Plans for huge military parade on Donald Trump's birthday emerge
Detailed plans for a large military parade on Donald Trump's birthday have emerged - involving thousands of soldiers as well as hundreds of tanks and helicopters.
Blueprints seen by the AP news agency suggest the event would feature seven army bands, parachute jumps and historical vehicles, followed by a concert and fireworks in the evening.
But the plans to showcase armoured fighting vehicles, Howitzers and tanks have raised concerns about potential damage to Washington DC's roads.
Donald Trump has long wanted a big military parade. After seeing one in France on Bastille Day in 2017, he called for an even grander event to take place on Pennsylvania Avenue.
Those plans were abandoned the following year because of high costs, with some estimates suggesting the display of America's military might would command a £69m price tag.
The latest proposals come as the US Army plans to mark its 250th anniversary on 14 June, which happens to coincide with the president turning 79.
According to the documents, more than 6,600 soldiers, 150 vehicles, 50 helicopters and more than 2,000 civilians would be involved.
Beyond the logistics of accommodating and feeding service personnel, it would also be costly to move military vehicles and aircraft from across the US.
One file warns of "significant concerns regarding security requirements" as equipment is brought in by train or flown in.
Read more:
Army spokesman Col Dave Butler said: "We want to make it into an event that the entire nation can celebrate with us. We want Americans to know their Army and their soldiers.
"A parade might become part of that, and we think that will be an excellent addition to what we already have planned."
Washington DC's mayor, Muriel Bowser, has warned tanks rolling through the streets "would not be good".
Last month, she said: "If military tanks were used, they should be accompanied with many millions of dollars to repair the roads."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
27 minutes ago
- Fox News
China's Escalating Espionage War Against The U.S.
Concerns over China's espionage campaign against the United States are growing following recent reports highlighting issues of espionage, agro-terrorism, and artificial intelligence. Most recently, China has faced scrutiny after the arrest of three Chinese nationals, including one who attempted to smuggle illegal biological materials into the U.S. from a university in Wuhan, China. Former diplomat and senior advisor with the Center for International Studies (CIS), Jim Lewis, joins the Rundown to discuss China's threat to the United States and how they are targeting America on multiple fronts. At the end of the last fiscal year in 2024, the US Army exceeded its recruitment goal. Now in 2025, our army says they've met their goal four months early. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth credits President Trump for this uptick in military recruitment, saying he had initially called it the 'Trump bump' but now sees it's really a tsunami of young folks who want to work 'under a President they know has their back.' Navy veteran and The Heritage Foundation senior fellow Brent Sadler joins to unpack what could be fueling this military recruitment surge. Plus, commentary from the host of 'Tomi Lahren is Fearless on Outkick,' Tomi Lahren. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit
CNN
28 minutes ago
- CNN
Professor of government has theory why Musk expressed ‘regret'
Elon Musk said Wednesday that he regrets some of his recent social media posts about President Donald Trump. Professor of government at the University of Essex Natasha Lindstaedt joins CNN Early Start to weigh in.
36 minutes ago
Appeals court to take up Trump's challenge to his criminal hush money conviction
Just over a year after Donald Trump became the first former president to be found guilty of a felony, an appeals court is set to hear the president's bid to move his case to federal court. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit has scheduled oral arguments Wednesday to consider whether to move the president's criminal hush money case from state to federal court. Trump was found guilty last year on 34 felony counts after Manhattan prosecutors alleged that he engaged in a "scheme" to boost his chances during the 2016 presidential election through a series of hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels, and then falsified New York business records to cover up that alleged criminal conduct. Trump's lawyers have argued that the conduct at issue during his criminal trial included "official acts" undertaken while he was president, giving the president broad immunity for his actions and the right to remove the case to federal court. They say that the Supreme Court's landmark ruling last year granting the president immunity for official acts -- which was decided after Trump was convicted in May -- would have prevented prosecutors from securing their conviction. "The fact that it was not until after the conclusion of his state criminal trial that the Supreme Court issued its landmark decision defining the contours of presidential immunity -- including a broad evidentiary immunity prohibiting prosecutors from inviting a jury to probe a President's official acts, as President Trump's removal notice alleges occurred here -- supplies good cause for post-trial removal," Department of Justice lawyers argued in an amicus brief filed with the court. Trump decried the prosecution as politically motivated and successfully delayed his sentencing multiple times before New York Judge Juan Merchan, on the eve of Trump's inauguration, sentenced the former president to an unconditional discharge -- the lightest possible punishment allowed under New York state law -- saying it was the "only lawful sentence" to prevent "encroaching upon the highest office in the land." "I did my job, and we did our job," Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who brought the case, said following Trump's conviction. "There are many voices out there, but the only voice that matters is the voice of the jury, and the jury has spoken." Bragg has pushed back on Trump's attempt to remove the case from state court, arguing that a case cannot be moved to federal court after sentencing. "These arguments ignore statutory indicia that Congress intended for removal of criminal cases to happen before sentencing by anticipating that essential federal proceedings will take place prior to a final criminal judgment," prosecutors have argued. Trump's appeal will be heard by a panel of three federal judges, each of whom was nominated to the bench by Democratic presidents. With Trump's former defense attorneys now serving top roles at the Department of Justice, the president will now be represented by former Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall of the elite law firm Sullivan & Cromwell. In an usual step, lawyers with the Department of Justice filed an amicus brief in support of Trump's request. "The United States has a strong and direct interest in the issues presented in this appeal," they argued. If the appeals court grants Trump's request, his conviction would still remain. The only change is that his appeal will play out in a federal, rather than state, courtroom. In either scenario, Trump could ultimately ask the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene. Moving the case into federal court could also open up the possibility that Trump could potentially pardon himself.
