logo
The Buffalo Supermarket Shooter Really Tried It With This Latest Request

The Buffalo Supermarket Shooter Really Tried It With This Latest Request

Yahoo04-04-2025

Updated as of 4/5/2025 at 3:00 p.m. ET
The white man who gunned down 10 Black people inside a Buffalo supermarket in a racially motivated massacre is facing the ultimate penalty by the Department of Justice. However, he's come up with a slick idea that may or may not change the odds of him meeting the chair.
Attorneys for Payton Gendron, 20, filed a request in the U.S. District Court earlier this week arguing that their client has no chance of receiving an unbiased jury if the pool is picked in the area impacted by the shooting, per USA TODAY.
'Due to the overwhelming amount of pretrial publicity, combined with the impact of this case on Buffalo's segregated communities of color, it is impossible for Payton Gendron to select a fair and impartial jury in the Western District of New York,' wrote Gendron's lawyers in the filing.
The attorneys argued that a 'diverse group of citizens' should be the ones to deliver a verdict in the case.
Gendron is already serving a life sentence after pleading guilty to state charges of murder and hate-motivated domestic terrorism in connection to the fatal mass shooting of ten Black people at Tops Friendly Market back in 2022, per The New York Times.
His racist motives were discovered after investigators found a manifesto he posted online, filled with white supremacist ideologies. They also found he targeted this neighborhood because it contained a majority-Black population.
Gendron still faces sentencing for federal hate crimes, use of firearms to commit murder and gun charges. Though New York does not hand out the death penalty, court records show the Department of Justice sent a notice of intent to seek the death penalty anyway Friday.
'...the United States believes the circumstances in counts 11 to 20 of the Indictment are such that, in the event of a conviction, a sentence of death is justified...' the notice reads.
Read more from CBS News:
New York does not have capital punishment, but the Justice Department had the option of seeking the death penalty in a separate federal hate crimes case. The gunman had promised to plead guilty in that case if prosecutors agreed not to seek the death penalty.
The Justice Department has made federal death penalty cases a rarity since the election of President Biden, who opposes capital punishment. This is the first time Attorney General Merrick Garland has authorized a new pursuit of the death penalty. Under his leadership, the Justice Department has permitted the continuation of two capital prosecutions and withdrawn from pursuing death in more than two dozen cases.
The families of the victims weren't necessarily jovial at the news of the filing. Mark Talley, grandson of Geraldine Talley who was killed in the incident, said he would've rathered Gendron do prison time.
'It would have satisfied me more knowing he would have spent the rest of his life in prison being surrounded by the population of people he tried to kill. I would prefer he spend the rest of his life in prison suffering every day,' he told CBS.
In a statement on behalf of the other relatives of the victims, attorney Terrence Connors said the families were relieved of the decision but 'no decision could eliminate the pain and suffering they continue to experience.'
In the same breath, Jamila Hodge, CEO of Equal Justice USA, an organization fighting against the expansion of death penalty legislation, said execution will do nothing to solve the real problem.
'The government's decision to pursue a death sentence will do nothing to address the racism and hatred that fueled the mass murder. Ultimately, this pursuit will inflict more pain and renewed trauma on the victims' families and the larger Black community already shattered by loss and desperately in need of healing and solutions that truly build community safety,' Hodge said in a statement.
For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Trump travel ban takes effect
New Trump travel ban takes effect

