Anti-Starmer strike fails to hit its target
Protest organiser Richard Donaldson told the channel he was 'not prepared to wait four years' for Keir Starmer to be ousted from power, calling for an immediate general election. As it turned out, Starmer can probably call off the removal van for a while yet. Because – possibly as Donaldson called the 'national strike' for a Saturday, a day most people are off work anyway – the event proved the dampest of damp squibs.
How went the Great British National Strike, a day of countrywide anti-government protests, which GB News confidently predicted would see 'more than 500,000 people across the country walking out in protest at the state of the UK'?
In most cities and towns, fewer than 100 people protested, often outnumbered by anti-fascist demos: in Bristol, for example (population: 483,000), Avon and Somerset Police said that 'an estimated 50 people took part in a protest, with an estimated 100 people taking part in a counter
demonstration'. Another 100 people (described by organisers as 'big crowds') turned up outside Downing Street to chant 'Keir Starmer is a wanker'.
In Manchester, meanwhile (population: 551,938), organisers claimed around 200 attendees, although photos would suggest this includes a protest by Chagossians protesting against the government's deal to hand over sovereignty of the islands to Mauritius, which was happening at the same time.
Supporters of the Great British National Strike were unimpressed, taking to social media to moan: 'No timetable, no speakers, no stage/platform, no PA system. Shambolic. Organisers were early with their excuses for failure, but admitted they'd spent two months arranging this butterfly's fart of a protest.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Keir Starmer grilled by schoolchildren on Messi v Ronaldo debate
Prime Minister Keir Starmer was grilled by schoolchildren during a visit on Thursday - with many keen to know his verdict on the Messi v Ronaldo debate. He visited a school in Essex as he declared the free school meal expansion as a 'down payment' on child poverty and was 'determined' to drive down child poverty and identify its root causes. As the Prime Minister sat with schoolchildren, one child asked him who his favourite footballer was. Mr Starmer, a keen Arsenal fan, said: 'My favourite player at the moment is Saka'. Another child asked who he thought was better: Messi or Ronaldo. After some hesitation, Mr Starmer replied: 'I'm going to go with Messi.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Starmer to pursue bereaved families for tax after winter fuel U-turn
Sir Keir Starmer could pursue bereaved families for tax after his about-turn on winter fuel payments. The Prime Minister promised to make more pensioners eligible for the winter fuel allowance after Rachel Reeves removed it from nearly 10 million people in 2024. Ministers are looking at restoring the payments as a universal benefit and then recouping the money from high-income pensioners when they fill in their tax returns. They have been forced down that route because creating a new means test would be highly complex. However, some in the Government are concerned about a time lag of at least six months between the payment of up to £300 being made and then clawed back. Thousands of people could die in that period, leaving grieving families to pick up the bill. Helen Whately, the shadow work and pensions secretary, said: ' Chaos reigns in Number 10 with pensioners picking up the bill again. It beggars belief that they're considering slapping a stealth tax on pensioners to clear up their winter fuel mess. 'Not content with that, they're going to come after the bereaved families of deceased pensioners for the money. This is the party that wouldn't stand up to the unions demanding inflation-busting pay rises. 'It's clear there is no plan, Labour just lurch from one disaster to the next. It seems that whichever way they go, pensioners end up battered.' In July 2024, the Chancellor announced that pensioners would not receive the winter fuel payment of up to £300 if they had incomes of more than £11,500. After a disastrous series of local election results, Sir Keir announced plans to hand the payment to more people but did not give any details on numbers. The Chancellor has said she will outline how the new system will work next week when she unveils the spending review, and promised the new system will be in place by this winter. A government source told The Guardian: 'We should never have scrapped the winter fuel payment in the first place, but the whole process of reinstating it has been completely chaotic. 'The optics of us demanding the money back from grieving families are just dire.' Asked on Wednesday about the winter fuel payment, Ms Reeves said: ' We have listened to the concerns that people had about the level of the means test, and so we will be making changes to that; they will be in place so that pensioners are paid this coming winter. ' We'll announce the detail of that and the level of that as soon as we possibly can. But people should be in no doubt that the means test will increase and more people will get a winter fuel payment this winter.' The option of paying to all then asking wealthier people to repay is a similar approach to that taken by Tory chancellor George Osborne when he reduced child benefit eligibility for better-off parents. A senior official at HMRC, Jonathan Athow, told the Treasury select committee that if the tax system were used to make the changes, it would not be possible until 2026. 'We'd have to get to April next year before we knew somebody's income, before we could then make any decisions about how [recouping the payment] would then be implemented,' he told MPs.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Starmer agrees to spend 3.5pc on defence after bowing to Nato pressure
