Wissam Haddad appointed as Chief Executive Officer of SICO Capital in Saudi Arabia
SICO BSC (c), a leading regional asset manager, broker, and investment bank, with over USD 7 billion in assets under management and a direct presence in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, announced today the appointment of Wissam Haddad as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of its wholly owned subsidiary, SICO Capital, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, effective 5 May 2025.
Wissam has over 22 years of experience in investment banking, private equity, real estate and corporate finance. He assumes the position of CEO of SICO Capital following 11 successful years as SICO's Group Head of Investment Banking, where he played a key role in positioning SICO as the leading investment bank in Bahrain. Under his leadership, the award-winning division multiplied its revenues and deal sizes, executing landmark transactions that include initial public offerings, debt issuances, mergers and acquisitions, strategic offers, multi-asset fund launches, and structuring and managing Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs).
'I am pleased to assume the position of CEO of SICO Capital and to drive our strategy towards becoming one of Saudi Arabia's preferred independent asset management, brokerage and investment banking firms. The public and private capital markets and financial landscape in Saudi Arabia have been growing dramatically, and we are eager to continue to expand our presence on the ground, offering a full suite of services directly through our dedicated team in Riyadh with robust support from the broader group in Bahrain and the UAE,' said Wissam Haddad, CEO of SICO Capital.
The Board of Directors of SICO Capital is pleased to welcome Wissam to his new role as CEO and looks forward to his leadership in driving the company's future growth.
SICO Capital is a full-service investment banking firm based in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, that offers a comprehensive range of financial services to individual, institutional, and corporate clients with multiple activities under the Saudi Capital Markets Authority license number 08096-37, including asset management, investment banking, and brokerage.
About SICO
SICO is a leading regional asset manager, broker, and investment bank with USD 7.4 bn in assets under management (AUM). Today, SICO operates under a wholesale banking licence from the Central Bank of Bahrain and also oversees two wholly owned subsidiaries: an Abu Dhabi-based brokerage firm, SICO Invest, and a full-fledged capital markets services firm, SICO Capital, based in Saudi Arabia. Headquartered in the Kingdom of Bahrain with a growing regional and international presence, SICO has a well-established track record as a trusted regional bank offering a comprehensive suite of financial solutions, including asset management, brokerage, investment banking, and market making, backed by a robust and experienced research team that provides regional insight and analysis of more than 90 percent of the region's major equities. Since inception in 1995, SICO has consistently outperformed the market and developed a solid base of institutional clients. Going forward, the bank's continued growth will be guided by its commitments to strong corporate governance and developing trusting relationships with its clients. The bank will also continue to invest in its information technology capabilities and the human capital of its 150 exceptional employees.
Media Contact:
Ms. Nadeen Oweis
Head of Corporate Communications, SICO
Direct Tel: (+973) 1751 5017
Email: noweis@sicobank.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Business
an hour ago
- Arabian Business
‘Magnet for hedge funds', the UAE could change the $4.5tr global industry
