
Protests at G7 summit in Alberta set to be largely peaceful, targeting Trump policies
EDMONTON – Protests during the upcoming G7 leaders summit in Kananaskis, Alta., may be starkly different than demonstrations happening this week against immigration crackdowns in the United States.
A University of Toronto research group that has been monitoring the meetings of world leaders since 1998 says its analysis shows Canadian protests are more peaceful and smaller.
But similar to the recent demonstrations in Los Angeles, they're likely to be against the policies of U.S. President Donald Trump.
'The Los Angeles protests will add another (issue) the protesters going there already care about, but it won't do anything much more than that,' said John Kirton, director of the G7 Research Group.
'I don't think it'll bring more protesters, too. Nor will the L.A. protests delay Trump from coming here.'
Prime Minister Mark Carney is hosting Trump and world leaders from France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, Italy and the European Union for the three-day summit starting Sunday in the Rocky Mountains southwest of Calgary.
Leaders of several non-member countries, including India, Ukraine and Mexico, are also set to attend.
The summit comes as protests in the United States continue against Trump's immigration raids, particularly his government's detainment of migrants.
Hundreds of marines have joined about 4,000 National Guard troops in Los Angeles. The protests have seen clashes with police, burned cars, rubber bullets shot at journalists and arrests.
In Alberta, Kirton said protests during the G7 are not expected to be the same.
'(The G7's) distinctive mission from the very beginning was to promote within its own members the values of open democracy,' he said.
'In democracies, people are supposed to protest. It's an integral part.'
It's unlikely Canada's government would respond to any clashes like Trump, by calling in the military, Kirton added.
The remote Kananaskis location will be closed off to the public.
Visuals and audio of protesters at three demonstration zones designated by the RCMP — two in downtown Calgary and one in Banff — are to be shown to the leaders and other delegates at the summit on TV screens. Another zone at the Calgary airport won't be broadcast.
Kirton said the distance between officials and protesters ensures the summit unfolds peacefully.
'Trump has been subjected to two assassination attempts, and one almost killed him. So you can see why (RCMP) have to be hypervigilant,' Kirton said.
The Calgary Raging Grannies group plans to be at the protest zone at Calgary City Hall on Sunday afternoon.
Mary Oxendale-Spensley, 74, said the grandmothers will be far from raging and clashing with police when they call out Trump's tariffs and his pitch to annex Canada.
'We do intend to sing,' said the retired teacher.
One of their songs in the lineup: 'U.S.A., you have got a problem.'
The song calls the U.S. president an 'orange blob' because of his tan, says he's 'way out of line,' and declares 'our sovereign nation will never be yours,' said Oxendale-Spensley.
Ensuring Trump hears their message is vital, she said, even if it's on a screen.
'I'm a Canadian. I was Canadian when I was born. I intend to be a Canadian when I die.'
It's hard to say how many grannies will be at the protest, she added. 'My big complaint about the grannies always is that we're grannies. People get sick, people break their ankle, that kind of thing.'
Protests at the last G7 summit in Kananaskis in 2002 were peaceful, Kirton said, as demonstrators were also given designated zones.
'I do remember most vividly it was very hot,' Kirton said, and there were not many protesters.
'There were so few of them and it was so peaceful that we didn't even bother to estimate a number.'
Aside from protests against Trump, some are expected to address other issues — like calling for an end to the Israel-Hamas war and Russia's war in Ukraine, Kirton said.
Kirton said he also anticipates a presence from Canadians who want Alberta to separate from Canada, as well as those opposed to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Tensions have been high between Canada and India since 2023, when former prime minister Justin Trudeau told the House of Commons that agents of the Indian government were linked to the killing of a Canadian activist for Sikh separatism outside a gurdwara in Surrey, B.C.
The World Sikh Organization of Canada said inviting Modi to the G7 is unacceptable.
The International League of Peoples' Struggles, an international alliance of grassroots organizations, is expecting about 200 people for a protest also at Calgary City Hall.
Winnipeg Jets Game Days
On Winnipeg Jets game days, hockey writers Mike McIntyre and Ken Wiebe send news, notes and quotes from the morning skate, as well as injury updates and lineup decisions. Arrives a few hours prior to puck drop.
Yasmeen Khan, vice-chair of the group's North America chapter, said protesters want to raise awareness about various issues, including Indigenous struggles, housing and climate change.
'We'll have banners. We'll be chanting,' she said. 'We will also have some cultural performances from some Indigenous artists and migrant youth.'
