide the service that women and their families should expect. When this happens, we make every effort to review individual cases to understand what went wrong and how we can improve."
She said the trust "make every effort" to keep women and families informed of what action it has taken, and said it is committed to maintaining an open dialogue with community groups.
"The Trust has agreed to meet with the campaign group and is eager to collaborate with them to implement the necessary changes and restore confidence in our services. These meetings are currently being scheduled."
Caesarean sections account for approximately 40% of all births at OUH.
A 'degrading strip wash'
A few hours after Morgan's son had been whisked away to another part of the hospital, a nurse tried to force her to take oramorph, a high strength painkiller, she said.
When she declined to take the drug, having previously had a bad reaction, she said staff "claimed I was being difficult".
"[They said] to just take the meds and get it over and done with."
When Morgan was unable to get out of bed, she says the same nurse then gave her a "degrading" strip wash, without her consent.
The unit, she said, felt like it was against C-sections.
"Even though it was recommended by doctors that I had caesarean, it was medically necessary, I felt I should have done more to help him," Morgan said.
Waiting eight hours for a C-section
When Kate* was 38 weeks pregnant with her third IVF baby, she was induced.
The doctors had tried to burst her waters, but realised her daughter was breech when the midwife felt her feet near the bottom of the birth canal, telling her: "I'm glad those didn't break, I think I just felt a foot."
At 11pm Kate reluctantly agreed to a C-section, but was told it was "safer to wait until the light of day" to go down to theatre.
She was sent away to an observation area experiencing intense contractions for more than six hours. In those hours, she said she was abandoned without pain relief and was bleeding.
"I felt so alone in the dead of night. My husband had been sent home, and I just wanted someone to talk to, someone to help me.
"I was in so much pain labouring but the midwife made me feel like a hypochondriac."
She said the situation was escalating, she was becoming dehydrated, and her daughter's heartrate was climbing, yet no one intervened.
A registrar who began his shift at 7am, examined her and rushed her immediately to theatre.
At this point she was 9cm dilated and the registrar was "shouting at me, telling me not to push."
Kate's daughter was her third IVF pregnancy, and she became emotional when she talked about what might have happened, had that registrar not examined her so quickly in the morning.
"They gambled with her life," she said.
"If my waters had broken and that registrar wasn't there, she would have started to come with her feet first. Both my boys had shot out, so I could be talking now as a mum who lost her child.
"It didn't need to even get to that point.
After she had given birth, she was left "in a pool of my own blood, just covered in blood" and had to pull herself out of bed to clean up.
She said she joined the campaign in the hopes women will be listened to in the future and not have to endure what she did.
'I can't get my baby out'
Annika Weldon had three miscarriages before giving birth to her son.
"I remember lying on the ward, screaming in pain and none of the other ladies around me were screaming like I was," she said.
"It didn't feel right, obviously when you go into labour you expect you are going to be in pain, but I just knew there was something not right."
The midwife who checked her when she was in active labour could not tell her if she was 1cm or 10cm dilated, she said.
"We spent 45 minutes trying to get my baby out but this midwife that I was with was just so uncaring, she didn't really explain what I should be doing."
She had said early in the pregnancy she told doctors she wanted a C-section and "was told I couldn't have one".
"I kind of accepted that unless it was an emergency situation, I wouldn't be able to have one but then in that moment I was like, I don't know what else I can do here. I feel completely exhausted; I can't get my baby out.
"I was just so tired and exhausted."
Her son was born not breathing and she was haemorrhaging blood.
She was taken to emergency surgery and the last thing she remembers before waking up in the ward is throwing up in her hair.
2:54
She wasn't told until much later the extent of her blood loss (2.5L) when she was struggling to pick up her own baby: "When I asked for help, I was made to feel like an inconvenience."
'OUH is particularly bad'
For Kim Thomas, co-founder of Families Failed by OUH Maternity Services and CEO of the Birth Trauma Association, these stories are nothing new.
But Oxford University Hospitals Trust is "particularly bad", she says.
"They seem to have this incredibly arrogant attitude. They won't take criticism.
"Women who complain are routinely dismissed. There's a failure to learn from mistakes."
She says OUH also has "poor postnatal care": "Dirty wards, blood on the floor, women left in their own blood, women not helped."
Yvonne Christley, from OUH, said: "We are never complacent and welcome all feedback, whether positive or negative, as we learn from both."
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: "Too many families have been devastated by serious failings in NHS maternity and neonatal care.
"They deserve swift answers, and urgent action is essential to prevent future tragedies."
They said the government was "immensely grateful" to families for sharing their experiences.
"[We] will work closely with families on this journey to help ensure no parent or baby is ever let down again."
The Oxford campaign group is growing daily, with more like Kate, Morgan and Annika joining the ranks of those calling for change.
And each day that passes without answers is a reminder of the trauma they endured.
"It still hurts to look back on. It's taken a while for me to stop blaming myself, but it doesn't get easier," Morgan said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

