US sets another grim record for killings by police in 2024
US sets another grim record for killings by police in 2024
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Qualified immunity: How it protects police from civil lawsuits
The doctrine of qualified immunity has been used to protect police from civil lawsuits and trials. Here's why it was put in place.
Just the FAQs, USA TODAY
The number of people killed by police officers rose slightly in 2024, marking the smallest increase recorded in years, according to a report released Tuesday by Mapping Police Violence.
Police killed more than 1,300 people in the U.S. last year, an estimated 0.3% increase in police killings per million people. The slight increase makes 2024 the deadliest year for police violence by a slim margin since Mapping Police Violence began tracking civilian deaths more than a decade ago.
There is no national database that documents police killings in the U.S. and the report comes days after the Justice Department removed a database tracking misconduct by federal law enforcement. Researchers spent thousands of hours analyzing more than 100,000 media reports to compile the Mapping Police Violence database.
"This rise in police violence, even as homicides and violent crime decline nationwide, is a deeply troubling trend that demands data-backed solutions," Campaign Zero, which runs the project, said in a statement.
How many people were killed by police in 2024?
Police killed at least 1,365 people in 2024, according to Mapping Police Violence. That number has been steadily rising since 2019, when 1,113 people were killed by police. The total increased by just 8 people last year, the report found.
Some estimates put the total even higher. The Gun Violence Archive found at least 1,445 suspects were killed and 806 were injured in police shootings in 2024.
It's hard to tell why the uptick was so much smaller than it has been in recent years, in part because the numbers are so small to begin with, according to Abdul Nassar Rad, managing director of research and data at Campaign Zero. Rad said more analysis needs to be done to determine the impact demographic changes, immigration and new policing policies may have had on rates of police violence.
Nearly 65% of the killings occurred following a 911 call, like the death of Sonya Massey, a Black woman who was fatally shot by an Illinois deputy after she called 911 to report an intruder. Rad said its not clear how many more of the victims were the ones who initially called 911.
Almost 90% of the victims were killed by gunshots, 8% by vehicles and 5% by devices like Tasers, according to the report. Some died from other forms of violence, like Robert Brooks, an inmate who died after being violently beaten by multiple officers while handcuffed in a New York prison infirmary.
Some places see sharp increases in police killings while others had none
The southwest United States continued to be a hotspot for police violence, Rad said. New Mexico and Corpus Christi, Texas, were the state and city with the highest per capita rate of police killings, with Corpus Christi seeing a 288% increase from its average from the 11 years prior, Mapping Police Violence found.
But at least 10 cities with at least 250,000 residents and one state, Rhode Island, experienced no police killings last year, according to the report. Rad acknowledged that there may have been police killings in these locations that went unreported by the media and thus not captured in the database.
Rhode Island had the lowest average rate of police killings over the past 11 years followed by Massachusetts, which saw a 75% decrease from its 11-year average in 2024. He said population could be a factor, given that Rhode Island is among the smallest states.
"But then at the same time, what I find interesting is you have places like Wyoming, which also has a pretty small population, but like ninth highest rate of police killings," he added.
Disparities remain for minorities, people with mental health problems
Longstanding disparities for people of color and people with mental health issues persisted at a similar rate in 2024, Rad said.
Black people, for example, were nearly three times more likely to be killed by police than their white counterparts, the report found. Though Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders make up just 0.3% of the population, they were 7.6 times more likely than white people to be killed by police.
In some cities, the disparities observed were even sharper. Black people were more than 30 times more likely to be killed by police in Chicago and more than 10 times more likely to die in St. Louis, according to more than a decades-worth of data collected by Mapping Police Violence.
In 2024, about 1 in 5 people killed by police exhibited signs of mental illness, the report said. This can be a challenging variable to track, given that there were insufficient details about the victim's mental health status in approximately 30% of incidents, Rad said.
"That is something I think pretty significant in terms of understanding and drawing more attention to that," Rad said.
