Guthrie County residents push back against carbon pipeline plan
GUTHRIE COUNTY, Iowa – Emotions are running high in one Central Iowa county over the recent presence of carbon pipeline land surveyors.
Members of the Guthrie County community are banding together and said they will do all they can to prevent the Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline project from passing through their properties.
'We go all the way to where you can see there would be a fence line down there,' said Angie Crowder, pointing out her property line near Guthrie Center. 'It's been in the family forever.'
Crowder's front porch looks out over their generational property. She and her husband, Ken, have become increasingly unsettled over seeing land surveyors wearing orange vests walking across their field in recent days. The route for the proposed pipeline project would cut right through their property. Something they said has them worried about the project's construction, its impact on property values, and safety risks.
'This is supposed to be our forever home, and I don't know that I can say that, that this is going to be our forever home,' she told WHO-13.
Summit Carbon Solutions states on its website that it has reached agreements with more than 2,700 landowners encompassing nearly 4,500 parcels of land. However, the Crowders are not alone in Guthrie County in their concerns. The recent presence of pipeline land surveyors has put numerous landowners there on edge. When a WHO-13 crew showed up to interview Crowder at her home on Tuesday afternoon, they were surprised to find more than two dozen locals had turned out wearing anti-pipeline garb to support her.
'There is no amount of money that is ever going to make me sign anything that they put in front of me unless it's by force,' said Darlene Partlow.
Partlow lives in nearby Adair County, but said her land crosses into Guthrie. She and her son, as well as a collective of other neighbors, said they have been helping to keep tabs on the surveyors and their locations from day to day.
'They seem to think that because they sent them, they have permission, and they do not,' she said.
Partlow said the surveyors accessed her property after being asked not to. However, pipeline land surveyors are within their rights to access private property while conducting their surveys under Iowa Code 354.4A. The code states, in part, that a land surveyor may enter private land to 'locate boundaries, rights-of-way, and easements, to determine geodetic positions, and to make surveys and maps.'
Surveyors are not allowed to enter buildings or other structures located on the land. They must be licensed under chapter 542B, or working under the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor. The code states that their vehicles must be marked on the exterior by a legible sign listing the name, address, and telephone number of the land surveyor or the firm that employed the land surveyor. Surveyors should announce and identify themselves and their intentions before accessing private property and provide written notice to the landowner or tenant at least seven days before.
Some Guthrie County residents alleged that some of these stipulations were not followed. WHO-13 emailed a list of follow-up questions to Summit Carbon Solutions early Friday morning, but has not yet heard back.
354.4aDownload
An Iowa Supreme Court ruling over a Hardin County case in late 2024 also helped to pave the way for pipeline survey crews.
Earlier in the week, a spokesperson for Summit Carbon Solutions confirmed that they have numerous surveyors working in the field and that the crews are in the process of conducting multiple types of surveys.
A spokesperson provided the following statement on Tuesday:
'Our contracted surveyors are expected to remain respectful and professional at all times. For boundary surveys, our teams operate within the public road right-of-way. For civil surveys, they follow the proposed pipeline route. These surveys are essential to responsibly design and engineer a pipeline—ensuring accuracy, safety, and minimal impact. We follow the same legal framework that applies to all utilities in Iowa, as outlined in Iowa Code 354.4A, and have gone above the regulatory requirement by notifying landowners via certified mail.'
Sabrina Ahmed Zenor, Director of Stakeholder Engagement and Corporate Communications for Summit Carbon Solutions
However, Guthrie County residents are not letting go of their land without a fight.
'We're exhausting every effort that we can,' said Candice Salvin.
WHO-13 cameras were rolling on Wednesday morning as a small group of Guthrie County residents joined landowners from several other impacted counties at the state Capitol to take their concerns to Governor Kim Reynolds. Governor Reynolds was not available, and the group provided their contact information and was told a meeting would be set up.
On Thursday, a new Guthrie County ordinance went into effect. Survey Permit Ordinance 25-38 established permit requirements for surveying certain parcels of land in the county.
Signed_Survey-Permit-Ordinance-25-38_Approved-4.8.25Download
WHO-13 also reached out to the Governor's office to see if a meeting between the Governor and Guthrie County landowners had been scheduled, but did not hear back. The landowners said they had not heard from the Governor's Office after their visit.
