logo
What will it take to exonerate the R.I. State Crime Lab?

What will it take to exonerate the R.I. State Crime Lab?

Yahoo18-03-2025

Evidence marked by year awaits testing at the Rhode Island State Crime Laboratory in this spring 2023 photo. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current)
Rhode Island's troubled state crime lab faces a full accreditation review this week, just as the state Senate considers a bill to restructure the commission overseeing the facility on the University of Rhode Island's (URI) Kingston campus.
A six-person team from the ANSI National Accreditation Board started a three-day review of the lab on Tuesday, two years sooner than required in its standard accreditation cycle, said the lab's director, Dennis Hilliard. He had asked for the review to be moved up after the lab suspended a type of forensic testing in gun cases last August to address a discrepancy with a Glock pistol linked to a 2021 Pawtucket murder case.
Since then, a second gun case, also from 2021, has been flagged by an out-of-state laboratory that has taken over some of the forensic testing, Hilliard said.
Hilliard said the accreditation team is looking to assess policies, examine completed and ongoing casework, and observe examiners in the lab's three sections: firearms, trace evidence, and latent prints. At the end of the week, the team will provide an assessment on what improvements the lab needs to make.
'I don't expect anything major,' Hilliard said. 'We're doing everything in our power to make sure that we get everything corrected and we get back to where we should be in terms of firearms analysis.'
The lab at Fogarty Hall stopped conducting toolmark testing on firearms, or how examiners determine if a cartridge or shell is fired from a specific gun, last August after casings matched to a Glock pistol seized as evidence in the Pawtucket murder case matched a different firearm in possession of the Boston Police Department.
The suspension of toolmark testing was made public on Sept. 3, 2024, by the Rhode Island Office of Attorney General.
A report published last October by California-based consultant Ronald Nichols, who formerly worked for the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, found there was a lack of diligence and confirmation bias — the principle that if you know what you're looking for, you're more likely to find it — on the part of all three forensic examiners who performed toolmark analysis at the state lab. All three staffers have since left the lab.
Confirmation bias played role in invalid toolmark testing at R.I State Crime Lab, report finds
The suspension prompted delays in nearly two dozen criminal cases, which underwent re-testing at labs in Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire. Most of the firearms-related work is finished, though Hilliard said some cases still require verification, technical review, or administrative approval.
Hilliard said testing at a Connecticut lab uncovered a problem in tying a Glock pistol to a 2021 shooting. He declined to name the municipality where the shooting occurred or share other details on the case.
The state's public defender's office was unaware of a second case being flagged, but the chief public defender says his team is usually kept in the dark by the lab.
'We've never really gotten a list of cases that were examined and confirmed,' Collin Geiselman told Rhode Island Current. 'We kind of find out second-hand from some of the defense attorneys who are informed about it.'
Geiselman said the lack of transparency also extends to the five-member commission overseeing the crime lab. The State Crime Laboratory Commission, which typically meets quarterly, includes the Attorney General, the Rhode Island State Police superintendent, a member of the Rhode Island Police Chiefs Association, and two public members appointed by the governor.
Rarely are any defense attorneys picked for the commission that can meet behind closed doors to look over issues involving ongoing trials, Geiselman said.
'A criminal trial happens in a criminal justice system that is, by design, an adversarial system ' he said. 'And we only have one side of that adversarial system privy to that information that is supposed to be coming from a neutral body.'
