logo
An Old Promise About Full Self-Driving Catches Up to Tesla

An Old Promise About Full Self-Driving Catches Up to Tesla

Yahoo31-01-2025

Tesla CEO Elon Musk says older versions of computing hardware for Full Self-Driving (Supervised) will need to be updated, contrary to Tesla's longtime position that the computer hardware would not need upgrades.
Tesla is expected to retrofit HW4 in place of HW3 for a certain population of Tesla models stretching back over half a decade.
FSD is still operating at SAE Level 2 and requires driver attention to the road at all times, though the automaker has indicated that future software updates will permit higher levels of automated driving.
Tesla's Full Self-Driving system, which recently received a Supervised suffix to hint at the limits of its actual capabilities, has seen no shortage of promises or controversy since its launch. And several years in, it appears that one particular promise is catching up to the automaker.
On this week's conference call with investors, Tesla CEO Elon Musk was asked by an audience member regarding the possibility of owners who have purchased Full Self-Driving years ago facing a hardware upgrade for the still-evolving system at some point.
In the past, Tesla had said FSD capabilities would increase via over-the-air updates, and that the hardware itself would not need to be upgraded. Specifically, hardware version 3, or HW3, which debuted in 2019 was signaled to not require updates in the future as FSD's own abilities grew via software.
However, this plan now appears to have been too confident, with the Tesla CEO indicating that hardware version 4, or HW4, will need to be installed in all cars for future FSD capabilities.
"We are going to have to upgrade Hardware 3 for people who bought FSD," Musk said during the call. "That's the honest answer. It's going to be painful and difficult but that's what we're going to have to do."
Aside from the optimistic view that computer hardware that debuted in 2019 would never need to be replaced, especially for a system that relies on processing power, plans to update the hardware itself could impose hefty service costs on the automaker.
However, one issue that this predicament ignores is the reality of how long people actually keep their cars.
Tesla had been selling FSD since 2016, before HW3 arrived, and had launched FSD Beta in October 2020. The system has been offered to buyers and lessees on a monthly subscription basis, as well as the one-time purchase, with the current one-time price set at $8,000 outright or $99 a month. FSD is also not transferrable to new owners once a Tesla is sold on the aftermarket.
Additionally, Tesla has not disclosed just how many FSD subscriptions or outright purchases have been made by Tesla owners in recent years, so the number of cars that would require this retrofit remains unknown.
Therefore, the pool of cars that Tesla would have to realistically worry about updating does not stretch all the way to 2016, but is likely far more recent.
When it comes to actual capabilities, at the moment FSD has not progressed beyond SAE Level 2, thus requiring driver attention to the road at all times, while some competitors' systems are already offering eyes-off capabilities of SAE Level 3.
"The currently enabled features require a fully attentive driver, who has their hands on the wheel and is prepared to take over at any moment," Tesla notes regarding FSD.
For now, SAE Level 3 is permitted in only two US states (California and Nevada), and Mercedes-Benz remains the sole automaker that has offered it to buyers in the US.
A nationwide regulatory standard for automated and autonomous driving is one of the things that is expected to emerge from the Tesla CEO's involvement in the Trump administration, possibly paving the way for a more permissive Level 3 landscape.
Will FSD need lidar and radar to achieve eyes-off, hands-off operation in coming years, or can it accomplish this with video alone, as Tesla proposes? Please comment below.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trending tickers: Tesla, IAG, FedEx, Bunzl
Trending tickers: Tesla, IAG, FedEx, Bunzl

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trending tickers: Tesla, IAG, FedEx, Bunzl

