logo
Calls for investigation after some in Nunavik left out of vote due to polling station issues

Calls for investigation after some in Nunavik left out of vote due to polling station issues

CBC30-04-2025

Tiivi Tulaugak was looking forward to voting in his first election in Ivujivik, Nunavik's northernmost community located in Quebec. But the 18-year-old's excitement quickly turned into frustration on Monday afternoon when he found out he was among the residents who wouldn't be able to cast a ballot.
CBC News has heard from residents in five Nunavik communities who reported issues at polling stations, including some that closed early — or didn't open at all.
"In my opinion, it's illegal," said Tulaugak, who called the situation "unacceptable." "They should plan and organize before the election."
Now, the Makivvik Corporation, the organization representing Inuit in Nunavik, is calling on Elections Canada to investigate. It says it learned polling hours were inconsistent and some communities couldn't vote altogether.
"This is unacceptable in 2025. In many cases, Nunavimmiut were effectively denied their right to participate in this election," read a statement.
Makivvik is demanding Elections Canada take immediate steps to ensure that every Inuk in Nunavik has equal access to voting in future elections.
In a statement on Monday, Elections Canada said weather issues were affecting flights for workers but did not confirm how many villages were affected, or whether polling booths did close down.
"In several cases, it was not possible to recruit local teams. In other cases, harsh weather conditions have prevented access to communities," read the statement on Monday.
On Tuesday, Elections Canada told CBC it was still gathering more information.
Mandy Gull-Masty, former grand chief of the Cree Nation Government in Quebec, won the seat in the region, flipping the Abitibi–Baie-James–Nunavik–Eeyou riding Liberal by just a couple thousand votes over the Bloc.
Lawyer weighs in on what can be done
Julius Grey, a constitutional and human rights lawyer in Montreal, says the right to vote is fundamental, and the Elections Act is subject to the Charter.
"Accessibility is one part of the right to vote, so a court could intervene on it," said Grey. "Now whether what could be done, I don't know."
He says recourse for individuals affected by this could manifest as a declaration for future safeguards or a symbolic monetary compensation for breach of a Charter right, for example.
But he says being excluded from voting can happen — whether that be due to a mistake, a polling station closing early or a voter not being able to enter the voting area, for example.
Now, to go as far as overturning or annulling the results of a riding, Grey says that would require demonstrating a real possibility that the outcome could have been different.
"If a riding was won by 30 votes and it appears that 2,000 people were deprived of the vote, then the solution would be to annul the vote in that area and hold a byelection," he said.
"But that is not so just because a few people didn't vote. Because you can imagine how difficult it would be to have claims after every election."
Another possibility is a declaratory relief — a kind of legal remedy to declare that "those communities should be served and that an error was made in not serving them," said Grey.
'It may leave a bad taste in their mouth'
Veldon Coburn, associate professor and faculty chair of Indigenous Relations Initiative at McGill University, says there's an opportunity for a post-mortem and to use this riding as a type of case study to prevent similar situations in the next election.
"Indigenous peoples have a long history of standing up for their rights," said Coburn, who is Anishinaabe from Pikwàkanagàn.
"Fighting for the right to participate in electoral politics has been something that's been dear to them. So Elections Canada may have awakened a bit of a sleeping giant here."
Due to the riding's unique makeup and a significant Indigenous population, he says residents may be feeling "rightly aggrieved and wronged."
Part of the problem, he says, stems from more than a century of political disenfranchisement faced by Indigenous people.
"There's a number of barriers for all sorts of matters of participating in politics and informal electoral politics. So it would be disheartening … in this era of reconciliation," said Coburn.
"I'm kind of a little bit bewildered that this could happen."
Coburn says Elections Canada should be able to anticipate some of these issues — especially considering the potential harms to Indigenous voters.
"It may leave a bad taste in their mouth," he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Immigration minister defends sweeping new powers in border bill