But a remedy could be coming via legislation under consideration in the Rhode Island Senate. The bill sponsored by Sen. Sam Bell, a Providence Democrat, would raise the number of commissioners from five to nine: three with expertise in law enforcement or prosecution, three with backgrounds in criminal defense, and three with experience in scientific research.
Each commissioner would be appointed by the governor with the advice and consent of the Senate. Geiselman said he supports the bill and was preparing to submit written testimony.
'The makeup here would make it more transparent and more neutral,' Geiselman said.
Bell said he introduced the bill because the existing commission 'isn't working.' Reforming the panel would also allow experts to properly assess whether ballistic and fingerprint evidence should continue to be relied upon in criminal cases, he said
'There's a wide array of academic studies that have come out really trashing the accuracy of forensic science,' Bell said in an interview. 'The fact that the lab is at URI gives us a great opportunity to approach this in a more academic way.'
The Rhode Island Police Chiefs Association and Rhode Island State Police declined to comment on the proposal. Attorney General Peter Neronah's office acknowledged a request for comment, but did not send a response.
Bell's bill is scheduled to have its initial hearing before the Senate Committee on Judiciary on Thursday.
Since last October, all new toolmark testing for gun cases have been handled by two former New York City police examiners working at the crime lab after the departure of the three in-house staffers — at the cost of $175,500 for a six-months contract that expires in April. But the exams conducted by Stria Consulting Group still require final verification by examiners at SCL Forensics in Texas and FoCoSS Forensics in New Hampshire. Hilliard said the commission wanted the verification done to avoid any further potential for confirmation bias.
Nichols' report detailed that an examiner shared information about testing on the Glock in the Pawtucket case with a coworker who was still testing the gun, giving the other examiner a false lead.
Geiselman isn't sold that outsourcing the work will lead to more accurate results.
'These other labs certainly aren't receiving these samples in a vacuum — they're probably hearing about what happened at the lab here in Rhode Island and know things have to be re-tested,' he said. 'And that leads to confirmation bias.'
Hilliard lamented the reliance of third-party labs, mainly due to their slow turnaround times.
'Those people are doing other cases as well,' he said.
Hilliard hopes the lab will return its toolmark verification fully in-house after passing the accreditation process, but that's assuming the lab can hire two new examiners, one of whom is a supervisor for the toolmarks team.
One of the lab's firearms technicians is being trained to conduct toolmark examinations though Hilliard said that employee likely won't be ready for the job until early next year.
Hilliard said a candidate interviewed for the lead examiner role who passed a competency test and toured the lab turned down a job offer, saying the salary was too low. URI's website lists a salary range of $70,971 to $107,830 for the lead examiner position which will supervise a new toolmarks team. Hilliard said the applicant sought upward of $150,000 to consider working at the lab.
'That salary range is above my salary range,' said Hilliard, who makes $143,627.
Hilliard said the lab will conduct a study whether to raise the pay rate, but he doubts doing so will attract any additional candidates.
'You're looking for somebody with 10-plus years of experience,' he said. 'And these days, people who do that can work as consultants and make their full amount of salary within half the time they'd normally work at the laboratory.'
Hilliard is hopeful about a standard examiner candidate who is scheduled to tour the lab on March 25.
The examiner salary ranges from $65,980 to $100,314, according to the online job posting.
As the lab continues to court applicants, Hilliard said he will likely extend Stria's contract, which was slated to end in April. The State Crime Lab Commission is next scheduled to meet May 1.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ventura County government pay practices benefited CEO employees, audit shows
Ventura County government pay practices benefited CEO employees, audit shows

