Some federal workers focused on 'black lung' screenings reinstated but still face June termination
The Trump administration plans to terminate federal workers focused on preventing and responding to work-related illnesses, including "black lung" disease in coal miners, according to an internal government memo obtained by NBC News, despite in recent days reinstating some who had been let go.
Those terminations could threaten critical programs used to screen for health issues in workers with toxic exposures, including 9/11 first responders, according to people who work on or benefit from the programs. Some workers who benefit from those programs have expressed fears that conditions such as cancer or lung disease could go undetected as a result.
Concerns about the future of those programs began earlier this month when the Department of Health and Human Services effectively gutted the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), drastically cutting the headcount of an agency that has been around for 55 years. The move was part of a broader plan to reduce the size of the federal workforce, including a massive restructuring of federal health agencies that called for the termination of roughly 20,000 full-time employees.
In an agencywide email sent Wednesday, NIOSH's director, John Howard, acknowledged 'a significant number of [reduction in force] notices sent to staff' and said some staffers were brought back from administrative leave this week as part of 'a temporary arrangement to help complete our obligations.' The staffers had received notices on April 1 that they had been placed on leave, with official termination dates set for June.
Howard himself received a termination notice in early April but returned to his post after bipartisan opposition from members of Congress regarding his dismissal.
The notices 'created confusion and gaps in information that we are continuing to try to fill,' Howard said in his memo. Some programs within NIOSH will move to a newly created agency known as the Administration for a Healthy America, he said, but it's unclear how that transition will occur.
One program caught up in the cuts is the Coal Workers' Health Surveillance Program, a congressionally mandated effort to monitor the health of coal miners. For decades, it offered free X-rays to identify lung scarring in miners who continuously inhale coal dust — what's colloquially known as 'black lung.'
An HHS official said critical NIOSH programs, including the Coal Workers' Health Surveillance Program, will continue to serve the needs of miners via the newly created Administration for a Healthy America, but did not address the upcoming staffing cuts.
Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., said Tuesday evening on X that she was encouraged by some NIOSH staff returning to work this week.
'My understanding is that this is temporary, so my focus will continue to be on working with @HHSGov on permanently restoring these functions and personnel in the most efficient and effective manner,' she wrote.
A lawsuit filed earlier this month by a coal miner in West Virginia on behalf of himself and others in his field calls for the program to be reinstated. It accuses HHS of violating the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act — which established the program in 1969 — by terminating staffers involved in black lung screenings. HHS has until Thursday to respond to the suit.
Coal miners have a higher-than-average risk of dying from black lung by virtue of their occupation. One in 10 underground coal miners who worked in mines for at least 25 years had black lung, according to a NIOSH report in 2018. In Central Appalachia, one of the main coal mining regions in the U.S., the rate was 1 in 5.
Scott Laney, an epidemiologist at the Coal Workers' Health Surveillance Program, said the program diagnosed new cases and provided evidence of the disease to miners filing for disability benefits. He estimated that, due to staffing cuts, there are hundreds of thousands of X-rays currently sitting in the basement of the NIOSH facility in Morgantown, West Virginia.
'There's a tranche of X-rays that have gone unread in our system, and these miners are waiting to find out whether they have black lung or not,' he said.
On top of that, he said, 'if someone calls NIOSH and asks for their personal health information, we don't have the ability to send that to them right now.'
Dave Dayton, a miner in Marion County, West Virginia, said he has personally taken advantage of NIOSH's mobile screenings for lung disease. Many miners work long shifts and would otherwise struggle to see a doctor, he said.
'Without NIOSH being there to help us, I don't know where we're going and where the miners are going to be without their help,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Transgender American woman files for asylum in Canada over Trump
An Arizona transgender woman claims the United States is no longer safe for trans people because of President Donald Trump and has applied for asylum in Canada. Hannah Kreager, 22, has now 'fled' her home in the Grand Canyon State for the Canadian city of Calgary. 'I have fled in hopes of finding safety, security, and the freedom to continue to live my life, and access/take my medications as prescribed,' Kreager wrote on her GoFundMe page Her legal filing cites two executive orders by the Republican president, including where the federal government only recognizes the male and female genders, according to The Globe and Mail. As a result, US passports and identity cards with an X gender marker are no longer being issued. Her own passport displays an X, she told the Canadian news organization, claiming she is concerned what might happen to hers after hearing the passports of other transgender people have been seized or damaged. 'Attitudes in the United States have grown increasingly intolerant toward trans people by those who have been influenced and emboldened by a president and administration that takes basic rights away from trans people on the basis of nothing more than their identity,' the US migrant stated. 'The danger to trans individuals in the United States is very high, while the threat my community poses is exceedingly low.' Her pending claim for protection in the Great White North could be a landmark case, the American believes. 'I'm here in Canada with a terrific lawyer taking up my unprecedented case: seeking asylum from the United States of America on the grounds of violation of human rights,' she posted online. 'My case is a precedent-setting one, and if successful, could make asylum for trans people in the U.S. possible.' Kreager's attorney Yameena Ansari claims she and other Canadian immigration lawyers have been flooded with inquiries from transgender Americans since Trump took power about how they can move to their country. 'This case is about safety,' her attorney Yameena Ansari told the Canadian news site. 'It's about whether Canada will recognize the threat Hannah faces in the U.S.' Other Americans have also applied for refugee status north of the US border. An Illinois family with transgender children has made a similar request of the Canadian government, reported the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Kaitlyn and Ted Berg, parents to older children who is transgender, and a younger singling who identifies as gender fluid, pulled their kids from school one day after Trump's inauguration. 'When I saw what happened, Donald Trump being elected, my gut started turning,' Kaitlyn told the CBC. 'And that is when I started looking at how to get my family out safely.' The military veteran parents drove to the US-Canada border without passports to a border crossing where they made an asylum claim. However, Canadian immigration officials have stressed that claims from Americans face an uphill battle, as they must prove that they have a 'real fear of persecution or face serious harm, such as torture or cruel treatment, in their home country or where they usually live.'
