
'Historic step': UK MPs back assisted dying; bill heads to House of Lords
AP photo
Britain took a historic step toward legalising
euthanasia
on Friday as Members of Parliament (MPs) backed a controversial bill that would introduce assisted dying for terminally ill people.
In the House of Commons, lawmakers voted 314 to 291 in favour of sending the proposal to the House of Lords for further consideration, following four hours of emotional debate.
The outcome sparked celebrations among supporters gathered outside Parliament, who argued that legalising euthanasia would offer dignity and choice to people facing incurable illnesses at the end of their lives.
At the same time, opponents at a nearby counter-protest voiced concerns that vulnerable individuals could be pressured into choosing death and called on lawmakers to instead prioritise improvements in palliative care.
The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill would allow assisted suicide in England and Wales for adults diagnosed with less than six months to live. Under the proposed law, individuals would need to self-administer the life-ending medication, and their decision would require approval from two doctors and a panel of experts.
If passed, the bill would bring Britain in line with several countries in Europe and elsewhere — such as Belgium and the Netherlands — that have already legalised some form of assisted dying.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Costco Shoppers Say This Wrinkle Cream Is "Actually Worth It"
The Skincare Magazine
Undo
'Heartbreaking stories'
Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who introduced the bill, told Friday's third reading debate that changing the law would 'offer a compassionate and safe choice' to terminally ill people.
She argued that keeping the current ban in place would result in more 'heartbreaking stories' of 'pain and trauma, suicide attempts, PTSD, lonely trips to Switzerland, (and) police investigations.'
However, Labour MP Vicky Foxcroft raised concerns that the bill did not include strong enough safeguards to protect disabled individuals.
'We have to protect those people who are susceptible to coercion, who already feel like society doesn't value them, who often feel like a burden to the state, society and their family,' she said.
Outside Parliament, demonstrators held placards with messages such as 'Let us choose' and 'Don't make doctors killers.'
David Walker, 82, shared his personal story of supporting the bill after witnessing his wife suffer for three years toward the end of her life.
'That's why I'm here, because I can't help her anymore, but I can help other people who are going through the same thing, because if you have no quality of life, you have nothing,' he told AFP.
But Elizabeth Burden, a 52-year-old doctor, warned that the legislation could lead to a 'slippery slope' where eligibility for assisted dying might expand.
'Once we allow this. Everything will slip down because dementia patients, all patients...
are vulnerable,' she told AFP.
Public support
MPs had initially backed an earlier version of the bill in November by 330 to 275 votes. Since then, several changes have been made, including a ban on advertising assisted dying and provisions allowing all healthcare workers to opt out of participating in the process.
Lawmakers also added a safeguard to prevent eligibility 'solely as a result of voluntarily stopping eating or drinking,' effectively ruling out cases such as people with anorexia.
Britain's medical community remains divided, and Prime Minister Keir Starmer's cabinet is also split. His health and justice secretaries have publicly opposed the proposed law.
However, public support appears strong. A YouGov poll of 2,003 adults, conducted last month and published on Thursday, found that 73 per cent of respondents supported the introduction of an assisted dying law.
The bill now moves to the House of Lords, which must approve the legislation before the end of the current parliamentary year, likely in the autumn, or it will lapse.
If passed and granted royal assent, the law would take approximately four years to implement before assisted dying services become available.
A government impact assessment published this month estimated that between 160 and 640 assisted deaths could take place in the first year, potentially rising to 4,500 annually within a decade.
Assisted suicide is currently illegal in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, carrying a maximum prison sentence of 14 years.
