MPs call for prison wardens to be armed with Tasers, stun grenades and 'baton rounds' following string of attacks in UK jails
Prison wardens must be armed with Tasers, stun grenades and 'baton rounds' that fire rubber bullets to protect themselves against violent criminals, Conservative MPs have said.
Armouries should also be built in high-security jails, holding lethal weapons as a last resort against violent prisoners, according to proposals to get tough in jails after a spate of attacks.
Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick also wants solitary confinement introduced for gang leaders who are radicalising other inmates to tackle Islamist threats in British jails.
Violent prisoners should also have no access to kitchens and appliances, he said.
It comes after a series of attacks in prisons, including Southport killer Axel Rudakubana, who allegedly injured a prison officer with boiling water from a kettle.
The calls follow a Tory-backed review by former prison governor Ian Acheson.
Mr Jenrick said: 'Islamist gangs and violent prisoners in our jails are out of control. It's a national security emergency but the government is dithering.
'If they don't act soon, there is a very real risk a prison officer is kidnapped or murdered in the line of duty, or that a terrorist attack is directed from inside prison.'
He added: 'We have to stop pussy-footing around Islamist extremists and violent offenders in jails.
'That means arming specialist prison officer teams with Tasers and stun grenades, as well as giving them access to lethal weapons in exceptional circumstances.'
Mr Acheson said: 'The threat to officer safety is now intolerable and must be met decisively by the Government.'
A Ministry of Justice source said: 'The last Government added just 500 cells to our prison estate and left our jails in total crisis.
'In 14 years, they closed 1,600 cells in the high-security estate, staff assaults soared and experienced officers left in droves. Now the arsonists are pretending to be firefighters.
'We are building new prisons, with 2,400 new cells opened since we took office.
'And we take a zero-tolerance approach to violence and extremism inside.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Charity warns of disposable vapes ‘ticking time bomb' following ban
A 'ticking time bomb' of disposable vapes is set to enter the waste system this week, risking widespread fires because of the incorrect disposal of the devices' batteries, a charity has warned. Electrical Safety First urged vapers not to 'bin the battery' following the ban on the sale of disposable or single-use vapes from June 1. A survey for the charity found almost three in five vapers (58%) plan on throwing their old vapes into their household's general waste or recycling bin, prompting fears of fires in refuse trucks and waste centres. This is despite 71% of vapers admitting that they are aware that improper disposal of vapes can cause fires. Disposable vapes contain lithium-ion batteries, which if damaged can create explosive and highly toxic fires that are almost impossible to put out – a process known as thermal runaway. However, the incorrect disposal of these vapes in the general waste system can cause bigger issues. When general rubbish or recycling is collected, vapes are often crushed, compacted, punctured or soaked in liquids. This can cause the batteries within them to overheat or ignite, leading to fires that put workers at risk, risking millions of pounds worth of damage and disruption to waste services. Even if they do not start a fire, damaged batteries release harmful chemicals and materials that can damage the environment if not recycled responsibly. Many vape retailers offer take-back services for disposable vapes. Some councils also have recycling points at household recycling centres. Consumers can check their local council's website to find out if this is available in their area. Giuseppe Capanna, product safety engineer at Electrical Safety First, said: 'This week we anticipate many disposable vapes will come to the end of their life following the ban. 'With reports of vapers having stockpiled these devices there is a risk that a large number of them could end up in the waste system if they are thrown out incorrectly in the household bin. 'These devices contain lithium-ion batteries that can explode or catch fire if damaged or crushed if they make their way into bin lorries, creating a ticking time bomb that puts refuse workers and communities at serious risk. 'The safest option is to recycle them properly. You can recycle them through retail take-back schemes or at a local recycling centre that has dedicated facilities.' The crackdown on the sale of the devices now makes it illegal for any retailer – ranging from corner shops to supermarkets – to sell them. The ban applies to both online and in-store sales across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and all disposable vapes whether or not they contain nicotine. Retailers are still allowed to sell reusable vapes. It follows the soaring use of disposable vapes in schools and a flood of plastic rubbish from the discarding of the devices. Rogue traders who continue to sell them risk a fine of £200 in the first instance, followed by an unlimited fine or jail time for repeat offending. Censuswide surveyed 1,003 UK adults who own a disposable vape between May 22-27.
