Prince Harry doubles down on royal family with fiery statement after explosive TV interview
Prince Harry has taken another swipe at the royal family, accusing them of being the reason his security was axed after Megxit.
On Friday, UK time, the UK Court of Appeal ruled against Prince Harry in a case that could end up costing him more than $3 million in legal fees.
Buckingham Palace welcomed the court's decision.
The Duke, who was not in the UK for the verdict, can appeal the ruling to the UK Supreme Court.
Following the hearing, Harry sat down for an astonishing BBC interview, where the defeated prince released a second tirade blaming his family for the row.
Harry later released a statement, saying that the legal action was a last resort but it uncovered 'shocking truths'.
He revealed he will be writing to the Home Secretary to ask her to review the matter.
The 40-year-old claimed that the 'Royal Household are key decision-makers on RAVEC'.
'Before the Royal Household's role on RAVEC was known, this secretive committee concluded that when my wife would join the royal family, she should not receive protection.
'Only when I asked for the name of the person willing to carry that risk did they reverse the decision.'
Speaking of the decision to strip the Sussexes of their security after Megxit, he said: 'This reckless action knowingly put me and my family in harm's way. Life is precious and I understand the fragility of it.'
The prince went on to say he remains committed to a life of public service and said: 'All I've been asking for is safety.'
Harry continued: 'To this present day, the Royal Household remain my sole representation on RAVEC for every visit and could call for this assessment to be done at any point.
'The only possible conclusion that can be drawn is that they choose not to because they known the outcome would prove that my security should never have been removed in the first place.
'My family and I have been subjected to well-documented neo-Nazi and extremist threats, including from al-Qaeda.'
The prince went on to slam the lack of a risk assessment as a 'dereliction of duty'.
Harry said he was born into 'lifelong circumstances that create inherent security risks' as a royal.
He went on to say his hands have now been tied in seeking 'legal recourse against the establishment'.
'This all comes from the same institutions that preyed upon my mother, that openly campaigned for the removal of our security, and continue to incite hatred towards me, my wife and even our children, while at the same time protecting the very power that they should be holding accountable.'
The prince had declared his 'life is at stake' but some experts have hit out at the estranged royal, suggesting Harry just wants to cut down on the costs of paying for bodyguards.
The Duke of Sussex's emotional comments came after he lost a British court battle on Friday over his taxpayer funded UK security arrangements, which the Government downgraded when he moved overseas and stepped back from royal duties.
Harry's astonishing TV interview
However, Harry told the BBC said he would 'love a reconciliation' with the royal family but King Charles 'won't speak to me', as Buckingham Palace issued a blunt statement in response.
Harry said he was 'devastated' by the legal failure which was due to an 'old fashioned establishment stitch up'.
He also said he did 'not know how much time my father has'. King Charles is receiving treatment for cancer.
'I'm devastated,' Harry told the BBC. 'Not so much as devastated with the loss that I am about the people behind the decision, feeling as though this is okay. Is it a win for them?'
The Duke of Sussex brought the case against the UK's Home Office and the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures, known as Ravec.
The legal row centred on to what extent the Sussex's could expect security to be provided to them when in the UK after they walked away from Britain and royal life.
The UK government downgraded their security and said protection would be provided on a case-by-case basis when Harry returned but he had to give notice.
Prince Harry had argued his family needed around-the-clock protection within the UK at any time because of the threats they had received. He claimed he and Meghan had been 'singled out' from the protection given to other royals, reported The Sun.
Harry's testimony 'moving' but no legal issue
But on Friday, UK time, in Britain's Court of Appeal, Sir Geoffrey Vos, Lord Justice Bean and Lord Justice Edis ruled against him in a humiliating blow for the prince.
It also means he faces paying the legal costs for both sides, which is estimated to be more than £1.5 million ($A3.09 million).
In his Judgement, Sir Geoffrey said Harry's arguments had been 'moving' but did not amount to an actual legal challenge.
'It was impossible to say that this reasoning was illogical or inappropriate, indeed it seemed sensible'.
'An unintended consequence of his decision to step back from royal duties and spend the majority of his time abroad has been that he has been provided with a more bespoke, and generally lesser, level of protection than when he was in the UK.
