Brother of Hamas hostage makes emotional plea to Trump: 'Achieve the biggest deal'
Print Close
By , Moshe Or
Published June 25, 2025
While the world breathes easier following the ceasefire with Iran, families like mine are still holding our breath — because my brother, and 49 other hostages, are still underground in Gaza, waiting to come home.
For almost two weeks, as Iran escalated its attacks, our families lived through a dual nightmare. When Iran's missiles first started falling, my wife was abroad. I was home alone with our three young children, racing to the bomb shelter, trying to hold it together while sirens howled above us. My wife fought to return to Israel — to a country under fire — because she couldn't bear the thought of us facing this alone.
That's the kind of fear we've been living with.
ISRAELI HOSTAGE FAMILIES MAKE DESPERATE PLEA TO TRUMP AS 'TIME IS RUNNING OUT'
I held my children close and did everything I could to comfort them. And still, through it all, my thoughts kept circling back to my younger brother Avinatan. If we were terrified with walls around us, close to our loved ones, what is Avinatan feeling there, underground, in the darkness, surrounded by terrorists?
That thought never leaves me.
This has been the reality for so many Israeli families — sheltering from bombs above, while knowing our loved ones are still captive below. As the world shifts its attention to the next crisis, the hostages risk being forgotten. But their suffering hasn't ended. Their time is still frozen. And we are still fighting to bring them home.
President Trump, you've shown the world what decisive leadership looks like. Your response to Iran sent a clear message: America stands by its allies, stands for the safety of the entire world. Now, with a ceasefire in place, we must not waste this window of opportunity. You've helped free hostages before. You've said you want a deal that brings them all home. Now you can achieve the biggest deal of all.
SIGN UP FOR ANTISEMITISM EXPOSED NEWSLETTER
Six hundred and twenty-eight days. That's how long my brother, Avinatan, has been held hostage by Hamas in Gaza. Alive — but suffering. Denied sunlight, clean water, medicine and basic freedom. He is being used as a bargaining chip in a cruel game.
Oct. 7, 2023 was Simchat Torah — a holiday that's supposed to celebrate joy and tradition. I had no idea that my brother was even at the Nova music festival, one of the first targets hit by Hamas. The first sign that something was wrong came through social media. Friends started looking for him online. Then the video surfaced — Avinatan, handcuffed, being dragged violently into Gaza, forcibly separated from his girlfriend Noa Argamani. It still doesn't feel real. But every day since then, I've been forced to live it. Noa was rescued this June. Avinatan is still there.
For the first 500 days, we had no idea about his fate. Just the sickening knowledge that he was likely suffering. Then, in March, we finally received a sign of life. It was a breath after months of suffocation. But confirming he's alive is not the goal. The goal is to bring him home that way.
Hostages who've returned describe horrifying conditions: underground tunnels in total darkness, starvation so severe their muscles broke down, and silence so prolonged some forgot how to speak. They face systematic cruelty and torture every day.
Avinatan is 32, my younger brother — thoughtful and full of heart. He's an electrical engineer at Nvidia, a devoted uncle and one of seven siblings in our big, close family. He never misses a birthday and will drive across the country just to show up. A passionate cook, he prepares elaborate meals just to see others smile. Smart, funny, always surrounded by friends — Avinatan is the soul of our family. Our bond never needed daily phone calls or long conversations. We're the kind of brothers who just know. We grew up side by side, and even as we built our own lives, we could still sit together at our mother's house on a Friday afternoon and talk and laugh like no time had passed.
The last time I saw Avinatan was at my youngest daughter's 3rd birthday. She's turning 5 soon. One of her older brothers recently told us his biggest fear is forgetting what Avinatan looks like — forgetting the sound of his voice. This is the childhood they've inherited. And now, on top of everything, they had to wake up to the terrifying sound of sirens — running to shelters, asking questions no child should have to ask.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
We miss him in every moment — during celebrations, in sadness, and most of all, in everyday life. At Friday dinners when his chair stays empty, during family milestones that pass without him. The hardest part is realizing how much time has passed, and still, he's there — buried in Hamas's tunnels, waiting for us to bring him home.
President Trump, you have the power to change this story — and complete your mission. The twelve-day operation in Iran has ended. The United States stood with Israel. Now it's time to turn that success into something even greater: a comprehensive deal that brings all the hostages home and ends this war.