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Ventura County government pay practices benefited CEO employees, audit shows

Employees of the top administrative office in the Ventura County government won substantial pay increases at disparate rates during the last few years of ex-CEO Mike Powers' tenure, an audit shows. Ventura County Auditor-Controller Jeff Burgh released a report on the audit of pay practices in May, three years after ordering the investigation from the Washington, D.C., law firm of FordHarrison. He has tied the delay to the complexity of making comparisons between the County Executive Office and dozens of other county departments and more recently the departure of Consuela Pinto, the firm partner in charge of the audit. Pinto informed him she was leaving the firm and that no other staff members were familiar with the audit, Burgh said. Reached via email, Pinto declined to comment. The county paid FordHarrison $82,000 before the auditor's office took over the audit in April 2024 and completed it, Burgh said. The audit examined a four-year period when Powers was the top executive for the county government, from January 2018 until he was forced out by the Board of Supervisors in March 2022 over a harassment claim filed by a female manager. Powers, who served as CEO for 11 years in all, denied any wrongdoing and filed a wrongful termination lawsuit that is still pending. The audit looked at whether employees of the CEO's Office received reclassifications of their positions into higher paying ones more often, started employment at higher points on the county pay scale, and won merit raises above 5% at a higher rate than people in several other departments. The query compared the pattern for employees of the CEO's Office with those in the General Services Agency, Information Technology Services, the Public Works Agency and the Auditor-Controller's Office. Burgh had initially said the analysis would compare compensation decisions for the CEO's Office with roughly two dozen other agencies in the large county government, but that it was narrowed down to four due to the volume of documents that needed to be gathered. The findings showed: Of 38 people whose jobs were reclassified, 20, or more than half, worked in the CEO's Office. Part of the paperwork was missing to support the reclassifications for 16 of the 20 CEO employees, but no omissions were cited for workers in the other departments. Typically, reclassification results in a 5% pay bump and a higher salary range. It's allowed for a variety of reasons including when someone's job duties change. Significantly more employees in the CEO's Office were eligible for and received merit increases above 5% than employees in the other four agencies. Three received the highest possible merit increase of 10%. CEO staff were hired above the midpoint of the salary range at a significantly higher rate than new hires in the other four agencies selected for the comparison. Almost half of 54 new hires in the CEO's Office got the benefit during the four-year period covered by the audit compared with a quarter in the auditor's and information technology offices and about 10% in the general services and public works agencies. Neither Powers or an attorney representing him in his lawsuit against the county could be reached for comment. In her response to the audit, current CEO Sevet Johnson said the audit report did not provide any evidence of preferential treatment, much less actual abuse of the personnel system for the benefit of the CEO's office. Nor did it show any violations of personnel rules, regulations or policies, she said. When he ordered the audit in 2022, Burgh said he did so after some county employees and managers expressed concerns about the appearance of disparate treatment for employees in the CEO's Office. Burgh said staff in his office had previously considered doing an audit of personnel decisions in the CEO's office, but that the "tipping point" came when former CEO public information officer Ashley Bautista was promoted to senior deputy executive officer three months after being hired. At the time, county officials tied the promotion to an expansion in her job duties. They appeared to grow dramatically during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Burgh said in 2022 that pay decisions benefiting other employees of the CEO's Office had also come to his attention. No specific employees including Bautista are mentioned in the audit report. Burgh said that's because they are personnel matters. The county's human resources department is a division of the County Executive's Office, an arrangement that the report suggested was too cozy. That structure and what was called "lack of independent oversight" appeared to result in more favorable personnel actions affecting compensation of CEO employees than the other four agencies reviewed, the report said. Reclassification of jobs in the CEO's office appeared to encounter fewer obstacles than in the other agencies, was not always supported with complete documentation, and was approved at a higher rate, the report said. The analysis called for additional safeguards to improve accountability for salary and other decisions for positions in the office. Human Resources should report directly to the Board of Supervisors and be moved out of the CEO's Office, the report advised. Johnson took strong exception to the audit findings even though she was not in charge of the CEO's Office at the time covered by the investigation. Johnson said Burgh does not possess the necessary expertise in employment practices to perform the audit himself, questioned whether he could be impartial, wanted to know why the law firm was no longer involved in the project and faulted the sample of agencies in the comparison. Still, she said the human resources division would endeavor to make improvements in cases where the findings clearly support such a change. Burgh said he expected any corrections to be completed by the end of next year. Kathleen Wilson covers courts, mental health and local government issues for the Ventura County Star. Reach her at This article originally appeared on Ventura County Star: Ventura County pay practices benefited CEO employees, audit shows

Trump orders troops to Los Angeles to combat violent protests against immigration enforcement
Trump orders troops to Los Angeles to combat violent protests against immigration enforcement

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump orders troops to Los Angeles to combat violent protests against immigration enforcement