time2 days ago

Immigration minister defends sweeping new powers in border bill

Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab is defending controversial new measures in the Strong Borders Act, such as giving her office the power to cancel immigration documents en masse and placing time limits for asylum seekers to make their applications. There's a lot of applications in the system. We need to act fairly, and treat people appropriately who really do need to claim asylum and who really do need to be protected to stay in Canada, Diab told CBC News. We need to be more efficient in doing that. At the same time, Canadians demand that we have a system that works for everyone. Introduced in the House of Commons on Tuesday, Bill C-2, the Strong Borders Act, is meant to protect Canadian sovereignty, strengthen the border and keep Canadians safe, according to the federal government. The bill would make dozens of amendments to existing laws. Its proposed changes to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act would force asylum seekers entering the country, including students and temporary residents, to make claims within a year. Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab said mass cancellations of immigration documents would not be done without careful consideration by cabinet. Photo: CBC / Mark Crosby The new law would also require irregular border crossers, people who enter Canada between official ports of entry, to make an asylum claim within 14 days of arriving in Canada. And it would speed up voluntary departures by making removal orders effective the same day an asylum claim is withdrawn. Groups such as the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers are raising concerns about these measures. There are a few categories of people who may end up making a claim after they've been in Canada for more than one year for fully legitimate reasons, said Adam Sadinsky, the group's advocacy co-chair. He cited examples such as changes in government in someone's country of origin, the breakout of conflict or their human rights advocacy in Canada placing a target on them. They may now be in danger returning back home in a way that they weren't when they first arrived, he said. Federal government data shows some 39,445 asylum claimants processed by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada and the Canada Border Services Agency between January and April. (new window) Sadinsky said if the government's motivations are about clearing backlogs, it may be creating another problem. Asylum seekers who find their application rejected by the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada can file appeals to the Refugee Appeal Division. However, shutting them out of the asylum route after a year could make them turn to the Federal Court of Canada for recourse instead, a body that has been public (new window) about its own courtrooms facing severe delays with immigration cases. It's a lot more work for the court, Sadinsky said, when people start getting removal dates from Canada and they have to ask the court for motions for stays of removal from Canada. Sadinsky suggested the government could have reduced backlogs by issuing blanket approvals for would-be asylum seekers from countries where Canada recognizes there is an imminent danger to sending them back, such as Taliban-controlled Afghanistan. WATCH: Public safety minister says border bill will give law enforcement better tools to deal with crime Début du widget Widget. Passer le widget ? Fin du widget Widget. Retourner au début du widget ? Public safety minister says border bill will give law enforcement better tools to deal with crime Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree said Bill C-2, the Strong Borders Act, will 'keep our borders secure, combat transnational organized crime, stop the flow of illegal fentanyl and crack down on money laundering,' as well as 'enhance the integrity and fairness of our immigration system.' Speaking to journalists on Wednesday, Justice Minister Sean Fraser said the government needed to act, though he recognized courts are facing efficiency problems. We need to be able to do two things at once, he said about changing the asylum system and reducing court backlogs. Reached for comment, the office of the chief justice of the Federal Court said in a statement it would simply hope that any potential impact on the court's workload would be taken into account, citing a previous amendment to immigration law under Stephen Harper's Conservative government in 2010 that included four new court positions. Mass cancellation powers The Migrant Rights Network, an advocacy group, said it is alarmed about the government giving itself the ability to cancel previously issued immigration documents in large groups. What this is, is setting up of a mass deportation machine, said its spokesperson Syed Hussan. Just go out and say we're walking away from the Geneva Convention. Diab said any mass cancellation decisions would be taken by the whole cabinet, not just her office, and they would not be done lightly. These are in exceptional circumstances, when you're talking about mass cancellation or suspension, she said. For example, when COVID happened, we literally had applications coming in, and the system had no authority to suspend or cancel those applications … we could have health risks again. We could have security risks. Bill C-2 is now moving through Parliament. The legislation would normally be studied by parliamentary committee next, though neither Diab nor Gary Anandasangaree, the public safety minister, could say which committee would pick it up. Committees have not been named yet for this sitting and it is unclear if they will before Parliament wraps up for the summer at the end of June. The Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers said it intends to write a letter outlining its concerns to the federal government, and would hope to present at committee when the moment arrives. Raffy Boudjikanian (new window) · CBC News ·