The ceasefire with Iran must mark the beginning of a broader resolution. There are 50 hostages still held in Gaza — some confirmed alive, others known to have been murdered. Every one of them matters. Every one of them must come home.
We thank you, Mr. President, and the people of the United States, for standing with us. We ask you now to help bring this fight to its just conclusion.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
Avinatan is still alive. Still waiting. And we will not stop — not until he and every other hostage are home.
Moshe Or is the brother of hostage Avinatan Or, who was kidnapped by Hamas terrorists on October 7, 2023. Print Close
URL
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/brother-hamas-hostage-makes-emotional-plea-trump-achieve-biggest-deal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Intercept
15 minutes ago
- The Intercept
War Powers Resolution From House Democratic Leaders May Not Limit Trump's War Powers
As Democrats try to push forward legislation that would block further strikes on Iran, one measure advanced by House leadership could actually strengthen the Trump administration's justification for subsequent attacks, anti-war advocates warn. House progressives on Wednesday were trying to reach a compromise with Democratic leaders that would curb further U.S. military involvement in Iran while satisfying concerns from pro-Israel members about American support for Israel's missile defense. There are three different war powers resolutions in play in Washington. In the Senate, a resolution from Tim Kaine, D-Va., appears to be on track for a vote on Friday. In the House, however, Democrats remain sharply divided between two resolutions. 'There's no upside to advancing a competing War Powers Resolution. It's not just unnecessary — it's actively counterproductive,' Cavan Kharrazian, a senior policy adviser at Demand Progress, said in a statement. 'There's still time to reconcile this on the House side, and we hope an agreement can be reached to enable a strong vote with the best possible language.' The resolutions in both chambers face long odds, thanks to near-unanimous support from the majority Republicans for President Donald Trump's strikes. Congressional Democrats are responding to Trump's strikes by pursuing a vote under the War Powers Act, the Vietnam War-era law designed to limit presidents' ability to launch military action abroad without congressional approval. Kaine's initial resolution introduced last week directs Trump to halt hostilities against Iran, while making clear that the president can still defend the U.S. from imminent attack. Kaine's resolution has drawn support from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. It is expected to come to a voter later this week. Amid concerns from pro-Israel Democrats, Kaine said Tuesday that he was co-sponsoring an amendment to his resolution with Sens. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and Andy Kim, D-N.J. The amendment is intended to continue to allow the U.S. to participate in Israeli missile defense. Pentagon officials said last April that the U.S. — not Israel — shot down most Iranian drones and missiles during an Iranian attack. 'This amendment would leave no doubt that Senator Kaine's resolution would ensure that President Trump has to make the case to the American people for further action against Iran without constraining our ability to help defend the Israeli people from Iranian attacks,' Kim said in a statement. While most Senate Democrats appeared to have coalesced around Kaine's resolution, House Democrats remained split on Wednesday over how to respond to Trump's strikes. Advocates last week said they were frustrated that Democratic leaders were not moving forward with a resolution as Trump publicly mulled attacking Iran. Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., teamed up with Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., to introduce a resolution. After the strikes were launched, three House Democratic committee ranking members introduced an alternative resolution that its authors claim would also force Trump to cease hostilities with Iran. The sponsors are Reps. Jim Himes of Connecticut, Adam Smith of Washington, and Gregory Meeks of New York. Anti-war advocates worry that the House leadership measure could actually wind up strengthening Trump's justification for launching further strikes on Iran. In an apparent nod to Israel, the leaders' resolution would give the president the power to 'defend the United States or an ally or partner of the United States from imminent attack.' Trump has already justified his strike on Iran as an act of 'collective self-defense of our ally, Israel,' according to a letter he sent Congress, despite the assessment of U.S intelligence agencies that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon. Critics say the House Democratic leadership resolution mirrors the language of Trump's justification far too closely. 'We think if it passes, it would be worse than not having a war powers resolution.' 'We think if it passes, it would be worse than not having a war powers resolution,' said Yasmine Taeb, the legislative and political director for the Muslim advocacy group MPower Change. 