Treaty of Waitangi: Government says Ngāpuhi negotiations cannot be open-ended
The Government maintains it wants to settle with Ngāpuhi by 2040, amid warnings a New Zealand First bill forcing the iwi into a single settlement 'closes the door' on negotiations.
NZ First minister Shane Jones said New Zealand could no longer afford the ongoing negotiations with the country's largest iwi
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Process to manage conflict of interests in fast-track approvals process 'sound'
Ministers Chris Bishop, Simeon Brown and Shane Jones. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver The Auditor General says the process to manage conflict of interests in the fast-track approvals process was "sound", but also saw opportunities to "further strengthen conflict management". A report released today showed the findings by the Auditor General from an inquiry that looked at the overall systems and processes used to identify and manage the potential and actual conflicts of interests of the ministers involved in the Fast-track Bill. The process was investigated by the office after it became aware of "concerns about the transparency" of the decision making processes for which projects would be included in the Bill. Conflicts of interest was described as "perceptions of bias, predetermination, and undue influence". The report said those concerns can be heightened when a " decision-making process gives Ministers a broad margin of discretion and the decisions benefit private businesses". "This was the case with the fast-track approvals process." It did not look at the merits of the Bill, the design of the fast-track approvals process or decisions about projects. The report stated ministers and the Cabinet Office considered a broad range of potential conflicts, including family and close associates. Campaign donations were also clearly documented as conflicts and had a management plan. While the process was considered "sound" by the Auditor General, it noted a range of options to strengthen conflict management. Those included having ministers declare their conflicts of interest earlier in the process - ideally before receiving officials' advice on the applications and before they determined the list of projects to take to Cabinet. It also suggested considering whether it was appropriate for ministers to participate in Cabinet discussions given they had a conflict - even if they were not the minister responsible for the final decision. Minister Chris Bishop - one the of the key ministers in charge of fast-track - said he welcomed the findings, and thanked the Cabinet Office for its ongoing advice and support.
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Strengthening Integrity Of Immigration System
Minister of Immigration The Government is taking another step to strengthen the fiscal sustainability and integrity of the immigration system following the successful first reading of the Immigration (Fiscal Sustainability and System Integrity) Amendment Bill. 'Our immigration system needs to be smart, responsive and flexible to keep pace with the changing geopolitical context. The changes proposed will help ensure our settings appropriately respond to risk and are sustainable,' Immigration Minister Erica Stanford says. 'The Bill introduces appropriate safeguards in the system for vulnerable people and implements legislative recommendations from two independent King's Counsel (KC) reviews of the immigration system. It also offers pragmatic updates to keep the Act current and support efficient visa processing.' Changes include: Introducing appropriate safeguards in the system for vulnerable people, including refugees and protection claimants, as recommended in the 2022 Victoria Casey review. Introducing a requirement for a judicial warrant for any 'out-of-hours' compliance activity, as recommended in the 2023 Micheal Heron review. Tightening some settings so that more instances of migrant exploitation can be prosecuted, and strengthening consequences for residence class visa holders who commit criminal offences. Ensuring the system is flexible to respond to unusual events, such as natural disasters. Other changes, such as the options to expand the immigration levy payer base and create a new immigration levy in the future, will enable a greater sharing of the costs of the immigration, although there is no intent to implement these changes this year. 'These sensible and timely changes will help futureproof the immigration system, and better balance the integrity of the immigration system with the rights of individuals,' Ms Stanford says.