Mounties said first responders are prepared for protests.
'While the number of participants may vary, we have strong situational awareness of anticipated demonstrations and are well positioned to respond accordingly,' said RCMP spokesman Fraser Logan.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
14 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Republican enthusiasm for Musk cools after his feud with Trump, a new AP-NORC poll finds
WASHINGTON (AP) — Tech billionaire Elon Musk has lost some of his luster with Republicans since his messy public falling-out with President Donald Trump last week, a new survey finds. Fewer Republicans view Trump's onetime government efficiency bulldog 'very favorably' compared with April, according to the poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Though most Republicans continue to hold a positive view of Musk, their diminished fervor suggests his vocal opposition to Trump's signature spending and tax cut legislation — and Musk's subsequent online political and personal taunts — may have cost him some enthusiasm within the party. 'Some things have happened lately that have changed how I feel about him a little,' said Alabama Republican Katye Long, whose feelings for Musk have cooled to 'somewhat favorable.' 'I liked what he was doing when he was helping. But now I feel like he's kind of hurting,' said the 34-year-old automotive component factory employee and mother of three from Woodstock, Alabama. 'I also don't feel like he matters that much. He's not actually part of the government. He's just a rich guy who pushes his opinions.' Musk's overall popularity hasn't shifted, the poll found, and most of the shift among Democrats and Republicans was between 'very' and 'somewhat' strong opinions. Americans are less likely to view him favorably than his electric vehicle company, Tesla. That said, about half of Americans have a negative opinion of Tesla, highlighting another challenge for Musk when the company has dropped in value and been the target of protests in the U.S. and Europe. About one-third have a favorable view of Tesla, while about 2 in 10 don't know enough to say. Republicans' enthusiasm waned, but so did Democrats' antipathy Even a subtle shift in the intensity of Republicans' feelings about Musk could be important as the electric car and aerospace mogul weighs a second political act after spending about $200 million in service of Trump's 2024 election effort. After decrying the GOP's massive tax and budget policy bill as 'a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote on X, his social media platform, 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.' The poll suggests the messy feud with Trump may have rubbed some Republicans the wrong way, as the share of Republicans viewing Musk as 'very favorable' has dropped from 38% in April to 26% now. At the same time, antipathy toward Musk among Democrats has waned a little. About two-thirds, 65%, of Democrats have a very negative view of Musk, down slightly from about three-quarters, 74%, in April. Musk's bitter back-and-forth with Trump has business implications, too. Tesla was already struggling with a backlash against Musk's association with Trump. Sales across Europe plunged by half in May, even as growth in the electric car market accelerated. Then the company's shares plunged in value when Musk began sparring publicly with the president. Victoria Brown, of Kansas City, Kansas, rated Tesla 'somewhat unfavorable' because she objects to how Trump is conducting his administration and links the company's owner with the president's agenda. 'I don't favor Trump. So, pretty much the fact that they have been working together means I don't care too much for Tesla,' said Brown, 63, a political independent and an insurance agent. Musk's overall approval remains unchanged While the intensity of people's feelings about Musk may have changed, their overall opinions have not. About one-third of U.S. adults have a favorable opinion of Musk, compared with about 6 in 10 who hold an unfavorable view, while about 1 in 10 don't know enough to say. That's unchanged from the April poll. The new poll was conducted June 5-9, after Musk left his government role and began attacking Trump's marquee legislative priority. Musk's public clash with Trump began four days after Trump honored Musk effusively during an Oval Office event discharging him from duties as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency. After first tearing down the budget bill, Musk two days later complained he had never seen the language, and he aimed his fire at Trump, suggesting the president didn't sufficiently appreciate the role Musk assumed as the chief benefactor to Trump's reelection effort. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk wrote. 'Such ingratitude.' Musk went on to claim without evidence that the federal government was concealing information about Trump's association with infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Musk deleted the post, and early Wednesday he stepped back from his attacks on Trump, writing on X that he regretted some of his posts and they 'went too far.' Views of Tesla are far more negative than other car companies Tesla endured a difficult first quarter in 2025, with its sales falling while the world's leading electric car manufacturer faced protests in showrooms. The new poll also shows that Tesla is viewed far more negatively than some of its peers — notably, Ford, Toyota and General Motors. Only about one-third of U.S. adults have a 'very' or 'somewhat' favorable view of Tesla. About half of U.S. adults have an unfavorable opinion of Tesla, including 30% of Republicans. Democrats, at 66%, are more than twice as likely as Republicans to have a negative view of Tesla. But even among Republicans, Tesla is viewed less favorably than the other brands. Marisa Mills is no Musk fan. The 41-year-old teacher from Oakland, California, objects to his association with Trump and what the Democrat sees as their misguided notion that government is always well served by operating like a business. And yet she was once proud to have Tesla building cars in her own county. She soured on the company in 2020, when Musk sued Alameda County over its workplace restrictions during the coronavirus pandemic, before he moved the company to Texas in 2021. 