logo
What slaughtering animals all day does to your mind

What slaughtering animals all day does to your mind

Vox2 days ago

is a senior reporter for Vox's Future Perfect section, with a focus on animal welfare and the future of meat.
In The Dying Trade, a forthcoming documentary film about slaughterhouse workers, a man named Tom describes a moment during his career that still haunts him many years later: the time he skinned a cow alive while she was giving birth.
Tom worked at slaughterhouses across Europe from the late 1990s to the mid-2010s, and one of his jobs on the production line was to remove the skin from animals after they had been hung up, stunned unconscious, and bled out. That's how it's supposed to work in theory.
But slaughterhouses operate at a rapid, hectic pace, with animals sometimes stunned improperly and butchered while still alive and conscious. If a cow remained conscious once they got to Tom — as was the case with this cow in particular, whose calf was partially hanging out of her birth canal — he was unable to stop the line to ensure they were properly killed. So, as the cow kicked at him, mid-birth, he had no choice but to skin her alive. The calf didn't survive.
'It takes 25 seconds,' to skin them, he said in The Dying Trade, 'but it stays with you for the rest of your life.'
Tom, who calls himself a 'devout animal lover,' said that it's 'very difficult watching animals being killed.' But the job desensitizes you: 'You become a robot.' Other slaughterhouse workers have made similar remarks.
Ducks hang upside down from a processing line as workers hang more animals on the line at a duck farm's on-site slaughterhouse in Portugal that also slaughters animals from nearby farms. Human Cruelties/We Animals
To cope, Tom spent most of his slaughterhouse career as a functioning alcoholic, drinking as soon as he got off work until he went to bed. He took magic mushrooms on weekends to escape. He also dissociated at work, spending much of his time on the production line 'thinking I was on holiday…I would dream I was in Spain somewhere — just anywhere but what I was doing.' Now, he said, he lives like a hermit and still dreams about slaughterhouses six to seven nights a week. He also has violent thoughts of hurting people, which he had never had prior to working in meat processing.
'I suffer with PITS as a result,' Tom said, referring to perpetration-induced traumatic stress, a subcategory of post-traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD, in which the cause of the trauma is being a perpetrator of violence — in this case, slaughtering animals for food — rather than being a victim of it.
Processing Meat
A newsletter analyzing how the meat and dairy industries impact everything around us. Email (required)
Sign Up
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Physical injury rates are high in slaughterhouses, making it one of the more dangerous occupations. But much less is known about the mental and emotional toll of slaughterhouse work. Psychology researchers have difficulty accessing slaughterhouse worker populations, and so we're left with a handful of small studies. As a result, it's unknown exactly what share of the world's millions of slaughterhouse workers suffer from PTSD or other mental health conditions.
But what's certain is that many do — surveys of slaughterhouse workers show high rates of anxiety and depression, and many have shared stories of mental health struggles with researchers and journalists. The problem is likely to worsen in the years ahead, as more and more slaughterhouses are built around the world to satisfy increasing meat consumption.
Two years ago, the American Medical Association's Journal of Ethics even devoted an entire issue to the meat industry's effects on societal health, including its impact on workers. One article by social psychologist Rachel MacNair, who coined the term PITS, put the psychological toll of slaughterhouse work — and society's complicity in the problem — in blunt terms: 'Public demand for meat creates ongoing, present, and future exposure to trauma and continual retraumatization.'
What we know about the psychological toll of slaughterhouse work
The concept of PTSD stems from studies of combat veterans, research that accelerated in the post-Vietnam War era in the US. It was officially recognized by the American Psychiatric Association as a mental health condition in 1980.
But it took time for psychologists to recognize that being the one who perpetrates violence — as opposed to experiencing or witnessing it — can also be highly traumatic, or even more so.
In a 1998 study, MacNair told me, she observed that Vietnam War veterans who directly killed people had higher trauma scores than those who only witnessed killing. In 2002, she published the first book on the issue — Perpetration-Induced Traumatic Stress: The Psychological Consequences of Killing — which went beyond war and into other arenas of violence, including policing, death penalty executions, torture, homicide, and slaughterhouse work. The idea has since expanded how psychologists think about traumatization from violence.
