Tŷ Hafan and Tŷ Gobaith appeal for increased funding
Tŷ Hafan and Tŷ Gobaith want at least 25 per cent of care costs to be funded by 2025, rising to 30 per cent by 2030.
They believe this would mean increasing statutory support from £2.3 million to around £3.2 million in 2025/26, and close to £5 million by 2030/31.
Tŷ Gobaith CEO, Andy Goldsmith, said: "Across Wales, children with life-threatening conditions are not getting the support that they and their families need."
He added that increased funding would allow hospices to bring "essential care closer to home, particularly in remote rural communities".
Tŷ Hafan CEO, Irfon Rees, said: "This is not about children's hospices competing with the NHS for funding.
"With most of the hospice care funded by charitable donations, the non-profit, charitable children's hospices are a cost-effective and important partner to the NHS and local government.
"We are incredibly grateful to the Welsh Government for the one-off funding in 2024/25 and the uplift in funding for hospices in the 2025/26 budget, but there is no certainty of this funding beyond this Senedd."
The request comes ahead of national Children's Hospice Week, which runs from June 16 to June 22.
The two hospices hope that by then, at least one leading political party will have made the pledge to prioritise children with life-shortening conditions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
40 minutes ago
- BBC News
Hospitals in Kent, Surrey and Sussex given £67m for repairs
Hospitals across the South East will receive nearly £67m in government funding for small-scale building upgrade cash comes from a £750m fund that the chancellor announced in the 2024 autumn budget to address critical infrastructure and safety risks in NHS buildings, according to the supported by the money included upgrades to faulty wiring, patching leaking roofs and addressing fire safety Secretary Wes Streeting said: "Patients and staff deserve to be in buildings that are safe, comfortable and fit for purpose." In Kent, William Harvey Hospital, Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother Hospital and Kent and Canterbury Hospital will share £13.2m for Maritime Hospital will get £4.8m for better ventilation systems, repairing machinery and replacing its nurse call system, the government Maidstone Hospital was granted £3.5m for a series of works while mental health facilities Coleman House in Dover and Priority House in Maidstone will share £400,000. The government has awarded £2.9m to East Surrey Hospital in Redhill, £1.4m to Queen Victoria Hospital in East Grinstead, and £1m to Darrent Valley Hospital in Dartford for improvements to "energy systems".Councillors granted planning permission for a two-storey extension to East Surrey Hospital in Surrey County Hospital, Haslemere Hospital, and Milford Hospital have been awarded a combined £2.9m for building fabric, plant equipment and roof works, while St Peter's Hospital in Chertsey will receive £ in Surrey, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust was awarded just over £10m for upgrades to Wexham Park Hospital and Frimley Park government has pledged to rebuild Frimley Park Hospital at a cost of up to £2bn by 2030, as about two-thirds of the building is made from unstable reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (Raac).In Sussex, Conquest Hospital in St Leonards-on-Sea and Eastbourne District General Hospital will share £8.5m. University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust was awarded £11.8m for works at four of its hospitals while Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust has been granted £2.3m, which it will spend across six Community NHS Foundation Trust was awarded £120,000 for its Brighton General Hospital and Chailey Clinical Services government previously pledged to rebuild Eastbourne District General, Conquest Hospital and Bexhill Community Hospital, but said it did not expect to begin work until at least 2037. South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust will receive £810,000 for upgrades to its sites.