On its website, Summit Carbon Solutions states it is 'committed to driving job growth across the Midwest, decarbonizing industrial processes and providing a substantial boost to the ethanol and agricultural industries,' which are critical to the U.S. economy. It includes a 'Get the Facts' page and 'Landowner FAQs' section, as well as other information regarding the proposed pipeline plan.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

2 days ago
Judge rules Abrego Garcia's lawyers can seek sanctions against government
The judge overseeing the case of wrongly deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia on Wednesday granted a request from his attorneys to file a motion seeking sanctions against the government for failing to comply with discovery requests. U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis in April ordered the Trump administration to provide discovery evidence showing the process by which Abrego Garcia was mistakenly deported to his native El Salvador despite him being issued a 2019 court order barring his deportation to his home country due to the fear of persecution. Wednesday's order from Xinis comes after Abrego Garcia's attorneys said in a court filing that some of the discovery productions by the government include "highly redacted internal messages" and other materials that were classified as "Confidential or Attorney's Eyes Only" -- without a motion to designate the items as being under seal. The judge directed the government to file its response within seven days of the motion's filing. In a separate order Wednesday, Judge Xinis ordered the unsealing of several filings related to the court's order for expedited discovery, including the transcript of a nonpublic hearing that was held on April 30. Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran native who had been living with his wife and children in Maryland, was deported in March to El Salvador's CECOT mega-prison after the Trump administration claimed he was a member of the criminal gang MS-13. His wife and attorneys deny that he is an MS-13 member. Judge Xinis ruled in April that the Trump administration must "facilitate" Abrego Garcia's return to the United States, and the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously affirmed that ruling, "with due regard for the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign affairs." On Monday, Abrego Garcia's attorneys filed a response to a motion by the government to dismiss the case, calling the argument for dismissal a "jurisdictional gambit." "The Government asks this Court to accept a shocking proposition: that federal officers may snatch residents of this country and deposit them in foreign prisons in admitted violation of federal law, while no court in the United States has jurisdiction to do anything about it," the attorneys said in the filing. "This Court, the Fourth Circuit, and the Supreme Court each rejected that jurisdictional gambit," the attorneys said. "All three courts unanimously affirmed a preliminary injunction that the Government must facilitate the return of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia from El Salvador to the United States." In their 26-page filing, Abrego Garcia's attorneys also said there is no indication to date that the government has tried to take all available steps in good faith to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return. "History shows that when the Government makes good faith efforts to facilitate someone's return, it succeeds," they said. "Defendants' refusal to seek Abrego Garcia's return in good faith, while simultaneously claiming his return is out of their hands, does not negate redressability." The attorneys asked the court to shorten the government's time to file a reply brief from 14 days to seven days, saying that "further briefing on recycled arguments should not prolong a case that has already dragged on far too long for Abrego Garcia and his family."
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Judge rules Abrego Garcia's lawyers can seek sanctions against government
The judge overseeing the case of wrongly deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia on Wednesday granted a request from his attorneys to file a motion seeking sanctions against the government for failing to comply with discovery requests. U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis in April ordered the Trump administration to provide discovery evidence showing the process by which Abrego Garcia was mistakenly deported to his native El Salvador despite him being issued a 2019 court order barring his deportation to his home country due to the fear of persecution. Wednesday's order from Xinis comes after Abrego Garcia's attorneys said in a court filing that some of the discovery productions by the government include "highly redacted internal messages" and other materials that were classified as "Confidential or Attorney's Eyes Only" -- without a motion to designate the items as being under seal. MORE: In unsealed declaration, Rubio claims disclosing some information about Abrego Garcia case would cause 'significant harm' to national security The judge directed the government to file its response within seven days of the motion's filing. In a separate order Wednesday, Judge Xinis ordered the unsealing of several filings related to the court's order for expedited discovery, including the transcript of a nonpublic hearing that was held on April 30. Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran native who had been living with his wife and children in Maryland, was deported in March to El Salvador's CECOT mega-prison after the Trump administration claimed he was a member of the criminal gang MS-13. His wife and attorneys deny that he is an MS-13 member. Judge Xinis ruled in April that the Trump administration must "facilitate" Abrego Garcia's return to the United States, and the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously affirmed that ruling, "with due regard for the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign affairs." On Monday, Abrego Garcia's attorneys filed a response to a motion by the government to dismiss the case, calling the argument for dismissal a "jurisdictional gambit." "The Government asks this Court to accept a shocking proposition: that federal officers may snatch residents of this country and deposit them in foreign prisons in admitted violation of federal law, while no court in the United States has jurisdiction to do anything about it," the attorneys said in the filing. "This Court, the Fourth Circuit, and the Supreme Court each rejected that jurisdictional gambit," the attorneys said. "All three courts unanimously affirmed a preliminary injunction that the Government must facilitate the return of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia from El Salvador to the United States." In their 26-page filing, Abrego Garcia's attorneys also said there is no indication to date that the government has tried to take all available steps in good faith to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return. "History shows that when the Government makes good faith efforts to facilitate someone's return, it succeeds," they said. "Defendants' refusal to seek Abrego Garcia's return in good faith, while simultaneously claiming his return is out of their hands, does not negate redressability." The attorneys asked the court to shorten the government's time to file a reply brief from 14 days to seven days, saying that "further briefing on recycled arguments should not prolong a case that has already dragged on far too long for Abrego Garcia and his family."
