Iraq reopens Syria crossing for trade and passenger traffic
ANBAR, June 14 (Reuters) - Iraq has officially reopened the Qaim border crossing with Syria for trade and passenger traffic, a spokesman for the Iraqi border authority said on Saturday, marking a key step in efforts to normalise relations and revive economic ties between the two countries.
'The Qaim crossing is now fully operational for both cargo trucks and civilian movement,' the spokesman told Reuters, adding that the reopening followed joint security assessments by Iraqi and Syrian officials.
The move comes three months after Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shibani visited Baghdad and urged Iraq to resume cross-border trade. The crossing had been shut in the wake of the revolt that toppled President Bashar al-Assad and the ensuing years of conflict that destabilised the region.
The reopening is also seen as a sign of warming ties between Baghdad and Syria's new leadership under President Ahmed al-Sharaa, who has sought to re-establish diplomatic and economic relations with regional neighbours. Iraqi officials say the two governments have intensified coordination on border security and trade facilitation since al-Sharaa took office last year.
'This crossing will serve as a strategic corridor for commodity trade between Iraq and Syria,' said Turki al-Mahallawi, mayor of the town of al-Qaim, where the border post is located.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Canada agrees to ratify Britain's accession to major trans-Pacific trade pact
Canada has agreed to ratify Britain's accession to a major trans- Pacific trade pact as Sir Keir Starmer and Mark Carney revived talks on a stalled bilateral deal. Ottawa will seek to introduce legislation to its parliament this autumn to formally approve Britain's entry to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). The UK joined the bloc in 2024, but Canada is yet to ratify its accession – meaning Britain still faces pre-CPTPP trade barriers in exporting to the country. Following a bilateral meeting between the Prime Minister and his Canadian counterpart Mark Carney on Sunday, Downing Street said: 'Prime Minister Carney confirmed that Canada would ratify the UK's accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), seeking to introduce legislation to their parliament in the autumn. 'This will bring huge benefits to UK businesses by lowering tariffs when buying from and selling to Canada. 'They also agreed to set up a joint taskforce to turbocharge progress on other areas of mutual benefit, including technology and artificial intelligence – in support of shared growth and our national security. 'The taskforce will also look to make progress on the wider UK-Canada Free Trade Agreement.'
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
The Israelis are doing the world a big favour
Iran has been behind most of the instability in the Middle East for at least the past two decades. Its militias ignited Iraq after the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003 and enabled Islamic State to develop across parts of the Arab world. Hezbollah, its proxy in Lebanon and Syria, kept the dreadful Assads in power for a generation and enabled the murder of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians. I saw Hezbollah up close in Syria for 10 years and I saw this year the huge joy of the Syrian people when the Iran-backed militia was vanquished there. Iran has also directed the Houthis to bring global shipping to its knees and backs the bloody-handed murderers of Hamas. But the mullahs' grand strategic plan has always been to develop a nuclear arsenal. This would have been an intolerable danger not only to Israel but to other nations regarded as enemies by the Tehran regime – including us. Sadly, President Donald Trump proved unable to persuade the mullahs to give up their nuclear programme. It must now be abundantly clear that the leadership in Iran has no intention of giving up its nuclear weapons programme, and Iranian bombs menace London and Washington as much as Tel Aviv. Like President Vladimir Putin in Moscow, the Supreme Leader in Tehran has no concern for his civilian population. Hence, whatever people think of Israel, their efforts in this case to end the nuclear ambitions of Iran must be applauded and supported by the entire free world. There is huge concern, and rightly so, about escalation but nobody is or should be keen to support Tehran. Even though Iran has given much support to Putin in his illegal fight with Ukraine, he has barely lifted a finger or even said anything to help. Of course, the truth is that Putin actually disdains everyone in the Middle East and without gold, missiles or some other inducement he would never do anything for Iran. Other traditional supporters of the mullahs have been deafening in their silence. Any escalation will only come from Iran, and only if we let it. This dangerous situation, in my view, makes it even plainer than it already was that we British must