Electric vehicle maker Tesla's (TSLA) stock rallied more than 8.2% in Monday's session, and looked set for further gains on Tuesday, as investors watch both analyst ratings for the company and its robotaxi rollout. Its self-driving cars hit the roads of Austin, Texas on Sunday, in the company's first big push to show how it might conquer the autonomous driving market. The small trial saw 20 Tesla (TSLA) Model Y's on the streets of Texas — some with humans sat in the passenger seat to monitor safety, according to reports. Elon Musk said in a post on X (formally Twitter) that the launch marked a "culmination of a decade of hard work", congratulating the company's AI and chip design teams. Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives maintained his 'buy' rating for the stock, calling the launch the "golden era of autonomous" for Tesla (TSLA). His high price target is now $500. British Airways' owner IAG (IAG.L) saw its stock bounce back from the doldrums on Tuesday, having taken a hit following concerns about one of its key flight paths due to conflict in the Middle East. The carrier moved to cancel flights from Dubai and Doha earlier this week, citing concerns about the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. A ceasefire, announced overnight, assuaged investor concerns, however. Industry peers Lufthansa (LHAB.F) and Air France ( also rallied, recovering yesterday's losses. Airlines had maintained their gains by 9.30am in London, even as news of an early break in the ceasefire filtered through, with IAG (IAG.L) up around 6.5% — still one of the top gainers in the FTSE 100 (^FTSE). The ceasefire appears to be a moving target. Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said on Tuesday he has ordered the country's military to respond forcefully to what he said was Iran's violation of the agreement with Israel, according to a report in Reuters. Delivery giant FedEx (FDX) saw its stock tick up in premarket on Tuesday, ahead of its earnings report due later today. Its share price had rallied more than 2% in the previous session, a welcome respite for investors from selling so far this year, which has seen the stock drop more than 18%. Last quarter, the company exceeded analyst expectations on revenue by 0.9%. Its revenue hit $22.2bn, up 1.9% year-on-year. FedEx (FDX) has been beset by tariff uncertainties since president Donald Trump took office, as businesses pause imports and exports in favour of a wait and see approach to inventory with an ever-changing tax landscape. As the administration gradually clinches trade deals, the landscape for the courier is set to become less uncertain. The company is expected to report earnings of $5.94 per share on $21.7bn in revenues, representing year-over-year gains of 9.8% and -1.9%, respectively. Estimates for the period have steadily come down, with the current $5.94 per share estimate down from $5.98 a month ago and $6.32 three months ago. Retail supplies outsourcing company Bunzl (BNZL.L) saw its stock rally on Tuesday, off the back of acquisitions, despite the 'uncertain' economic backdrop. 'Rubber gloves, takeaway coffee cups, cling film; the products Bunzl (BNZL.L) supplies are the sort of things people take for granted. Its fortunes are closely tied to the global economy – if the world is ticking over then Bunzl will be busy but if there is economic weakness it will find life harder," said AJ Bell investment director Russ Mould. Moves higher came as the FTSE 100 company announced its latest deal to buy Brazilian food packaging business Solupack. The proposed takeover, which generated £15m of revenues last year, will 'enhance our offering to customers', Bunzl (BNZL.L) said. Bosses at Bunzl (BNZL.L) said it is 'remaining active' regarding more potential acquisitions, following its third takeover deal this year. On Tuesday, Bunzl (BNZL.L) said revenue for the first half of 2025 is expected to be around 4% higher than the previous year, driven by acquisitions. It added that profit margins are set to be in line with previous guidance of 7%. 'Uncertain macroeconomic conditions mean that investors retain a sense of caution towards Bunzl (BNZL.L). The shares are only up because there is no further bad news following the recent profit warning, rather than the market becoming more optimistic," Mould added. Carnival (CCL) — quarterly results Blackberry ( — quarterly results SThree (S8T.F) — trading updateError in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Elon Musk wants to put his thumb on the AI scale
Elon Musk wants to put his thumb on the AI scale