Slaughterhouse work can also deeply impact those who don't directly kill animals but still play a critical role in meat production, like David Magna, a former slaughterhouse inspector for the Canadian government.
For six years, Magna worked at a major chicken plant, where one of his jobs entailed standing behind employees on the slaughter line — which operated at the breakneck speed of 180 birds per minute — to check for signs of disease and other issues. He also inspected crates of chickens as they were unloaded to be slaughtered; sometimes, hundreds would arrive dead from exposure to extreme heat or cold during transportation from the factory farm.
After six years at the chicken slaughterhouse, Magna developed severe respiratory problems, requiring him to take time off (it's not uncommon for poultry workers to complain about the toxic, bacteria-killing chemicals used in slaughterhouses).
Over the next decade, Magna went on to work as an inspector at other plants along with a desk job in which he reviewed animal welfare violation reports, including a number of disturbing cases. In one, a farmer branded some of his pigs a dozen or so times each with a hot iron all over their bodies, but was only penalized with a fine and was allowed to continue to raise animals for meat. In another case, a truckload of pigs froze to death after a driver fell asleep. One report involved a pregnant dairy cow who gave birth on a slaughterhouse-bound truck. Because the trailer was so crowded, the calf's head was smashed in by other cows.
Pigs lie dying on a bloody slaughterhouse floor in Canada as a worker stands over them before pushing them into a scalding tank. Jo-Anne McArthur/We Animals
'I'm a shell of what I was when I walked in that [first] day,' Magna told me. Throughout his career, he'd try to improve conditions, but the deck was stacked against him: regulations are weak, violators face little to no penalties, and higher-ups often didn't take his concerns seriously.
Like Tom, the slaughterhouse worker in Europe, Magna drank excessively to cope. He also had dreams in which he was a chicken packed in a crate and then slaughtered. His mother, who had briefly worked on the slaughter line, had similar dreams.
Objects like a plate of meat or a truck can trigger flashbacks for Magna. He's dealt with suicidal ideation, and a few years ago, he was diagnosed with PTSD and bipolar disorder.
Gathering broader data on the experiences of people who work in slaughterhouses has proven difficult, but there is some. A few years ago, a literature review by psychologists Jessica Slade and Emma Alleyne at the University of Kent found slaughterhouse workers have higher rates of anxiety and depression, and a higher propensity for physical aggression. A small study of slaughterhouse workers in South Africa found that each had recurring nightmares, like Tom and David, and some workers have reported high rates of alcoholism in the workplace.
But there's been no large-scale study investigating PTSD rates among slaughterhouse workers, and there's a good reason why: It would be hard to conduct such a study without cooperation from meat companies. And many slaughterhouse workers are undocumented immigrants who might be reluctant to share their stories, even if they were anonymous.
'This system oppresses everyone'
Some people who live near factory farms, which produce vast amounts of animal manure that pollutes the air and water, call their communities 'sacrifice zones' for the meat and agricultural industries. In low-income and disproportionately immigrant communities, the meat industry has found its sacrifice populations — people with few economic opportunities who must kill animals for hours on end and suffer whatever physical or psychological trauma may come.
'It is unnatural and inhumane for someone to kill for hours every day,' Susana Chavez, a former slaughterhouse worker in Mexico, wrote in a 2022 op-ed.
Former slaughterhouse inspector David Magna holding Peter, a rescued pig, at Dara Farm Sanctuary in Ontario, Canada. David Magna
And as MacNair has noted, our high demand for cheap meat creates ever more trauma — trauma that is outsourced to these sacrifice populations.
And killing isn't the only potential source of trauma. Employees can also experience physical or sexual violence from colleagues, something some women in slaughterhouses have reported, and experience or witness severe accidents among other workers. In The Dying Trade, Tom recalled a time when a coworker got stuck in a machine and was essentially cut in half: 'I can still hear him screaming.'
Activism 'has given me a new lease on life,' he said. 'I'm fortunate; I got out of this system. For whatever reason, I'm here today doing this, and I think of the people that aren't so lucky.' He mentioned a former coworker, Maria, who had to get carpal tunnel surgery like many other slaughterhouse workers, due to intense wrist pain from making repetitive cuts to animal carcasses. When Magna asked her why she's still working at the plant, she told him that because she doesn't speak English, she doesn't have many options. She said she has to continue on to provide for her kids — that her own life doesn't matter.
'This system,' Magna said, 'oppresses everyone.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

