logo
The MAGA Fight Over the Iran Fight

The MAGA Fight Over the Iran Fight

New York Times4 hours ago

A decade ago, President Trump electrified conservatives with his promises to get the United States out of foreign entanglements and to always put — say it with me — 'America first.'
As he weighs involving American planes and weaponry in Israel's attacks on Iran, a brawl has broken out in the Republican Party over what 'America first' really means.
I wrote today about how a swath of Trump's base is in an uproar over the president's increasing openness to deploying U.S. warplanes — and perhaps even 30,000-pound bunker-busting bombs — against Iran in an effort to help Israel finish off its nuclear program.
'Everyone is finding out who are real America First/MAGA and who were fake and just said it bc it was popular,' Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia posted on X over the weekend. She added, 'Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA.'
The anger extends well beyond Greene's social-media account, to cable television and the podcast feeds of the likes of Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon and Candace Owens. They are passionately arguing that intervening in Iran would contravene Trump's long-held promise to steer the nation out of, not into, foreign entanglements, and threaten to fracture his whole coalition.
It's a remarkable fight, and one that raises a bigger question about who is really the keeper of Trump's political flame. Is it the non-interventionists who have been there from the start, or the Republican hawks — the Senator Lindsey Grahams of the world — who are now sticking by the president?
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tucker Carlson Rips Apart Ted Cruz's Bible-Based Defense Of Israel
Tucker Carlson Rips Apart Ted Cruz's Bible-Based Defense Of Israel

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tucker Carlson Rips Apart Ted Cruz's Bible-Based Defense Of Israel

Tucker Carlson just backed Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) into a corner during a discussion about Israel and its conflict with Iran. The former Fox News host dissected Cruz's argument for America's unyielding support for Israel as his guest explained how his commitment to the country was based on what he learned back in Sunday school. 'I was taught from the Bible, those who bless Israel will be blessed, and those who curse Israel will be cursed,' the senator said while appearing on an episode of Carlson's show posted on Wednesday. 'And from my perspective, I want to be on the blessing side of things.' Cruz's statement left Carlson with a few questions, like whether that verse was referring to the current government of Israel or if the Republican could even tell him what part of the Bible he was pulling from. When Cruz was unable to find an answer off the top of his head, right-wing pundit Carlson reminded the senator he was cribbing from the book of Genesis and then wondered how Cruz could base his opinion on scripture he couldn't even cite correctly. 'So you're quoting a Bible phrase, you don't have context for it,' Carlson said. 'You don't know where in the Bible it is, but that's your theology? I'm confused. What does that even mean?' Cruz got defensive as Carlson pushed him to define what he meant by Israel, be it the state's current borders, its current leadership, a 'political entity' or how it was defined in biblical times. When Cruz settled on the term 'nation,' Carlson straight up asked, 'Is the nation God is referring to in Genesis, is that the same as the country run by Benjamin Netanyahu right now?' Cruz and Carlson's clash reflects a growing schism within the Republican Party, where 'America First' isolationists like the commentator have found themselves at odds with Middle East war hawks like the senator. The discussion came on the heels of Israel's preemptive military strike on Iran last Thursday, a move that has forced President Donald Trump to weigh whether or not the U.S. will join its ally in its bombing campaign. Watch the testy exchange right here: New clip of Ted Cruz getting cooked by Tucker Carlson just dropped — MeidasTouch (@MeidasTouch) June 18, 2025 Tucker Carlson Tears Into Ted Cruz In The Most Gloriously Awkward Interview You'll See Marjorie Taylor Greene Makes Rare Break From Trump — And It's All About Tucker Carlson Trump Escalates His Feud With Tucker Carlson Over Israel And Iran

Former Trump Aide Steve Bannon Says Fox News Is Pushing 'Pure Propaganda' On Iran
Former Trump Aide Steve Bannon Says Fox News Is Pushing 'Pure Propaganda' On Iran

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Former Trump Aide Steve Bannon Says Fox News Is Pushing 'Pure Propaganda' On Iran

