Diddy's trial judge told prosecutors to move on from their flood of baby oil questions
Sean Combs' defense lawyers objected on Tuesday after prosecutors asked R&B singer Cassie Ventura some 20 times about the baby oil she said the millionaire rapper demanded be used in multiple "freak off" sex performances.
Details of the private, at-the-bench discussion — during which the sides debated how many baby oil questions are too many — were released Tuesday night, and revealed a wisecrack by Combs' lead lawyer.
"I was going to say slippery slope," the lawyer, Marc Agnifilo, joked after the judge said prosecutors might be nearing the point of overkill on the topic. "But I'm not going to say it."
The defense objection and sidebar discussion briefly interrupted Ventura's first day of testimony at Combs' federal racketeering and sex trafficking trial in Manhattan.
Prosecutors are using Ventura's very detailed testimony about baby oil, drugs, lubricants, candles, and other alleged freak off supplies to bolster the charge that Combs personally "orchestrated" these elaborately-planned, dayslong sex performances.
Combs demanded that heated Johnson's baby oil be available in large quantities for the nearly weekly encounters, during which he would film male escorts and strippers having sex with Ventura, according to her testimony and the indictment.
"Everyone," she replied when prosecutor Emily A. Johnson asked who would apply the oil.
"You need to be glistening," she said Combs would repeatedly demand.
The defense objection was raised after Ventura described a freak off she said happened at the L'Ermitage hotel in Beverly Hills. Combs demanded that a blow-up pool be brought to their hotel suite there, and that it be "filled with lube and oil," she told jurors.
"Did you get into the pool?" Johnson asked.
"I did, with my outfit, my shoes," she said, referring to footwear she'd previously described as platform high heels. "It was quite dangerous."
"It was his idea," she said of Combs. "I couldn't say no," she said, for fear of his violent temper.
"Were there freak offs where you ran out of baby oil?" Johnson asked.
At this point, Anna Estevao, who is expected to do the cross-examination of Ventura on Wednesday, objected, telling the judge that the testimony was "getting a little cumulative."
"Let's see if we can wrap this up and move on," the judge responded.
But when Johnson's next question involved "Astroglide," and Estevao objected again, the sidebar was called.
Outside the jury's hearing, the judge asked the prosecutor for "some guidance as to where we're going next."
Johnson responded that she intended to "go through the various supplies that were used, because those are supplies that were demanded by the defendant, that were at every freak off."
These supplies were consistent and "showed how he controlled the events that happened at these freak offs," she told the judge.
"I will not ask any more oil questions," she added.
Ventura's testimony continued Wednesday and is expected to last into Thursday.
On Wednesday morning, Ventura was shown the last of some 15 photos of male strippers and escorts she said were involved in the freak offs over the course of a decade, starting when she was in her early 20s.
"Did you have sex with all the individuals that we saw, during those freak offs?" Johnson asked.
"Yes," Ventura answered, her voice quiet and her expression grim.
"Sean's money," she said when asked who paid for the escorts.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Political violence is threaded through recent U.S. history. The motives and justifications vary
The assassination of one Democratic Minnesota state lawmaker and her husband and the shooting of another lawmaker and his wife at their homes are just the latest addition to a long and unsettling roll call of political violence in the United States. The list, in the last two months alone: the killing of two Israeli Embassy staffers in Washington, D.C.; the firebombing of a Colorado march calling for the release of Israeli hostages; and the firebombing of the official residence of Pennsylvania's governor — on a Jewish holiday while he and his family were inside. Here is a sampling of other attacks before that — the assassination of a healthcare executive on the streets of New York City late last year; the attempted assassination of Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania rally during his presidential campaign last year; the 2022 attack on the husband of then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) by a believer in right-wing conspiracy theories; and the 2017 shooting of Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.) by a gunman at a congressional softball game practice. 'We've entered into this especially scary time in the country where it feels the sort of norms and rhetoric and rules that would tamp down on violence have been lifted,' said Matt Dallek, a political scientist at Georgetown University who studies extremism. 'A lot of people are receiving signals from the culture.' Politics have also driven large-scale massacres. Gunmen who killed 11 worshipers at a synagogue in Pittsburgh in 2018, 23 shoppers at a heavily Latino Walmart in El Paso in 2019 and 10 Black people at a Buffalo, N.Y., grocery store in 2022 each cited the conspiracy theory that a secret cabal of Jews was trying to replace white people with people of color. That has become a staple on parts of the right that support Trump's push to limit immigration. The Anti-Defamation League found that from 2022 through 2024, all of the 61 political killings in the United States were committed by right-wing extremists. That changed on the first day of 2025, when a Texas man flying the flag of the Islamic State group killed 14 people by driving his truck through a crowded New Orleans street before being fatally shot by police. 'You're seeing acts of violence from all different ideologies,' said Jacob Ware, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations who researches terrorism. 