Something in Your Poop May Predict an Imminent Death
The contents of a patient's entrails could be key to assessing how close they are to death.
No, it's not some form of living haruspicy. A team of doctors led by Alexander de Porto of the University of Chicago and the University of Amsterdam has created an index of markers in a patient's feces that can help gauge the risk of mortality within 30 days.
They have named it the metabolic dysbiosis score (MDS), and it could help save the lives of critically ill patients in medical intensive care.
Their results, they caution, require further investigation and validation, but offer exciting promise as a future tool for diagnostic medicine.
"The findings suggest that fecal metabolic dysbiosis, quantified through the MDS, holds potential as a biomarker to identify critically ill patients at increased risk of mortality," de Porto and his colleagues, Eric Pamer and Bhakti Patel of the University of Chicago, told ScienceAlert.
"This underscores the importance of gut-derived metabolites as independent contributors to host resilience, offering an avenue for precision medicine."
Critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units often develop severe syndromes such as sepsis and acute respiratory distress – but these syndromes don't always develop and evolve in the same way. This heterogeneity poses a huge challenge for trying to treat these patients; two patients with the same syndrome may respond to the same treatment very differently.
One way to circumvent this challenge, the researchers said, is to identify specific traits to treat rather than attacking the whole syndrome at once. Scientists know that critically ill patients often have reduced diversity in their gut microbiota, as well as altered concentrations of the metabolites produced by their microbiomes.
De Porto and his colleagues embarked on an investigation into dysbiosis, an imbalance in the gut microbiome, in critically ill patients, as a trait that could be treated. They studied fecal samples collected from 196 patients exhibiting respiratory failure or shock, dividing them into a training cohort of 147 patients and a validation cohort of 49 patients.
They used these samples to develop the MDS, based on concentrations of 13 distinct fecal metabolites. The results indicate an auspicious avenue for further investigation.
"The MDS performed well in predicting mortality in the training cohort of medical ICU patients, with 84 percent accuracy, 89 percent sensitivity, and 71 percent specificity," the researchers said.
"However, the validation cohort, despite showing similar trends, failed to reach statistical significance, probably due to its smaller sample size. These findings highlight the promise of the MDS but also underscore the necessity to validate its predictive capacity and generalizability in independent cohorts before widespread application."
What the researchers found particularly interesting is that, even though a lack of diversity in the microbiome has previously been associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill patients, they could find no such link. Instead, their results showed a strong link between dysbiosis and increased mortality risk, suggesting that an imbalance in the microbiome plays a crucial role in patient health.
A lot more work needs to be done before the team's approach is suitable for clinical application. The null result in the validation cohort of just 47 patients shows that quite a bit of refinement is required. However, there are several encouraging points.
The lab has shown, for instance, that fecal metabolites can identify liver transplant patients who have a higher risk of developing a post-operative infection. In addition, while specific treatments have not yet been investigated or identified, the MDS indicates some pathways for further exploration.
"The metabolites comprising the score, such as short-chain fatty acids, bile acids, and tryptophan metabolites, point to biological pathways that might be targeted therapeutically," the researchers said. "Potential interventions might include dietary changes, administration of probiotics, or direct supplementation with these metabolites."
The next step is to work on validating MDS in new sets of patients, and to examine whether the link between the observed dysbioses and the increased mortality risk is causal or symptomatic of another cause.
"Subsequently," the researchers said, "intervention trials targeting specific metabolites or metabolic pathways are necessary to assess therapeutic benefits."
The research has been published in Science Advances.
Long-Term Contraceptive Pill Use Linked With Brain Tumor Risk
Just One Night of Poor Sleep Can Change How Your Brain Sees Food
Insulin Isn't Just Made by The Pancreas. Here's Another Location Few Know About.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Health Line
41 minutes ago
- Health Line
Can IVF Cause Early Menopause?
No, in vitro fertilization (IVF) cannot cause early menopause. It is a common misconception that IVF can quicken the transition to menopause by causing you to 'run out of eggs' at a faster rate. However, there is no evidence to suggest that this is true. Menopause that occurs before the age of 45 is considered early. There are various factors that may contribute to early menopause, including: having a family history of early menopause smoking, which may also lead to more severe menopause symptoms having or having had chemotherapy having a bilateral oophorectomy, which is the surgical removal of the ovaries having a hysterectomy, which is the surgical removal of the uterus having autoimmune conditions, like thyroid disease and rheumatoid arthritis It's also important to note that early menopause may not be linked to a condition or treatment and occur with no clear reason. How do I know if I'm going through early menopause? The most common sign of early menopause is having irregular periods or periods that stop completely before the age of 45. You may also experience the following symptoms: hot flashes difficulty sleeping night sweats vaginal dryness low mood anxiety reduced sex drive If you think you may be experiencing early menopause, consider speaking with a healthcare professional. They can run blood tests to confirm this and suggest treatment options to help you manage symptoms.


Health Line
41 minutes ago
- Health Line
Can Stress Cause Postmenopausal Bleeding?