spend – as an absolute minimum – 3 per cent of GDP on defence. And that figure must not be achieved by pretending that intelligence, spies, diplomacy or pensions are defence spending, as we are doing now with our current, misleading, 2.6 per cent aspiration. We need an actual genuine increase in spending on actual genuine defence, not more smoke and mirrors from the Treasury. Hopefully even the 'wokerati', who bizarrely seem to support everyone who would do us harm – and who seem blind to the fact that those they support do not share their values in the slightest – will realise that hiding behind their fake shemaghs and liberation flags won't protect them in any way from the mullahs who would see us all burn in hell, with gay people and feminists first in the queue. Meanwhile with our limited resources we are doing the right things. I applaud the deployment of RAF jets to the region. Force is the only useful currency in dealing with Iran. The Israelis are doing our work for us, but we should stand ready to help if required. And help may, in fact, be required, though we Brits cannot provide it. The deepest parts of the uranium enrichment complex at Natanz are probably beyond the reach of any weapon the Israelis have. It might be necessary to deploy the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), a huge and heavy steel spear with an explosive payload like the bunker-busting bombs of WWII. Only heavy US bombers can carry the MOP, and so the decision would be one for President Trump. An alternative might be some kind of daring special operation. Mossad and the various other Israeli secret services would seem well able to manage this sort of thing, as they have proved against Hezbollah. There are many people in this country who are concerned that this conflict will ignite a wider war across the Middle East. They worry that the UK could be drawn into the fight, and I understand that. As a British soldier I went to war twice in the region. Nevertheless, I believe that Israel's necessary strikes on Iran's nuclear weapons programmes will make the world in general, and Britain in particular, much safer than allowing the Islamic Republic to gain possession of 'the bomb'. It is better to deal with such festering problems before they have fully developed, rather than later.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Key GOP senator clarifies heated exchange with Trump aide
By Senator Ron Johnson set the record straight after allegations of a 'shouting match' between him and a top Trump aide emerged from a Thursday afternoon meeting. The Wisconsin Republican reportedly was involved in a 'shouting match' with Trump's White House aide Stephen Miller over the border security funding number contained in the 'big beautiful' GOP spending bill currently being worked on in the Senate. Johnson, a fiscal conservative who has voiced his concerns about the bill's impact on the towering national debt, is a critical vote that the White House wants to secure. The senator cleared the air to the Daily Mail via a statement from his press office Thursday. He did not deny that the spat took place, but any hatchet that came out behind closed doors seemed to have been buried. 'Stephen didn't realize that we didn't have the detailed breakdown in cost, so he explained why the wall was going to be more expensive. Simple misunderstanding, quickly resolved,' Johnson noted. 'We are all huge supporters of Stephen and providing the administration the funding they need to clean up the enormous mess created by Biden and the Democrats,' Johnson added. The impetus of the reported 'shouting match' was when Johnson said Miller's (pictured) border security numbers didn't add up. After the closed door meeting, Johnson told reporters that Miller's justification for additional border funding was enough to convince him, adding 'if anything, we maybe ought to need more' funding. In a May explainer published to his website titled 'The Ugly Truth About the 'Big Beautiful Bill'', Johnson outlined his opposition to the budget bill, primarily on the basis of the sheer cost of the proposed package. The explainer was published on May 12th, before the House of Representatives passed their version of the spending bill just before the Memorial Day recess. 'There's nothing now to justify this abnormal level of government spending. Pathetically, Congress is having a hard time agreeing on a reduction of even $1.5 trillion from that 10-year amount,' Johnson noted at the time. The Wisconsin senator isn't the only one opposed to the eye-popping cost of the House spending package. While he wants to see the President's 2017 tax cuts extended, Paul has portrayed the current $5 trillion in new debt as 'Biden spending levels.' Kentucky Senator Rand Paul (pictured) has shared opposition to the legislation as well, due to the projected new additions to the national debt. While he wants to see the President's 2017 tax cuts extended, Paul has portrayed the current $5 trillion in new debt as 'Biden spending levels.'