'That did not in itself give rise to a legal complaint.'
'Establishment stitch up'
Talking to the BBC, Prince Harry said the court's decision meant he feared for his family's safety in Britain.
'I can't see a world in which I would be bringing my wife and children back to the UK at this point,' he said.
'I love my country I always have done, despite what some people in that country have done.
'I miss the UK. It's really quite sad that I won't be able to show my children my homeland'.
Harry said his security downgrade was put in place under the previous Conservative government and with a new Labour government in place he insinuated a change could occur. But that would also involve Charles allowing a security review to take place.
'There is a lot of control and ability in my father's hands,' the Duke said.
'Ultimately, this could be resolved through him, not necessarily by intervening, but by stepping aside, allowing the experts to do what is necessary.
'I have had it described to me … that this is a good, old fashioned establishment stitch up, and that's what it feels like.'
Palace responds
Buckingham Palace released a short statement, published by The Sun, shortly afterwards, with a spokesman saying, 'All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion'.
'My family will never forgive me'
Elsewhere in the interview, Harry said despite the bad blood between him and the other Windsors, safety was paramount.
'There have been so many disagreements between me and some of my family,' Harry said.
'Of course, some members of my family will never forgive me for writing a book.
'(But) this current situation that has been ongoing for five years with regards to human life and safety is the sticking point. It is the only thing that's left.'
'Don't know how long my father has'
'I would love reconciliation with my family,' Harry continued.
'I don't know how much longer my father has. He won't speak to me because of this security stuff, but it would be nice to be nice to reconcile
'(But) there's no point in continuing to fight anymore … life is precious.'
The court had been told previously that Prince Harry had offered to fund his own Police armed bodyguards but officials refused – with insiders insisting cops are not 'guns for hire'.
Today's ruling comes after another court case where UK High Court judge Sir Peter Lane rejected the duke's case and ruled Ravec's approach was not irrational or procedurally unfair.
In his ruling in February, the judge said there had not been any 'unlawfulness' in the call to pull Harry's security.
He also explained Harry's lawyers had taken 'an inappropriate, formalist interpretation of the Ravec process'.
The judge added: 'The 'bespoke' process devised for the claimant in the decision of 28 February 2020 was, and is, legally sound.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
6 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Ex-premier slams MP's debt bid to ensure pre-selection
A former Liberal premier has criticised an MP over a proposed deal that would have put a whopping legal bill put on ice as part of a push to help her political career. Former Victorian opposition leader John Pesutto owes Liberal MP Moira Deeming $2.3 million in legal costs after the Federal Court found he defamed her by implying she was associated with neo-Nazis who gatecrashed a Melbourne rally she attended in 2023. Mr Pesutto faces bankruptcy and a forced exit from parliament unless the money is paid or a payment plan sorted out within weeks. Mrs Deeming on Sunday proposed an offer that would spare Mr Pesutto bankruptcy if five demands were met, including she be endorsed for pre-selection before the next election. Liberal preselection is finalised through a vote of rank-and-file members and a special resolution would have been required in such a scenario. Victorian premier Jeff Kennett accused Mrs Deeming of failing to "understand how the party works" and described her bid for preselection unusual. Mr Kennett donated to Mr Pesutto's defence and wants the Liberal Party to pay part of the legal bill. "I really felt she has been terribly, badly advised so, to some degree, I feel very sorry for her," Mr Kennett told ABC Radio on Thursday. "The Liberal Party should never, ever contemplate throwing one of its own under a bus and, second, we've always got to do what's in the best interests of, in this case, the state and the party." In her letter to Mr Pesutto, his successor Brad Battin and Victorian Liberal president Philip Davis, Mrs Deeming said she was "dismayed" the party was considering a request to help the former leader meet his financial obligations. "It is because of the extraordinary support that I have received from rank-and-file members that I make this offer with the intention