One thing we can count on to keep ruining our summers
One thing we can count on to keep ruining our summers

Vox

time5 hours ago

  • Vox

One thing we can count on to keep ruining our summers

is a correspondent at Vox writing about climate change, energy policy, and science. He is also a regular contributor to the radio program Science Friday. Prior to Vox, he was a reporter for ClimateWire at E&E News. Smoke from wildfires in Canada is once again shrouding parts of the United States — cities like Chicago and Milwaukee — with unhealthy air, according to the US Environmental Protection Agency. Parts of the plume have reached as far as Europe. The bulk of the smoke is forecasted to drift eastward across North America and thin out. As of Thursday afternoon, Canada was battling more than 200 blazes, the majority in western provinces like British Columbia and Alberta, according to the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre. In Canada, the fires forced more than 27,000 people to evacuate, but the smoke is 'impacting aerial operations for both suppression and evacuation flights.' This is all too familiar. Canada faced a massive spate of wildfires in 2023 and in 2024 that similarly sent clouds of ash and dust across North America, reaching places like New York City. The burned area this year is a fraction of the size of the regions scorched in 2023, a record-breaking year for wildfires in Canada, but it's still early in the fire season. Canadian fire officials warn that the 'potential for emerging significant wildland fires is high to extreme' and lightning may lead to more ignitions in the next few days. These blazes remind us that the dangers of wildfires reach far beyond their flames, and the threat is growing. Wildfire smoke contains a melange of gases like carbon monoxide, particles of soot, and hazardous chemicals like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons that can cause cancer. The tiniest particles in smoke can penetrate deep into the lungs, and even reach the bloodstream, leading to a variety of health problems. When it drifts over a community, it often causes a surge in emergency room visits as people who breathe the smoke suffer strokes, heart attacks, and asthma attacks. There's also evidence that long-term exposure to smoke can lead to a higher likelihood of death from heart, lung, kidney, and digestive diseases. And experts believe the true health burden from wildfires is likely much more extensive than we realize. The harms to health will increase as wildfires become more destructive. Though wildfires are a natural, regular, and vital phenomenon across many landscapes, more people are now living in fire-prone areas, increasing the risk to lives and homes. That increases the odds of starting a fire and means more people and property are in harm's way when one ignites. Decades of fire suppression have allowed fuels like trees and grasses to build up to dangerous levels. And as humanity continues to burn fossil fuels, emitting greenhouse gases and heating up the planet, the climate is changing in ways that enhance fire conditions. So smoke isn't the only pollutant to worry about, and as average temperatures continue to rise, these factors are undoing hard-fought progress in improving air quality across much of the world. However, there are ways to clear the air and avoid some of the worst harms. One tactic is to pay attention to the Air Quality Index in your area and avoid being outdoors when pollution reaches high levels. Wearing a high-quality KN95 or N95 mask can help reduce the damage from polluted air. Blocking air from getting indoors and filtering the air in living areas reduces smoke exposure as well.