Meanwhile, a separate assisted dying bill is progressing through the devolved Scottish Parliament. In March, the Isle of Man became the first British territory to pass an assisted dying bill.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Putin warns about World War III, points to Ukraine war and Israel-Iran conflict Middle in East
Russian President Vladimir Putin raised serious concerns over a potential World War III during a key address at the 28th St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF). Speaking during a plenary session, Putin said rising regional tensions must not be taken lightly. "It does concern me. There is no irony about it, this is no joke," Putin said, responding to a journalist who asked if he feared the world was heading toward WW3. Putin pointed to several ongoing crises. He cited his own country's war against Ukraine, instability in the Middle East, and recent attacks on nuclear facilities in Iran by Israel . 'These conflicts need serious attention and peaceful solutions,' he said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search ads Search Now Undo He also revealed he had spoken with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, and US President Donald Trump. Putin said Russia had shared its vision for resolving the Iran-Israel crisis and hoped those proposals would be implemented. The Russian leader criticized western dominance and said the world is undergoing a shift in power. "The G7's share of the global economy is shrinking. BRICS is growing. These are objective trends, and the changes they bring are inevitable," he said. Live Events Putin said Russia and China were not forcing a new world order but were helping shape a more balanced one. 'It is rising naturally, like the sun,' he added. He reiterated his claim that Russians and Ukrainians are one people. 'In that sense, all of Ukraine is ours,' he said. However, he added that Russia has never opposed any nation's desire for sovereignty. He accused Kyiv of rejecting early peace proposals and said Ukraine refused to withdraw troops from disputed territories. 'From the outset, we urged Kiev to end the conflict. They refused,' Putin said.


Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill': Senate aims for passage by this date; hopes to finalise it 'even sooner'
Senator Ron Johnson said there's a strong chance that Donald Trump 's "Big Beautiful Bill" could be passed by the Senate and land on the US president's desk by July, possibly before the August recess. "I think we can do it before the August recess, yes, and maybe even sooner than that," Johnson told Fox News. President Trump has earlier urged Congress to send the bill to his desk by July 4, calling it "arguably the most significant piece of legislation that will ever be signed in the history of our country." — bennyjohnson (@bennyjohnson) The wide-ranging legislative package — formally known as the "One, Big, Beautiful Bill" bundles together major tax reforms, spending cuts, and border security proposals that aim to reshape key areas of American policy. At its core, the over 1,000-page bill seeks to make Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent while adding new tax breaks, such as deductions for tips, overtime, and car loan interest. It also proposes raising the standard deduction to $32,000 for joint filers, boosting the child tax credit to $2,500, and offering a $4,000 deduction for certain seniors. But the bill has sparked backlash over proposed cuts to federal programs. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Thị trường có dấu hiệu suy thoái không? IC Markets Đăng ký Undo It includes major reductions in spending on Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill could cut SNAP spending by $295 billion over the next decade and push around 3.2 million people off the program each month by tightening work requirements and shifting more costs to states. While Republicans hold a slight majority in the Senate (53-47), opposition remains — not just from Democrats but also from some GOP senators worried about impacts on vulnerable populations and the potential to worsen the federal deficit.


Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Uttarakhand HC seeks affidavit on vet doctors' transfer norms
Dehradun: The division bench of Chief Justice G Narendar and Justice Alok Mahra, while hearing petitions challenging transfer regulations of veterinary doctors on Friday, directed the animal husbandry secretary to review the objections and file a report along with an affidavit within two weeks. Secretary BVRC Purushottam appeared via video conferencing as per court instructions. The court questioned the transfer process, observing discrepancies between the existing regulations and their implementation. Petitioners stated that the regulations clearly mention employees above 55 years of age or those suffering from serious health conditions should not be transferred. However, these rules were overlooked. "Staff with minor ailments like diabetes or uric acid were retained at their posts, while those with serious conditions were transferred to remote locations," the petitioners' counsel argued. The petition cited the example of Dr Ravishankar Jha, stationed in Gadarpur, who had recently undergone bypass surgery. Despite ranking 21st on the departmental transfer list, he was transferred to Narsan, Haridwar, while several others ahead of him on the list remained unaffected, violating departmental norms. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The regulations prohibit transfers for employees above 55 years. The court stressed that illness-based transfer exemptions "should rely on annual certificates from the state medical board" to avoid misuse of medical grounds for avoiding remote postings. It advised the department to cross-check medical records against state medical board reports during transfer processes. The matter arose after several veterinary officers challenged their transfer orders, claiming a violation of rules despite their long service in difficult areas and serious health issues.