Head of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency visits Colorado to meet with state leaders
Lee Zeldin, the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, was in Colorado on Saturday to meet with state leaders, including Gov. Jared Polis.
Zeldin
is making his rounds, talking with as many people across the country as possible to gather information on potential ways to run the agency more efficiently.
The visit came after he announced
sweeping changes to the EPA
last month and a week after EPA workers in Denver protested potential job cuts.
"There's no message whatsoever that I'm here to deliver to anyone in region 8 about their jobs being in jeopardy," said the administrator. "That's not even part of the conversation."
During a visit to Denver Water following his meeting with Polis, Zeldin shut down implications to reporters that Denver workers would be losing their jobs. But he didn't shy away from questions regarding his overall goal of shrinking the agency.
"We do not want one more or one less than what we need to be able to do our job for the American people, and I think we owe that answer to the American taxpayer," he said.
"If, at the end of the day, it's identified that somebody's in a particular position that doesn't fill a core statutory obligation, and it isn't fulfilling any of our power in the 'Great American Comeback initiative,' I would love to hear that feedback from the ranks," Zeldin added.
His visit to Denver Water was an effort to collect feedback.
"It's important to get out across the country. I feel like I can be a more effective administrator, that our team can be more effective, that the EPA can be more effective being out of Washington as much as possible in states and getting the feedback on the ground."
The meeting could also be to the benefit of Denver Water as its CEO Alan Salazar took the opportunity to ask for the agency's help in getting the
Gross Reservoir expansion project
across the finish line.
Last week, a
federal judge ordered a halt to the construction
of the $531 million project underway in Boulder County after finding assessments of its environmental impacts were flawed. During the discussion, Salazar was able to secure a meeting with the agency next week.
"The most important thing for me to do is to do my homework. I got feedback here today that I can take back to DC with me. I could reflect on it, and it's good that Denver Water will be in Washington, D.C. next week; they can meet with leadership in Washington."
Zeldin's visit to Colorado ended with a tour and a message of collaboration.
"We believe in advancing cooperative federalism. We want a strong partnership with the state of Colorado."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk is on a national debt crusade after slamming Trump's spending bill: Dimon, Powell, Dalio, and Buffett have all echoed the Tesla CEO's concerns
Elon Musk has publicly severed ties with Donald Trump over a controversial Congressional spending bill, slamming it as fiscally irresponsible and warning it will balloon the U.S. national debt to unsustainable levels. Prominent financial leaders—including Jamie Dimon, Jerome Powell, Ray Dalio, and Warren Buffett—echo Musk's concerns, warning that unchecked government borrowing could trigger a severe economic crisis. The partnership between Elon Musk and Donald Trump appears to be over for good, with the Tesla CEO departing Washington D.C. before launching an attack on the White House's central spending bill. Last night, the gloves were off, and Musk declared President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill.' Musk's ire stems from his concern that the bill containing the 'largest tax cuts in history' will further increase the national debt, which Musk had been attempting to reduce—or at least not increase—with his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). DOGE's role had been to reduce the yearly budget deficit, which feeds into the wider government deficit, currently at $32.6 trillion. But while the White House says its policies will boost GDP by 2.6% to 3.2% in the long term and increase take-home pay for median income households by $5,000 a year, independent economists and researchers have found the legislation would add $3.8 trillion to the deficit. In comparison, proposed cuts to Medicaid would shave only $1 trillion in spending. After labelling the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' a 'disgusting abomination' Musk continued with his tirade about national debt, writing on his social media platform, X: 'It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' 'Congress is making America bankrupt,' he added. The real concern with U.S. national debt is not merely its existence—in fact borrowing is a necessary component of the global economy—but America's debt-to-GDP ratio. Is America's economy growing quickly enough to not only service its existing debt but also sell additional loans it will need to pay interest on in the future? To this end, the richest man on the planet doubled down. Reposting a video of Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell—something of an adversary to the Trump 2.0 administration—discussing his concerns about national debt, Musk added: 'This immense level of overspending will drive America into debt slavery!' He added: 'Interest payments already consume 25% of all government revenue. If the massive deficit spending continues, there will only be money for interest payments and nothing else! No social security, no medical, no defense … nothing.' Musk is not alone in his concern about national debt—far from it. Here are just some of the other notable names who are concerned by the issue. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon is a fan of the extension of Trump's tariff cuts, saying it will foster business investment and, therefore, growth. But that doesn't detract from the Wall Street veteran's wider concerns about debt. Speaking Friday at the Reagan National Economic Forum, the leader of America's largest bank said the bond market is going to 'crack' at some stage because of spending and quantitative easing. 'I just don't know if it's going to be a crisis in six months or six years, and I'm hoping that we change both the trajectory of the debt and the ability of market makers to make markets,' Dimon said. 'Unfortunately, it may be that we need that to wake us up.' This isn't the first time Dimon has issued a wake-up call to policymakers. Last year he said the economy faces a market 'rebellion' because of interest payments on the debt, explaining: 'If you look at that 100% debt to GDP by [2035] I think it's going to be 130%, and it's a hockey stick. That hockey stick doesn't start yet but when it starts, markets around the world…there will be a rebellion.' Federal Open Market Committee leader Jerome Powell is equally worried about the national debt path. However, he said it's not his position to suggest how the problem should be rectified. 'It's probably time, or past time, to get back to an adult conversation among elected officials about getting the federal government back on a sustainable fiscal path,' Powell said. Speaking last month, Powell said: 'I think [Congress] don't need my advice and our advice on how to do fiscal policy, any more than we need their advice. 'It's on Congress to figure out how to get us back on a sustainable path.' In the Congressional Budget Office's (CBO) latest reporting, the independent agency reported it expects debt to reach 156% of GDP in 2055. 'Mounting debt would slow economic growth, push up interest payments to foreign holders of U.S. debt, and pose significant risks to the fiscal and economic outlook; it could also cause lawmakers to feel constrained in their policy choices,' the CBO adds. Bridgewater founder Ray Dalio reiterated his concerns earlier this year. Speaking at CONVERGE LIVE in Singapore in March, Dalio explained: 'We have a very severe supply and demand problem. Some people think we'll handle it because we've handled it so far. I don't think they understand the mechanics of debt.' Dalio continued that, at some point, the U.S. will have to 'sell a quantity of debt that the world is not going to want to buy.' This is an 'imminent' scenario of 'paramount importance,' Dalio said. The man worth $14 billion according to Forbes continued: 'You are going to see shocking developments in terms of how [debt] is going to be dealt with.' Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett isn't shy of rolling his sleeves up in a time of crisis, but even the Oracle of Omaha wouldn't fancy the task of addressing national debt. Speaking at this year's annual shareholder meeting, Buffett was asked how far DOGE would be able to go when it came to addressing the debt issue. 'I think the problem of how you control revenue and expenses in the government is one that is never fully solved. And has really hurt dramatically many civilizations and I don't think we're immune from it,' Buffett said. 'We're operating at a fiscal deficit now that is unsustainable over a very long period of time—we don't know if that means two years or 20 years because there's never been a country like the United States,' he continued. 'But you know that if something can't go on forever, it will end.' Debt also has the aspect of becoming 'uncontrollable' Buffett added: 'I wouldn't want the job of trying to correct what's going on … I think it's a job I don't want, but it's a job I think should be done, and Congress does not seem good at doing it.' Professor Joao Gomes, a Wharton Business School finance professor, told Fortune: 'The most important thing about debt for people to keep in mind is you need somebody to buy it. We used to be able to count on China, Japanese investors, the Fed to [buy the debt]. All those players are slowly going away and are actually now selling. 'If at some moment these folks that have so far been happy to buy government debt from major economies decide, 'You know what, I'm not too sure if this is a good investment anymore. I'm going to ask for a higher interest rate to be persuaded to hold this,' then we could have a real accident on our hands.' This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Associated Press
22 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Cuts to USAID severed longstanding American support for Indigenous people around the world