Israel recovers bodies of Canadian Israeli Judih Weinstein Haggai and husband held by Hamas

time2 days ago

Israel recovers bodies of Canadian Israeli Judih Weinstein Haggai and husband held by Hamas

Israel's military recovered the bodies of two hostages, Canadian Israeli Judih Weinstein Haggai and her husband, Israeli American Gadi Haggai, who were held by Hamas, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Thursday. The Israeli army said in a statement that the bodies of the husband and wife were recovered in a special operation from the Khan Younis area in the Gaza Strip. Together with all the citizens of Israel, my wife and I extend our heartfelt condolences to the dear families. Our hearts ache for the most terrible loss. May their memory be blessed, Netanyahu said in a statement. Kibbutz Nir Oz announced the deaths of Weinstein Haggai, 70, and Haggai, 72, both of whom had Israeli and U.S. citizenship, in December 2023. The Israeli military said they were killed in the Oct. 7, 2023, attack and taken into Gaza by the Mujahideen Brigades, the small armed group that it said had also abducted and killed Shiri Bibas and her two small children. Weinstein Haggai grew up in Canada and held Canadian and U.S. citizenship. She was born in New York state but moved to Toronto at the age of three, and then moved to Israel 20 years later to live with Haggai. She was a mother of four and a grandmother of seven. 56 hostages still held by Hamas An Israeli group formed after Oct. 7, the Hostages Families Forum Headquarters, expressed gratitude for the development in a statement. The return is painful and heartbreaking, yet it also brings healing to our uncertainty, the statement read. "Their return reminds us all that it is the state's duty to bring everyone home, so that we, the families, together with all the people of Israel, can begin the process of healing and recovery. WATCH l Weinstein Haggai's niece spoke to CBC News in 2023 about her aunt's strength, character: Début du widget Widget. Passer le widget ? Fin du widget Widget. Retourner au début du widget ? 'Sleepless nights' for family of Canadian missing since Oct. 7 Hamas attacks Ali Weinstein, who spoke about her aunt Judih Weinstein Haggai in an exclusive interview with CBC's Heather Hiscox, says her family has 'no information' about their beloved relative — who is believed to be among those being held in Gaza. Weinstein Haggai was among several Canadian citizens (new window) killed in the Oct. 7 attacks. Israel believes there are still 56 hostages held by Hamas, with fewer than half believed to be alive. The hostages' forum group cited that number in its statement, calling on the warring sides to facilitate their return. There is no need to wait another 608 agonizing days for this. The mission can be completed as early as tomorrow morning, the group said. Israel launched its military campaign in Gaza following the Oct. 7 assault in which Hamas-led gunmen killed 1,200 people and took 251 hostages, by Israeli tallies. In the subsequent fighting, more than 54,000 Palestinians have been killed, local health authorities say. Thomson Reuters with files from CBC News and The Associated Press

Ministers say new border bill upholds rights while limiting asylum claims
Ministers say new border bill upholds rights while limiting asylum claims