'It feels more random and chaotic and more frequent.' The United States has a long and grim history of political violence, including presidential assassinations dating to the killing of President Abraham Lincoln, lynchings and other violence aimed at Black people in the South, and the 1954 shooting inside Congress by four Puerto Rican nationalists. Experts say the last few years, however, have reached a level not seen since the tumultuous days of the 1960s and 1970s, when political leaders the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., President Kennedy, Malcolm X and Robert F. Kennedy were assassinated. Ware noted that the most recent surge comes after the new Trump administration has closed units that focus on investigating white supremacist extremism and pushed federal law enforcement to spend less time on anti-terrorism and more on detaining people who are in the country illegally. 'We're at the point, after these six weeks, where we have to ask about how effectively the Trump administration is combating terrorism,' Ware said. One of Trump's first acts in office was to pardon those involved in the largest act of domestic political violence this century — the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol by a pro-Trump mob intended to prevent Congress from certifying Trump's 2020 election loss. Those pardons broadcast a signal to would-be extremists on either side of the political debate, Dallek said: 'They sent a very strong message that violence, as long as you're a Trump supporter, will be permitted and may be rewarded.' Often, those who engage in political violence don't have clearly defined ideologies that easily map onto the country's partisan divides. A man who died after he detonated a car bomb outside a Palm Springs fertility clinic last month left writings urging people not to procreate and expressed what the FBI called 'nihilistic ideations.' But each political attack seems to inspire partisans to find evidence the attacker is on the other side. Little was known about the man police identified as a suspect in the Minnesota attacks, 57-year-old Vance Boelter. Authorities say they found a list of other apparent targets that included other Democratic officials, abortion clinics and abortion rights advocates, as well as fliers for the day's anti-Trump 'No Kings' parades. Conservatives online seized on the fliers — and the fact that Boelter had apparently once been reappointed to a state workforce development board by Democratic Gov. Tim Walz — to claim the suspect must be a liberal. 'The far left is murderously violent,' billionaire Elon Musk posted on his social media site, X. It was reminiscent of the fallout from the attack on Paul Pelosi, the former House speaker's then-82-year-old husband, who was seriously injured by a man wielding a hammer. Right-wing figures falsely theorized the assailant was a secret lover rather than what authorities said he was: a believer in pro-Trump conspiracy theories who broke into the Pelosi home echoing Jan. 6 rioters who broke into the Capitol by saying: 'Where is Nancy?!' No prominent Republican ever denounced the Pelosi assault, and GOP leaders including Trump joked about the attack at public events in its aftermath. On Saturday, Nancy Pelosi posted a statement on X decrying the Minnesota attack. 'All of us must remember that it's not only the act of violence, but also the reaction to it, that can normalize it,' she wrote. After mocking the Pelosis after the 2022 attack, Trump on Saturday joined in the bipartisan condemnation of the Minnesota shootings, calling them 'horrific violence.' The president has, however, consistently broken new ground with his bellicose rhetoric toward his political opponents, whom he routinely calls 'sick' and 'evil,' and has talked repeatedly about how violence is needed to quell protests. The Minnesota attack occurred after Trump took the extraordinary step of mobilizing the military to try to control protests against his administration's immigration operations in Los Angeles during the last week, when he pledged to 'HIT' disrespectful protesters and warned of a 'migrant invasion' of the city. Dallek said Trump has been 'both a victim and an accelerant' of the charged, dehumanizing political rhetoric that is flooding the country. 'It feels as if the extremists are in the saddle,' he said, 'and the extremists are the ones driving our rhetoric and politics.' Riccardi writes for the Associated Press.


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Pence says Minnesota shooting ‘must be universally condemned'
Former Vice President Mike Pence said the fatal shooting of state Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman (D) and her husband over the weekend 'must be universally condemned' and that there is 'no antidote for law and order.' 'There is no antidote for law and order, for making it very clear that there will be no tolerance in this country for political violence, whatever its motivation,' he said during an appearance on 'The Hill Sunday.' 'And I believe instances such as this must be universally condemned.' Pence's condemnation comes as officials continue their manhunt for the suspect in the shooting of Hortman (D) and her husband on Saturday, Vance Boelter. The 57-year-old is also suspected of shooting and wounding state Sen. John Hoffman (D) and his wife. A $50,000 award is being offered for information leading to Boelter's arrest and conviction. Host Chris Stirewalt asked Pence how the U.S. can 'break out of this cycle that seems to be afflicting us year after year,' to which the Indiana Republican replied, 'Swift and certain law enforcement.' 'Look, I know there's always a temptation for people to look at trends,' he added, noting an incident in 2017 when then-House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) and others were shot during a congressional baseball practice. Pence said he denounced shifting any blame at the time, mentioning that the shooter, James T. Hodgkinson, supported Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and volunteered for the Vermont senator's presidential campaign. Immediately after the revelation, Sanders criticized Hodgkinson's actions, calling the shooting 'a despicable act.' 'Now, as we live in a time when we've seen two assassination attempts on President Trump during his campaign, when we've seen an attack on the home of the governor of Pennsylvania, attack on Jewish protesters, I honestly think the answer here is to see that these people are prosecuted swiftly and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,' Pence said.