JK Rowling is right: The Guardian should be embarrassed by this pro-trans propaganda
JK Rowling is right: The Guardian should be embarrassed by this pro-trans propaganda

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

JK Rowling is right: The Guardian should be embarrassed by this pro-trans propaganda

The Guardian has long been celebrated for its typos. The other day, however, it ran a headline which appeared to have an entire word missing. It read: 'One in three across UK are overdue for cervical cancer screening.' One in three what? Mothers? Midwives? Marchionesses? Members of Bananarama? I scanned the article's intro to locate the mislaid noun. Unfortunately, though, I ended up even more confused. Because the answer turned out to be 'people'. 'A third of people across the UK,' reported someone with the unusual job title of health and inequalities correspondent, 'are overdue their cervical cancer screening, while in parts of England some are at greater risk of the disease than others due to a low uptake for the preventive vaccine.' Naturally, I was alarmed. Because 'a third of people across the UK' includes me. In all my 44 years on this Earth, I've never had a single screening for cervical cancer. Am I in danger? Should I ring my GP and demand a detailed inspection of my cervix as soon as possible? Then again, there is another way to interpret this story. Which is that the poor old Guardian is so desperate not to offend trans activists, it's got itself tied up in knots. Any sane newspaper, after all, would simply have used the word 'women'. But The Guardian daren't do that. Because then it would be besieged by horrified ideologues, irately reminding it that trans women are women but don't need cervical cancer screenings – while trans men are men but do need cervical cancer screenings. To use the word 'women', therefore, is hateful and trans-exclusionary. Sadly, there's just one drawback to The Guardian 's wonderfully inclusive approach. Which is that other readers will be baffled. They'll think: 'Does it mean a third of women? Or a sixth?' As JK Rowling put it on social media: 'This is what happens when you erase the word 'woman' from your reporting: you disseminate inaccuracies and falsehoods. If you prioritise an ideology over giving clear and accurate information, you aren't journalists, you're propagandists.' To be fair to The Guardian, however, it doesn't always get it wrong. Less than a month ago, it ran the headline: 'New AI Test can predict which men will benefit from prostate cancer drug.' So they are clear about the difference between men and women sometimes. When the cancer only affects men, anyway. Still, it would be nice if they and other progressive outlets could be consistent. In an important medical context, such nonsense is enough to give you a thumping headache.

‘We haven't learned anything': Readers despair over UK's Covid response in 2025
‘We haven't learned anything': Readers despair over UK's Covid response in 2025