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
Labour promised to fix the NHS but seems set on breaking it even more
Illustration by Charlotte Trounce When NHS Providers – the membership organisation that represents NHS trusts – starts using language like 'unthinkable', it's time to sit up and take note. They chose the term in early May to characterise the scale of the cuts being forced upon NHS managers by Wes Streeting's Department of Health and Social Care. Using evidence gathered from 114 trusts – more than half the total number in England – NHS Providers revealed the 'eye-watering' array of local services that face being scaled back or completely shut down: diabetes care for young people, rehabilitation centres, talking therapies, even – incredibly – palliative care beds. Meanwhile, nearly every trust surveyed said they were planning to cut – or had already begun cutting – up to 1,500 posts each to save money. Crucially, these include clinical roles such as doctors and nurses. How have we arrived at this brave new world in which the route to 'an NHS fit for the future… with world-class care for the many, not just the few' (Streeting at last year's party conference) is through slashing clinical services upon which the health, well-being and dignity of patients so manifestly depend? The role of Jim Mackey, Streeting's choice to lead the NHS in England, is key. In March, Mackey ordered trusts to comply with a 'financial reset' – code for unprecedented budget savings during 2025-26 to avoid a projected £6.6bn NHS deficit in England. The government, like its Conservative predecessors, insisted cuts required could occur harmlessly, through 'efficiency savings' alone. Needless to say, savings of up to 12 per cent of entire trusts' budgets cannot possibly be achieved without cutting services. Perhaps Mackey and Streeting hoped that so long as they had a target-driven story to tell the press about falling waiting lists, no one would care very much about the less headline-grabbing forms of NHS care such as rehabilitation after serious injuries or humane deathbed care. It is no coincidence that services for people with disabilities, mental health conditions and terminal illnesses are on the line; certain patients have long been deprioritised by those in power. As one anonymous finance director told NHS Providers: 'Health inequalities [are] a real issue when streamlining services. We need investment to reach the most vulnerable and excluded populations, not disinvestment.' What happens now? In a speech at the Medical Journalists' Association on 9 May, Mackey gave short shrift to the prospect of additional funding: the government, he said, was 'maxed out on what's affordable'. Meanwhile, a Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson doubled down on the fiction that reducing red tape could square the circle: 'We have underlined the need for trusts to cut bureaucracy to invest even further in the front line.' Easy for them to say. Less so for the doctor forced to have deathbed conversations with patients on trolleys in corridors (me, with increasing frequency these days). From a patient perspective, the impasse is painfully familiar. In his conference speech, Streeting rightly slammed 14 years of underinvestment as a legacy of 'Conservative neglect'. He explicitly stated, the day after the general election, that: 'The policy of this department is that the NHS is broken.' For NHS staff, this radical candour was more than a relief – it felt exhilarating. At last, it seemed, we had a health secretary willing to be honest about the scale of the task required to rebuild an NHS to be proud of. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Less than one year later, Streeting appears to be the first Labour health secretary willing to countenance the cutting back of end-of-life care on his watch. For me – a palliative care doctor who entered my specialty precisely to advocate for the patients that so many in power overlook – the only thing that's 'maxed out' right now is incredulity and disgust. Rachel Clarke's 'The Story of a Heart' has been shortlisted for this year's Women's Prize for Non-Fiction [See also: The public doesn't like Brexit. Has anyone told the media?] Related
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Fake psychiatrist must pay back £400k to NHS for ‘cheating the public'
A bogus psychiatrist has been ordered to pay back the NHS more than £400,000 or face two-and-a-half more years in prison. Zholia Alemi, 62, was jailed in February 2023 for seven years after she committed a series of fraud offences. Alemi claimed to have qualified at the University of Auckland in New Zealand but a jury at Manchester Crown Court found her guilty of forging the degree certificate and letter of verification she used to register with the General Medical Council in 1995. She moved around England to different posts for more than 20 years to ensure 'the finger of suspicion' did not point at her, the court heard. Alemi worked 'more or less continuously' for NHS trusts and private providers across the UK in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, earning an estimated £1.3 million. This week, a judge ordered her to pay £406,624 in compensation to the NHS or face more time in custody. 'Little regard for patient welfare' Adrian Foster, of the Crown Prosecution Service, said: 'We have robustly pursued the proceeds of crime with the NHS Counter Fraud Authority and have identified all the assets that she has available to pay her order. 'Alemi had little regard for patient welfare. She used forged New Zealand medical qualifications to obtain employment as an NHS psychiatrist for 20 years. 'In doing so, she must have treated hundreds of patients when she was unqualified to do so, potentially putting those patients at risk. 'Her fraudulent actions also enabled her to dishonestly earn income and benefits of more than £1 million, to which she was not entitled. 'She cheated the public purse and £406,624 will be paid in compensation to the NHS.'