A new research on the hedge fund industry has praised the effect Dubai and Abu Dhabi are having on what now has a size of over US$4.5 trillion. 'The state of the hedge fund industry', a report by the London-based IG Prime, said the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) had attracted 60 hedge funds as of September 2024, and the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) is not far behind. UAE attracts hedge funds The UAE has 'emerged as a magnet for hedge funds' and other financial institutions in recent years. Some of the world's biggest hedge funds, including Millennium and Balyasny, have opened offices in the country, while overall employment in financial services has exploded to 44,000, up by two-thirds on the 2019 figure. The report quoted an earlier IG Prime/Hedgeweek report in September last year, which found that a clear majority (62 per cent) of the hedge funds surveyed identified Abu Dhabi and Dubai as the 'challenger' hubs. These locations were expected to see the most hedge fund growth, ahead of India, Latin America and the Nordics. Proximity to allocators was a key reason, but the report also highlighted tax advantages, time zone, and lifestyle as strong reasons. 'The huge wealth of the UAE, with the Gulf home to some of the world's largest allocators to alternatives, has advanced the case for having not only traders but business development leaders in the region,' the report added. The IG Prime report said the 'lightly regulated financial centres' such as Dubai and Abu Dhabi could lead to a global change and 'increase the pressure on regulators worldwide to carefully consider the impact of any new rules'. The UAE is an area of focus for the IG Prime, and Max Hayden, Global Head of Prime Brokerage, said: 'Everyone in the industry is talking about Dubai and Abu Dhabi and we're seeing headcount in both places increase, driven by new satellite offices started by big firms and, a relatively new phenomenon, new hedge funds launching there.' Turf war with PE firms With some of the more 'traditional' hedge fund strategies failing to deliver over the last few years, investor demand for hedge funds to improve their returns has led to more of them investing in a wider array of alternatives such as private credit, private equity and private real estate. The IG Prime research shows that 70 per cent of hedge funds now invest in private markets. As many as 61 per cent say they now invest in private equity, 45 per cent in private real estate, 39 per cent in private credit/debt and 38 per cent in infrastructure. Demand for investment in private markets from investors has also been driven by a global trend toward delisting from stock markets and companies holding off on IPOs for longer. These are expected to continue driving growth for private markets in the future. Hedge funds' expansion into private markets means they are increasingly competing with private equity funds, who have also been expanding from private equity into other private asset classes such as infrastructure, private credit and real estate. Chris Beauchamp, Chief Market Analyst at IG Prime, commented: 'The growth of hedge funds has meant that there has been a crowding of trades that have traditionally worked well for them. Arguably some of the opportunities have been arbitraged away, which has driven funds to look for new ways of getting index-beating returns. Many hedge funds are seeing private markets as an answer.' Private equity is the private market asset class with the fastest growth amongst hedge funds, with 58 per cent of hedge funds saying it's the area they've most increased exposure in during the last year. Hedge fund managers are also increasing their exposure in real estate (48 per cent), private credit (31 per cent), infrastructure (30 per cent) and natural resources (34 per cent). Despite its growing popularity, higher interest rates and uncertainty about the future of markets made private equity more difficult in 2024. That may change in the second half of this year as tariff levels continue to move down from their 'worst case' scenarios. While private equity suffered in 2024, private credit has continued to grow rapidly – 31 per cent of hedge funds identified private credit as the area of greatest growth within private markets. Stricter banking regulations and the withdrawal of bank lending have made private credit an important alternative for borrowers. Beauchamp added: 'While most hedge funds see private equity as the substantial growth investment in private markets, demand for hedge funds that invest in private credit have also been particularly strong. 'The question for hedge funds is what skills they bring to bear in these private market that might give them the edge over existing participants such as PE funds. Some will be competing directly with PE and private credit funds for the same investments. Others will be hoping that they can use the current tariff-related disruption to pick up assets priced for distress.'
Khaleej Times
an hour ago
- Khaleej Times
Prenups in UAE: Why more couples are signing contract before marriage
Across the Gulf, more couples are now choosing prenuptial agreements as a practical step before marriage. This is particularly happening in the UAE, where legal reforms have made them easier to draft, recognise, and enforce laws. While prenups can't prevent a marriage from breaking down — and may still carry a social stigma, legal experts say they can often reduce the bitterness and legal chaos that sometimes follow. A turning point came in 2021, when Abu Dhabi introduced Law No. 14/2021 on Personal Status for Non-Muslim Foreigners, followed by Resolution No. (8) of 2022, establishing a legal framework for civil marriages. For the first time, non-Muslim couples, mostly expats, could marry under a civil contract, independent of religious laws. 'As the ceremony is civilly based, it effectively allows for prenuptial agreements to be signed before marriage,' explained Tyne Hugo, Senior Associate, from law firm BSA. 'Couples now have the opportunity to tailor their financial arrangements from the outset, something that was previously unavailable or legally ambiguous.' With the UAE home to millions of expatriates from diverse cultural backgrounds, officials have increasingly worked to make the country feel like a long-term home, not just a stopover. 'To attract foreigners, the UAE must cater to their cultural norms, and in the West, prenups are not only common but expected,' Tyne added. Stay up to date with the latest news. Follow KT on WhatsApp Channels. Learning from experience While prenups can't guarantee a marriage will succeed, they often serve as a powerful tool to reduce emotional and legal fallout if it fails. BSA shared that in one recent divorce case they handled, there was no prenup in place, but the couple was still able to amicably negotiate a financial agreement. 'That's not always the case,' Tyne said. 'We've seen divorces where couples fought over everything, including the cutlery. These kinds of disputes are often more about emotions than assets.' By contrast, couples who sign prenups typically experience less conflict and faster resolutions. 'There's clarity,' Tyne added, 'and that clarity helps prevent unnecessary legal battles.' One such experience was of Maha A., a Lebanese designer who got married last year. 'I was surprised when my fiancé suggested a prenup,' she recalled. 'At first, I felt hurt. But he explained it wasn't about preparing for divorce, it was about protecting each other. We both have separate assets and wanted to keep things clear. In the end, it actually made me feel more secure.' She said the process also forced them to have difficult, but important, conversations about spending habits, savings goals, and potential risks. 'It wasn't romantic, but it was responsible.' A tool for protection Although still an uncomfortable topic in some families, prenups are increasingly being viewed not as a threat to marriage but as a means of clarity and mutual understanding. 'Prenups don't just deal with how assets are split in case of a divorce; they can also outline how assets are managed during the marriage,' the Tyne noted. 'Partners can decide whether to have joint or separate estates and shield themselves from each other's financial liabilities. If one person goes into debt, the other can ensure their assets are protected from creditors.' Custom fit, not culture clash Cultural differences still shape how prenups are perceived. In more conservative families, the idea of signing a legal agreement before marriage can feel like an admission of doubt or distrust. 'Some cultures may see this as a betrayal of what a marriage is supposed to be,' Tyne said. 'But the beauty of a prenup is that it's entirely customisable. It can reflect any cultural or religious values the couple deems important.' Yet younger couples, especially those from dual-nationality backgrounds or raised in more globalised environments, are seeing prenups in a new light. 'Couples are beginning to realise that love and legal planning are not mutually exclusive,' said Rania F., a licensed marriage and family therapist based in Dubai. 'A prenup doesn't mean you expect a divorce, it just means you're mature enough to talk about money, expectations, and personal boundaries before problems arise.' Rania noted that more clients are now asking about prenups during premarital counselling, particularly when one partner owns a business, has children from a previous marriage, or carries significant debt.
