Letters: Department of Education's unique functions; Fenchak should still be a choice for trustee
With the proposal to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education, (DoED) we should review the importance of the agency. It has unique functions that would be difficult for individual states to replicate.
The DoED does not have power over school curriculum, staffing or academic standards. These are decided by the individual states.
There are three main functions of the DoED: research, civil rights and funding for specific individuals. Examples are:
Research — oversees the National Assessment of Educational Progress, the nation's report card mandated by congress in 1969. Collects and tracks data on college admissions, graduation rates and need-based aid among other functions.
Funding — Provides funding for public schools via: Title 1 for districts that serve lower income areas and Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) for districts that serve students with disabilities. DoED is the only agency directly responsible for ensuring local compliance with the IDEA.
Manages college financial aid and federal student loans via FAFSA and FSA that includes grants (Pell Grants), loans and work study funds for undergraduate students.
Civil rights — Investigated complaints nationwide regarding discrimination in schools (more than 22,000 last year). These include Title IX that prohibits sex discrimination in education including men, women, girls, boys and staff in educational programs that receives federal funds.
Pennsylvania receives $2.8 billion in grants from the DoED including $736 billion for Title 1 and $554 million for IDEA. Loss of some or all of this money would mean increased property taxes.
Susan Johnston, State College. The author is the chair of the AAUW State College Education Committee.
Penn State alumni including myself signed a petition to nominate Barry J. Fenchak '84 for another term as alumni trustee. The board's nominating committee, with the exception of Jay Paterno, voted however to exclude Fenchak from the ballot. In doing so, the committee may have exceeded the scope of its authority by considering a controversy that was already covered in an injunction issued against the board, as opposed to Mr. Fenchak's qualifications. Judge Brian Marshall wrote in part, 'Denying the injunction and allowing Plaintiff's removal would re-cast a shadow over the financial operations of Defendants, to the detriment of every Penn State stakeholder except those at the very top of the Penn State hierarchy.' (In 2014, State Senator John Yudichak opined that personal agendas rather than a Penn State agenda were driving board decisions.) Marshall's ruling also cited alleged retaliation against Fenchak.
I can understand why the board's leaders want Fenchak out. If I was the subject of multiple adverse rulings from a court of law because of my behavior toward this individual, I would certainly want him gone as well. In any event, the alumni who nominated Fenchak did not ask the nominating committee for its opinion so I recommend accordingly that alumni write in Barry J. Fenchak '84 (the full name and year of graduation are important) in the upcoming election for alumni trustee.
Bill Levinson, Wilkes Barre
The current federal administration is neo-fascist — as the Nazis demonized the Jews and homosexuals, so Donald Trump demonizes migrants and transgender people. These are not normal times politically. In just a few months the president has been cruel and hateful to them, to the federal workforce and to all the poor abroad who have lost our foreign aid.
In State College, we must all stand up in moral witness. We must find ways to nonviolently fight back.
John Harris, State College
Mr. Trump has succeed where generations of dictators failed. He shut down the Voice of America.
Hitler tried. So did Tojo. And Stalin, Castro, Mao, Putin, Xi, Kim Jong-Il, and a few others in history's rogues' gallery.
But only Trump succeeded in silencing the VOA which, for more than 80 years, delivered accurate news to people who weren't going to hear it from their own governments. It was a powerful tool for democracy.
But democracy is so 20th century. At least the Trumpsters think so.
How many know that former Penn State University President Milton S. Eisenhower was closely involved with the early days of the Voice of America when he was associate director of War Information in World War II? He is buried in Centre County Memorial Park and I'll bet he is turning in his grave.
Richard W. Jones, State College
We speak only from our own experience, but we have enjoyed some delightful times and delicious food; we have met some warm, cordial and helpful people; and we have caught some magnificent northern pike in Canada, which has shared with all of us down here some greatly talented actors, writers, singers, and athletes, along with its maple syrup and Labatt's beer.
When obdurate Americans gather to disparage, insult, embarrass, threaten, or harm Canadians, however we can, we plan to resist.
