Nationwide ‘No Kings' protests set for this weekend, including across San Diego
SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — A massive wave of protests, dubbed 'No Kings Day,' is scheduled for this Saturday, June 14, 2025, with events planned in San Diego County and across the nation. Organized by several grassroots groups, the demonstrations aim to challenge what participants view as authoritarian actions by the Trump administration.
The 'No Kings' protests are part of a coordinated effort involving over 1,500 cities across all 50 states, as shown in a map pinpointing the planned events. The demonstrations coincide with President Trump's planned military parade in Washington, D.C., celebrating both his 79th birthday and the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary.
Critics argue that the parade serves as a personal spectacle for Trump, rather than a genuine celebration of military history. Based on a new AP-NORC poll, others have argued that the military parade is not a good use of money.
RELATED: What is the difference between democracy and authoritarian rule?
Participants are rallying against several policies and actions by the Trump administration, with immigration enforcement at the forefront. This comes as recent ICE raids, including a high-profile operation in San Diego's South Park neighborhood, have intensified community concerns.
Another key factor is the militarization of Los Angeles, where troops from the National Guard and Marine Corps have been sent in response to recent protests and as backup for those ongoing ICE raids—efforts encouraged by the president.
Federal workforce reductions are also fueling pushback, with executive orders leading to significant layoffs across federal agencies. This has sparked outrage over job security and government efficiency.
RELATED: National Guard troops directed to LA ICE protests from San Diego: Bonta
In San Diego, the main 'No Kings' event will take place from 10 a.m. to noon at Waterfront Park, located at 1600 Pacific Highway. Organizers anticipate a significant turnout, building on the momentum of previous rallies such as the 'Hands Off' protest in April, which drew around 10,000 attendees.
Also in San Diego, another 'No Kings' protest is planned at Civic Center Plaza, located at 1200 Third Ave. This event will start at 10 a.m. and last until 1 p.m.
From the South Bay to North County, similar 'No Kings' demonstrations are planned across the region on Saturday. Here's a breakdown:
— Chula Vista: The protest is scheduled at 10 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. The meeting spot is Panera in Otay Lakes with movement planned from Birch Road and Millenia Avenue.
— El Cajon: The protest is scheduled at 10 a.m. to noon. The meeting spot is at Magnolia Avenue and Fletcher Parkway.
— Mira Mesa: The protest is scheduled at 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. The meeting spot is the corner of Mira Mesa Boulevard and Westview Parkway.
— Del Mar: The protest is scheduled at 10 a.m. to noon. The meeting spot is the intersection of Del Mar Heights Road and Carmel Country Road.
— : The protest is scheduled at 11 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. The meeting spot is at Bernardo Center Drive and Rancho Bernardo Road.
— Ramona: The protest is scheduled at 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. The meeting spot is at the southwest corner of the intersection of 10th Street and Main Street.
— Escondido: The protest is scheduled at 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. The meeting spot is Grape Day Park, located at 321 N Broadway.
— San Marcos: The protest is scheduled at 4:15 p.m. to 5:45 p.m. The meeting spot is at Corner Grand and West San Marcos Boulevard.
— Carlsbad: The protest is scheduled at 10 a.m. to noon. The meeting spot is at Carlsbad Boulevard and Pine Avenue.
Participants are encouraged to bring homemade signs and wear comfortable clothing. The march routes and additional details are available on the official event page.
Organizers have emphasized that the protests are intended to be peaceful demonstrations. Local law enforcement agencies, including the San Diego Police Department, are expected to monitor the events to ensure public safety and uphold participants' First Amendment rights.
On Thursday morning, officials with SDPD released the following statement regarding the planned demonstrations:
'The San Diego Police Department fully supports the right to peacefully assemble and exercise freedom of speech. Our priority is the safety of all individuals—both those participating in demonstrations and those in the surrounding community.
The First Amendment protects the right to protest peacefully; however, unlawful acts such as blocking roadways, destroying property, or engaging in violence are not protected forms of protest.
When individuals break the law, they are no longer protesters—they are committing crimes and will be held accountable. We encourage everyone to stay safe, stay informed, and demonstrate responsibly.'
One thing's for certain: activism is going to be the theme across the nation this weekend.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Israeli Ambassador: ‘Objective is not to contain the war' but ‘win the war' against Iran
Israeli ambassador to the United States, Yechiel Leiter, said the goal in the war against Iran is not to contain it but to win it, as the two countries continue to exchange strikes for a third day. During an appearance on ABC's 'This Week,' host Martha Raddatz asked Leiter how Israel would avoid escalating and attempt to contain the war. 'Martha, the objective is not to contain the war,' Leiter responded. 'The objective is to win the war.' 'Eighty years ago, we had a little man with a mustache running around Europe that nobody believed him when he said he was going to destroy the Jewish people,' he continued. 'We lost 6 million. Now we've got a crazed new Hitler running around the Middle East saying he's going to destroy us. 'We have to take him at face value… He's got a concrete plan to destroy us.' Her comments come after Israel and Iran continued to exchange airstrikes on Sunday. Another round of U.S.-Iranian nuclear talks was scheduled in Muscat, Oman, but was cancelled amid the fighting. When Raddatz mentioned that Trump did not want Israel to strike Iran because it would 'blow it,' Leiter said Trump was 'congratulatory about our strike,' noting that he had been given a 'heads-up' by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. When pushed further on whether Israel would accept a deal between Iran and Israel, Leiter said not unless Iran is willing to halt the nuclear program entirely. 'He wants the nuclear program in Iran to be halted in its entirety,' Leiter said. 'He said it very clearly: dismantle the centrifuges, dismantle the infrastructure, and stop in total the enrichment of uranium. So, if that can be achieved through negotiation, so be it. We'll be very happy. But it hasn't been.'