'This war powers resolution gives the impression that the president has broad authority to be able to engage in military offensive action with respect to Iran — if Israel is asking us to.' Spokespersons for Himes, Meeks, and Smith's offices did not immediately comment. Khanna has said that his resolution is intended to preserve the U.S. military's ability to participate in Israeli missile defense. Advocates said they understood there were ongoing discussions about a compromise. The two sides have ample time: A vote on the measure is not expected to come to the floor before mid- to late-July. Whether or not the two sides come to an accord, however, the push to respond to Trump's strikes could face serious pushback from Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson. Johnson said Tuesday that he thought the War Powers Act itself was unconstitutional and signaled that he may use a procedural move to prevent it from coming to the floor. The War Powers Act states that resolutions brought under its auspices must be fast-tracked to the House floor within 15 working days. Johnson, however, could try to block the resolution from receiving such a 'privileged' status — although that would likely force a vote on the procedural maneuver itself. Massie's co-sponsorship of the resolution gave it bipartisan support, but it's unclear whether he will continue to push its passage in the face of intense pressure from the White House and the ceasefire announced by Trump on Monday. Massie has said he is taking a 'wait and see' approach. As a shaky ceasefire between Israel and Iran continued to hold Wednesday morning, progressives in the House said they were pursuing a vote on their preferred resolution despite the opposition from Johnson. Khanna said at a Capitol press conference that blocking the vote with a procedural maneuver would be an 'unprecedented abrogation of congressional power.' 'The fundamental point here is that we don't know what the strikes accomplished, but we do know a lot of the harm,' Khanna said. 'It has hardened the resolve in Iran to now race towards a nuclear weapon.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Where is Iran's enriched uranium? Questions loom after Trump claims victory.
WASHINGTON − Amid President Donald Trump's scramble to save the Israel-Iran ceasefire and his claims to have "obliterated" Iranian nuclear sites, a key question remains unanswered − where's the uranium? Trump's June 23 ceasefire announcement came after his administration said it destroyed three of Iran's major nuclear facilities – Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. The U.S. strikes "completely and totally obliterated" Iran's nuclear facilities, Trump said June 21 after the bombs were dropped. Initial assessments showed all three sites "sustained extremely severe damage and destruction," Gen. Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters. But watchers of Iran's nuclear program say a massive question mark looms over the U.S. operation – what happened to Iran's enriched uranium? That's "not the question before us," Vice President JD Vance said in a June 23 Fox News interview, dodging the question of what happened to Iran's uranium stockpile. The bombing had, more importantly, destroyed Tehran's ability to enrich uranium to the level needed for a nuclear weapon, he said. "I do think that the uranium was buried," he added. Nuclear experts disagreed. "Significant nuclear materials remain unaccounted for," said Kelsey Davenport, the Arms Control Association's director for nonproliferation policy. "Our understanding is that some of them were taken away by Iran, and we don't know where they are," David Albright, a former United Nations nuclear weapons inspector, said of the enriched uranium stockpiles in a June 24 CNN interview. More: Inside the attack: Details revealed of secret US mission to bomb Iran Satellite images showed new craters at the Fordow and Natanz facilities where U.S. "bunker buster" bombs made impact. "It is clear that Fordow was also directly impacted, but the degree of damage inside the uranium enrichment halls can't be determined with certainty,' Rafael Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said in a June 22 report. Officials and nuclear experts say most of Iran's enriched uranium was stored in an underground complex near the Isfahan facility, which the U.S. struck with Tomahawk missiles fired from a Navy submarine, demolishing several above-ground facilities, satellite images show. Grossi reported damage to several buildings and entrances to the underground storage tunnels, but it's unclear what happened to any uranium that may have been held in the tunnels. "It does not appear like the underground facility has been targeted at all," said Sam Lair, a research associate at Middlebury College's James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies. "Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan all include deeply buried facilities where it will be challenging to assess the extent of the damage without boots on the ground at these sites," said Davenport. Lair said Iran had ample time to move enriched uranium out of the underground tunnels before Israel first struck the facility on June 13. Even if they had not yet moved the uranium by the time Israel launched its first attack of the 12-day conflict, "they had a period where Isfahan was not being targeted, and they could have done so," he said. Satellite images from Maxar Technology captured vehicles activity at Fordow in the days leading up to the U.S. strikes, including a line of cargo trucks parked outside. And Hassan Abedini, deputy political director for Iran's state broadcaster, told reporters after the U.S. bombing that Iran "didn't