that the funds they have raised to fight the Labor Party remain solely directed to that important objective," she wrote. Mrs Deeming's other requests included the party release an unreserved apology and Mr Pesutto pay $750,000 he has raised so the rest of his debt is delayed until 2027. "I have suffered through a gruelling two-and-half years where almost every offer I made to negotiate a settlement was rejected," she wrote. A member of the public who was "outraged" by reports of the letter emailed Liberal MPs to reveal he referred the matter to Victoria's Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC). Anyone can make a referral to IBAC but that does do not automatically trigger a full investigation. The man told AAP he was not a member of the Liberal Party but had been a member of three other political parties in the past. Mr Battin described Mrs Deeming's preselection request as "unusual" but said he could not comment on the offer or reports of the IBAC referral. Mrs Deeming has been contacted for comment. A former Liberal premier has criticised an MP over a proposed deal that would have put a whopping legal bill put on ice as part of a push to help her political career. Former Victorian opposition leader John Pesutto owes Liberal MP Moira Deeming $2.3 million in legal costs after the Federal Court found he defamed her by implying she was associated with neo-Nazis who gatecrashed a Melbourne rally she attended in 2023. Mr Pesutto faces bankruptcy and a forced exit from parliament unless the money is paid or a payment plan sorted out within weeks. Mrs Deeming on Sunday proposed an offer that would spare Mr Pesutto bankruptcy if five demands were met, including she be endorsed for pre-selection before the next election. Liberal preselection is finalised through a vote of rank-and-file members and a special resolution would have been required in such a scenario. Victorian premier Jeff Kennett accused Mrs Deeming of failing to "understand how the party works" and described her bid for preselection unusual. Mr Kennett donated to Mr Pesutto's defence and wants the Liberal Party to pay part of the legal bill. "I really felt she has been terribly, badly advised so, to some degree, I feel very sorry for her," Mr Kennett told ABC Radio on Thursday. "The Liberal Party should never, ever contemplate throwing one of its own under a bus and, second, we've always got to do what's in the best interests of, in this case, the state and the party." In her letter to Mr Pesutto, his successor Brad Battin and Victorian Liberal president Philip Davis, Mrs Deeming said she was "dismayed" the party was considering a request to help the former leader meet his financial obligations. "It is because of the extraordinary support that I have received from rank-and-file members that I make this offer with the intention that the funds they have raised to fight the Labor Party remain solely directed to that important objective," she wrote. Mrs Deeming's other requests included the party release an unreserved apology and Mr Pesutto pay $750,000 he has raised so the rest of his debt is delayed until 2027. "I have suffered through a gruelling two-and-half years where almost every offer I made to negotiate a settlement was rejected," she wrote. A member of the public who was "outraged" by reports of the letter emailed Liberal MPs to reveal he referred the matter to Victoria's Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC). Anyone can make a referral to IBAC but that does do not automatically trigger a full investigation. The man told AAP he was not a member of the Liberal Party but had been a member of three other political parties in the past. Mr Battin described Mrs Deeming's preselection request as "unusual" but said he could not comment on the offer or reports of the IBAC referral. Mrs Deeming has been contacted for comment. A former Liberal premier has criticised an MP over a proposed deal that would have put a whopping legal bill put on ice as part of a push to help her political career. Former Victorian opposition leader John Pesutto owes Liberal MP Moira Deeming $2.3 million in legal costs after the Federal Court found he defamed her by implying she was associated with neo-Nazis who gatecrashed a Melbourne rally she attended in 2023. Mr Pesutto faces bankruptcy and a forced exit from parliament unless the money is paid or a payment plan sorted out within weeks. Mrs Deeming on Sunday proposed an offer that would spare Mr Pesutto bankruptcy if five demands were met, including she be endorsed for pre-selection before the next election. Liberal preselection is finalised through a vote of rank-and-file members and a special resolution would have been required in such a scenario. Victorian premier Jeff Kennett accused