'My government is supposed to serve the people, not his company. We were all glad to see him go,' Mills said. 'I do regret that we now have feelings of regret for the Tesla car product. We were once so proud.' Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. ___ Beaumont reported from Des Moines, Iowa. ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Find the AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at


National Post
18 minutes ago
- National Post
Ivison: President Trump, the G7 and Canada's new ‘realistic' foreign policy
Article content The last time he came north was to the Charlevoix summit in 2018, when he refused to sign the joint communiqué and called his host, then prime minister Justin Trudeau, 'dishonest and weak.' Article content Article content To discuss whether we can expect another Trump wrecking ball in Alberta, John Ivison is joined by Louise Blais, former Canadian ambassador and deputy permanent representative at the United Nations, who is now a strategic advisor to the Business Council of Canada. Article content Ivison asked if the G7 can function properly when the president of the United States clearly disdains multilateralism in all its forms. Article content Blais pointed out that this is the first multilateral meeting since Trump was re-elected. Article content 'But all the leaders this time have had practice. They've had their one-on-one meetings with them. We're all at the receiving end of a slew of tariffs. But you can see that the leaders are trying to find a way to keep relations cordial. I think everyone will try to avoid a disaster. It's not without its dangers. It can be unpredictable. But it is my sense that the prime minister has been speaking to the president and I don't think he has been speaking to him only about Canada-U.S. relations and the lifting of our tariffs. I think he's also been speaking to him about the G7 and how we can maybe make him at ease and move some things of common interest forward,' she said. Article content Prime Minister Mark Carney has said that if the U.S. does not want to lead, Canada will. Ivison asked if this is empty rhetoric or whether Canada has a real opportunity to set the agenda? Article content 'I'm very cautious about that ambition personally. I think there's a very good chance that the prime minister will shine next week. If you had asked me a month ago: 'Should we pass on this G7 this year?', I would have probably said yes. Too risky, wrong year for us. We're in an election. It was really difficult to prepare. Article content 'But now that we're on the other side, we're already seeing the elements of the foreign policy that the prime minister wants to put forward. We have established some form of cordial dialogue with the president. I think that it's actually turned into an opportunity for Mark Carney to show leadership and to balance sort of the core interests of Canada with international leadership. Article content 'On the other hand, he needs to be careful and not present himself too overtly as an alternative. If the world sees it that way, then fine. But I think he personally has to be careful because he has to balance both the president and the president's sense of himself.' Article content Blais said Trump's relationship with China will have a massive influence on how he handles allies at the G7. 'I think that the sense probably now in the White House is that it's difficult for the Americans to take on China on their own. And so, the president is coming to the summit having absorbed that and having (concluded) that if they really want to make headway, they will have to work with allies,' she said. Article content Ivison said former G7 Sherpa and now Canadian Senator Peter Boehm has suggested there will be no consensual joint communiqué this time, and that the G7 may wrap up with a summary statement from Carney, as the chair of the meeting. Article content Blais said she is hearing that there may be separate statements on different issues like Ukraine. Article content 'In other words, not putting everything into one, where if you don't agree on every single comma and every single period, the whole thing is out the window. I know that from experience at the UN, it can happen. It's tough. It's really tough to get consensus now in general in the multilateral world,' she said. Article content Ivison suggested Carney's decision to invite Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, despite human rights concerns, is symbolic of a new realism in Canada's foreign policy under Carney. Article content Blais agreed: 'It's clear that he's signalling that he wants a foreign policy that is much more focused on our core interests. And those core interests are very simple. They're sovereignty, territorial, primarily, and of course, economic prosperity. Those are the two things that really Canada needs to focus on… We need to grow up. We need to adapt. And we need to prioritize those interests. That doesn't mean that we will sacrifice our values at the altar of our own core interests. But it's a balance that is shifting.' Article content Blais said her time at the United Nations taught her that world leaders and ambassadors