The Guardian
15 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Reeves faces fresh pressure to spend billions more on affordable housing
Rachel Reeves is under renewed pressure to spend billions more on affordable housing, after an industry report suggested the government had significantly overestimated how many new homes would be built over the next few years. The chancellor is being urged by figures inside and outside government to spend heavily on affordable housing at this month's spending review, as a report by one of the country's biggest housing companies cast doubt on official forecasts. The findings from Savills suggest the government is further away from hitting its target of building 1.5m new homes than previously admitted. Its findings are likely to boost the arguments of Angela Rayner, the housing secretary, who is at loggerheads with Reeves over how much her department should be given to build new affordable homes. Kate Henderson, the chief executive of the National Housing Federation (NHF), which commissioned the report, said: 'This analysis shows that reaching the OBR's [Office for Budget Responsibility] forecasts, let alone the government's targets, will require a generational boost to investment in social and affordable housing.' Chris Buckle, the residential research director at Savills, added: 'The heroic rates of growth forecast by the OBR will not be achieved without further action from the government to support demand – particularly support for housing associations and an ambitious new grant funding programme.' One government source said funding for affordable homes was proving a sticking point in negotiations over June's spending review, with Rayner pushing for Reeves to spend much more heavily on it than the previous government did. Labour's vow to build 1.5m houses over the course of the parliament has been central to its promises on economic growth and tackling the cost of living. Hitting the target would require 300,000 net new additions to housing supply every year of the parliament – a level that has never been hit before. Ministers argue that they will be able to stimulate a housing boom by making changes to the planning system that make it far easier for private developers to invest in new schemes. Their claims have been bolstered by official forecasts from the OBR, which say there are likely to be 1.3m net new homes built over the five years to March 2030. Reeves welcomed that forecast in March, saying it showed the government was within 'touching distance' of hitting its target. However, the findings from Savills suggest ministers are much further from that target than Reeves's words suggest. First, the report says the 1.3m forecast applies to the whole of the UK, while the government's target applies only to England. It also highlights the fact that the OBR's forecast is for a period until March 2030, nearly a year after the latest possible date for the next election. Taken together, the report estimates the government is actually on track to oversee the building of 1m new homes by the end of the parliament – only two-thirds of the way to its target. In addition, Savills found the OBR had relied on historically high estimates of private housebuilding to create its forecast. In 2030, for example, the forecast says there are likely to be just over 1.2m private house sales, of which 160,000 will be newly built properties. This would be far in excess of historical trends, given that transaction volumes throughout the 2010s were closer to 1m, and that sales of newbuild properties rarely exceed 10% of the total number of transactions. If overall sales and sales of new properties remain closer to recent trends, it would mean only 100,000 new houses going on sale every year – less than two-thirds of the OBR's forecast. The OBR's forecasts also rely on affordable housebuilding rising in line with the private market, despite the fact that the number of new affordable homes being started has collapsed recently – down 35% in England in 2024 and 90% in London. The report comes amid a standoff between Reeves and Rayner over how much to spend on affordable housing until the end of the parliament. With less than two weeks to go until the chancellor announces departmental spending limits for the next three years, officials say the two cabinet ministers are yet to reach an agreement on the housing budget. At the March budget, Reeves announced an extra £2bn for the government's affordable homes programme in 2026-27. But Rayner is understood to be arguing for more, saying the extra money was billed at the time as a 'downpayment' on the government's housing commitments. She argues that the 1.5m target will be missed without much higher levels of support. The NHF has calculated that to meet housing need the government must build 90,000 new socially rented homes a year, which if entirely publicly funded would cost the government £11.5bn a year. The federation is also urging Reeves to guarantee that social rents should go up by 1 percentage point above inflation for the next 10 years – double the length of time the government has proposed. This would help buttress the finances of the country's housing associations, 11 of which recently wrote to the housing minister Matthew Pennycook warning of 'the worst housing situation in living memory'. Henderson said: 'This certainty of income is vital for housing associations to unlock the private investment needed to build new affordable homes and deliver growth, jobs and improved living standards.' Part of the government strategy for hitting its building targets is to reduce environmental protections, saying: 'We can't have a situation where a newt is more protected than people who desperately need housing.' But this is causing grave concern among environment groups who say that nature in England and the UK is already in crisis, that builders are already not fulfilling the promises they have made on nature, and that the delays in housebuilding are very unlikely to be entirely down to bats or newts. The OBR declined to comment.