The Intercept
10 hours ago
- The Intercept
Why Did NBC Delete Its 'Dateline' Episode on Diddy?
On May 11, NBC premiered a 'Dateline' episode describing Combs's various past legal entanglements. Less than a month later, the episode has now disappeared both from NBC's website as well as from Peacock, NBC's streaming service. The removal comes as NBC and Peacock face a defamation lawsuit from Combs over a separate news documentary. The Dateline episode, titled 'Sean Combs on Trial,' has been entirely wiped from the networks' official streaming platforms, with only promotional materials remaining scattered online, such as a trailer, a publicity piece, and official social media posts. The episode's logline described it as a 'report on Sean 'Diddy' Combs' life.' The show summarizes Combs's rise to fame and his litany of past legal troubles, culminating with the present trial over charges of racketeering, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution. Combs has pleaded not guilty to the charges and rejected a plea deal. An NBC spokesperson told The Intercept that once the trial began on May 12, the 'Dateline' episode that aired the previous day had become outdated. NBC would not elaborate on which specific portions of the episode had become outdated and warranted the episode being taken down, since the bulk of the program is not about the current trial. Only the first three and last seven minutes of the 41-minute episode focus on Combs's present indictment. NBC also declined to comment on whether or how often Dateline episodes removes episodes because they have become outdated, and what criteria is used before scrubbing a show from NBC's platforms. 'Dateline' episodes that air before trials don't always appear to be removed from the program's official streaming portals. For instance, the fourth episode of the show's current 33rd season, 'The Night of the Nor'easter,' focuses on Karen Read, who stands accused of killing her boyfriend. The episode originally premiered on October 18, 2024 — some three months after Read's initial trial was declared a mistrial; a retrial began in April 2025. Although Read's second trial is presently ongoing, the original 'Dateline' episode remains online despite presenting now outdated information. For instance, the episode mentions that Read's lawyers are appealing a judge's decision to reject their attempt to dismiss several of the charges. The appeal was denied in February 2025, four months after the 'Dateline' episode aired. The 'Dateline' episode that aired two days before the Combs episode, 'The Terrible Night on King Road,' also discusses an upcoming trial. Bryan Kohberger, who is accused of the killings of four University of Idaho students, is scheduled to stand trial in August. The episode remains online on Peacock, although there have been new developments since the episode aired. The case judge issued a document hold order, as the episode contained nonpublic information about the case that the judge believes someone either in law enforcement or on the prosecution team provided Dateline with. Kohberger's attorneys also requested a delay in the trial, citing the 'Dateline' episode. In February, Combs filed a lawsuit against NBC and Peacock, seeking a minimum of $100 million in damages owing to allegedly false and defamatory statements against Combs in another NBC documentary, 'Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy.' The complaint was filed three months before the Dateline 'Sean Combs on Trial' episode aired. NBC would not comment on the record about whether the removal of the Dateline episode was related to the defamation lawsuit. Combs's lawyers did not respond to a request for a comment. Dateline continues to host a daily podcast about the trial. NBC has also joined a number of other media outlets in asking the court to allow cameras inside the courtroom. The Combs defamation suit against NBC comes amid a sweep of prominent public figures filing cases against the media. Kash Patel, who was selected by Trump to be the reigning FBI director, previously sued CNN for defamation for claiming that he spread conspiracy theories about then-President Joe Biden. That defamation suit was dismissed, though Patel is now filing a new defamation suit, this time against MSNBC over reporting on the amount of time he allegedly spent at nightclubs. Trump has recently announced that he is suing CBS for defamation, though the threatened lawsuit doesn't appear to have come to fruition as of yet. Parent company Paramount has also reportedly offered $15 million to settle another suit by Trump against CBS for allegedly deceptive editing practices. In court on Tuesday, meanwhile, one of Combs's exes testified that 'Dateline' is Combs's favorite TV show.