NEW YORK (AP) — Miguel Guimaraes Vasquez fought for years to protect his homeland in the Peruvian Amazon from deforestation related to the cocaine trade, even laboring under death threats from drug traffickers. A leader in an Indigenous rights group, Vasquez said such efforts were long supported by financial assistance from the U.S. Agency for International Development, which spent billions of dollars starting in the 1980s to help farmers in Peru shift from growing coca for cocaine production to legal crops such as coffee and cacao for chocolate. The agency funded economic and agricultural training and technology, and helped farmers gain access to international markets. But the Trump administration's recent sweeping cuts to the agency have thrown that tradition of U.S. assistance into doubt, and Indigenous people in the Amazon worry that without American support there will be a resurgence of the cocaine market, increased threats to their land and potentially violent challenges to their human rights. 'We don't have the U.S. government with us anymore. So it can get really dangerous,' said Vásquez, who belongs to the Shipibo-Konibo people and is vice president of the Interethnic Association for the Development of the Peruvian Rainforest. 'We think the situation is going to get worse.' Several Indigenous human rights defenders have been killed trying to protect their land, Vasquez said, and in some of those cases U.S. foreign aid provided money to help prosecute the slayings. 'We really needed those resources,' he said. Sweeping cuts began in January When Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, began dismantling USAID shortly after President Donald Trump began his second term, it all but eliminated U.S. foreign aid spending, including decades of support to Indigenous peoples around the world. USAID's work with Indigenous peoples sought to address a variety of global issues affecting the U.S., according to former employees. Its economic development efforts created jobs in South America, easing the need for people to work in illicit drug markets and reducing the likelihood they would migrate to America seeking jobs and safety. And its support for the rights of Indigenous peoples to steward their own land offered opportunities to mitigate climate change. That included Vásquez's organization, which was about to receive a four-year, $2.5 million grant to continue fighting illicit activity that affects Indigenous people in the region. Vásquez said that grant was rescinded by the new administration. In January, DOGE launched a sweeping effort empowered by Trump to fire government workers and cut trillions in government spending. USAID, which managed about $35 billion in appropriations in fiscal year 2024, was one of his prime targets. Critics say the aid programs are wasteful and promote a liberal agenda. Trump, Musk and Republicans in Congress have accused the agency of advancing liberal social programs. 'Foreign assistance done right can advance our national interests, protect our borders, and strengthen our partnerships with key allies,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement in March. 'Unfortunately, USAID strayed from its original mission long ago. As a result, the gains were too few and the costs were too high.' Musk last week announced his departure from the Trump administration, marking the end of a turbulent chapter that included thousands of layoffs and reams of litigation. Former USAID employees said political pressure from the U.S. often kept foreign governments from violating some Indigenous rights. In the three months since thousands of foreign aid workers were fired and aid contracts canceled, the Peruvian government has moved quickly to strip Indigenous people of their land rights and to tighten controls on international organizations that document human rights abuses. It's now a serious offense for a nonprofit to provide assistance to anyone working to bring lawsuits against the government. The National Commission for Development and a Drug-Free Lifestyle, the country's agency that fights drug trafficking, did not respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press. 'The impact was really, really strong, and we felt it really quickly when the Trump administration changed its stance about USAID,' Vásquez said. The U.S. spends less than 1% of its budget on foreign assistance. Tim Rieser, a senior foreign policy aide in the Senate who works for Democratic Vermont Sen. Peter Welch, called DOGE's cuts to USAID a 'mindless' setback to years of work. The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Agency reached Indigenous communities worldwide USAID's work reached Indigenous communities around the world. It sought to mitigate the effects of human rights abuses in South America, created programs in Africa to enable Indigenous people to manage their own communities and led the global U.S. effort to fight hunger. One of the most recent additions to USAID's work was incorporating international concepts of Indigenous rights into policy. Rieser, for instance, was responsible for crafting legislation that created an adviser within USAID to protect the rights and address the needs of Indigenous peoples. The adviser advocated for Indigenous rights in foreign assistance programs, including actions by the World Bank. 'That provided Indigenous people everywhere with a way to be heard here in Washington,' Rieser said. 