Chelsea FC XI vs Flamengo: Confirmed news, predicted lineup, injury latest for Club World Cup
28 Years Later plot and ending explained — and will there be another film?
28 Years Later plot and ending explained — will there be another film?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Sun
38 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
REVIEW: ‘28 Years Later' deftly revives a franchise of the undead
Published Jun 19, 2025 • 4 minute read Spike (Alfie Williams) and Dr. Kelson (Ralph Fiennes) in "28 Years Later." Photo by Miya Mizuno / Columbia Pictures/Sony Pictures Entertainment Reviews and recommendations are unbiased and products are independently selected. Postmedia may earn an affiliate commission from purchases made through links on this page. Among its many other attributes, '28 Years Later' is a reminder of why Ralph Fiennes is a cultural object to be treasured. Rarely bothering with lead roles, the actor prefers instead to airdrop into films as a politely strange supporting presence, radiating intelligent lunacy tinged with regret. In Danny Boyle's new movie – a jump-start to a dormant franchise and the first in a new trilogy – Fiennes appears midway through, dyed yellow with iodine and apologetic about the tower of skulls in his backyard. And he's one of the movie's good guys. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account A follow-up to Boyle's galvanizing 2003 horror thriller '28 Days Later' and its 2007 sequel '28 Weeks Later,' '28 Years Later' (which at one point was supposed to be titled '28 Months Later,' but someone got distracted) asks questions surprisingly relevant to our current moment. Such as: Where does civilization go at a time of societal collapse? How do a people maintain normality? What place does kindness have in a world of rampage and insanity? These are deep and welcome thoughts for a zombie movie. Although, right, they're not technically zombies. As posited in the original film, a laboratory-made 'rage virus' has escaped, turning England into a mob of ravenous, kill-crazy cannibals, able to pass a fast-acting infection with a bite or even a drop of saliva. By the time of '28 Years Later,' all of Britain has become one giant quarantine zone, its waters patrolled by an international coalition and outposts of humanity clinging to the coastline like life rafts. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. One such community is Holy Island, connected to the mainland by a causeway that surfaces only at low tide. The islanders have made a life for themselves as a village of hardy, inventive survivors who come ashore to forage and pick off the infected where they can. The film's hero, a 12-year-old boy named Spike (Alfie Williams), makes the journey with his father (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) in the early scenes of '28 Years Later,' marking his first kill with a bow and arrow. The ghoulies have evolved over the years into various types, including creepy crawling fatties who live on a diet of worms and strapping 'alphas' who like to rip off heads with their spines attached. In Williams's sweetly sensitive portrayal, Spike is brave but also terrified, and he checks out of a celebratory party on his return to look in on his mum, Isla (Jodie Comer of 'Killing Eve'), who's bedridden and delusional from a mystery ailment. The meat of the movie consists of the boy deciding to lead his mother toward a rumor of a doctor on the mainland, through a gantlet of naked, frothing beasties with the occasional assist from a random human (Edvin Ryding, quite funny as an exasperated Swedish soldier). Along the way, Spike and we learn new things about zombie obstetrics and related matters. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Despite Boyle and co-screenwriter Alex Garland (writer-director of 'Ex Machina,' 'Civil War' and other provocations) returning to this property – and despite Boyle's usual bag of tricks with stutter-stop cinematography and gruesome flash-cuts – '28 Years Later' lacks the visceral shock and relentless pace of the first two films (the second was directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo and written by a team that didn't include Boyle or Garland). Nor do the logistics of the film's reinvented universe bear much scrutiny. (What do the infected feed on if there are no normal humans left? Why are there still youngish ones after three decades?) Instead, the tone is one of finely wrought mourning punctuated by bursts of adrenaline, with the relationship between mother and son given real emotional weight. The camerawork by the great Anthony Dod Mantle ('Slumdog Millionaire'), a brooding score by the Scottish hip-hop trio Young Fathers and some gob-stopping Highlands locations all raise the movie above standard fright-night fare. And when Fiennes appears, '28 Years Later' becomes even more clearly a meditation on what comes after humanity's downfall – what memories we save and who we choose to love and remember. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. There's still enough flesh-rending and severed body parts to sate the average horror fan. More crucially, '28 Years Later' has enough meat on its bones to serve as more than just a warmup for the next installment, due in 2026 and possibly featuring the original movie's star (and this one's executive producer) Cillian Murphy, who has gone on to bigger things in the intervening 22 years. You do get the sense that this property is just getting (re)started, though, with a cliff-hanger ending that doesn't leave the audience twisting in the wind, as such things often do, but instead introduces a character who threatens to take the next films into appealing looney-tunes territory. I'd tell you more, but then I'd have to eat you. — Ty Burr is the author of the movie recommendation newsletter Ty Burr's Watch List at — Three stars. Rated R. At theatres. Contains strong bloody violence, grisly images, graphic nudity, language and brief sexuality. 115 minutes. Rating guide: Four stars masterpiece, three stars very good, two stars okay, one star poor, no stars waste of time. MMA NHL World Toronto & GTA Editorial Cartoons