Global News

time3 days ago

  • Global News

Ministers say new border bill upholds rights while limiting asylum claims

Safeguards have been written into the government's border bill to ensure civil rights and due process are upheld in proposed immigration regulations, Immigration Minister Lena Diab said Wednesday. Critics and advocacy groups are calling the wide-ranging border security legislation a threat to civil liberties in the immigration and asylum system. One proposed change in the legislation would prevent people from making asylum claims if they've been in Canada for more than a year. That change would not affect applications that have been submitted already but would be retroactive to June 3, assuming the bill becomes law. Diab said there would still be opportunities for asylum seekers who have been in Canada for more than a year to make their case through measures like pre-removal risk assessments. 'There's a lot of applications in the system and so this is will streamline it to ensure that those newcomers, or those people that really need our protection and use the asylum system, are processed faster,' she said. Story continues below advertisement Justice Minister Sean Fraser also pointed to the pre-removal risk assessment clause as a safeguard that helps ensure the bill upholds individual rights and freedoms. 'We went through the bill to make sure that we have the tools that are necessary to protect the integrity of the border, also to protect rights of Canadians and to be in compliance with the Charter,' Fraser said on his way into Wednesday's caucus meeting. 0:25 Anandasangaree introduces bill aimed at tightening border security, immigration system The 127-page bill, unveiled Tuesday, would give authorities new powers to search mail and expand the Canadian Coast Guard's role to include security activities. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy There are several other immigration measures are in the bill. They include giving authorities the power to cancel or suspend immigration documents for health or national security reasons, closing a loophole that allows people to make an asylum claim 14 days after crossing the U.S. land border, and allowing Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada to share the personal information of immigrants and refugees with provincial and territorial governments. Story continues below advertisement Immigration lawyer Zool Suleman said the information-sharing proposal poses a threat to the civil liberties of all Canadians. 'Everybody thinks they have nothing to hide. You'd be amazed at how much we do want to hide in terms of the personal lives that we lead in this country and that we have a right to lead in the country,' he said. 'The real issue is that the government should not be delving into your private life unless they have cause. And so what this bill is really doing is threatening the civil liberties of everybody in Canada.' Diab said the legislation includes a number of safeguards to protect personal information. She said the goal is to streamline information-sharing between branches of government that process immigration, citizenship and passport applications. 'These programs cannot share information together. So this at least will give us that ability to do that, but also share information with the provinces and territories where the need arises,' she said. Diab said information-sharing arrangements with provincial and territorial bodies would be outlined in agreements stating which information can be shared and when. 'Most Canadians probably think this is the sensible thing to do and in fact most probably think it exists already. Well, it does not,' Diab said. Story continues below advertisement Diab said the final decision on cancelling or suspending immigration documents in the event of a health or public safety emergency would be made by cabinet. 'I think people, Canadians, should feel safe that we are putting all these safeguards in. But again, as I said, it's all part of protecting our country and protecting our system,' Diab said. Suleman said he has worried about a government giving itself this kind of power since the 2001 Immigration and Refugee Protection Act became law. 'People had predicted that this is the direction in which the government would go when it was passing this framework legislation. And what we find more than two decades later is it's exactly where the government has gone,' he said. 'They've taken on more and more authority for themselves with less and less safeguards for refugees and immigrants.' 0:35 New border bill has elements 'that will strengthen' Canada-U.S. relationship: Anandasangaree The legislation says that some asylum cases — such as those of migrants crossing by land from the U.S. — will no longer be sent to the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada for review. Story continues below advertisement 'You will be subjected to a much lower level of review and much lower levels of safeguards. Essentially, what the government is trying to do for many, many refugee claimants is move to a paper review basis, not an oral review basis to determine their claims,' Suleman said. The government has been trying to cut the backlog in immigration and refugee applications and is reducing the number of permanent and temporary residents being admitted to Canada. Roxham Road in Quebec became a focal point for the immigration debate during the first Donald Trump presidency, with thousands of people claiming asylum after crossing the Canadian border onto the small rural road, about 50 kilometres south of Montreal. More recently, the government has reported an increase in the number of international students making asylum claims when their visas expire. Diab said the asylum system can't be used as a shortcut to immigration. 'If you want to immigrate to Canada, we have rules. We have processes. Please use them,' she said. — With files from Jim Bronskill

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store