Contributing: Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why ABC News Anchor Terry Moran Got Fired
Wondering why ABC News fired longtime correspondent Terry Moran? A recent social media post sparked controversy and led to swift action from the network. The situation drew reactions from political figures and raised questions about journalistic standards. Here's what led to Moran's firing and what ABC News said about the decision. ABC News fired Terry Moran after he posted a social media message criticizing Stephen Miller, President Donald Trump's deputy chief of staff for policy. On June 10, 2025, ABC News confirmed it would not renew Moran's contract, stating his post was 'a clear violation of ABC News policies.' In a now-deleted June 8 post on X, Moran called Miller 'a man who is richly endowed with the capacity for hatred' and described Trump as a 'world-class hater' who uses hatred for self-glorification. ABC News responded by suspending Moran and later announced his departure, citing a breach of its standards for 'objectivity, fairness and professionalism.' A spokesperson told USA TODAY, 'We are at the end of our agreement with Terry Moran and based on his recent post… we have made the decision to not renew.' The network emphasized that its reporters must adhere to editorial guidelines that prohibit subjective personal attacks. The post sparked a backlash from senior Republicans. Vice President JD Vance called Moran's remarks 'an absolutely vile smear.' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt described the post as 'unhinged and unacceptable' and said the White House had contacted ABC about the matter. According to The Washington Post, Moran was initially suspended 'pending further evaluation' of whether his post violated neutrality standards. ABC News insiders expressed frustration over Moran's actions. Some said his post harmed the network's credibility, especially after recent efforts to rebuild relations with the Trump administration. Moran, 65, joined ABC in 1997 and served as co-anchor of Nightline and senior national correspondent. He had recently interviewed Trump in April 2025. While he deleted the post, Moran has not issued a public statement since his dismissal. The post Why ABC News Anchor Terry Moran Got Fired appeared first on - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments in Trump's bid to erase his hush money conviction
NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump's quest to erase his criminal conviction heads to a federal appeals court Wednesday. It's one way he's trying to get last year's hush money verdict overturned. A three-judge panel is set to hear arguments in Trump's long-running fight to get the New York case moved from state court to federal court, where he could then try to have the verdict thrown out on presidential immunity grounds. The Republican is asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene after a lower-court judge twice rejected the move. As part of the request, Trump wants the federal appeals court to seize control of the criminal case and then ultimately decide his appeal of the verdict, which is now pending in a state appellate court. The 2nd Circuit should 'determine once and for all that this unprecedented criminal prosecution of a former and current President of the United States belongs in federal court," Trump's lawyers wrote in a court filing. The Manhattan district attorney's office, which prosecuted Trump's case, wants it to stay in state court. Trump's Justice Department — now partly run by his former criminal defense lawyers — backs his bid to move the case to federal court. If Trump loses, he could go to the U.S. Supreme Court. Trump was convicted in May 2024 of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to conceal a hush money payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels, whose affair allegations threatened to upend his 2016 presidential campaign. Trump denies her claim and said he did nothing wrong. It was the only one of his four criminal cases to go to trial. Trump's lawyers first sought to move the case to federal court following his March 2023 indictment, arguing that federal officers including former presidents have the right to be tried in federal court for charges arising from 'conduct performed while in office.' Part of the criminal case involved checks he wrote while he was president. They tried again after his conviction, arguing that Trump's historic prosecution violated his constitutional rights and ran afoul of the Supreme Court's presidential immunity ruling, which was decided about a month after the hush money trial ended. The ruling reins in prosecutions of ex-presidents for official acts and restricts prosecutors in pointing to official acts as evidence that a president's unofficial actions were illegal. U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein denied both requests, ruling in part that Trump's conviction involved his personal life, not his work as president. In a four-page ruling, Hellerstein wrote that nothing about the high court's ruling affected his prior conclusion that hush money payments at issue in Trump's case 'were private, unofficial acts, outside the bounds of executive authority.' Trump's lawyers argue that prosecutors rushed to trial instead of waiting for the Supreme Court's presidential immunity decision, and that prosecutors erred by showing jurors evidence that should not have been allowed under the ruling, such as former White House staffers describing how Trump reacted to news coverage of the hush money deal and tweets he sent while president in 2018. Trump's former criminal defense lawyer Todd Blanche is now the deputy U.S. attorney general, the Justice Department's second-in-command. Another of his lawyers, Emil Bove, has a high-ranking Justice Department position. The trial judge, Juan M. Merchan, rejected Trump's requests to throw out the conviction on presidential immunity grounds and sentenced him on Jan. 10 to an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction intact but sparing him any punishment. Appearing by video at his sentencing, Trump called the case a 'political witch hunt,' 'a weaponization of government' and 'an embarrassment to New York.'


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Tariffs Can Stay in Effect Longer, Appeals Court Says
Donald Trump can continue to enforce his global tariffs for now, a federal appeals court held in a win for the president on one of his signature economic policies. The order Tuesday by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit extends an earlier, short-term reprieve for the administration as it presses a challenge to a lower court ruling last month that blocked the tariffs. The Justice Department had argued that US officials' concerns about ongoing trade negotiations outweighed the economic harm claimed by the small businesses that sued.