Cordy and John Swinton, State College
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Will Penn State trustees remove Barry Fenchak from board? Special meeting scheduled
The Penn State board of trustees scheduled a special meeting for Monday to vote on removing one of its most outspoken board members. The board will meet virtually at 3 p.m. Monday, June 16 to consider a proposal recommending removing trustee Barry Fenchak from the board. A vote in favor of doing so would make Fenchak permanently ineligible to serve on the board again. Fenchak is an alumni-elected trustee whose three-year term expires June 30. He submitted materials and garnered enough signatures to appear on the trustee election ballot to run for a second term, but the board ruled he was unqualified and ineligible to appear on the ballot. He ran an unsuccessful write-in campaign. The board previously tried to permanently remove Fenchak from the board in the fall because of an incident that occurred after the board's July 2024 meeting. Fenchak loosely repeated a quote from the PG-rated movie 'A League of Their Own' in which Tom Hanks' character told a baseball umpire he looked like a 'penis with a little hat on' to a female staff member. A board subcommittee found it to be a code of conduct violation and unanimously recommended his removal. When the board tried to remove him, the issue went to court as part of a lawsuit Fenchak filed against the board. The judge blocked the board from removing him as trustee a day before the vote was scheduled, finding Fenchak had provided 'uncontradicted evidence of a broad pattern of retaliatory behavior' by the board. But the judge, Brian Marshall, lifted that preliminary injunction in May — paving way for his removal — after finding the basis for it had since become moot. He granted the injunction in the fall after Fenchak showed the board was trying to remove him in retaliation for his repeated requests for information, namely the university's approximately $4.57 billion endowment and a reportedly $1 billion athletic department contract with a ticketing and fan engagement agency. But in the seven months since, Fenchak was given 510 pages of information related to the endowment and a complete, unredacted copy of the contract with Elevate. He can no longer claim he is subject to removal from the board because of those specific requests, Marshall wrote in his ruling. Reporter Bret Pallotto contributed to this report.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Minnesota Title IX investigation escalates after Champlin Park softball championship
The Brief The U.S. Department of Education is escalating its Title IX investigation into Minnesota after the Champlin Park girls softball team won a state championship with a transgender pitcher. Law professor David Schultz says Minnesota and the Trump Administration have very different interpretations of Title IX when it comes to transgender athletes. Attorney General Keith Ellison is suing the Trump Administration, challenging the executive order that MINNEAPOLIS (FOX 9) - The U.S. Department of Education is raising the stakes in its Title IX investigations against the State of Minnesota. What we know The federal government announced an investigation into Minnesota earlier this year. A few weeks ago, they launched a second investigation into the Minnesota Department of Education and the Minnesota State High School League for allowing transgender athletes to play in women's sports. Thursday, officials announced they were accelerating the investigation. Why you should care This, after the Champlin Park girls softball team garnered national attention. The Rebels just won the Class 4A state championship, led by a star pitcher who is transgender. The U.S. Department of Education and Department of Justice announced Thursday they were elevating their investigations into the Minnesota Department of Education. Federal officials say it's because Champlin Park won the state softball title with a male athlete. "If we start to look at the state of interpretation of Title IX, it's not completely clear," said David Schultz with the Mitchell Hamline School of Law. Dig deeper Schultz says Title IX, which prohibits sex-based discrimination and education, is being interpreted very differently by the Trump Administration and the State of Minnesota when it comes to transgender athletes. "It comes down to the federal courts, including possibly the Supreme Court, to render the final interpretation of what Title IX actually requires or what it means," Schultz said. The Minnesota State High School League and Department of Education's position is that Minnesota human rights laws ban discrimination based on gender identity, and that it does not conflict with Title IX. The Trump Administration believes Title IX protects women athletes, and transgender athletes violate that protection. "They're going to have to eventually show that the interpretation of the word sex isn't broad enough to include transgender, and if transgender athletes participate in high school or college sports, their participation actually hurts women, and therefore violates Title IX," Schultz said. What's next So where does this go from here? It's now an expedited investigation, with a resolution expected soon. Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison has an ongoing lawsuit against the Trump Administration, challenging President Trump's executive order banning transgender athletes in women's sports and threatening to pull federal funding to states. The federal government's response is due by June 26.
CNN
4 days ago
- CNN
Supreme Court backs families fighting school district over disability discrimination
The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously sided with a Minnesota family that has been battling their local school district over the education of their daughter in a decision that could make it easier for other parents of disabled children to seek damages from schools under federal disability laws. The decision, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, rejected a lower court ruling that had set a high legal bar to bring those claims, essentially shielding school districts from certain suits involving disability discrimination. The teenager at the center of the case, identified in court papers as Ava, has a rare form of epilepsy that made it impossible for her to attend school in the morning. Her parents requested that the district accommodate her disability with evening instruction, but school officials initially declined to do so. The parents filed a successful complaint under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, which resulted in a decision requiring the school to offer evening parents then sued the district for damages under the Americans with Disability Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. That latter law is what allows parents and schools to develop '504 plans' to accommodate students with disabilities. A federal district court ruled with the schools, holding that the family had not demonstrated that school administrators operated with 'bad faith or gross misjudgment,' a higher legal standard than the 'deliberate indifference' threshold that courts apply in other disability discrimination contests. The 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that decision and the parents appealed to the Supreme Court in September. In its decision on Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled that the same standard that applies in other disability contexts should also apply in schools. It doesn't mean that the families will necessarily win their cases, but it will make it easier for them to bring their claims. 'That our decision is narrow does not diminish its import' for the family involved in the litigation 'and 'a great many children with disabilities and their parents,'' Roberts wrote. 'Together they face daunting challenges on a daily basis,' Roberts added. 'We hold today that those challenges do not include having to satisfy a more stringent standard of proof than other plaintiffs to establish discrimination under Title II of the ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.' Five federal appeals courts have required parents to meet the higher standard to proceed with litigation and two others apply the lower standard. Public school districts, worried about limited resources, had argued at the Supreme Court that the way to handle the case was not to lower the standard for families like the one involved but rather to raise it for everyone else. But the court dismissed that argument as arriving too late in the litigation. The court's 'resolution of these issues could have significant ramifications for both disability law and discrimination law more generally,' Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a concurring opinion joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. 'That these issues are consequential is all the more reason to wait for a case in which they are squarely before us and we have the benefit of adversarial briefing.' Two years ago, the Supreme Court sided unanimously with a student who is deaf and also sought to sue his school for damages. That case dealt with whether students could pursue those claims for damages before they exhaust administrative processes required under another law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