'That has now been silenced.' That adviser position remains unfilled. Vy Lam, USAID's adviser on Indigenous peoples, who said he was fired in March as part of the DOGE downsizing, said the idea of Indigenous rights, and the mandate to recognize them in foreign operations, was new to USAID. But it gained momentum under President Joe Biden's administration. He said concepts such as 'free, prior and informed consent' — the right of Indigenous people to give or withhold approval for any action that would affect their lands or rights — were slowly being implemented in American foreign policy. One of the ways that happened, Lam said, came in the form of U.S. political pressure on foreign governments or private industry to negotiate mutually beneficial agreements between Indigenous peoples and their governments. For instance, if an American company wanted to build a hotel in an area that could affect an Indigenous community, the U.S. could push for the deal to require Indigenous approval, or at least consultation. 'We had that convening power, and that is the thing that I grieve the most,' Lam said. U.S. foreign aid workers were also able to facilitate the reporting of some human rights violations, such as when a human rights or environmental defender is jailed without charges, or Indigenous peoples are forced off their land for the establishment of a protected area. Money supported attendance at international meetings In some cases, USAID supported travel to the United Nations, where Indigenous leaders and advocates could receive training to navigate international bodies and document abuses. Last year, under the Biden administration, USAID awarded a five-year grant to support Indigenous LGBTQIA people through the United Nations Voluntary Fund for Indigenous People, an agency that offers financial support to Indigenous peoples to participate in the U.N. At $350,000 per year, it was the largest grant from any member state in the U.N., fund Secretary Morse Flores said. The money would have paid for attendance at the U.N. and other international bodies to report human rights abuses and to testify on foreign policy. In February, the fund received notice that the grant would be terminated. The State Department does not plan to fulfill its pledge to fund the remaining four years of the grant. In most cases, people receiving assistance to attend major meetings 'are actual victims of human rights violations,' Flores said. 'For someone who's unable to come and speak up, I mean, it's really just an injustice.' ___ This story was published in partnership with Grist, a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.
Black America Web
24 minutes ago
- Black America Web
Black History Mural In Miami Defaced With Swastikas And Racist Graffiti
Source: Art Wager / Getty In today's episode of Attack Of The Fragile Vandals , a Black history mural at Dorsey Park in Miami's Overtown neighborhood has been defaced with swastikas, racial slurs and other racist graffiti, likely put there by a person (or persons) who gets their Confederate flag under garments in a bunch at the sight of Black culture being commemorated. (And, look, I'm not saying they're probably Trump supporters, but they're probably yuge fans of authoritarian governments that lie about 'white genocide' while trying to ban all teachings on anti-Black systemic racism into 'woke' oblivion.) From CBS News: The vandalism appeared on a section of the mural at NW 17th St. and NW 1st Ave., part of a historic public art effort led by the MLK Mural Project, Urgent Inc., and Touching Miami with Love. Painted in 2012, the mural was created to honor the cultural legacy of Dorsey Park, once home to the Negro Leagues' Ethiopian Clowns. Artist and community organizer Kyle Holbrook, who founded the MLK Mural Project, led the effort to commemorate African American icons and local history. The mural features figures such as Jackie Robinson, whose image was among those defaced. 'This was an act of hate, but it will not define us,' Holbrook said. 'This mural was born from a community's pride, history, and power. We will restore it—stronger, bolder, and with even more purpose. Black history is American history. And no spray paint can erase that truth.' It's starting to feel like a trend, honestly. Last week, in Texas — arguably the only state that rivals Florida when it comes to labeling non-whitewashed Black history 'woke' in order to justify banning it just to placate white nationalism and white fragility — a historical marker in downtown Dallas that tells the story of a Black man, Allen Brooks, who was lynched by a white mob in 1910, was cut down at the base and destroyed by unkown vandals. The week before that, a white man in Beachwood, Ohio, was accused of checking out 100 books on Black, Jewish and LGBTQ studies and burning them all on camera. Hell, when it comes down to it, the destruction of Black Lives Matter Plaza in Washington, D.C., was done by the current administration in an effort to appease the same white and eternally fragile people who are likely out here vandalizing Black historical renderings out of pure racial resentment. As for the mural at Dorsey, CBS reports that 'local leaders, artists and residents are organizing efforts to restore and expand the mural, using the incident as a call for unity,' and they're asking community members to participate in the effort. Hopefully, the mural will be restored. Hopefully, all of the defaced Black historical art across the nation will be as well. As for the hatred and bigotry that causes the vandalism — well, that's just America making itself great again , unfortunately. SEE ALSO: White Florida Man Says He Would Have Shot Black Girl Who Rang His Doorbell Karens, Klans And Caucasian Tears: The Grift Of Racism In America SEE ALSO Black History Mural In Miami Defaced With Swastikas And Racist Graffiti was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE
