
S.F.'s budget woes could kill programs that help the city's most at-risk tenants
Long regarded as a critical supplement to the work done by city building inspectors, two community-based code enforcement outreach programs that target some of the city's most at-risk tenants could soon cease to exist as San Francisco's Department of Building Inspection looks to trim costs.
Emails sent to about half a dozen local housing nonprofits on Monday informed them that the decades-old Code Enforcement Outreach Program, or CEOP, is facing complete erasure due to the city's budget woes. Among the supports offered by the nonprofits that receive funding through CEOP and the SRO Collaborative program, another DBI-administered initiative focused on residents of low-income single-room occupancy hotels (SROs) that's also at risk, are multilingual outreach, housing counseling and disaster preparedness services. In the past, the programs have united advocates representing landlords and tenants.
And yet, both are on the chopping block under DBI's proposed two-year budget plan, which suggests cutting the department's annual $4.8 million allocation for the programs as Mayor Daniel Lurie seeks to eliminate $185 million in grant and contract spending in order to close a looming $800 million two-year city budget shortfall.
'We greatly value and respect the work we've done together, but any grant is dependent on having sufficient funding in our budget. As such, we are invoking the termination stipulation in Section 2.3,' a DBI representative said in the emails sent to nonprofit leaders on Monday, which the Chronicle obtained. The Chinatown Community Development Center, or CCDC, the Tenderloin Housing Clinic, the San Francisco Apartment Association, Dolores Street Services and the Housing Rights Committee, are among the groups that will be impacted by the programs' elimination.
Monday felt like 'groundhog day' to service providers who, for the second time in two years, were told that the programs would be defunded. They pushed back against cuts planned by DBI in 2023 under then-Mayor London Breed, and were successful in getting the funding reinstated.
Those interviewed by the Chronicle Tuesday said they were blindsided by the news, given that DBI's own commission recommended keeping the programs in place and fully funded earlier this year.
'We were shocked in 2023 and we are shocked this year, mainly because around February we were advocating at the commission as we were expecting about a 25% cut in total,' said Lisa Yu, a policy analyst with CCDC, a local affordable housing developer. 'Everything is in jeopardy.'
DBI requested that the recipients of the code enforcement outreach grants 'plan for an end date for your services' on June 30. The move will impact an estimated 15 outreach workers across the list of nonprofits that are funding through the grants, the Chronicle has learned.
'The mayor talked about cutting some nonprofit contracts that emerged during COVID. But CEOP started in 1996. The collaboratives have been here for more than 25 years. These are programs that no one's ever had a negative word to say about,' said Randy Shaw, director of the Tenderloin Housing Clinic, a low-income tenant advocacy organization that stands to lose roughly $900,000 for its Central City SRO Collaborative program and CEOP.
The funding cuts appear to thwart recommendations made by DBI's Building Inspection Commission, which penned a letter to the city's Board of Supervisors in March requesting that the code enforcement outreach grants be fully funded.
That letter, obtained by the Chronicle, suggested that Lurie and the Board use general fund dollars to continue to support the programs, and that DBI could increase the inspection fees it charges across the board by 1.5% to 'compensate for the proposed General Fund reductions in support.'
'These providers go to the tenants as well as take complaints. Reduction in outreach services will not mean a reduction in need, it will mean more tenants leave inhabitable apartments and end up homeless or people will suffer health conditions as a result of uninhabitable housing,' the commission warned in its letter.
Neither DBI nor Lurie's office immediately responded to the Chronicle's inquiries for comment on the programs' planned elimination.
Last week, Lurie unveiled his $15.9 million budget proposal, which he said prioritizes the city's core services, including clean street and public safety. Declaring an end to what he described as the ' era of soaring city budgets,' his plan includes slashing 1,400 city jobs. The proposed cuts come as the city's revenues remain impacted by high commercial vacancy rates and sluggish tourism downtown.
CEOP and the SRO Collaborative program were previously placed in jeopardy under former Mayor London Breed, who sought to patch a growing budget deficit in 2023 by ordering city departments to trim their budgets. The funding was ultimately restored, though the total allocation for the programs was reduced by 10%, according to Yu, of CCDC.
She said that the nonprofit providers expected another 15% funding cut for the outreach programs.
'We're all really confused on what happened, because we weren't expecting a 100% funding cut when the issue was presented to the Commission in February,' Yu said.
CEOP has received about $1.7 million from the total grant allocation, while the SRO program received about $3.8 million. The nonprofits that have historically received the funding are operating on five-year contracts that are due to expire next June.
Yu said that CCDC runs the SRO Collaborative, for which it receives about $1.5 million in annual funding. It also receives about $272,500 for CEOP.
'We have housing counseling, and we provide fire prevention workshops. For home visits alone, we visit about 43 SROs in Chinatown with about 80 SRO families total,' Yu said, adding that the nonprofit assists about 86 clients per quarter with housing counseling services.
'About 183 tenants attended our fire and disaster preparedness workshops per quarter,' she said.
About 16% of the Housing Rights Committee's total budget, or $617,000, comes from the DBI grant, according to the nonprofit's executive director, Maria Zamudio. HRC has long provided housing counseling and advocates for tenants rights in San Francisco.
'We provide language access to tenants who are not going to be able to just connect directly with a building inspector, or are not able to navigate the DBI website. We also ensure that there is support for (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development) tenants, who have some of the most egregious habitability conditions in the city,' Zamudio said.
'In this political moment, with all of the attacks on immigrants and all of the attacks on HUD funding at the federal level, to feel those attacks locally and in a way that doesn't need to happen … really shows where the priorities for this new administration are,' she said.
Tenant advocacy organizations aren't the only ones impacted by the proposed cuts. The San Francisco Apartment Association advocates for property owners on a 'shoestring budget,' according to spokesperson Charley Goss. The organization faces a funding reduction of close to $150,000 if the code enforcement outreach programs are cut.
'There are difficult decisions that have to be made with regard to the budget. But, from our perspective, these are maybe the only programs where you have tenant groups and landlord groups working together for a common goal, which is to improve living conditions in apartment buildings,' Goss said. 'We've seen firsthand that the programs work … and we believe they also save the city money. We have nonprofits doing the work to get buildings up to code, which saves the city money via their inspectors. The inspectors don't have to do that work.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
San Francisco Mayor Lurie open to eliminating free parking in Golden Gate Park
SAN FRANCISCO - Mayor Daniel Lurie said on Thursday he is open to eliminating free parking on roads in San Francisco's Golden Gate Park in order to bring more revenue to the city to balance the budget. What we know Every year, people come to Golden Gate Park to enjoy the beautiful grounds to exercise or to visit one of the museums and recreational facilities. San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department says the problem is, with 20 million visits per year, their budget has not kept up with growth. "Our deficit for the next two years is $16.5 million," SF Rec and Parks spokesperson Tamara Barak Aparton said. She said the department is grateful Mayor Lurie is supporting a plan to end free street parking and begin charging vehicles. The proposal calls for creating 3,100 parking spots along the roads in Golden Gate Park. Vehicles would be charged $3 an hour to park, which would generate an estimated $4.9 million per year. "We have to find revenue sources," Mayor Lurie said, adding the parking fees are up for discussion as the city faces a two-year deficit of more than $800 million. Larry Mazzola, a member of the San Francisco Rec and Parks Commission, was the only 'no' vote when it came up before the commission at their February meeting. "The only people who won't be charged are the coyotes if we start charging to park there," Mazzola said. "That's one of the jewels in San Francisco that is still free. I understand they need money, but I don't think they should do it on San Franciscan's backs." Barak Aparton says the department is looking at developing other revenue streams such as charging a fee for tennis courts or finding a golf course contractor. "Without new revenue we're looking at cuts to core services, things like pool hours, summer camps, maintenance of parks and playgrounds. This proposal helps us avoid those painful choices." What they're saying Some residents say they support keeping the services and charging for parking. Others say the city should find funds elsewhere. "Every day three dollars. One time not expensive, but every day that's big money for me." Mei Lai, of San Francisco said, adding she is retired and on a fixed income, and enjoys coming to the park daily to walk and stay healthy. "It feels a little nickel and diming to me to do this. They charge us taxes in many other ways. I don't think they should do this," Julie Feldstein, a San Francisco resident, who says she comes to walk her dog, but would not come to the park if they began charging. What's next The issue will be up for the mayor, Board of Supervisors and the public to weigh in on, as the budget details are debated in the coming months.


Bloomberg
19 hours ago
- Bloomberg
San Francisco Mayor's Ultra-Rich Allies Could Become a Liability
Welcome to Bloomberg's California Edition—covering all the events shaping one of the world's biggest economies and its global influence. Join us each week as we put a unique lens on the Golden State. Sign up here if you're not already on the list. San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie is playing a risky game to turn his city around. Ideas and investments from his circle of wealthy business titans have scored him several leadership wins. But if those alliances start looking too friendly, his credibility could suffer.


Bloomberg
a day ago
- Bloomberg
San Francisco Is the Envy of Every City, Mayor Lurie Says
San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie invites businesses to not only bring their conferences to his city but to invest in the community as well. He speaks with Brad Stone at the Bloomberg Tech Summit in San Francisco. (Source: Bloomberg)