quickly grew tired of Canada attaching progressive values to its relationships. Article content 'We were pushing things that certain countries weren't ready for. And it's okay to try to improve the lives of people around the world. But at the end of the day, we have to think about our impact as a nation. We're not a super-power, we have to be realistic. And we certainly can't promote those things at the expense of our own interests. I think that's where it went too far. Article content 'To be honest, what always struck me is no matter how principled the position we took, and no matter what the price of that position might have been, we did not impact the change that we had hoped for. Article content 'We ended up really with very complicated relationships with very important powers, some of them regional, some of them global, and it hurt our interests.' Article content


Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Canadians favour other countries over Donald Trump's America, survey suggests
As G7 leaders gather in Kananaskis, Alta., a new poll suggests Canadians are souring on the U.S. and embracing relations with other world powers. The Pollara Strategic Insights survey found net impressions of the U.S. have plunged since President Donald Trump returned to office in January. At the same time, Canadians are feeling positive about the other G7 member nations: Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, France and Germany. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW 'We've kind of lost our best friend in the United States and maybe, as a country, Canada is now looking toward some of its older friends to reconnect with as a result of that,' said Dan Arnold, Pollara's chief strategy officer, referring to Trump's tariffs on Canadian goods that have led to a trade war between the neighbouring countries. Indeed, the firm polled people in Canada and the U.K. and found similar results on both sides of the Atlantic. Five out of six Canadians — 83 per cent — said the bilateral relationship with Britain was 'important' with only 17 per cent saying it wasn't. Across the pond, 76 per cent of Britons said their country's relationship with Canada was 'important' while about one in four said it was not. The British have a more positive view of Canada (+78 per cent) than any other country in the poll — ahead of Japan (+61 per cent), Germany (+60 per cent), France (+50 per cent) and Ukraine (+47 per cent). But the poll found they have a negative view toward India (-1 per cent), the U.S. (-3 per cent), China (-24 per cent) and Russia (-63 per cent). ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Among Canadians, Italy has a +66 per cent favourability rating followed by Japan at +64 per cent, the U.K. at +59 per cent, France at +57 per cent, Germany at +54 per cent and Ukraine at +41 per cent. China was at -27 per cent, India at -29 per cent, the U.S. at -47 per cent and Russia at -63 per cent. That's a 60 percentage point drop in Canadian sentiment toward the American since Pollara's survey last year when Joe Biden was U.S. president. Using online panels, Pollara surveyed 3,400 Canadians on May 16-20. While opt-in polls cannot be assigned a margin of error, for comparison purposes, a random sample of this size would have one of plus or minus 1.7 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. Similarly, the firm polled 2,511 Britons on May 2-16. The margin of error for comparable surveys is within 1.9 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. 'If the Americans aren't going to be the number-one ally in many respects for the next three years (of Trump's presidency) … then the Canada-U.K. relationship is something that bears some noting,' said Arnold, pointing out Canada's recently elected Prime Minister Mark Carney used to be governor of the Bank of England. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Because of that, 60 per cent of Britons are familiar with him, and of those, 80 per cent had a positive view of Carney, who succeeded Justin Trudeau as Liberal leader on March 9 and was elected April 28. Just seven per cent had a negative view and the rest had no opinion. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is not as well known among Canadians. Only 26 per cent were familiar with him. Of those, 58 per cent had a positive view with 30 per cent negative and the remainder had no opinion. That's an overall +28 per cent for Starmer, who won power last summer. The most admired foreign leader among Canadians was Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who will attend the G7 summit that begins Sunday. Zelenskyy, whose country was invaded by Russia in 2022, was at +53 per cent, ahead of French President Emmanuel Macron (+46 per cent), German Chancellor Friedrich Merz (+33 per cent), Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba (+31 per cent) and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni (+29 per cent). On the negative side of the ledger, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who will also be at the G7, was at -17 per cent, ahead of Chinese President Xi Jinping (-52 per cent), Trump (-66 per cent) and Russian President Vladimir Putin (-69 per cent). Neither Xi nor Putin was invited to Kananaskis. Politics Headlines Newsletter Get the latest news and unmatched insights in your inbox every evening Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. Please enter a valid email address. Sign Up Yes, I'd also like to receive customized content suggestions and promotional messages from the Star. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Politics Headlines Newsletter You're signed up! You'll start getting Politics Headlines in your inbox soon. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page.