
Tesla Completes First Self-Driving Delivery To Customer's Home, Elon Musk Reacts
Last Updated:
The Tesla Y Model drove itself from the company's Texas factory to the customer's home within 30 minutes by navigating highways, intersections, traffic signals
Electric Vehicle (EV) giant Tesla has accomplished its first fully autonomous and driverless car delivery, with a Model Y driving itself to the customer's home.
The Tesla Y Model drove itself from the company's Texas factory to the customer's home within 30 minutes by navigating highways, intersections, traffic signals, and city streets entirely on its own.
The trip, which took place a day ahead of schedule, was announced by Tesla CEO Elon Musk in a post on X.
'The first fully autonomous delivery of a Tesla Model Y from factory to a customer home across town, including highways, was just completed a day ahead of schedule. There were no people in the car at all and no remote operators in control at any point. FULLY autonomous," Musk said.
The first fully autonomous delivery of a Tesla Model Y from factory to a customer home across town, including highways, was just completed a day ahead of schedule!!Congratulations to the @Tesla_AI teams, both software & AI chip design!
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 27, 2025
The mega accomplishment was shared online, with Tesla first releasing a three-minute time lapse teaser, followed by a full 30-minute video on June 28.
Captured from the back seat, the video, shared by Tesla, showcased Model Y operating entirely on its own, departing from the Gigafactory's parking area. It autonomously and adeptly navigated roads, executed turns, observed stop signs, yielded at red lights, and managed real-time traffic situations without any human input.
The Model Y parked itself under the owner's building at the end of the journey.
Musk reposted the video on X, with a one-word caption: 'Kapow."
Kapow! 💫 https://t.co/vltieZy7nO — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 28, 2025
Tesla's head of AI and Autopilot, Ashok Elluswamy, said the vehicle reached a top speed of 72 miles per hour during the 30-minute journey, Bloomberg reported.
Tesla also debuted its robotaxi service in Austin this week. A small group of influencers and investors got rides in self-driving Model Y cars. Musk had hinted at both the robotaxi launch and the self-driving delivery earlier this month on X. He says Tesla plans to have millions of robotaxis on the road in the future.
Tesla first showed off this kind of hands-free driving in April, when it posted a video of cars moving from its Texas factory floor to parking lots on their own.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Nato remains ambiguous about goals in new world
At the close of the Nato (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) Summit 2025 in The Hague, alliance members made a landmark decision: All 32 nations agreed to raise defence spending to 5% of their gross domestic product (GDP) by 2035. The new pledge, up from the long-standing 2% benchmark, marks the most ambitious military investment target in the alliance's history and reflects mounting security concerns across the Euro-Atlantic space. US President Donald Trump hailed the agreement as a 'monumental win' for Washington, claiming that it corrected longstanding imbalances in Nato's burden-sharing. Despite growing anxiety over global hotspots, the summit avoided direct mentions of several key geopolitical challenges (Bloomberg) The summit declaration outlined that the 5% commitment will be split into two distinct categories. Around 3.5% of GDP will go toward traditional defence spending aligned with Nato capability targets, covering military hardware, force readiness, and interoperability. The remaining 1.5% will be directed toward emerging non-military threats — securing critical infrastructure, cyber defence, civil preparedness, innovation, and the defence industrial base. Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte, hosting his first summit in the role, emphasised that this investment 'will ensure we have the forces, capabilities, resources, infrastructure, and resilience needed to deter and defend in line with our three core tasks: deterrence and defence, crisis prevention and management, and cooperative security.' Yet, despite the show of unity on funding, the summit exposed cracks beneath the surface. Several members, including Spain and Slovakia, pushed back on the timeline. Spain openly stated that it would not be able to meet the 5% target before 2035, while Slovakia argued that competing economic priorities such as improving living standards and reducing debt made the goal unrealistic. France's President Emmanuel Macron offered guarded support for the new defence goals but expressed concern about broader alliance coherence. Stressing that Russia remained Nato's principal threat, Macron warned against allowing intra-alliance trade tensions to escalate. 'We can't say we're going to spend more on defence and then start a trade war within Nato,' he said, alluding to new US tariffs on European goods. 'It's an aberration. It's time we returned to the principle of trade peace among allies.' In a subtle rebuke of recent US actions, Macron added that he had raised this concern directly with President Trump. 