Birmingham New Street Station ranks 'worst for pickpocketing outside of London'
Birmingham New Street Station ranks the 'worst for pickpocketing offences outside of London,' new data has revealed.
There were 62 pickpocket incidents at the city travel hub between January and December last year.
That is just over 40 percent higher than the second highest at Leeds Railway Station with 37 incidents, while Manchester Piccadilly came third recording 30 incidents over the same time frame.
READ MORE: All-out Birmingham bin strikes prompts 'renters to desert city'
READ MORE: Triple killer's weapon of choice on sale for less than £100 - and there's no licensing system
READ MORE: Midland beauty spot homes under hammer for £375k - and they make money
British Transport Police data was released through Freedom of Information requests by the luggage storage network Bounce.com to determine the number of pickpocketing offences throughout train stations in Britain.
Cody Candee, the CEO and Founder of Bounce.com shares his tips on protecting your belongings in train stations.
He said: 'Train stations are some of the busiest public spaces, making them a prime target for opportunistic thieves. Extra precautions can make all the difference in keeping your personal belongings safe.
'A secure luggage storage service can help prevent theft, especially when exploring crowded areas. Using a trusted luggage storage service means you can travel around the city hands-free without worrying about keeping an eye on your bags.
"Bounce offers secure storage at over 10,000 locations in over 2,000 cities, making it easy to find a safe spot near major train stations worldwide.
'If you're carrying your bags, always keep them within sight. Wear backpacks on your front in crowded areas, and keep suitcases close, especially near escalators and ticket barriers.
"Avoid leaving bags on the floor or unattended on a seat when waiting for a train. If you do put your bag down, loop a bag strap around your arm or leg to prevent quick grabs.
'Scammers and pickpockets often work in teams, using distraction tactics to steal valuables. Be wary of anyone causing a scene, and stay alert in crowded spaces.
"Whether storing your bags securely or keeping them close, a little extra caution can result in a stress-free journey."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Thousands of criminal cases collapsing every year
Thousands of criminal cases, including murders and rapes, are collapsing every year because of lost, damaged or missing evidence. More than 30,000 prosecutions in England and Wales collapsed between October 2020 and September last year, according to data from the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) obtained under Freedom of Information laws. Some 70 homicides and more than 550 sexual offences were among the cases that the CPS ruled could not proceed because prosecutors did not have the necessary evidence to secure a conviction. They are recorded as E72 cases, which collapse because physical or digital evidence such as forensics and body camera footage has been lost, damaged or contaminated during storage. They can also include witness statements or pathology reports not being made available by police or key evidence not gathered from the crime scene. The reasons why cases have collapsed are not included in the data, obtained by the BBC. However the figures do suggest the number of cases that are recorded as an E72 is increasing, with a higher proportion of prosecutions failing to result in a conviction because of lost or missing evidence each year. In 2020, a total of 7,484 prosecutions collapsed because of lost, missing or damaged evidence. Last year, that had risen by nine per cent to 8,180. Former police officers told the BBC they were not surprised by the findings. 'It's [evidence] chucked all over the place,' one officer said. Another said: 'The amount of it is overwhelming … it's unsurprising it gets lost or damaged.' Prof Carole McCartney, a criminologist and expert in evidence retention, said the loss of the dedicated Forensic Science Service (FSS) in 2012 was one of the reasons behind the growing proportion of cases affected by unavailable evidence. Before 2012, all police forces could send exhibits that needed storing or analysing to the FSS, but the government-owned company was closed that year after making large losses. Since then, police forces have had to make their own arrangements to store evidence and contract private providers for forensic services. Prof McCartney said she had witnessed an officer pull out what he called a 'box of horrors' from underneath a desk, which contained various pieces of uncatalogued evidence including a plastic bag with a broken wine bottle in it and a car number-plate. All items held by the FSS from before 2012 were moved to a different facility, the National Forensics Archive, just outside Birmingham, that year, but that archive is for unsolved cases only and does not accept new items. The National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) said police and the CPS worked together to ensure evidence was 'gathered and presented in a timely manner, bringing offenders to justice and ensuring victims are safeguarded'. It said the data obtained by the BBC referred to all evidence that was either missing or unavailable when a defendant was going to trial after being charged. This could include situations where police cannot find an expert witness or may not be able to obtain a required medical statement. The NPCC said: 'When evidential issues occur in a case, the CPS will raise this with police for any action deemed necessary and we will work together to ensure these are resolved wherever possible.' The results of a consultation by the Law Commission, which proposed re-establishing a national forensic service and making the mishandling of evidence a criminal offence in some circumstances, are set to go before Parliament next week. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Thousands of criminal cases collapsing due to missing or lost police evidence