WASHINGTON — Right-wing pundit Steve Bannon on Wednesday blasted some conservative media outlets and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for encouraging U.S. participation in Israel's ongoing war against Iran — accusing Fox News of pushing 'pure propaganda' and highlighting a deepening rift among the coalition close to President Donald Trump. Fox is promoting 'the exact propaganda you had in the Iraq War,' Bannon said. referring to America's 2003 invasion of Iraq, which set off years of bloodshed and instability in the Middle East. 'The traditional Republican Party' is using Fox and other platforms like National Review magazine to pursue 'forever war,' while 'that part of the Republican Party can't win national elections,' he continued, noting that Trump's rise to political prominence involved a rebuke of President George W. Bush for the Iraq War. 'There's no difference between the pitch they're making here and the pitch they made on Iraq,' Bannon said. The former Trump White House adviser made the remarks at a Wednesday breakfast with reporters organized by the Christian Science Monitor. His fierce comments demonstrated how right-wing factions supportive of Trump are openly clashing as the president says he has not yet made a decision about entering American forces into the war. And while he called himself a supporter of Israel, Bannon repeatedly criticized Netanyahu for attempting to influence the conversation in the U.S. and weighing in on the pro-Trump slogan 'America First.' 'If [Trump] decides to use combat operations, he will explain it to the American people and not be hectored and lectured by Bibi Netanyahu,' Bannon said. 'Having the gall to come on ABC News and lecture the MAGA movement: 'Do you want America first or America dead?' That is inappropriate for any foreign leader to tell us, particularly somebody that's dependent upon the United States.' Bannon believes Trump may still avoid involving the U.S. in Israel's offensive, defying pressure for a strike from some on Trump's own team and prominent hawkish voices, including many GOP lawmakers. 'The Israelis have to finish what they started … There's no rush for the United States' to intervene, he said, arguing Trump's ongoing buildup of American military forces in the Middle East is because 'Trump likes optionality' and he may seek 'coercive diplomacy' with Iran. The focus of the diplomacy would be beyond the current fighting, to a long-running dispute over Iran's nuclear enrichment program. Trump was pursuing a deal with Tehran to limit the program in exchange for relief from economic sanctions — akin to the Obama-era nuclear deal that he abandoned — and appears to believe such an agreement can still be reached. On Wednesday, the president told reporters that U.S. and Iranian officials might soon meet, even potentially at the White House. Iran's mission to the United Nations slammed the idea and most analysts believe the country will not negotiate under Israeli bombing, which has killed hundreds of Iranians while Iranian retaliatory attacks have killed at least 24 Israelis. Trump also said he told Netanyahu to 'keep going' and suggested the next several days or up to a week would be 'very big,' adding: 'Nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Bannon said he agrees Iran should not get a nuclear weapon. But Trump's negotiation effort was attempting to reach that goal, he said, and questioned why Israel launched its strikes last week, saying he does not see why the U.S. should trust officials who 'had the biggest intelligence failure since 9/11 on October 7,' 2023, when Palestinian militants invaded Israel. While Bannon praised a range of Trump appointees like Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, he blasted U.S. Central Command, or CENTCOM, which oversees American military operations in the Middle East and whose hawkish chief, Erik Kurilla, is wielding significant influence in Trump's decision-making. 'The Pentagon has a CENTCOM mentality. Until we break that, we're not going to have any progress,' Bannon said. The rifts among Trump supporters have gone viral through moments like right-wing pundit Tucker Carlson challenging pro-war Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) in a Tuesday interview about his limited knowledge of Iran. Still, flaws in the understanding of the country and surreal ideas about U.S. influence exist across those factional divides. Bannon repeatedly mispronounced the name of Iran's most sensitive nuclear facility, Fordow, as he discussed the prospect of the U.S. helping Israel to attack it. He frequently referred to Iran and Iranians as 'Persia' and 'Persians' — terms that, while appealing to pop historians, ignore the potent force of modern Iranian nationalism and seem to try to divorce the country from Islam, which has been deeply rooted there for around 1,000 years. And he suggested his own interest in regime change, the bugbear among anti-war conservatives, by saying Trump waged 'economic warfare' against Iran through sanctions during his first presidency, which Bannon claimed helped drive Iranian protests in 2022. (Iranian activists have decried attempts by Netanyahu and other outside hawks to co-opt their calls for change in their country.) 'That's kind of how you want to play it, right?' he said.

Trump's Envoy to China Calls Out Threat of Foreign Supply Chains
Trump's Envoy to China Calls Out Threat of Foreign Supply Chains

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Envoy to China Calls Out Threat of Foreign Supply Chains

(Bloomberg) -- The US wants to revamp its trading relationship with China and the world by bringing many critical supply chains back onshore, the American ambassador to Beijing said. Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads How E-Scooters Conquered (Most of) Europe Taser-Maker Axon Triggers a NIMBY Backlash in its Hometown NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports 'Unfettered globalization has increasingly created single-source supply chain vulnerabilities,' David Perdue, who assumed his post last month, told a dinner in Washington on Thursday. 'We have all witnessed the extent to which our businesses have become overly dependent on China for components, inputs, intermediate goods and even entire supply chains,' he said, adding that American leaders had been 'blind to the hollowing out of many US strategic industries.' The assessment echoes criticism by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who said at the recent Group of Seven meeting that the world is experiencing a new 'China Shock.' Her accusation, which drew a sharp retort from Beijing, took aim at what von der Leyen characterized as China's use of its quasi-monopoly over some sectors as both a bargaining chip and a weapon to undermine competition. Perdue took a more measured view, noting in his comments that President Donald Trump doesn't blame China for pursuing its own national interest. 'President Trump's vision is to have a trading relationship with China that is based on reciprocity, fairness and respect — one in which the United States puts the American people first, just as China does for its own people,' he said via a video message to the annual dinner of the US-China Business Council. In earlier remarks at the same event, China's ambassador to the US, Xie Feng, made a case for America to become a partner and not a rival to his country, calling for the removal of still 'unreasonably high' tariffs imposed by Trump. Xie also argued that the trading relationship between China and the US was a 'two-way street,' and neither side was getting ripped off. While the US had a goods trade deficit with China, American companies generated a lot of revenue in China, which in turn ran a shortfall in its services trade with the US. For Perdue, however, the lopsided commerce between the world's two biggest economies can't go on as before. 'We must remedy the current imbalance in our relationship,' he said. 'If the United States is to pursue its own national interest in global trade while ensuring the dollar's place as world's reserve currency, then our economy cannot be so dependent on foreign supply chains that can be severed at any moment.' Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? How a Tiny Middleman Could Access Two-Factor Login Codes From Tech Giants The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store