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Treaty Negotiations Minister Says Settlements With Iwi Can't Be 'Open Ended'
The Treaty Negotiations Minister says money and time spent on progressing settlements with iwi can't be "open ended". Paul Goldsmith told reporters the process "can't be as long as forever." It comes as NZ First is drafting a member's bill forcing Aotearoa's largest iwi, Ngāpuhi, into a single commercial settlement. Last week Goldsmith said it was the government's preference to have one commercial settlement for Ngāpuhi, and on Tuesday said he wouldn't put a timeline on concluding that. He wouldn't say whether there should be a limit on the amount of money or time spent on reaching a settlement, but said he wasn't comfortable spending as much or as long as it took. "I don't think it can be open ended. Can't be as long as forever. "We do need to make progress at some time, but we haven't put an exact date." When asked if it would be within the political term, he said he wouldn't make any commitments around this, "it's only 18 months". "There's a tension between - we don't want to impose an unrealistic deadline, but likewise, we don't want things to go on past 2040 when we want to be celebrating our bicentenary. "We're encouraging proper movement as best we can." He said currently the various hapū of Ngāpuhi were trying to get an agreement around a mandate to negotiate, "and we're still at that stage." Labour's Peeni Henare - of Ngāpuhi descent - said Goldsmith's comments had "fiscal envelope tones", referring to 1994 when the then government suggested capping the amount allocated for settlements. "It's certainly got fiscal envelope tones to it, and that's what they tried to do to our people in the 1990s. "I suspect that while it might not be an official policy of this government, it's front of mind in terms of the expenditure on settlement." In regards to Jones' potential Members Bill, Henare said "Ngāpuhi is unique". "Whatever Mr Jones thinks is going to bring Ngāpuhi to the table, he is misguided if he thinks forcing a bill to bring Ngāpuhi to the table is going to do that. "I think it's going to be a dismal failure by him and this government." He said it would go against the "good faith" provisions that had seen settlements conclude. "If they do that, I think they're setting a really bad precedence." Labour leader Chris Hipkins also said he did not think sending "veiled threats" was useful. He said everyone needed to continue negotiating in good faith. Hipkins said the National government's "hostile position" towards Māori was likely to make Treaty settlements in the next few years "very, very difficult to achieve". He referenced the discussion around the "agree to disagree" clause, which he called an "elegant way out of the issue" of determining who was sovereign. In 2023, the previous Labour government initialled a Deed of Settlement with East Coast iwi Te Whānau a Apanui which included an "agree-to-disagree" clause where the iwi maintained it was a sovereign nation while the Crown also maintained its own sovereignty. Goldsmith said that was not something the government was comfortable acknowledging and that the Crown was sovereign and represented the "democratic will" of New Zealand. Hipkins said if the government walked away from that, it would mean debates around sovereignty would again be "front and centre" of the Treaty settlement debate, which was not helpful for the country moving forward. Ngāti Hine leader Pita Tipene told RNZ no hapū of Ngāpuhi will be subdued. "Working together for the common good is still there in 2025 and beyond and "no colonial government then or modern government now will impose themselves on the hapū of Ngāpuhi." On taxpayer money being spent, he said that money is being wasted "because governments have made serious mistakes in trying to impose themselves on the hapū of Ngāpuhi". "The moment they listen to the hapū and work with hapū instead of imposing themselves or trying to impose themselves, they will save many a taxpayer dollar. "And the taxpayer needs to know that the government has tried this in the past and failed." He suggested the government try a different approach, given they are getting the same result from the same approach. "They can learn a lot from the previous minister, Chris Finlayson, who realised the way that the government tried then and failed must not be repeated." Finance Minister Nicola Willis confirmed the government had a goal of progressing and settling any outstanding Treaty claims. "What we need to do is keep in good faith progressing our desire to negotiate." She said it was up to Ngāpuhi to decide that they too wanted to do that. "Settlements have proven to be a really effective tool for advancing relationships between iwi and the crown. "I would say that any leader needs to be responsive to the needs of their people. Leaders change, but the needs of people don't tend to." Greens co-leader Marama Davidson said the Treaty of Waitangi was not something to be settled, and wasn't about "ending something", it was an "enduring relationship". "It needs to go on for as long as it needs to go on for." Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour said he would support putting a timeline to Ngāpuhi that would require a decision to have been made by a certain point, but said that was ultimately up to the Treaty Negotiations Minister. Shane Jones told reporters on Tuesday his party would be taking its proposal for how taxpayer money would be used for settlements to the next election. "We can no longer have 20 years and beyond 20 million of squandered money, someone's gotta draw a line in the sand and stop this dysfunction." On the agree-to-disagree issue, he said NZ First's focus was economic empowerment, not funding "unrealistic dreams about hapū sovereignty". Jones said it had been people from Ngāpuhi who encouraged him to take this step Tipene acknowledged there are always differing voices in any community or country, but he said the majority of people won't allow the government to impose themselves on the hapū. "You will find some people in Ngāpuhi who, for their own reasons, want to get on with it. "Largely, you will find that those people are not connected to the people on the ground."