Ketamine is suddenly everywhere
Ketamine is suddenly everywhere

Vox

time5 hours ago

  • Vox

Ketamine is suddenly everywhere

covers health for Vox, guiding readers through the emerging opportunities and challenges in improving our health. He has reported on health policy for more than 10 years, writing for Governing magazine, Talking Points Memo, and STAT before joining Vox in 2017. Ketamine seems to be everywhere — from the nightclub to the psychiatric clinic. Among its growing number of users is Elon Musk, who says he takes ketamine every two weeks for depression as prescribed by a doctor. He's far from alone: More and more Americans are turning to ketamine for relief for their mental health struggles. But the New York Times reported recently that Musk was taking so much ketamine during last year's presidential campaign, sometimes daily, that he reportedly told people it was causing him bladder problems, a known symptom of chronic ketamine use. Musk's reported experience with the drug — from medical to possibly abusive — provides a window into ketamine's growing popularity in the United States, and the paradox that popularity presents. Ketamine, both an anesthetic and a hallucinogen, was first synthesized in the 1960s and has long been used for surgery and veterinary medicine. More recently, it has shown remarkable effectiveness in alleviating symptoms of depression, particularly in treatment-resistant populations. Clinics administering the drug — which legally must be licensed by the government to provide intravenous infusions — are becoming more popular. The Food and Drug Administration approved the first ketamine-derived nasal spray for depression in 2019. On the other hand, as highlighted in the Times' report alleging that Musk was mixing ketamine with other drugs, more Americans appear to be using ketamine recreationally and outside of medical supervision. Chronic misuse can put people at risk of serious physical and mental health consequences, from kidney and liver damage to memory loss and paranoia. 'There is absolutely a role for ketamine to help people with depression and suicidal ideation,' said Dr. Kevin Yang, a resident physician in psychiatry at the University of California-San Diego. 'At the same time, that doesn't mean it's going to be safe and effective for everyone.' According to a study co-authored by Yang and published earlier this year, the percentage of Americans who reported using ketamine within the past year grew by 82 percent from 2015 to 2019, took a brief dip in 2020 — possibly because of the pandemic complicating people's access to the drug — and then rose another 40 percent from 2021 to 2022. The increases were similar for both people with depression and people without, suggesting that the growth is being driven by both more people seeking ketamine for clinical purposes and more people using it recreationally. The overall number of people taking ketamine is still tiny: About 0.28 percent of the population as of 2022, though this might be an undercount, as people don't always tell the truth in surveys about drug use. There is other evidence to suggest more people are taking ketamine recreationally. Yang's study found that ketamine use was rising most among white people and people with college degrees, and users reported taking it more often in combination with other recreational drugs such as ecstasy and cocaine. Ketamine drug seizures nationwide increased from 55 in 2017 to 247 in 2022, according to a 2023 study led by Joseph Palamar at New York University. Experts think most recreational ketamine is produced illicitly, but the number of legitimate ketamine prescriptions that are being diverted — i.e., lost or stolen — has been going up, a 2024 analysis by Palamar and his colleagues found, which is another possible indicator of a blossoming black market. The buzz about ketamine's popularity in Silicon Valley and its persistence in certain club cultures that first emerged in the '80s confirms its place in the counterculture. We can't know the reality behind Musk's public statements and the anonymous reporting about his ketamine use. The Times reports that people close to Musk worried that his therapeutic use of ketamine had become recreational; Musk quickly dismissed the Times's reporting. But the drug does coexist as a therapeutic and a narcotic, and the line between the two can be blurry. People should not try to self-medicate with ketamine, Yang said. Its risks need to be taken seriously. Here's what you need to know. How to think about ketamine as its popularity grows Ketamine is edging into the mainstream after years at its fringes. It has been around for decades, enjoying a boom as a party drug in the '80s and '90s. For the most part, ketamine had been viewed warily by mainstream scientists. But in 2000, the first major research was published demonstrating its value in treating depression. And increasingly over the past decade, however, ketamine has started to gain more acceptance because of its consistently impressive study results. Studies have found