suffer a major blow because the materials had already been taken out." Iran's enriched uranium is central to Israeli and U.S. justifications for their attacks. According to the IAEA, Iran has enriched more than 400 kilograms − about 880 pounds − of uranium to 60%, enough to make around nine nuclear weapons if it is further enriched to weapons grade, which is around 90%. "The risk posed by the 60% enriched uranium is amplified because Iran may have also stashed centrifuges at an undeclared site," said Davenport. On June 13, the day Israel launched its attack on Iran, citing the dangers of its nuclear program, the IAEA said Iran had revealed plans for a new enrichment site. "The Iranians, on some level, were preparing for an outcome similar to this," Lair said. Another site is "ready to have centrifuges installed somewhere, and not very many people are talking about it." On June 24, Iranian nuclear chief Mohammad Eslami told Mehr News the nuclear program – which Iran asserts is peaceful – would be restored. "The plan is to prevent interruptions in the process of production and services," Eslami said. But Trump vowed in a post on Truth Social: "IRAN WILL NEVER REBUILD THEIR NUCLEAR FACILITIES!" This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: What happened to Iran's enriched uranium? Experts say it's a mystery
an hour ago
Trump faces an alliance shaped to his liking as he attends the NATO summit
THE HAGUE, Netherlands -- U.S. President Donald Trump huddled on Wednesday with members of a NATO alliance that he has worked to bend to his will over the years and whose members are rattled by his latest comments casting doubt on the U.S. commitment to its mutual defense guarantees. Trump's comments en route to the Netherlands that his fidelity to Article 5 'depends on your definition" drew attention at the NATO summit, as will the new and fragile Iran-Israel ceasefire that the Republican president helped broker after the U.S. unloaded airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. At the same time, the alliance is poised to enact one of Trump's chief priorities: a pledge by NATO member countries to increase, sometimes significantly, how much they spend on their defense. 'I've been asking them to go up to 5% for a number of years,' Trump said Wednesday as he met with Mark Rutte, the alliance's secretary-general. 'I think that's going to be very big news.' The boost in spending follows years of Trump's complaints that other countries weren't paying their fair share for membership in an alliance created as a bulwark against threats from the former Soviet Union. Most NATO countries, with the key exception of Spain, are preparing to endorse the 5% pledge, motivated to bolster their own defenses not just by Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine but also, perhaps, to placate Trump. As a candidate in 2016, Trump suggested that as president he would not necessarily heed the alliance's mutual defense guarantees outlined in Article 5 of the NATO treaty. In March of this year, he expressed uncertainty that NATO would come to the United States' defense if needed, though the alliance did just that after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. On Tuesday, he told reporters aboard Air Force One on his way to The Hague for the summit that whether he is committed to Article 5 'depends on your definition.' 'There's numerous definitions of Article 5. You know that, right?' Trump said. 'But I'm committed to being their friends.' He signaled that he would give a more precise definition of what Article 5 means to him once he was at the summit. New Hampshire Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, who traveled to The Hague and met with several foreign leaders at the summit, said other countries raised 'understandable questions' about the U.S. commitment to the alliance, 'certainly given President Trump's past statements.' 'We were very strong and reassuring everyone that we are committed to NATO, we are committed to Article 5, we are committed to maintaining troops on the Eastern flank,' said Shaheen, who represented the U.S. Senate with Democratic Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware. Trump also vented to reporters before leaving Washington about the actions by Israel and Iran after his announced ceasefire — although on Monday, he said the ceasefire was 'very good.' After Trump arrived in the Netherlands, news outlets, including The Associated Press, reported that a U.S. intelligence report suggested in an early assessment that Iran's nuclear program had been set back only a few months by weekend strikes and was not 'completely and fully obliterated,' as Trump had said. But on Wednesday morning, Trump and other senior Cabinet officials vigorously pushed back on the assessment, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the administration was launching an investigation into who disclosed those findings to reporters. 'That hit ended the war," Trump said. Drawing comparisons to the atomic bombings from the U.S. during World War II, he added: "I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima. I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki. But that was essentially the same thing. That ended that war.' The White House has not said which other world leaders Trump would meet with one on one while in The Hague, but Trump said during his meeting with Rutte that he will meet with Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelenskyy later Wednesday.