Thousands of criminal cases - including some of the most serious violent and sexual offences - are collapsing every year because of lost, damaged or missing evidence, the BBC has found. More than 30,000 prosecutions in England and Wales collapsed between October 2020 and September 2024, data from the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) reveals. They include 70 homicides and more than 550 sexual offences. Police chiefs say not all the cases relate to lost evidence and the figures include situations where officers may not be able to find an expert witness or get a medical statement. However, it follows a series of damning reports about how police forces are storing evidence. A Home Office spokesperson said: "We always expect forces to adhere to the National Police Chiefs' Council's (NPCC) guidance on storage and retention of evidence." A leading criminologist says the increase was largely "a resourcing issue" brought about by cuts to police forces throughout the 2010s. And ex-police officers told the BBC it was unsurprising and the amount of evidence they deal with is "overwhelming". When police forces build cases around defendants they hand a file to the CPS. But when the CPS cannot proceed to trial because police do not have the necessary evidence needed to secure a conviction - they record it in their data as an "E72". The BBC, alongside the University of Leicester, managed to obtain Freedom of Information (FOI) requests showing the number of E72s recorded between 2020 and 2024 at police forces in England and Wales. They can include: Physical evidence - including forensic evidence - being lost, damaged or contaminated during storage Digital evidence, such as victim interview footage or body camera footage, being lost Witness statements or pathology reports not being made available by police Key evidence not gathered from the crime scene The figures obtained by the BBC do not break down why cases have collapsed. However, the data does suggest the number of cases recorded as an E72 are increasing, with a higher proportion of prosecutions failing to result in a conviction because of lost or missing evidence each year. In 2020, a total of 7,484 prosecutions collapsed because of lost, missing or damaged evidence. In 2024, that had risen by 9%, to 8,180. When Kiera was just nine years old she gave an interview on camera to Lancashire Police describing the harrowing details of the sexual abuse she had been subjected to over several years. But a few months later, she says, police officers told her mother they had lost the recording. "It was really hard, because I sat there for hours and hours telling people what had happened to me and for that to be lost, I just thought like what's the point in doing it again?" said Kiera, now 19. "They did want me to do it again, but I just couldn't go through with it at the time." It wasn't until nine years later, when Kiera was an adult, that she felt strong enough to provide her evidence again. In October 2024, her perpetrators were jailed for almost 30 years for raping and sexually assaulting seven children, including her. "It can really affect someone's mental state. It's also not protecting other people because these people then don't get convicted of crimes." A Lancashire Police spokesperson apologised for the lost interview disc in her case, and said, since 2015, it had introduced new processes to prevent similar issues happening again. Responding to the BBC's findings, Katie Kempen, chief executive at independent charity Victim Support, said: "Police forces must ensure crimes are thoroughly investigated and evidence is handled appropriately and sensitively. "All victim-survivors deserve the opportunity to seek justice." Former police officers have told the BBC they are not surprised by the findings. "It's [evidence] chucked all over the place," said one former officer. "The amount of it is overwhelming… it's unsurprising it gets lost or damaged," another told the BBC. Professor Carole McCartney, a criminologist and expert in evidence retention believes the loss of the dedicated Forensic Science Service (FSS) in 2012 is one of the reasons behind the growing proportion of cases affected by unavailable evidence. Before 2012, all police forces could send exhibits that needed storing or analysing to the service, but the government-owned company was closed that year after making large losses. Since then, police forces have had to make their own evidence storage arrangements and contract private providers for forensic services. Prof McCartney said she had witnessed an officer pull out what he called a "box of horrors" from underneath a desk which contained various pieces of un-catalogued evidence including a plastic bag with a broken wine bottle in it and a car numberplate. All Items held by the FSS from before 2012 were moved to a different facility - the National Forensics Archive just outside of Birmingham - that year, but that archive is for unsolved cases only and does not accept new items. Exhibits in the archive were crucial in overturning the convictions of both Andrew Malkinson and Peter Sullivan. Its director Alison Fendley says that without a dedicated forensic service, police forces were currently suffering from a lack of resources and expertise at a local level. "Police forces have got lots of other things to do - archiving is not their day job and there's so much material coming and going it must be difficult to keep on top of," she says. Meanwhile, backlogs at courts, the growth in online crime and the increase in digital evidence such as body worn video are all adding to a growth in the amount of exhibits police have to keep. The NPCC said police and the CPS worked together to ensure evidence was "gathered and presented in a timely manner, bringing offenders to justice and ensuring victims are safeguarded". It said the data obtained by the BBC refers to all evidence that is either missing or unavailable when a defendant is going to trial after being charged. And this could include situations where police cannot find an expert witness or may not be able to obtain a required medical statement. A number of recent reports have raised serious concerns about police storage of evidence. In 2022, His Majesty's inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services (HMICFRS) found police forces were "struggling to meet the demands placed on it by the digital age" as a result of the fast growth in digital evidence. The University of Leicester's study into police retention of investigative materials, found three quarters of lawyers it surveyed had worked on a criminal conviction where evidence had been lost, destroyed or contaminated. Almost half claimed this had happened on multiple occasions. And Baroness Casey's 2023 review into the culture of the Metropolitan Police found officers having to contend with "over-stuffed, dilapidated or broken fridges and freezers containing evidence including the rape kits of victims". It found an "overworked and inexperienced workforce" lacked the "infrastructure and specialism" for dealing with sexual offences, which existed before a specialist unit was disbanded in 2019. The BBC study found around one in 20 prosecutions by the Met had been dropped as a result of missing evidence between 2020 and 2024. By comparison around one in 50 were dropped across England and Wales. The Met said the number included situations where police could not find an expert witness or were not able to obtain a required medical statement and to suggest it was simply down to lost evidence was misleading. It acknowledged that on "a rare number of occasions" evidence is misplaced, adding: "We continue to make improvements to our recording systems to minimise this risk." The NPCC said: "When evidential issues occur in a case, the CPS will raise this with police for any action deemed necessary and we will work together to ensure these are resolved wherever possible." The results of a consultation by the Law Commission, which proposed re-establishing a national forensic service and making the mishandling of evidence a criminal offence in some circumstances, are set to go before Parliament next week. Additional reporting by Catherine Heuston and Claire Jones.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Male criminals can self-identify as women in mental health hospitals