Arabian Post
9 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Afreximbank downgrade dispute raises questions on loan categorisation
African Union's African Peer Review Mechanism has challenged Fitch Ratings' downgrade of the African Export‑Import Bank, arguing the move rests on a misinterpretation of its sovereign loan portfolio. On 4 June, Fitch lowered Afreximbank's long‑term foreign‑currency issuer rating from BBB to BBB‑—a notch above junk—with a negative outlook. The agency attributed the downgrade to elevated credit risk, citing an estimated non‑performing loan ratio of 7.1 %, primarily due to sovereign exposures to Ghana, South Sudan and Zambia classified as NPLs. The APRM asserts that Fitch's classification is flawed and inconsistent with Afreximbank's own disclosure of an NPL ratio of 2.44 % as of end‑March. The AU‑established body emphasises the bank's status as a multilateral lender created under a 1993 treaty, which binds member governments—including Ghana and Zambia—as signatories, shareholders and founding members. APRM contends such loans are grounded in intergovernmental cooperation rather than standard commercial terms, so treating them as NPLs misrepresents their nature. Fitch defended its methodology, stating that its supranational rating decisions adhere to globally consistent and publicly available criteria, and highlighting that their analysis clearly identified rating drivers and sensitivities. The agency maintains sovereign exposures showing delayed repayments meet its threshold for classification as non‑performing, irrespective of legal structures or treaties. In that sense, the downgrade aligns with accepted analytical standards. ADVERTISEMENT APRM's critique zeroes in on that threshold. It argues that sovereign repayment negotiations are routine diplomatic engagements, not signs of default. It remains concerned that Fitch's decision conflates financial dialogue with credit impairment. The body has formally called on Fitch, Afreximbank and other African institutions to convene technical consultations and reassess the rating, emphasising the importance of contextually intelligent credit assessments. Beyond the immediate dispute, this episode resonates with a broader continental debate over the relevance and fairness of global credit‑rating frameworks applied to African multilaterals. Africa's longstanding concerns that Western rating methodologies fail to grasp local realities and may unfairly inflate borrowing costs have sparked momentum for alternative mechanisms. Among these, an Africa‑led credit‑rating agency is under development, envisaged to begin operations by September 2025, aimed at providing sovereign ratings that reflect regional economic and institutional contexts. Central to the debate is Afreximbank's evolving lending strategy. Under outgoing president Benedict Okey Oramah, the Cairo‑based lender has aggressively expanded its footprint, increasingly financing private sector projects across the continent and taking calculated sovereign exposure. Supporting growth in under‑served markets like Zimbabwe and Nigeria, the bank grew its asset base from around US$7 billion in 2015 to approximately US$40 billion in 2024, with deposits rising to US$37 billion. That growth has attracted scrutiny. Fitch has highlighted what it sees as elevated concentration of corporate and sovereign risk, pointing to an NPL ratio that exceeds its internal threshold. Observers note that up to 92 % of Afreximbank's lending is directed at commercial businesses, and certain sovereign loans carry interest rates as high as 6.875 % over benchmark rates—much higher than traditional development finance institutions. Proponents of the APRM's position, including lead credit‑ratings expert Misheck Mutize, argue that supplementary indicators such as capital adequacy, collateral density and profitability should carry mitigating weight. Mutize points to a strong equity ratio of 19 %, risk‑weighted capital at 21 %, internal capital generation through profits, and loan collateral cover for 84 % of the portfolio. These factors, he suggests, are downplayed in the rating downgrade despite being explicitly acknowledged in Fitch's own analytic framework. He warns that over‑reliance on contested NPL figures can breach the methodology's balance principles. ADVERTISEMENT Not everyone supports APRM's framing. Analysts note that countries like Zambia officially halted repayments to Afreximbank in 2021, and South Sudan failed to honour its obligations, prompting legal recourse in London. Zambia's treasury has openly stated its debt will be restructured. Against this backdrop, Fitch's interpretation that certain sovereign debt has become non‑performing appears defensible under global standards. This dispute underscores a tension: Afreximbank's assertive growth strategy has boosted its developmental reach and institutional clout, yet it must reconcile that dynamism with risk and transparency expectations imposed by global credit agencies. With Oramah set to step down later this month, the new president will face a pivotal choice: maintain aggressive expansion as the bank charts an independent path, or recalibrate operations to conform more closely with multilateral development bank norms—a course change that could preserve borrowing benefits but limit growth prerogatives. Beyond institutional implications, the outcome has broader financial consequences. A downgrade to BBB‑ tightens Afreximbank's borrowing costs, heightens the risk premium for countries swayed by its lending, and complicates its mission to finance intra‑continental trade. That may squeeze African exporters and traders relying on the bank's funding. Policy stakeholders are paying attention. The APRM's call for dialogue and transparency signals a pushback against the perceived hold of Western agencies over African financial destiny. Meanwhile, the African Development Bank is developing a Continental Financial Stability Mechanism that may borrow under a regional rating—another step towards financial sovereignty.