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

‘We haven't learned anything': Readers despair over UK's Covid response in 2025

Big disasters often change how we see the world. The Lisbon earthquake in 1755 shook people's faith in religion. After the 1918 flu pandemic, there was growing interest in fresh air, better hygiene, and healthier living spaces – ideas that influenced architecture and public health policy at the time. Covid, though? So far, the public inquiry has focused more on WhatsApp messages and political drama than on the bigger lessons. But many Independent readers believe there were lessons, but we haven't necessarily learned from them. Before the pandemic, there were fears that people wouldn't cope with restrictions – that 'behavioural fatigue' would kick in and we'd all give up. That fear led to delays in lockdown and, in the end, cost tens of thousands of lives. But that view turned out to be wrong. Faced with a shared threat, most people acted with care and responsibility. Communities pulled together. Many went without seeing loved ones, missed work, lost income – all to protect others. Now, readers feel much of that collective effort has vanished. When we asked for your views, you told us that people no longer wear masks on public transport, and sick people are back in offices and schools. The things we learned – about clean air, proper sick pay, the importance of staying home when ill – are being forgotten, even though the virus hasn't gone away. Many of you told us that the return to 'normal' is anything but normal. You're frustrated by the lack of public messaging, the scrapping of protections, and the ongoing risks, especially from long Covid. Here's what you had to say: Covid is more like polio than flu Unfortunately, Covid is still here, still causing ill health and disability. Doing nothing is a false economy: in terms of impact, Covid is more like polio than flu – and we don't ignore polio. We don't need extreme measures, but good ventilation, FFP masks (especially in healthcare), HEPA filters in enclosed spaces like classrooms, wards, clinics and offices would all make a difference and aren't difficult. Reversing the removal of NHS vaccination from most groups, and ensuring access to vaccines and antivirals – the norm in other countries that are doing better – is essential. Multiple Covid infections, even if mild, increase the chance of complications, including cardiac, and damage the immune system, making it harder to shake off other infections. Long covid is now the most common illness in US children, and the UK is on the same trajectory, for the same reason. In children, Covid can cause metabolic dysfunction and lead to diabetes. This is all avoidable. Housemartin We know what to do – we're just not doing it We haven't learned anything. We need clean air in public spaces (especially schools and health settings); proper sick pay; to stop the ridiculous pressure to send infectious children into school; better public information about the benefits of masks and ventilation; use of high-quality masks where appropriate (certainly for people with symptoms, and routinely in healthcare settings and for travel); and vaccines available to anyone who wants one. Affordable tests should also be widely available. We know what to do to reduce the spread of Covid – we're just not doing any of it. Kittensarecute We didn't learn anything No, we didn't learn anything from the Covid pandemic. It was all done through panic. It wasn't handled right at all, money was wasted, and greedy firms faked the prices to make obscene profits. No medical authority had the faintest clue how to handle it. This must never happen again – separating families, causing misery and sheer panic. We have had pandemics before and will again. Lessons must be learned from that last fiasco and handled totally differently. People will catch it regardless of what they do; it cannot be avoided. Time for a total rethink from these so-called medical experts. Annieinthecastle Long Covid is the main danger The main danger with Covid is getting long Covid. The science says no one is immune to suffering from it, and it's likely a lifelong chronic condition that could end your ability to work. 3.2 million English people know that is what they are suffering from, and the number goes up every year. The only defence we really have against Covid now, since most of the vaccines have been withheld, is wearing an FFP2/3 respirator, which is hugely effective at stopping infection. These masks also stop hay fever and most other infections as well. People who have started wearing them haven't been sick in years. Paul Covid could be eradicated – but there's no will Covid-19 could be eradicated pretty easily in this country with ventilation, investment in proper HEPA infrastructure in all public buildings, a functioning vaccination programme, and – most importantly of all – those who can mask to wear FFP2 or FFP3 respirators when indoors anywhere. If the government could be bothered to protect our public health, it should lock down the country – properly – for a couple of weeks. With all that in place, it would disappear. There is no will or impetus among our leaders to protect us from this incredibly disabling illness. Bumblebee Covid is here to stay. There is growing consensus it probably escaped from a lab, and it will carry on rapidly mutating – picking off the vulnerable and elderly – saving governments a bit of cash, somewhat offset by the cost of Long Covid. I mask in shops but rarely see anyone else doing so. Sooner or later, a vicious strain will emerge, and we'll be back to square one. Galileo666 Learn from countries like Japan We should take the findings of other countries ahead of us into account – e.g. Japan on the spread of the virus – and improve ventilation of buildings, trains and buses... even doctors' waiting rooms in the winter! Jennifer Covid is an inconvenient fact Covid is an inconvenient fact that governments and the right-wing press prefer to suppress. Sadly, it's still very much around, and it's still killing the old, the very young and those with a compromised immune system. It's also leaving a trail of devastation in the shape of long-term damage caused by long Covid. And all of this relates just to people – there's also the impact on the economy. Drugs which would have enabled the immunocompromised to live normal lives (hundreds of thousands are still shielding) have been denied by the UK government to cut costs. Drugs like Paxlovid – literally a life-saver for any immunocompromised person unlucky enough to contract Covid – have been made near-impossible to access. The treatment of immunocompromised people by this government and previous ones is shameful. And to cap it all, there are still plenty of clowns around who somehow feel threatened by anyone taking the sensible precaution of wearing a mask, and feel the need to mock or display outright aggression. DavidM The conversation isn't over. To join in, all you need to do is register your details, then you can take part in the discussion. You can also sign up by clicking 'log in' on the top right-hand corner of the screen.

Bilston Indoor Market hosts cancer awareness drop-in sessions
Bilston Indoor Market hosts cancer awareness drop-in sessions

BBC News

time2 hours ago

  • BBC News

Bilston Indoor Market hosts cancer awareness drop-in sessions

A series of cancer awareness drop-in sessions will begin later at Wolverhampton are being invited to Bilston Indoor Market to get information and advice about the signs and symptoms of the disease, screening programmes and treatment, as well as how to enjoy a healthier will be available about the three main NHS screening programmes, for breast, bowel and cervical cancer, including when people will be invited and what is of Wolverhampton Council, which will be working with the NHS sessions, said the first will be taking place later on, and on future Thursdays - 17 and 31 July, 14 and 28 August and 11 September. People will be shown how to check for symptoms of cancer and what to do if they have Ahmed, council cabinet member for health, wellbeing and community, said she would encourage anyone with questions on the signs and symptoms of cancer, screening, diagnosis and treatment to attend a session."Reducing harm from cancer through education and awareness, and promoting the uptake of cancer screening, are key public health priorities for us, and we continue to work with our NHS colleagues to take this important work forward," she drop-in session later and on the other dates, will run from 09:30 to 13:30 BST. Health checks will also be available on 17 July, 14 August and 11 September. Follow BBC Wolverhampton & Black Country on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store