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Democrats respond to Trump's ‘reckless' and ‘discriminatory' travel ban
Democrats have criticized Donald Trump's travel ban on 12 countries as 'reckless' and 'discriminatory', with some warning the policy may be an effort to distract Americans from Trump's much-criticized tax bill. Trump signed a sweeping order banning travel from countries including Afghanistan, Equatorial Guinea and Haiti on Wednesday night, claiming he had considered multiple factors, including 'foreign policy, national security and counterterrorism goals' in deciding on the ban. Adam Schiff, the Democratic senator from California, disagreed, calling the move 'Trump's reckless first term travel ban all over again'. 'Just like before, Trump's expanded ban on travelers from around the world will not improve our national security and will only further isolate the US from the rest of world [sic]. Bigotry is not a national security strategy.' Pramila Jayapal, a Democratic congresswoman from Washington, said in a statement: 'This ban, expanded from Trump's Muslim ban in his first term, will only further isolate us on the world stage. This discriminatory policy, which limits legal immigration, not only flies in the face of what our country is supposed to stand for, it will be harmful to our economy and our communities that rely on the contributions of people who come to America from this wide range of countries. 'Banning a whole group of people because you disagree with the structure or function of their government not only lays blame in the wrong place, it creates a dangerous precedent.' Trump announced the ban as Republicans in the Senate weigh his tax and spending bill. On Wednesday, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the legislation, which would extend tax cuts and increase military spending, would add $2.4tn to the national deficit over the next decade and leave millions more people without health insurance. 'Not a coincidence Trump announced his travel ban tonight,' Chris Murphy, the Democratic senator from Connecticut, said on social media. 'He's trying to distract us from the core story. And the core story is their bill to throw 15 million people off their health care in order to give a $270,000 tax cut to the richest Americans.' Don Beyer, a Democratic congressman from Virginia, said on social media: 'From his first Muslim Ban, Trump's travel bans have always betrayed of [sic] the ideals and values that inspired America's Founders. Trump's use of prejudice and bigotry to bar people from entering the U.S. does not make us safer, it just divides us and weakens our global leadership.' Beyer added: 'This policy will separate families, including many I represent. And with Trump's assault on asylum and refugees, it will intentionally put people at deadly risk. The true rationale isn't security, it's racism.'
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
New York, other states urge FDA to expand access to abortion pill
NEW YORK, June 5 (Reuters) - The attorneys general of New York, California, Massachusetts and New Jersey asked the Food and Drug Administration to expand access to the abortion pill mifepristone, and remove outdated restrictions still in place 25 years after its approval. Thursday's petition came after Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr told Congress last month he directed FDA Commissioner Marty Makary to review the pill, saying "alarming" new data suggested at minimum that the label should be changed. Mifepristone, together with the drug misoprostol, won FDA approval in 2000 for medication abortion in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy. Medication abortions account for more than half of U.S. abortions, though 28 states restrict access according to the nonprofit Guttmacher Institute, which focuses on reproductive health. The petition challenges FDA requirements that mifepristone prescribers be included in national and local abortion provider lists, patients attest in writing that they intend to end their pregnancies, and pharmacies perform a variety of recordkeeping. New York Attorney General Letitia James said the FDA's Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program imposes "medically unnecessary" rules that keep mifepristone out of reach of most primary care settings. She called the problem particularly acute in rural and other areas where getting abortions often requires lengthy travel. "There is simply no scientific or medical reason to subject it to such extraordinary restrictions," James said, referring to mifepristone. "The FDA must follow the science." Many states, primarily Republican-led or leaning, have restricted or substantially eliminated abortions in the three years since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that legalized the procedure nationwide. The White House under Republican President Donald Trump has largely sided with abortion opponents, though Trump said during his 2024 campaign he did not plan to limit access to mifepristone. Last month, the administration asked a federal judge to dismiss, on procedural grounds, a lawsuit by three generally Republican states seeking to narrow such access. That lawsuit began during the administration of Democratic President Joe Biden, who generally supported abortion access. Seventeen other Democratic-led or -leaning states plus Washington, D.C. are separately suing the FDA in Spokane, Washington to loosen restrictions on mifepristone. They said doctors and pharmacies should be able to dispense the pill, as with most drugs, without special certifications. On May 30, the Trump administration urged a dismissal, saying the states didn't show the FDA's policy was flawed or the agency ignored important evidence.