Britain has agreed to significantly ramp up defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP after bowing to pressure from Nato. Mark Rutte, the alliance's secretary-general, said a 'historic' decision had been made to invest more on tanks, fighter jets, air defence, drones and long-range missiles at a meeting of defence ministers in Brussels. The Dutchman proposed a rise in defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, and a further 1.5 per cent on related infrastructure, to meet the challenges posed by a resurgence of Moscow. It was only on Monday that Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer in his strategic defence review promised to spend 3 per cent of GDP on the military by the end of the next parliament, but failed to explain how that would be funded. That plan was undermined within 24 hours, after Nato demanded the Government raise that figure to 3.5 per cent. Now that Sir Keir has agreed to the further increase, he will face renewed pressure to set out concrete plans on how he can pay for it. It is expected that Nato's first spending plan in over a decade will be signed off when the alliance's leaders gather for their annual summit in The Hague later this month. The dramatic increase in defence spending was brokered under pressure from US president Donald Trump, who has suggested he could withdraw American support for the alliance if its members fail to hit expenditure targets. Mr Rutte acknowledged that governments started to spend more on defence in the wake of complaints by the US president during his first term in the White House. But the Nato chief added: 'We don't have to do this because of an audience of one, we have to do this to keep one billion people safe.' 'It's important the UK gets there' Earlier, Pete Hegseth, the US secretary of defence, singled out the importance of Britain meeting the new goals in response to a question over Sir Keir's pledge to spend only 3 per cent of GDP on defence. 'We think everyone is going to get there, we really do. It's important they do. It's important that the UK gets there,' Mr Hegseth told reporters on the sidelines of the meeting in Brussels. He argued the extra investment by European allies and Canada was crucial to keep pace with a pledge by Mr Trump to spend $1 trillion on defence in an upcoming budget. 'When you consider the threats that we face, the urgency in the world, it's critical,' Mr Hegseth said. 'We don't need more flags, we need more fighting formations. We don't need more conferences. We need more capabilities, hard power.' Critics have argued that American demands for European governments to invest more in defence will hurt spending on hospitals, schools and other civilian projects. But Mr Rutte said the investment in weapons was needed more than ever, as Russia currently produces as much ammunition every three months as Nato does in a year. 'For the next three years, we are fine, but we have to start now. Otherwise three, four, five years from now, we are really under threat,' he added. 'I may be using rhetoric here, but I really mean it that you will have to get your Russian language course or go to New Zealand.' Talks on the exact details of the defence spending pledge to be made in The Hague will continue in the weeks running up to the summit. Departing the meeting in Brussels, Mr Hegseth said he was confident that there would be a deal. 'Countries in there are well exceeding 2 per cent, and we think very close, almost near consensus, on a 5 per cent commitment for Nato in The Hague later this month,' he said. Mr Hegseth said it was 'heartening' to hear his European counterparts agree to White House demands to become less reliant on America for the continent's security. The Pentagon chief earlier this year shocked Nato allies by insisting that America could no longer be Europe's main security guarantor, as it had to focus Washington's attention on the growing threat posed by China. 'I have total confidence we will get there,' Mr Rutte said on Thursday. 'Look at the Russian threat. The Chinese build-up. We live in a different world. We live in a more dangerous world.' Spain emerged as the country diplomats were most concerned about hitting the target, after its defence minister claimed it could meet the new capability targets while spending just 2 per cent of GDP. Margarita Robles later insisted Madrid would not veto any agreement, even if it did not agree with setting a 'fixed percentage' figure. The new capability targets will see a number of dramatic changes to European defence, including Germany increasing the size of its armed forces by 'around 50,000 to 60,000' more soldiers, according to defence minister Boris Pistorius. The Netherlands also expects to more than double its military from 70,000 to 200,000 personnel in the next five years. Without any reference to the 5 per cent spending goal, Defence Secretary John Healey said 'war-fighting readiness' was at the centre of future plans for Britain's armed forces.