President Donald Trump ordered thousands of National Guard troops to help quell violent protests against immigration enforcement in Los Angeles, where helmeted police in riot gear clashed with concrete-hurling protesters who opposed tougher federal actions against undocumented immigrants. The clash spanning June 6 and 7 marked one of the most serious confrontations yet between agents carrying out Trump's directives on mass arrests and deportations, and local officials who oppose the stricter enforcement measures. Some protesters hurled large chunks of broken concrete at officers, slashed tires and defaced buildings, according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Police declared an unlawful assembly and responded by firing tear gas, pepper spray and flash-bang concussion rounds toward the crowd. Trump signed a memo June 7 deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. The Trump administration has a zero tolerance policy for criminal behavior and violence, especially when that violence is aimed at law enforcement officers trying to do their job, she said. "Left-wing radicals waving foreign flags are viciously attacking ICE and Border Patrol agents and obstructing official law enforcement activities in Los Angeles," Leavitt said in a statement. "The mob violence will be quelled, the criminals responsible will be brought to justice, and operations to arrest illegal aliens will continue unabated." The clash enflamed an ongoing feud between federal and state officials. Trump said on social media June 7 that federal authorities needed to step in because of the inaction of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" Trump said. Newsom criticized the military deployment on social media, saying local police are available at a moment's notice. 'That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions,' Newsom said. 'This is the wrong mission and will erode public trust.' The Department of Homeland Security said 118 undocumented immigrants were arrested during the week in Los Angeles, including five alleged gang members and others with criminal records for smuggling, drug trafficking and assault. Todd Lyons, acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said agents were outnumbered June 6 for hours as more than 1,000 rioters surrounded the federal building. 'What took place in Los Angeles yesterday was appalling,' Lyons said in a statement June 7. Lyons, who vowed to continue the enforcement action, accused Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of taking 'the side of chaos and lawlessness over law enforcement.' Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said city policy since 1979 has barred officers from initiating police action based solely on trying to determine a person's immigration status. He said the department 'will not assist or participate in any sort of mass deportations.' 'I'm aware that these activities cause anxiety for many Angelenos, so I want to make it clear: the LAPD is not involved in civil immigration enforcement,' McDonnell said in a statement June 6. Bass said she was 'deeply angered' about the enforcement actions and that she would coordinate with immigrant-rights organizations. 'These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city,' Bass said in a statement June 6. 'We will not stand for this.' "We will," FBI Director Kash Patel replied on social media June 7. Border Patrol Chief Michael Banks highlighted on social media how a rock pierced the windshield of an agent's vehicle and injured him. "Imagine if more had followed," Banks said. "This incident is a stark reminder of the real dangers our agents face every day. Thankfully, it wasn't worse − but it easily could've been." FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino asked for the public's help in identifying a helmeted protester who threw rocks at police cars. "And yes, multiple arrests have already been made for obstructing our operations. More are coming," Bongino said on social media. "We are pouring through the videos for more perpetrators. You bring chaos, and we'll bring handcuffs. Law and order will prevail." One of the skirmishes involved the arrest of a union leader, David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union of California, who was injured and detained by ICE at one site. The union said Huerta was arrested "while exercising his First Amendment right to observe and document law enforcement activity." "We all collectively have to object to this madness because this is not justice,' Huerta said in a post on social media. 'This is injustice." U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli accused Huerta of deliberately obstructing federal agents at a worksite. Huerta will be arraigned in federal court June 9, Essayli said. 'Let me be clear: I don't care who you are – if you impede federal agents, you will be arrested and prosecuted,' Essayli said in a post on social media. 'No one has the right to assault, obstruct, or interfere with federal authorities carrying out their duties.' Federal authorities said they would continue their enforcement actions despite the protests in Los Angeles and across the country. ICE announced June 6 that nearly 1,500 undocumented immigrants were arrested in Massachusetts during a monthlong Operation Patriot. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump orders troops to LA as agents, protesters clash over immigration

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store