NHS mental health hospitals are allowing male criminals to self-identify as women, NHS documents have revealed. Trusts in London are permitting transgender women to use female-only spaces despite acknowledging their presence as a 'risk to a particular gender' and potentially 'very distressing for other patients on a single-sex ward'. Campaigners have accused the NHS of endangering the welfare of the 'most vulnerable women' by allowing transgender women, who were born male, on female wards. A women's rights group used Freedom of Information (FoI) requests to obtain sex and gender policies at NHS mental health trusts in London. The recently disclosed documents found mental health trusts raising concerns over the guidance that forensic patients should use single-sex female spaces if they identified as women. Forensic patients are those referred to the NHS from court or prison for committing offences, or considered a potential risk to themselves or others because of a mental health disorder. Under the current NHS guidelines published in 2019, transgender people should be accommodated according to the way they dress, their name and pronouns, which 'may not always accord with the physical sex appearance of the chest or genitalia'. This also 'applies to toilet and bathing facilities', with the exception of pre-operative transgender people sharing open shower facilities. Policy at West London NHS Trust, which runs the high-security Broadmoor Hospital, abides by these guidelines, stating: 'A trans man or a trans woman must be admitted on to a ward in accordance with their presenting gender, if this is their preference.' It added: 'Patients should be addressed respectfully, using the pronouns of their acquired gender.' The trust cited an example of a transgender patient in a manic state getting undressed in front of women and revealing their genitals. It said: 'A patient with bipolar (who happens also to be trans) who is in a manic state and who does not have capacity may be disinhibited and at risk of disrobing in public. 'Depending on where they are in their transition, it may be more appropriate for them to be admitted to a ward that is in line with their birth gender … while they are acutely unwell and at risk of 'outing' themselves.' The policy document added: 'Once they have recovered and have regained capacity it would be essential to have a conversation with the patient around where they would be most comfortably accommodated, and to arrange a move to a ward in accordance with their correct gender.' Both trusts note that there may be circumstances where it is lawful to exclude a patient, transgender or otherwise, from a single-sex ward if it constitutes 'proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim' such as harm reduction. At Central and North Western London, a policy document said that 'further consideration may be needed as to how best to manage a trans individual' in some cases, such as when 'a sexually disinhibited pre-operative transsexual individual may be very distressing for other patients on a single-sex ward'. In such a 'rare occasion', the policy recommends the individual 'be transferred to a single room and consideration made to their temporary use of a disabled toilet should individual toilets not be available'. The trust said it 'respects an individual's right to self-identify as male or female', and made clear that transgender women could access women's lavatories. The Equality and Human Rights Commission, the equalities watchdog, has issued interim guidance advising it should be 'compulsory' for workplaces to provide single-sex lavatories, though trans women should not be left with no facilities to use. The NHS is currently reviewing its guidelines on same-sex accommodation in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling on biological sex. Helen Joyce, director of advocacy at the human rights charity Sex Matters, said: 'It's deeply disturbing that the safety and welfare of some of the most vulnerable women in London – those in the care of state mental health services – are being so seriously compromised by NHS trusts. 'The Supreme Court judgment was crystal-clear that single-sex services must be run on the basis of biological sex. 'There is no excuse for a dangerous 'case-by-case' approach that deems some men safe to be housed in women's accommodation. 'These NHS trusts are missing the point: no male patient should ever be allowed in female accommodation under any circumstances. His claimed identity, history of sexual behaviour and whether he has had surgery to remove body parts are all irrelevant. So is the state of his mental and physical health. 'If health care managers cannot understand why this matters so much in mental health services, then they are not fit to run NHS trusts or to have female patients in their care.' A campaigner involved in the audit told The Times that it was 'scary to think' that the gender identity of violent criminals could 'override the safety and dignity of women'. They added: 'NHS trusts are playing Russian roulette with women's safety. The Supreme Court ruling clarified that single-sex spaces must be single sex, and it is vital that this is now enforced nationally across all hospitals.' An NHS spokesman said: 'The NHS is working through the implications of the Supreme Court ruling, and we absolutely recognise the need for revised guidance. It's important that we wait for the Equality and Human Rights Commission to publish its statutory guidance before final decisions about future policy are taken. 'In the meantime, we are working closely with Government to ensure we can provide updated guidance for the health service as soon as possible.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