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
28 Years Later review: Zombie franchise pushes boldly into new terrain
28 Years Later ★★★★ MA 15+, 115 mins It is 23 years since writer Alex Garland, director Danny Boyle and producer Andrew Macdonald unleashed the Rage virus upon the world and redefined the zombie genre in 28 Days Later (despite insisting their film wasn't a zombie flick at all). And in the first of a projected new trilogy, they prove there's plenty of life in them old bones yet. The filmmakers claim no prior knowledge of the franchise is necessary (Garland and Boyle were only executive producers on the 2007 sequel 28 Weeks Later) in order to enter the latest incarnation of the hellscape of England after the outbreak. And while it undoubtedly adds a little something to have seen the earlier films, they are largely right in that. As The Walking Dead made perfectly clear, you don't need an origin story when the world you've created is as fully fleshed out as this. Even if the flesh is in a horrible state of decay. We start here on the island of Lindisfarne, off the coast of north-east England. That gives our leads – Aaron Taylor-Johnson as Jamie, Jodie Comer as Isla, and Alfie Williams as their son, Spike – the chance to do some cracking Geordie accents, something we just do not hear enough of on screen, if you ask me. Isla is bed-bound, racked by a mystery illness that at first glance could be mistaken for early-onset Rage. Jamie is a hunter, a leader of the gated and so-far secure island community that seems to have clung to a version of civilisation fashioned some time between 1830 and 1940. He's taking Spike across the causeway – accessible only at low tide – that connects the island to the mainland, to hunt for slow-moving infected, and to dodge the fast-moving variety. It's a coming-of-age ritual, with a rather higher degree of risk than a bar mitzvah or a blue-light disco. Of course, things unravel pretty quickly, as they encounter a horde led by an oversized, more intelligent leader, known as an Alpha. Boyle is masterful at creating an almost unbearable sense of tension in these scenes. His use of jump-cuts, of varied focal lengths and exposures, above all his use of music and sound design (think Trainspotting, times 10) all combine to create and sustain a state of high anxiety in the audience. The mission is a turning point for Spike, but not quite in the way his old man had anticipated. His experiences, and the aftermath of them, open his eyes to the way myth is used to reinforce a particular version of the world. It causes a rift between father and son, and sets in train the second part of the film, in which Spike leads his mother back to the mainland in search of a doctor who is rumoured to be there, and who might provide a diagnosis and a cure.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Ralph Fiennes shares hilarious fashion advice for whoever plays Voldemort in Harry Potter TV series
Actor and film producer Ralph Fiennes shared fashion advice for whoever plays Voldemort in the Harry Potter TV series Actor and film producer Ralph Fiennes shared fashion advice for whoever plays Voldemort in the Harry Potter TV series, reported People. "Make sure you can handle the long, flowing robes, and don't trip over them," Fiennes advised during an interview, adding, "Practice your long, flowing robe walk." Fiennes also shared a fun fact about a part of his Voldemort garb he had changed throughout the film series. The actor, fresh off an Academy Awards campaign for Conclave and next starring in '28 Years Later', said he had some notes for the wardrobe department regarding his tights, as per the outlet. Fiennes played Voldemort for five Harry Potter films, making his debut in 2005's Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. The actor went on to play the villain for the remainder of the film series, which ended in 2011 with Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 2. He also returned alongside many of his fellow cast members, including Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter), Rupert Grint (Ron Weasley) and Emma Watson (Hermione Granger), for a TV special in 2002 marking the 20th anniversary of the Harry Potter movies, reported People. Fiennes has said he would "of course" reprise his role as Voldemort if asked, but more recently gave his approval for Cillian Murphy taking over the part, calling him a "wonderful suggestion," as per the outlet. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pedí hoy tu kit de alarmas Verisure con 30% OFF, ¡solo por esta semana! Alarmas Verisure Ver oferta Undo Though who will play Voldemort in HBO's upcoming TV adaptation of JK Rowling's book series has yet to be announced, the actors starring as the main trio have already been confirmed. Harry, Ron and Hermione will be played by Dominic McLaughlin, Alastair Stout and Arabella Stanton, respectively, reported People.
