Veterans gauge progress from legislative session
Soldiers line up for an annual veterans day parade. (Getty Images)
With the 2025 budget session now in the rear-view mirror, Hoosier veterans are taking note not only of what passed and what didn't, but how it all unfolded.
This session brought minimal progress for Indiana's veterans. Some long overdue improvements made it through, but far too many priorities were ignored, watered down, or outright rejected.
One win was expanded life insurance for Indiana National Guard members. Lawmakers approved a long-overdue increase in coverage — from $8,000 to $20,000 — for those who die while serving on state active duty orders.
The General Assembly also modernized charitable gaming. Veteran service organizations can now use electronic pull-tabs and apply revenues more flexibly. This modernization was decades in the making.
Businesses assisting veterans with their benefits must now be accredited and required to inform veterans of the free services available to them.
The Indiana Code now recognizes the U.S. Space Force, U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, and the NOAA Commissioned Officer Corps — making their income exempt from state tax.
These are meaningful steps, but they pale in comparison to the support veterans deserve and the issues left unaddressed.
Despite its potential to save lives, especially for veterans with traumatic brain injuries and post-traumatic stress, the proposed hyperbaric oxygen therapy program failed to advance.
And there is still no restoration of tuition remission for children of disabled veterans, a benefit stripped away in 2011 and not returned.
Once again, Indiana's reserve forces were left behind, with no state-funded education support.
We stopped a House attempt to raid the Veterans Affairs Trust Fund of $1.25 Million annually for a state program only to see the Senate reinsert the same provision. The Military Family Relief Fund, funded by Hoosiers to support veterans in need, is being quietly siphoned off to fund state agency advertising. Up to 10% of the fund is taken each year, despite the agency already having a communications staff and outside marketing firm on payroll.
That same agency also blocked a bill that would have allowed disabled veterans to access hyperbaric oxygen therapy through the fund. Veterans were denied critical care and a bureaucracy won out. That's not supporting veterans, that's exploiting them.
In 1975, Indiana honored disabled veterans with a property tax deduction of $24,950—when the average home cost just $39,000. An additional $14,000 was granted for the totally disabled. Many paid little to no property taxes as a result. It was a tangible, targeted acknowledgment of their sacrifice.
CONTACT US
Fast forward to 2025: In an attempt to address broader property tax issues, the General Assembly proposed folding veterans into a general tax credit system.
Under the original plan: all homeowners would get a $300 credit and disabled veterans would receive an additional $250.
Those over 62 or totally disabled would get another $150. However, those over 62 and totally disabled would be excluded from the senior credit entirely.
This was not a continuation of the original benefit, it was a replacement that undermined it. Veterans spoke out. The Indiana American Legion issued a call to action. The Military Veterans Coalition of Indiana mobilized. On the final day of session, lawmakers reversed course and reinstated the original property tax deduction for disabled veterans.
While that correction matters, it shouldn't be viewed as a win. It was a fix for a mistake that should never have been made and it still leaves the deduction unchanged from 50 years ago. No adjustment for inflation. No reflection of today's housing market. Just the bare minimum to maintain appearances.
Also in the final hours of session, lawmakers inserted language into a conference report that fundamentally alters who is eligible for benefits in Indiana throughout the Indiana code. Anywhere the law previously required an 'Honorable Discharge,' it now reads 'Anything Other Than Dishonorable.'
This opens the door to eligibility for those with bad conduct and other-than-honorable discharges. To manage this, the Indiana Veterans Commission is tasked with reviewing DD-214 discharge codes which the Department of Defense stopped publicly sharing in 2022. This is a bureaucratic workaround to a problem that shouldn't exist. The longstanding definition of a veteran, one who earned benefits through honorable service is being rewritten without adequate oversight or public input. Benefits come with honorable service. Period. Rewriting that standard isn't equity, it's erasure.
This session proved that vigilance is necessary. When legislators tried to undermine or redirect hard-earned benefits, veterans stood up, spoke out, and pushed back. And we're not done.
Hoosier veterans live to fight another day. And fight we will.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Missouri special session focuses on Royals and Chiefs stadium funding
ST. JOSEPH, Mo. (News-Press NOW) — Monday's special session announced by Governor Mike Kehoe last week honed in on funding for the Chiefs and Royals. The General Assembly met at noon Monday to discuss Kehoe's agenda, which included providing incentives to retain the local professional sports teams. The state of Kansas developed incentives to encourage the teams to cross the state line. St. Joseph resident Larry Stafford said he would rather see the Chiefs and Royals stay in Missouri, but he isn't worried the potential move if they stay in the Kansas City Metropolitan area. Kansas isn't that far away where they'd be," he said. "It's not like they'd be over in Topeka or Wichita or someplace like that." Senate Bill 3 was first read by legislators on Monday and would allow the state to invest in large stadium projects and potentially cover up to 50% of the costs. But not all St. Joseph residents are open to the teams moving to Kansas. Rita Davis would like to see the Chiefs and Royals continue playing in Missouri because it's a tradition she remembers as a child. "I have had friends take me to a football game down there or a baseball game, and it was—just the memories of it are fun," she said. "It was tradition, and I think it's good to know it will still be close, but I still like the idea that it's part of Missouri history." SB 3 would allow the sports teams to use tax revenue generated at the stadium to pay off construction bonds. Any tax revenue received after the bonds are paid off would then go to the state. "That doesn't bother me," Stafford said. "I mean, if they weren't there, you wouldn't have (tax revenue from the stadium) anyway." The terms apply to construction or rehabilitation projects that cost $500 million and serve professional baseball or football teams. "This isn't a giveaway—it's a strategy to ensure Missouri remains competitive with other states that would gladly take this opportunity for themselves," Governor Kehoe wrote Monday in an opinion letter through his office. It is unclear how long the special session will last, but the Missouri Constitution says the Governor may convene the General Assembly for a maximum of 60 days. SB 3 was second read and referred to the senate Fiscal Oversight Committee on Tuesday. "They're our teams, they're Missouri's teams, they're our history and we want to keep them here, Davis said.
Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Five countries win seats on the UN Security Council
UNITED NATIONS — Five countries won seats on the United Nations Security Council on Tuesday in uncontested elections and will start serving two-year terms in January on the U.N.'s most powerful but deeply divided body. The 193-member General Assembly held a secret-ballot vote for the five rotating seats on the 15-member council. Bahrain received 186 votes, Congo 183 votes, Liberia 181 votes, Colombia 180 votes and Latvia 178 votes.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Louisiana likely to make it harder to sue nursing homes over wrongful deaths
Louisiana legislators have sent legislation to shield nursing homes from lawsuit damages to Gov. Jeff Landry's desk. (Getty Images) Louisiana lawmakers gave final approval to legislation Tuesday to limit the amount of money nursing home residents and their families receive from lawsuits over injuries, neglect and wrongful deaths. Senate Bill 134 has been one of the most controversial bills of the legislative session. Advocacy organizations for seniors and people who are disabled made it a top priority to defeat the bill, saying it would protect nursing homes owners who keep their residents in dangerous situations. 'We are supposed to protect the elderly – not somebody who is trying to make more money off the elderly,' said Rep. Mandie Landry, D-New Orleans, who opposed the bill. Supporters insisted the proposal was not just about nursing homes and would protect a variety of medical facilities from frivolous lawsuits. But Louisiana's powerful nursing home owners were the primary backers of the bill and made it the focus of their legislative agenda this year. 'We're going to have those health care facilities turning in their keys because they can't do business in this state anymore' if these lawsuits continue, Wes Hataway, policy director for the Louisiana Nursing Home Association, said at a legislative hearing last month. There are more than 60 lawsuits pending against nursing homes across the state that could be limited by the legislation. They are being brought by residents and families, often alleging a loved one developed bedsores or injuries from repeated falls while living at a facility. The lawsuits allege the nursing homes and their management companies don't hire enough staff to watch the residents adequately, instead prioritizing lower costs and maximum profits. The bill would limit the damages that can be recovered from such a lawsuit. It would bring many of the lawsuits nursing homes currently face under the state Medical Malpractice Act, which caps awards at $500,000. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Recently, lawsuits against Chateau St. James Rehab and Retirement in Lutcher and Heritage Manor West in Shreveport over infected bedsores that contributed to residents' deaths had produced awards worth millions of dollars, far more than the legislation would allow. Nursing home owners are among the state's biggest political donors and one of the most influential industries at the Louisiana Capitol, focusing many of their contributions on state lawmakers and governors. A handful of legislators also have direct ties to the nursing home industry. Senate President Cameron Henry, R-Metairie, and Sen. Bob Hensgens, R-Abbeville, are part of the 10-person ownership group of Acadia St. Landry Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in Church Point. Their nursing home currently faces a wrongful death lawsuit. The nursing home industry pushed for this bill particularly hard, employing extra lobbyists and recruiting other influential groups such the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry and the Louisiana Hospital Association to support the proposal. The legislation passed easily, with a 58-37 vote in the House Tuesday and a 26-11 vote in the Senate last month. Gov. Jeff Landry could still attempt to block the legislation from passing into a law with a veto however. Legislators opposed to the bill attempted to water down the legislation by adding an amendment that would block a nursing home from being put under the $500,000 medical malpractice cap if it was poorly rated by the federal government. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX The U.S. Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services give nursing homes ratings of one to five stars based on factors such as facility inspections and staffing. The proposed amendment would have permitted lawsuits carrying greater risk to be brought against those nursing homes receiving one- or two-star ratings. 'Don't we want our seniors, our family members, our grandparents …to be in a safe space?' asked Rep. Stephanie Hilferty, R-New Orleans, who sponsored the amendment on the House side. Backed by AARP and other advocates for seniors, similar amendments failed in both chambers, with the Senate voting one down 20-16 and the House voting one down 57-39. Louisiana has some of the worst-rated nursing homes in the country, with approximately two-thirds of the facilities receiving one- and two-star ratings, according to Hilferty. She said those poorly-rated nursing homes make up 50% of such facilities in Metairie, which she represents in part, and more than 70% of nursing homes in Baton Rouge. Rep. Michael Melerine, R-Shreveport, defended the nursing home industry on the House floor, saying the facilities might face challenges with keeping residents healthy because of Louisiana's high rates of obesity and diabetes. He also said the state's general shortage of nurses contributes to low staffing at the facilities. 'You cannot address this without addressing the shortage of registered nurses,' he said. Melerine's law partner, Sen. Alan Seabaugh, R-Shreveport, is one of the sponsors of the legislation. Seabaugh is an attorney representing a nursing home facing a lawsuit over neglect in Bossier Parish.