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Federal judge delivers one-two punch to Trump in Abrego Garcia case
A federal judge granted a request Wednesday from more than a dozen major news outlets and publishers to unseal certain records in the case of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, the Salvadorian migrant and alleged MS-13 member who was deported from Maryland to El Salvador in March in what administration officials have acknowledged was an administrative error. Separately on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis granted a request from Abrego Garcia's legal team to file a motion for sanctions against the Trump administration. That filing is due June 11, she said in an order. The one-two punch from Xinis could give plaintiffs new ammo to pursue more formal punishments against the Trump administration if officials are found to have been acting in bad faith or knowingly defying court orders. It will also give new access to media outlets covering the case. Xinis agreed to grant in part a request from a group of 14 major media outlets and publishers – including Fox News, NBC News, CBS News, New York Times, the Washington Post and NPR – who filed a motion to unseal records in the Abrego Garcia case, citing concerns over the lack of public access, as well as over government efforts, or lack thereof, to facilitate his return to the U.S. Judge Presses Trump Doj On Abrego Garcia Deportation; Answers Leave Courtroom In Stunned Silence In her order, Xinis agreed with the contention of the news outlets – referred to jointly as the "Press Movants" – that the public "enjoys a presumptive right to access court records, overcome only when outweighed by competing interests." Read On The Fox News App As such, Xinis ordered the Trump administration to unseal a handful of documents that have so far been filed under seal, as part of a protracted legal battle over the status of Abrego Garcia. Xinis also ordered them to unseal a transcript from an April 30 hearing in his case. "The right to public access of court records remains critical to promoting 'trustworthiness of the judicial process, to curb judicial abuses, and to provide the public with a more complete understanding of the judicial system, including a better perception of fairness,'" she said Wednesday. The order comes amid a months-long court fight over the status of Abrego Garcia, who remains in El Salvador. Xinis in April ordered the Trump administration to comply with an expedited discovery schedule to determine whether they were complying with the directive to return Abrego Garcia to the U.S., which was upheld by the Supreme Court earlier this year. Since then, she has struggled to ascertain the status of Abrego Garcia, or efforts made to return him to the U.S. Trump's Remarks Could Come Back To Bite Him In Abrego Garcia Deportation Battle Trump officials, for their part, have repeatedly alleged that Abrego Garcia is a member of the MS-13 gang, though any formal ties remain unproven. Lawyers for the government and Abrego Garcia's attorneys have sparred with Xinis in court over what exactly it means to "facilitate" his return – a months-long fight that Xinis most recently described as beating a "frustrated and dead horse." Xinis previously took aim at what she deemed to be the lack of information submitted to the court as part of an expedited discovery process she ordered last month, describing the government submissions as "vague, evasive and incomplete" responses, and which she said demonstrated "willful and bad faith refusal to comply with discovery obligations." The order is the latest development in the ongoing feud between Trump officials and the courts over the use of the Alien Enemies Act, a 1798 wartime immigration law used earlier this year to quickly deport migrants from the U.S. Click To Get The Fox News App To date, the Trump administration has not knowingly complied with any court orders to return migrants who were removed and sent to El Salvador in the early wave of deportation flights, despite earlier court orders from Xinis, Judge James Boasberg of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and others. It is unclear whether Xinis plans to begin contempt proceedings against the administration, though the federal judge in D.C. said earlier this year that he had found probable cause to do article source: Federal judge delivers one-two punch to Trump in Abrego Garcia case