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

New Trump travel ban takes effect

President Trump's travel ban targeting a dozen countries went into effect on Monday, the latest step by the White House to crack down on the number of individuals entering the U.S. The new policy fully restricts the entry into the United States of nationals from Afghanistan, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also partially restricts entry into the U.S. for nationals coming from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The policy makes exceptions for nationals from all 19 of those countries who are lawful permanent residents of the United States or existing visa holders and individuals 'whose entry serves U.S. national interests.' The travel ban is taking effect amid rising tensions in Los Angeles around immigration raids in the city. Trump and White House officials have argued the travel restrictions are based on national security concerns, specifically with vetting procedures involving the listed countries. Trump's attempts to restrict entry into the United States from certain Muslim-majority countries in his first term drew legal challenges and protests at airports across the country. This time around, experts have suggested he is likely on firmer legal footing in part because of a Supreme Court ruling that upheld the third version of his first-term ban and in part because the administration laid the groundwork with an executive order focused on enhanced vetting. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Feds ask to keep Kilmar Abrego Garcia in jail pending trial
Feds ask to keep Kilmar Abrego Garcia in jail pending trial

USA Today

time36 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Feds ask to keep Kilmar Abrego Garcia in jail pending trial

Feds ask to keep Kilmar Abrego Garcia in jail pending trial The detention request comes after Garcia was mistakenly deported to Salvador in March and then returned to face criminal charges in Tennessee. Show Caption Hide Caption Trump on the return of deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia President Trump spoke with reporters on Air Force One on the return of deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Acting U.S. Attorney Robert McGuire argued that Garcia is 'a serious risk' to flee or threaten witnesses in the case. Justice Department lawyers contend Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Salvadoran immigrant wrongfully deported to his home country and now returned to face criminal charges, should remain jailed while the case is argued. U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw in Tennessee scheduled a detention hearing to consider the question on June 13. Garcia is charged with conspiracy to transport undocumented immigrants and unlawful transportation for financial gain. He faces a maximum of 10 years in prison for each person transported, and the indictment unsealed last week charged him with driving a van with nine other people in it. Acting U.S. Robert McGuire argued in a filing June 9 that one of the immigrants transported in the conspiracy was a minor, which would justify detention. Garcia 'is a serious risk' to flee or to threaten, injure or intimidate witnesses in the case, McGuire argued. 'It is not simply that he would face serious prison time,' McGuire said in the filing. 'It is that, if convicted, he would likely lose forever the opportunity to remain lawfully in the United States.' 'This motivation is substantially different from a citizen defendant who, while he may face prison time, does not face that permanent expulsion from a country where his family currently resides,' McGuire said. Garcia was among hundreds of immigrants deported March 15 to a notorious Salvadoran prison as an alleged gang member, in his case MS-13. Immigration officials acknowledged an 'administrative error' in removing him despite a court order preventing his deportation while he sought asylum in the U.S. Garcia has denied being a member of MS-13. His lawyers have said he needs to meet with his Maryland family and lawyers to mount his defense, but that he has not gotten a fair trial in the court of public opinion.

States sue US government over deal ending ban on triggers that make some rifles fire more rapidly
States sue US government over deal ending ban on triggers that make some rifles fire more rapidly

San Francisco Chronicle​

time36 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

States sue US government over deal ending ban on triggers that make some rifles fire more rapidly

Sixteen states have sued the Trump administration over its plan to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers that make semiautomatic rifles fire more rapidly and return devices already seized to their owners. The suit announced Monday argues that returning the triggers would violate federal law, pose a threat to residents and law enforcement and worsen gun violence. It was filed in federal court in Maryland. There had been several legal battles over the devices, which replace the typical trigger on an AR-15-style rifle. The Biden administration had previously argued the triggers qualify as machine guns under federal law because constant finger pressure on the triggers will keep a rifle firing, essentially creating an illegal machine gun. Rare Breed Triggers, the maker of the devices, had argued that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives was wrong in its classification and ignored demands to stop selling the triggers before being sued by the Biden administration. The Justice Department reached a deal announced last month to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers with Rare Breed Triggers, which was previously represented by David Warrington, Trump's current White House counsel. Under the settlement, Rare Breed Triggers agreed not to develop such devices to be used on handguns, according to the Justice Department. The settlement requires the ATF to return triggers that it had seized or that owners had voluntarily surrendered to the government. The states' lawsuit is being led by the attorneys general of Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey. Other states involved are Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, along with the District of Columbia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store