that for some patients, ketamine can begin to relieve their depression symptoms in a matter of hours after therapy and other medications have failed. The testimonials of patients whose depression improved quickly, such as this one published in Vox, are convincing. The benefits identified in clinical research have opened up a larger market for the substance. Johnson & Johnson developed its own ketamine-derived treatment for depression (esketamine, sold as a nasal spray called Spravato) that received FDA approval in 2019, the first of its kind. The number of monthly prescriptions for Spravato doubled from the beginning of 2023 to October 2024. People can also visit clinics to receive an IV of conventional ketamine for treatment, and that business is booming too: In 2015, there were about 60 clinics in the US dedicated to administering ketamine; today, there are between 1,200 and 1,500. For the 21 million Americans who experience major depression, this widening access could help: ketamine and esketamine do appear to have strong anti-depressive effects — as long as it is used in consultation with a doctor and under their supervision. A 2023 meta-analysis of the relevant studies found that across many clinical trials, most patients reported significant improvements in their symptoms within 24 hours. It is recommended primarily for people whose depression has not gotten better after trying other treatments or for people with severe suicide ideation, who need a rapid improvement in their symptoms to avoid a life-threatening emergency. But providers also screen potential patients for any current substance use problems for a very important reason: The risks for ketamine abuse are real. When taken outside of a clinical setting, ketamine is often consumed as a pill or a powder, either snorted or mixed with a drink, and it's easy to take too much. One recent survey found that more than half of patients who attempted to take ketamine at home for depression either intentionally or accidentally took more than the prescribed amount. Users can also develop a tolerance over time, which raises the risk that people will take stronger and stronger doses to feel the same effects. Packs of illegal ketamine are seen before a destruction ceremony to mark the 'International Day against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking' in Yangon on June 26, 2023. Sai Aung Main/AFP via Getty Images Scientists have found that people who use ketamine can develop a dependency on it, especially with frequent and high-dosage use. They become irritable or anxious without the drug and experience other withdrawal symptoms. Its addictive quality, while less potent than that of nicotine or opioids, is an important difference from some other hallucinogens, such as psilocybin, that are also being used in experimental settings for mental health needs and are less likely to be habit-forming. Maintenance doses can also be necessary for ketamine therapy, and regulating any long-term use to prevent dependency is another reason medical supervision is so crucial. There is limited evidence that most people who use ketamine in a clinical setting do not end up abusing it, which is a promising sign that properly managing its use reduces the risk of therapeutic use turning into a disorder. But because ketamine's use for depression is still so new and still growing, it's an important risk to watch out for. Johnson & Johnson urges patients to be mindful of Spravato's potential for misuse. The line between genuine therapeutic use and abuse becomes clearer when a biweekly treatment at a clinic turns into a regular at-home habit, especially if that involves obtaining the drug from illicit sources whose purity is not guaranteed. Street ketamine is typically just the drug itself, produced and sold illegally. But Dr. Nabarun Dasgupta, who oversees the University of North Carolina's Street Drug Analysis Lab, told me they've noticed a recent rise in samples where ketamine is combined with other substances. On its own, ketamine overuse in the short term can cause nausea and high blood pressure, with all of the attendant risks, as well as hallucinations and 'bad trips.' Longer-term abuse can lead to problems with a person's bladder and urinary tract, which can create difficulty urinating — the kind of issues Musk described to people in private, according to the Times. People who chronically abuse ketamine can also experience paranoia, memory loss, and a shortened attention span. The potential for ketamine in a clinical environment is exciting. But its use does come with risks, and not enough people are aware of them: A recent survey from the United Kingdom found that many people there who were taking ketamine did not know that it could be addictive. It can be. Ketamine is not something to experiment with on your own. Clinics have all sorts of safety checks for their patients, Yang told me. Ketamine 'absolutely has been shown to be very effective,' he said, before adding the all-important qualifier: 'under the supervision of a clinical physician.'