CNN
9 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump wary of increasing US involvement as Israel-Iran conflict escalates
Amid ongoing waves of tit-for-tat strikes between Israel and Iran, President Donald Trump is publicly and privately making clear his desire to keep the United States out of the fray for now, wary of becoming bogged in another Middle East war and highly attuned to the changing politics of his party. Sources familiar with the matter say Israel has spoken with the US about possibly increasing its level of involvement, though one Israeli official cautioned those conversation have not yet included 'practical' discussions of the finer details. And while Trump hopes to avoid a prolonged conflict that could further destabilize the Middle East, some in the administration recognize that American military assistance may help Israel conclude its objectives more quickly, the sources said. 'We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved,' Trump told ABC News on Sunday morning. The competing interests have created a complicated dynamic for a president eager to make good on his pledge to bring peace to the world's troubled regions. Since Israel launched its first attack early Friday morning, the US has offered defensive support to Israel intercepting an onslaught of Iranian reprisal strikes. But Trump has stopped well short of joining Israel's military in its attempts to dismantle Iran's nuclear facilities, resisting pressure from fellow Republicans to join the fight. He said in a social media post Saturday that he felt the conflict 'should end' as he continues to hold out hope for a negotiated agreement that would curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions, even after planned talks this weekend in Oman between the US and Iranian negotiating teams were called off. At stake is Trump's promise to act as a global peacemaker — or, as he told his inaugural crowd in January, to 'bring a new spirit of unity to a world that has been angry, violent and totally unpredictable.' That vow has already been tested by his inability to bring about an end to the Ukraine conflict and halting efforts to stop the fighting in Gaza. Now, as a new flashpoint is threatening to spiral out of control on Trump's watch, the commander-in-chief is attempting to limit US involvement. 'The U.S. had nothing to do with the attack on Iran, tonight,' Trump wrote on Truth Social late Saturday amid a fresh round of attacks in the region. 'If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before. However, we can easily get a deal done between Iran and Israel, and end this bloody conflict!!!' The post sent the message that Trump's line for getting more directly involved in Israel's assaults would be an attack on American facilities or personnel in the region. Short of that, the US role in the conflict so far has largely been defensive. The Israeli operation against Iran is expected to take 'weeks, not days' and is moving forward with implicit US approval, according to White House and Israeli officials. The Trump administration has not critiqued the weeks-long timeframe in private discussions, an Israeli official told CNN. A White House official said the administration was aware and implicitly supportive of Israel's plans. When asked about how long the conflict could continue, the official said it depended on Iran's response. 'The Trump administration firmly believes this can be solved by continuing negotiations with the US,' the official said, adding that the US was not going to direct Israel to do anything but defend itself. American military planners have long had prepared options for joint US-Israeli actions against Iranian facilities should a US president ultimately decide to try taking out Iran's nuclear facilities, some of which are buried deep underground. There is little to indicate Trump has come close to approving such options, however, and according to an Israeli official, the possibility of offensive US support for Israel's strikes inside Iran had not been discussed on a 'practical basis.' 'We are not there, on a practical basis,' the Israeli official said. 'If at some point, the United States decides to take an offensive role, I don't think we'll be in a position to try and talk them out of it – but that's not our ask,' the official said, adding that such a move would be a sovereign decision of the US. The official explained that the endgame is to make sure that Iran is 'no longer an existential threat' to Israel, with both its nuclear and ballistic missiles program. 'If it's done in conjunction with allies, fine, but if it's not done in conjunction with allies, we have to do it ourselves,' the official said. Inside the White House, there continues to be heavy skepticism about getting involved in the conflict further, according to multiple officials familiar with the matter. Trump remains concerned about getting dragged into a war he didn't start and wanted to avoid, and is acutely aware of the complicated politics at play, those officials said. Though he publicly warned Israel against launching an attack on Iran ahead of Friday's strikes, he said afterward he was supportive of the effort and well aware that it was being planned. Prev Next Trump has long promised not to engage in 'nation building' adventurism overseas, decrying his predecessors for sending American troops to die in wars that generated little benefit back home. 'For at least two decades, political leaders from both parties have dragged our military into missions it was never meant to be' a part of, said Trump told graduating cadets at West Point last month. 'They sent our warriors on nation-building crusades to nations that wanted nothing to do with us, led by leaders that didn't have a clue in distant lands,' he said, vowing to never repeat the mistake. Now, however, he is under pressure from some of his Republican allies to take a more interventionist role. 'If diplomacy fails, going all in for Israel shows that America is back as a reliable ally and a strong force against oppression. It would strengthen our hand in all corners of the world, as well as all other conflicts we face,' Sen. Lindsey Graham wrote on X last week.
CNN
9 minutes ago
- CNN
‘We cannot move in this direction as a nation': Panel reacts to Minnesota assassination
CNN Political Commentators Shermichael Singleton, Karen Finney, Brad Todd and former Democratic Congressman Andy Levin join CNN's Dana Bash to discuss the growing trend of political violence in America, as well as broader protests against President Trump.