Mrs Deeming of failing to "understand how the party works" and described her bid for preselection unusual. Mr Kennett donated to Mr Pesutto's defence and wants the Liberal Party to pay part of the legal bill. "I really felt she has been terribly, badly advised so, to some degree, I feel very sorry for her," Mr Kennett told ABC Radio on Thursday. "The Liberal Party should never, ever contemplate throwing one of its own under a bus and, second, we've always got to do what's in the best interests of, in this case, the state and the party." In her letter to Mr Pesutto, his successor Brad Battin and Victorian Liberal president Philip Davis, Mrs Deeming said she was "dismayed" the party was considering a request to help the former leader meet his financial obligations. "It is because of the extraordinary support that I have received from rank-and-file members that I make this offer with the intention that the funds they have raised to fight the Labor Party remain solely directed to that important objective," she wrote. Mrs Deeming's other requests included the party release an unreserved apology and Mr Pesutto pay $750,000 he has raised so the rest of his debt is delayed until 2027. "I have suffered through a gruelling two-and-half years where almost every offer I made to negotiate a settlement was rejected," she wrote. A member of the public who was "outraged" by reports of the letter emailed Liberal MPs to reveal he referred the matter to Victoria's Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC). Anyone can make a referral to IBAC but that does do not automatically trigger a full investigation. The man told AAP he was not a member of the Liberal Party but had been a member of three other political parties in the past. Mr Battin described Mrs Deeming's preselection request as "unusual" but said he could not comment on the offer or reports of the IBAC referral. Mrs Deeming has been contacted for comment. A former Liberal premier has criticised an MP over a proposed deal that would have put a whopping legal bill put on ice as part of a push to help her political career. Former Victorian opposition leader John Pesutto owes Liberal MP Moira Deeming $2.3 million in legal costs after the Federal Court found he defamed her by implying she was associated with neo-Nazis who gatecrashed a Melbourne rally she attended in 2023. Mr Pesutto faces bankruptcy and a forced exit from parliament unless the money is paid or a payment plan sorted out within weeks. Mrs Deeming on Sunday proposed an offer that would spare Mr Pesutto bankruptcy if five demands were met, including she be endorsed for pre-selection before the next election. Liberal preselection is finalised through a vote of rank-and-file members and a special resolution would have been required in such a scenario. Victorian premier Jeff Kennett accused Mrs Deeming of failing to "understand how the party works" and described her bid for preselection unusual. Mr Kennett donated to Mr Pesutto's defence and wants the Liberal Party to pay part of the legal bill. "I really felt she has been terribly, badly advised so, to some degree, I feel very sorry for her," Mr Kennett told ABC Radio on Thursday. "The Liberal Party should never, ever contemplate throwing one of its own under a bus and, second, we've always got to do what's in the best interests of, in this case, the state and the party." In her letter to Mr Pesutto, his successor Brad Battin and Victorian Liberal president Philip Davis, Mrs Deeming said she was "dismayed" the party was considering a request to help the former leader meet his financial obligations. "It is because of the extraordinary support that I have received from rank-and-file members that I make this offer with the intention that the funds they have raised to fight the Labor Party remain solely directed to that important objective," she wrote. Mrs Deeming's other requests included the party release an unreserved apology and Mr Pesutto pay $750,000 he has raised so the rest of his debt is delayed until 2027. "I have suffered through a gruelling two-and-half years where almost every offer I made to negotiate a settlement was rejected," she wrote. A member of the public who was "outraged" by reports of the letter emailed Liberal MPs to reveal he referred the matter to Victoria's Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC). Anyone can make a referral to IBAC but that does do not automatically trigger a full investigation. The man told AAP he was not a member of the Liberal Party but had been a member of three other political parties in the past. Mr Battin described Mrs Deeming's preselection request as "unusual" but said he could not comment on the offer or reports of the IBAC referral. Mrs Deeming has been contacted for comment.