Yes, in some cases, stress can cause postmenopausal bleeding. This is because stress can result in hormonal imbalances which can lead to changes to the vaginal lining. If the lining becomes too thick, thin, or inflamed, it can shed and cause bleeding. It's important to note, however, that stress is a rare cause of postmenopausal bleeding. The most common causes include: a thickened vaginal lining, which can be caused by excess estrogen in the body cervical polyps, which are noncancerous growths on the cervix inflammation or thinning of the vaginal lining, caused by low estrogen levels » Learn more about how postmenopausal bleeding is treated. When to speak with a doctor about postmenopausal bleeding You should always speak with a doctor about any vaginal bleeding that occurs after menopause, even if it is just spotting or has only happened once. In some cases, postmenopausal bleeding can be a sign of uterine cancer. While this is rare, a doctor can run some tests to check for any cancerous cells. Remember, an early diagnosis of cancer can increase the chance of successful treatment and improve the overall outcome. How can I manage my stress levels? There are several way you can manage your stress levels, including: Learn your triggers. It can be helpful to identify what may be triggering your stress and work to reduce these stressors where possible. Ensure you're getting enough sleep. Not getting enough sleep can often make daily stressors more difficult to manage. Make time for things you enjoy. Consider scheduling time for activities that bring you joy and allow you to relax. Seeking support from loved ones. Speaking about your worries with loved ones may help you feel more supported. If you are finding it difficult to manage your stress levels, consider speaking with a healthcare professional. They can work with you to put together a suitable treatment plan.


Medscape
an hour ago
- Medscape
Are Sports Drink Just Colorful Delusions?
Every gym in America is awash in neon. The rainbow array of sports drinks promises to transform weekend warriors into athletic dynamos. For decades, these beverages have occupied a curious space in American consumer culture, somewhere between medicine and marketing, between science and snake oil. Now comes a study showing sports drinks might improve athletic performance. Sort of. Researchers from Peking University in Beijing, China, recently presented a poster at the American Society for Nutrition (ASN) 2025 Annual Meeting in Orlando, Florida, from what appears to be a rigorous experiment: 23 trained adults who consumed a multi-ingredient sports drink performed 15% better during high-intensity exercise than when they drank a placebo beverage. The drink contained a blend of macronutrients and micronutrients: Sugar for immediate energy, taurine and lysine as amino acids, inositol for cellular function, caffeine as a stimulant, and niacin and vitamins B6 and B12 to help metabolize food into energy. The patients experienced less fatigue, maintained higher energy levels, and showed improved metabolic markers that suggested their bodies were preserving muscle protein during exercise, according to the researchers. 'I wouldn't say the findings are shocking or excitingly novel,' said Andrew Jagim, PhD, director of Sports Medicine Research at Mayo Clinic Health System, in La Crosse, Wisconsin. The participants were already trained athletes performing structured, 100-minute exercise sessions, a far cry from the typical American's relationship with physical activity. According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, adults should spend at least 150 min/wk doing aerobic exercise, but only two thirds of Americans meet this guideline. This disconnect between laboratory conditions and real life gets to the heart of what Stella Volpe, PhD, MS, head of the Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise at Virginia Tech University in Blacksburg, Virginia, calls the fundamental question: 'For the average person who might be exercising 30 minutes a day, likely they don't need something like this. Likely they are fine with just water.' Jose Antonio, PhD, MS, the CEO of the International Society of Sports Nutrition and professor of health and human performance at Nova Southeastern University in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, concurs. 'Traditionally, sports drinks have been shown for decades to improve performance, reduce fatigue, etc.,' Antonio said. 'It often depends on what the ingredients are. We already know caffeine is effective. The most important components of this sports drink are, of course, the fluid itself, but [also] the sugar and caffeine. The rest of it has a minor effect.' Sports drinks can be dense in calories. A 16-oz bottle of AMP Energy, for example, is 220 calories per serving compared with 155 for a 12-oz serving of Coca-Cola. For Jagim, the question becomes one of benefits and costs: 'Are those extra calories in that drink really worth what they're chasing in terms of just burning more calories during the workout?' 'When I train or race, I focus on two things [in a sports drink]: Sugar and caffeine,' he added. 'The rest is ok, but for most, it doesn't matter. Don't trip over dollars to pick up pennies.' But a psychological dimension complicates the purely nutritional calculus. Volpe, a professional athlete on the USA Masters field hockey team, said she will 'hydrate better if I drink more.' Consuming a beverage that tastes better than water can improve overall fluid intake. If a sports drink gets someone to stay properly hydrated during exercise, as long as they do not have diabetes or are trying to lose weight, the modest caloric cost might be worth paying. 'I'd say go for it,' she said. Jagim and Antonio agree valuable future research would be testing different treatment groups using different versions of the same drink. 'Then you'd be able to answer that question of which ingredient is the more important one here,' Jagim said. 'Is it the carbohydrate or the caffeine? Or is it truly, when we combine them, we get that synergistic benefit, where they collectively help each other make you feel better and perform better?' Antonio, Jagim, and Volpe reported having no relevant financial conflicts of interest.