'We cannot build a stronger Europe within Nato while undermining our economic unity,' he said. Despite growing anxiety over global hotspots, the summit avoided direct mentions of several key geopolitical challenges. There was no formal communique on Russia, China, the Indo-Pacific, or flashpoints like Gaza and Iran. While leaders addressed some of these issues in sideline meetings, their omission from the official agenda raised eyebrows. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz acknowledged the shifting focus. Merz also lobbied the US for stronger economic measures against Moscow and added that there needs to be more economic pressure, especially 'on those enabling Russia by buying its fossil fuels — namely China and India.' Trump, for his part, maintained ambiguity on Nato's Article 5 — its core clause of mutual defence. When asked during a bilateral with Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof whether he remained committed to Article 5, Trump responded: 'I stand with it. That's why I'm here.' This came just a day after he had publicly remarked there were 'numerous definitions' of the clause, leading to unease among allies. He also made headlines with a controversial comment about the ongoing Israel-Iran tensions. He claimed both nations were 'tired' and ready to 'go home,' though he warned that the conflict could 'perhaps soon' reignite. Is the US hands off or on in the Middle East? In contrast to past summits, where unity against adversaries like Russia or growing concern over China's Indo-Pacific ambitions dominated discussions, this year's gathering seemed adrift in a sea of rising budgets but unclear strategic purpose. Is Nato marooned on an island of anxiety, preparing for unknown threats without a clear definition of who the enemy is? This strategic ambiguity underscored a deeper issue — while Nato is now better funded, questions linger about what exactly it is preparing to confront. With global power dynamics in flux, and transatlantic relationships under increasing strain, the alliance is investing heavily in its future, but the direction of that future remains uncertain. Gurjit Singh is a former ambassador to Germany, Indonesia, Ethiopia, Asean and the African Union. The views expressed are personal.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Trump says he doesn't expect to extend July 9 trade tariff deadline
"I don't think I'll need to," he said in an interview on Fox News's Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo that was taped Friday. He then added, "I could, no big deal." Bloomberg


India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
Pakistan to get another loan worth billions from..., it is because...
New Delhi: Pakistan and China have finalized commercial loan agreements worth $3.7 billion this week. This means that China is going to give Pakistan a huge loan. After this loan from China, Pakistan's foreign exchange reserves will increase to $12.4 billion, which had come down to just $8.9 billion last week due to which Pakistan was facing the threat of bankruptcy. How much is Pakistan's foreign exchange? A Bloomberg report has confirmed, citing sources, that the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) and the Bank of China have signed a $1.6 billion deal on Friday, June 27. This loan is expected to help Pakistan meet its IMF target of ending the fiscal year with gross reserves of $14 billion. These agreements have come at a time when Pakistan's foreign exchange reserves have reached a mere $8.9 billion, more than half of which is being repeatedly 'rolled over' by China. According to reports, Beijing has kept Pakistan financially alive by continuously advancing cash deposits of $4 billion, commercial loans of $5.4 billion, and trade finance facility of $4.3 billion. What does Chinese loan mean to Pakistan? According to the report, on May 19, Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar, who is also the country's Foreign Minister, visited Beijing and during this time an agreement was reached between the two countries regarding the loan. According to the report, the loans taken by Pakistan from China have an average floating interest rate of 7.5%. Pakistan's entire economic strategy now revolves around China. Cash loans from Beijing, unfinished projects under CPEC (China-Pakistan Economic Corridor), and emergency credit lines being continuously taken from Chinese banks have made Pakistan's economic policy completely dependent on China. How much is Pakistan's total debt? At present, Pakistan's total debt to China is around $26 billion, which includes cash deposits, commercial loans and export-import financing. China is repeatedly 'rolling over' this debt, but this has become a permanent debt spiral rather than a relief. Reports from June 2025 say that Pakistan's current account deficit is growing, the rupee is unstable, and food and fuel prices are constantly rising. Foreign investment has almost stopped, and domestic industries are dying due to lack of power and raw materials while policymakers have ignored warnings from international agencies. But interest rates are rising, and repayment deadlines are approaching. Pakistan has to pay back about $25-27 billion in the next 12 months, with most of the debt taken from China, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).