Axios

time41 minutes ago

  • Axios

Elon Musk wants to put his thumb on the AI scale

Elon Musk still isn't happy with how his AI platform answers divisive questions, pledging in recent days to retrain Grok so it will answer in ways more to his liking. Why it matters: Efforts to steer AI in particular directions could exacerbate the danger of a technology already known for its convincing but inaccurate hallucinations. The big picture: Expect to see more of this in the future as governments and businesses may choose or even create their own AI models that try to sway generated responses on everything from LGBTQ rights to territorial disputes. Driving the news: In a series of tweets over the past week, Musk has expressed frustration at the ways Grok was answering questions and suggested an extensive effort to put his thumb on the scale. "We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors," Musk wrote. "Then retrain on that. Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data." Musk also put out a call for people to suggest things that are "divisive facts," adding that he meant things that are "politically incorrect, but nonetheless factually true." The suggestions, though, included examples of Holocaust denialism and other conspiracy theories. An xAI representative did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Reality check: AI models are already hallucinating in ways that suggest failed attempts by company staff to manipulate outputs. Last month, Grok started injecting references to "white genocide" in South Africa to unrelated conversations, which the company later attributed to an "unauthorized change" to the company's system. At the other end of the political spectrum, Google and Meta appeared to make an effort to correct for a lack of diversity in image training data, which resulted in AI generated images of Black founding fathers and racially diverse Nazis. Between the lines: These early stumbles highlight the challenges of tweaking large language models, but researchers say there are more sophisticated ways to inject preferences that could be both more pervasive and harder to detect. The most obvious way is to change the data that models are trained on, focusing on data sources that align with one's goals. "That would be fairly expensive but I wouldn't put them past them to try," says AI researcher and Humane Intelligence CEO Rumman Chowdhury, who worked at Twitter until Musk dismissed her in November 2022. AI makers can also adjust models in post-training, using human feedback to reward answers that reflect the desired output. A third way is through distillation, a popular process for creating smaller models based on larger ones. Creators could take the knowledge of one model and create a smaller one that aims to offer an ideological twist on the larger one. What they're saying: AI ethicists say that the issue is broader than just Musk and Grok, with many companies exploring how they can tweak answers to appeal to users, regulators and other constituencies. "These conversations are already happening," Chowdhury said. "Elon is just dumb enough to say the quiet part out loud." Chowdhury said Musk's comments should be a wake up call that AI models are in the hands of a few companies with their own set of incentives that may differ from those of the people using their services. "There's no neutral economic structure," Chowdhury said, suggesting that rather than asking companies to "do good" or "be good," perhaps powerful AI models should be treated similar to utilities. Yes, but: It's also not the case that current AI — or any generative AI really — can be free from bias. The training data reflects biases based on whose perspectives are over or underrepresented. There's also a host of decisions large and small made by model creators as well as other variables. Meta, for example, recently said it wants to remove bias from its large language models, but experts say that's more about catering to conservatives than achieving some breakthrough in model neutrality.

What is going on with the Tesla Robotaxi logo?
What is going on with the Tesla Robotaxi logo?

Fast Company

timean hour ago

  • Fast Company

What is going on with the Tesla Robotaxi logo?

Tesla launched its Robotaxi service Monday in Austin, Texas, with a limited pilot featuring a small fleet of self-driving cars. Tesla has encountered challenges getting its Robotaxi service up and running, and now it's facing a new hurdle of its own making: the Robotaxi logo. The self-driving taxis feature a 'Robotaxi' logo written out in a graffiti style on the car's front doors. The scrawled typeface is reminiscent of the branding for the video game Cyberpunk, and hearkens directly back to the Tesla Cybertruck logo (a puzzling choice considering how poorly the Cybertruck has been received). With its sharp edges and careening forward slant, the logo doesn't exactly scream 'safe.' And yet, that's exactly what a new autonomous vehicle brand should be doing. AVs require a higher level of consumer trust than your average product or service, since you're putting your life in its hands. A logo that looks spray-painted doesn't communicate that, nor does the pilot program's flat $4.20 ride fee. The logo 'looks sloppy and casual, not reassuring,' Eben Sorkin, art director of the type foundry Darden Studio, tells Fast Company, calling it 'aesthetically anachronistic and out of sync with current cultural vibes.' 'Would you board a flight with an airline logo that looks like this?' he asks. The Robotaxi rollout represents a chance for the beleaguered electric vehicle company to change the narrative after CEO Elon Musk's unpopular foray into government. And indeed, after the Robotaxi announcement, Tesla's stock rose. From a branding perspective, though, the Robotaxi wordmark isn't suggestive of a company moving away from the Cybertruck aesthetic that has now become associated with Musk's DOGE efforts. Rather than using a visual identity that communicates safety, trust, or reliability, the logo is a sign that the company sees the graffiti-style cyberpunk aesthetic of its Cybertruck as the model for branding future products and services. 'A good logo always tries to convey the brand promise,' says type designer and Hoefler & Co. founder Jonathan Hoefler. 'And this one definitely foreshadows the tragic collisions ahead.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store