Sky News AU
7 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Former prime minister Scott Morrison dismisses AUKUS concerns amid Trump administration review
Former prime minister Scott Morrison has dismissed concerns about the future of the AUKUS defence pact, after the Trump administration launched a review to ensure the agreement aligned with the 'America First' agenda. The trilateral partnership between the United States, United Kingdom and Australia was established to counter the growing power of China and threats in the Indo-Pacific. Mr Morrison—who was the architect of AUKUS in 2021—said the review was entirely within the remit of the new US government and should not be cause for alarm. 'No, I'm not,' Mr Morrison responded when asked by Sky News if he was concerned about the Pentagon review. 'It's totally within their remit… Incoming governments do reviews. Keir Starmer did a review and that resulted in the UK government being even more committed to AUKUS. 'Like with any arrangement, you've always got to keep making the case.' Defence Minister Richard Marles has also played down concerns, confirming that Australia was aware of the review in advance and would fully engage in the process. 'We've known about the review for some time, we welcome it and we will engage with it,' Mr Marles told Sky News on Thursday. 'I do have a sense of confidence about the way in which AUKUS is playing out under the Trump administration and that we will meet the pathway that we have committed to.' The review, led by US Under-Secretary of Defence for Policy Elbridge Colby, will assess whether the AUKUS submarine project fits the administration's defence priorities. Mr Colby has previously criticised the AUKUS deal and suggested that Pillar 1 of the agreement, the nuclear submarines, could be 'problematic'. Mr Marles however argued that AUKUS remains in the strategic interests of all three partner nations. 'I think whenever we see a new government, a review of this kind is going to be something which will be undertaken,' he said. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley voiced concern that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was adopting a 'bystander approach' when stronger advocacy may be required. 'I feel there's something of a bystander approach from Anthony Albanese,' Ms Ley told Sky News. 'This is a Team Australia moment, and I've always said we'll support the government on Team Australia moments.' Mr Albanese has been scheduled to attend the G7 summit in Canada, where he will likely meet President Donald Trump for the first time. The White House has also asked Australia to consider increasing its defence spending from 2 per cent to 3.5 per cent of GDP. The Albanese government has so far declined to commit to the target—though it has promised to raise spending to 2.3 per cent. AUKUS is Australia's largest-ever defence undertaking, aimed at acquiring nuclear-powered submarines and increasing interoperability with US and British forces. Under AUKUS, Australia was scheduled to make a $2 billion payment in 2025 to the US to help boost its submarine shipyards and speed up submarine production. The first $500 million payment was made when Mr Marles met with his US counterpart Pete Hegseth in February.
7NEWS
7 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Hundreds riot over multiple nights on streets of Ballymena in Northern Ireland: ‘Racist thuggery'
Violence has erupted in different parts of Northern Ireland for a third successive night, with masked youths starting a fire in a leisure centre. However, unrest in the primary flashpoint of Ballymena was notably smaller in scale. Hundreds of masked rioters attacked police and set homes and cars on fire in Ballymena — a town of 30,000 people located 45km from Belfast — on Tuesday night in what police condemned as 'racist thuggery'. The violence flared on Monday after two 14-year-old boys were arrested and appeared in court earlier that day, accused of a serious sexual assault on a teenage girl in the town. The charges were read via a Romanian interpreter to the boys, whose lawyer told the court that they denied the charge, the BBC reported. Police are investigating the damaging of properties on Monday and Tuesday in Ballymena, which has a relatively large migrant population, as racially motivated hate crimes. Two Filipino families told Reuters they fled their home in Ballymena on Tuesday night after fearing for their safety when their car was set on fire outside the house. A few dozen masked youths threw some rocks, fireworks and petrol bombs at police after officers in riot gear and armoured vans blocked roads in the town on Wednesday evening. Police deployed water cannon against the crowd for the second successive night, but the clashes were nothing like the previous night that left 17 officers injured and led to five arrests. Much of the crowd had left the streets before midnight. A small number of riot police were also in the town of Larne 30km west, where masked youths smashed the windows of a leisure centre before starting fires in the lobby, BBC footage showed. Swimming classes were taking place when bricks were thrown through the windows and staff had to barricade themselves in before running out the back door, local Alliance Party MP Danny Donnelly told the BBC. Northern Ireland's Communities Minister Gordon Lyons had earlier posted on Facebook that a number of people had been temporarily moved to the leisure centre following the disturbances in Ballymena, before then being moved out of Larne. The comments drew sharp criticism from other political parties for identifying a location used to shelter families seeking refuge from anti-immigrant violence. Lyons condemned the attacks on the centre. Police said youths also set fires at a roundabout in the town of Newtownabbey, a flashpoint for sectarian violence that sporadically flares up in the British-run region 27 years after a peace deal largely ended three decades of bloodshed. Debris was also set alight at a barricade in Coleraine, the Belfast Telegraph reported. The British and Irish governments as well as local politicians have condemned the violence.