What today's new college graduates are up against
What today's new college graduates are up against

Vox

time6 hours ago

  • Vox

What today's new college graduates are up against

is a policy correspondent for Vox covering social policy. She focuses on housing, schools, homelessness, child care, and abortion rights, and has been reporting on these issues for more than a decade. Northeastern University students toss their caps at the end of their graduation ceremony on May 11, 2025, at Fenway Park in Boston. Matthew J Lee/The Boston Globe via Getty Images A Vox reader asks: Maybe it's because I am a new grad, graduating with my bachelor's in May yippee! But it seems everyone is super pessimistic about the job market these days. Has it been harder to get a job for people in recent years, or am I just finally shedding my childhood naïveté and being forced to wake up to the way the job market has always been? Congratulations on your graduation! That's a genuine achievement worth celebrating, even amid job market concerns. The short answer to your question is that, unfortunately, the economic data does confirm what you're sensing: The job market really is more challenging for new graduates right now, and it's not just your childhood optimism fading away. You and your peers have faced uniquely tough circumstances. You started college during a pandemic, and now you're entering a job market that's shifting beneath your feet in ways that can feel discouraging, even though they're driven by much larger economic and technological forces. This isn't the first time graduates have faced a difficult transition. The Great Recession in 2008 led to hiring freezes and layoffs that blocked new workers from landing entry-level jobs. The labor market took time to heal after unemployment peaked in 2009, but improved steadily until the pandemic disrupted that progress. What new grads are facing Numbers from the first quarter of 2025 from the New York Federal Reserve show that the unemployment rate for recent college graduates reached 5.8 percent, up from 4.8 percent in January. Companies have also pulled back on hiring. Last fall, employers expected to increase college-graduate hiring by 7.3 percent, according to a survey led by the National Association of Colleges and Employers. Now they're projecting just a 0.6 percent increase, with about 11 percent of companies planning to hire fewer new grads than before. Explain It to Me The Explain It to Me newsletter answers an interesting question from an audience member in a digestible explainer from one of our journalists. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. A few different factors are working together to create this challenging environment. First, the new tariffs have created economic uncertainty. The stock market responded accordingly, with the S&P 500 down about 6.5 percent since inauguration day. As a result, businesses are hesitant to expand their workforce. The elephant in the room here — that Great Recession grads didn't have to deal with — is artificial intelligence. There's evidence that AI might be affecting entry-level opportunities. The tasks typically performed by new college graduates — synthesizing information, producing reports — align with what generative AI can now generally handle. And while the unemployment rate for recent grads is 5.8 percent, the overall unemployment rate is 4.2 percent — a record gap. This suggests that while companies are not laying workers off because of AI en masse, they may be using AI to do jobs that would otherwise have gone to new grads. It's understandably frustrating when you've done everything 'right' — earned your degree and prepared for the job market — only to face conditions that are more challenging than in recent years. The good news about the job market Despite these challenges, some sectors are still actively hiring. Health care accounts for 34 percent of total payroll gains this year. Engineering positions, especially electronics engineering, offer opportunities with high starting salaries (projected at $78,731). Special education roles are abundant, and while federal hiring has contracted, state and local governments remain strong for entry-level hiring. Sales consistently ranks among the top fields for new college graduates. On the tariffs front, the situation seems to be turning a corner now, as stock markets digest news of President Donald Trump's recent deal with China. This deal could help prevent a full recession and improve the outlet for college-graduate hiring. The reality is that your job search might take longer than you hoped. Over 80 percent of seniors told ZipRecruiter in March that they expect to start working within three months of graduating, but in reality, only about 77 percent from recent graduating classes started that quickly. If it takes even longer for you or your peers, that's not a personal failure — it's simply a reflection of the market you're entering.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store