Sky News
16 minutes ago
- Sky News
'He didn't understand he was dying from cancer': Anonymous nurse reveals what her job is like
Dreaming of a new career? Each week, we speak to someone from a different profession to discover what it's really like. Today, the Money team chats to an NHS learning disability nurse - we agreed to make them anonymous so they could provide an unfiltered view of the job. I worked with a man with a severe learning disability who was dying of cancer... He didn't understand what this meant and just wanted to feel well and looked after. I worked with the oncologist, GP and local palliative care service to arrange a professionals meeting, advocating for the unique needs of this man. We were able to arrange for him to be at his "best" health for one last holiday, before being supported into a planned palliative care community bed with staff he knew, where he was supported to die with dignity in minimal pain. Without my support advocating on his behalf, he would have died in a hospital bed, without known staff, scared and alone, and would never have had the chance to have his last holiday. I will truly never forget him; it was humbling to be able to help in any way I could. You start on £30,000... Entry-level nurses start at NHS pay band 5, which equates to £29,970 (rising to £36,483). Progression is, of course, possible through developing skills and expertise, with experienced senior nurses earning £50,000+. The NHS pension is generous... Depending on salary, we can pay from 5-12% of our salary into pension, with the employer putting in 14.4% for all pensions. Pension and financial advice is also available to support retirement planning. This job is so varied... Learning disability nurses work with people who have a learning disability (and with their families and carers) to help them stay as healthy as possible throughout their lives. I could be supporting someone to understand and manage their diabetes or other complex health issues, helping someone to safely express their emotions or any distress, or supporting with future planning, which could be related to dementia, or their end-of-life wishes, and all this just in one day. A wide range of clinical skills is also required - including those relating to epilepsy, complex physical health, mental health, autism, forensic risk, dementia, and positive approaches to behavioural support. The NHS is really good with flexible working... There are so many different jobs... it can really work for different lifestyles. I work part-time currently (four days). On holidays, you start with 27 days, and after 10 years, you have 32 (plus bank holidays on top). One person I worked with had been in a hospital environment for 20 years... She described herself during that time as a flower that hadn't been watered. One of the most rewarding parts of the job is helping people to move back to their local area and live in community settings, ensuring the best support is available to maintain this. After successfully moving out of hospital, the woman later described herself as like a garden full of beautiful flowers in full bloom. If I could change one thing, it would be for people to know who we are... Learning disability nurses have the same clinical skills as other branches of nursing registrants but it is a lesser-known specialism and few people understand what we do. This means that fewer people enrol to be a learning disabilities nurse, making vacancies harder to fill. People with learning disabilities often have communication needs, anxieties, past negative experiences or other barriers to accepting help... As learning disability nurses, we pause, reflect and then try again using adapted and creative approaches to meet individuals' specific needs. Learning disability support does not get enough funding... this is a fundamental requirement if we are to support individuals to lead longer, happier and healthier lives. Capacity is always an issue... with increased demand being placed on services. Similarly, challenges in social care provision often have an impact on people's health and wellbeing, and, as a result, pressure on health services increases. There is also often a reliance on families and care providers to implement recommendations that have been made, which can prove challenging, as is ensuring that appropriate levels of support are in place. There continues to be inequitable access to healthcare generally, which learning disability nurses are instrumental in challenging to improve health outcomes for those with a learning disability. Laughter and smiles are more common than tears... when working with people who have a learning disability! One of my most memorable success stories... was supporting a young lady who needed eye surgery due to her failing eyesight. Initially, this lady declined surgery, but by using accessible information, she was able to understand why surgery was important and the impact that not having this could have on her quality of life. We discussed her fears, undertook some desensitisation work, and I worked with the hospital teams to make sure that her fears were listened to, and that adjustments to her treatment plan were made too. The operation was a success, and the lady regained some of her sight. A common misconception... is that people who have a learning disability are not able to learn new skills and are not able to make their own choices. With the right support, individuals are more than able to achieve positive change and have their voice heard.
