logo
ICE asked judges to close certain immigration cases—and then immediately arrested the people

ICE asked judges to close certain immigration cases—and then immediately arrested the people

Fast Company6 days ago

Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers arrested 11 people after their court hearings at the San Diego Immigration Court last Thursday as part of a new nationwide operation to try to fast track deportations.
Beginning on Tuesday, May 20, in courts including those in Santa Ana and Las Vegas, attorneys representing the U.S. government—who are also employed by ICE—requested that immigration judges close cases of some people who had been in the U.S. for less than two years and who had shown up without attorneys. Normally a closed immigration court case would mean that the government is no longer trying to deport someone. But instead, ICE officers waited outside courtrooms to arrest those people and put them into expedited proceedings that do not require a judge.
'Going to immigration court is your chance to be heard,' said Michelle Celleri, an attorney and legal rights director of Alliance San Diego. 'It is your right. It is part of due process.'
Celleri said that arresting people who show up for their hearings would discourage others from coming to immigration courts.
ICE and the Executive Office for Immigration Review, which runs the immigration court, did not respond to requests for comment from Beyond the Border. ICE has told other news outlets that it is detaining people who are subject to a fast-track deportation authority.
That fast-track deportation process is called expedited removal.
In expedited removal, an immigration officer, rather than a judge, gives the deportation order. In an executive order issued in January, President Donald Trump called for officers to use the process on anyone who has been in the U.S. for less than two years.
'With expedited removal, they can deport them tonight,' said Ginger Jacobs, a private immigration attorney in San Diego. 'They're short-cutting the due process these folks came here to receive in immigration court.'
But not everyone detained in San Diego last Thursday had closed cases. ICE arrested several people who had received future hearings dates from the immigration judges they appeared before, according to their attorneys and friends.
Ruth, a volunteer with the grassroots group Detention Resistance who asked not to be fully identified because of concerns about potential retaliation, said she had accompanied her friend, a man from Colombia who has been in the U.S. for just under a year, to court Thursday morning.
She said that when her friend left the courtroom to go to the bathroom, officers tried to detain him even though his hearing hadn't happened yet. During his hearing, Ruth's friend told the judge that he was afraid of being arrested when he went back outside the courtroom.
The judge told her friend that he wasn't affiliated with ICE and couldn't control what they did, Ruth said. Her friend turned in his asylum application, and the judge gave him another hearing date.
When her friend left his hearing, ICE officers took him into custody.
'He came in good faith keeping with his asylum process,' Ruth said. 'Now we don't even know what's going to happen to him.'
Ruth said her friend has been active in the San Diego community and getting involved as a volunteer to help others in need.
Tracy Crowley, an immigration attorney with Immigrant Defenders Law Center, took on Ruth's friend's case as he was being detained. She said she was still trying to figure out the legal reason for taking him into custody.
'It's wild,' Crowley said. 'The warrants are very bareboned and don't include the legal basis for detaining them.'
Crowley was among a group of lawyers who jumped in to try to represent people in their court proceedings throughout the day in an effort to avoid additional arrests.
Jacobs, the private immigration attorney, said her office took on four cases on May 22, including that of a young woman from Turkey who seemed terrified by the officers' presence.
In the afternoon, Jacobs helped a mother and her teenage son, quickly getting to know them in the courtroom in the moments before the hearing began. Outside in the hallway, more than 10 officers waited. ICE also called in two private security guards and two Federal Protective Services officers because of the presence of journalists, attorneys, and community members documenting their actions in the hallway.
After the family left the courtroom, ICE appeared to follow them to try to detain them. Jacobs followed after the officers, and she said that ICE decided to let the family go.
Jacobs said ICE let the family go because the son had accompanied his mother.
ICE officers in San Diego mistakenly attempted to arrest two additional people that same day. The officers later acknowledged the error.
In one case, an attorney from the American Bar Association Immigration Justice Project accompanied his client out of the courtroom. When ICE moved to arrest the client, the attorney objected, asking to see a warrant.
Officers shoved themselves between the attorney and his client. Two officers took hold of the man and he ended up on the ground. Beyond the Border witnessed him begin to gasp for air and hyperventilate. The attorney asked to be allowed to help his client, but ICE officers kept him away.
'May I please see a warrant because the warrant you provided is not that person,' the attorney said after ICE showed him their documentation. 'You are making an unlawful arrest.'
ICE continued to keep him away from his client, saying that the man was having a medical emergency.
'He's having a medical emergency thanks to you,' the attorney replied.
Another attorney in the hallway called for an ambulance, and eventually ICE backed away from the man. The attorney helped his client down the hallway to the elevator, holding the man's arm over his shoulders to support his weight so that he could move away from the officers.
'I will help my client at this point,' the attorney said as they left. 'You guys have done enough.'
Several people who had accompanied family members to their hearings were left in the hallway in tears as they watched loved ones being taken away. Celleri worried about family members who weren't there and would have no way of knowing what had happened.
'For those who are unrepresented, to their family they have just disappeared, and they are not going to know where they are for 48 hours—and that's if they know how to find them,' Celleri said.
Officers told attorneys in the hallway that those arrested on Thursday would be taken to Otay Mesa Detention Center in San Diego.
Lindsay Toczylowski, an attorney and CEO of Immigrant Defenders Law Center who was among the first to publicly call attention to the ICE operation, called the arrests a bait and switch.
'By detaining people in courtrooms, we are discouraging people from doing what we have always asked them to do,' Toczylowski said. 'We have always stressed how important it is for people to show up to court, to avail themselves of the system to follow the rules that are set out.'
She said courts in Santa Ana, Chicago, Phoenix, and Miami also saw arrests this week.
Celleri said people with upcoming hearings should know that if they don't come to court, they will likely be ordered deported in their absence.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Family of Colorado attack suspect taken into ICE custody
Family of Colorado attack suspect taken into ICE custody

CNN

time32 minutes ago

  • CNN

Family of Colorado attack suspect taken into ICE custody

Federal agencies CrimeFacebookTweetLink Follow The family of the Egyptian national charged with attempted murder after an antisemitic Molotov cocktail attack in Colorado has been taken into ICE custody and are being processed, a DHS official confirmed to CNN Tuesday. The suspected attacker, Mohamed Soliman, has a wife and five children, according to court filings. It remains unclear what the family members' US immigration status is and whether the whole family was taken into custody. This is a developing story and will be updated.

Peyton Manning joins Denver NWSL's ownership group, joining Mikaela Shiffrin, Mellody Hobson, Molly Coors
Peyton Manning joins Denver NWSL's ownership group, joining Mikaela Shiffrin, Mellody Hobson, Molly Coors

CBS News

time33 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Peyton Manning joins Denver NWSL's ownership group, joining Mikaela Shiffrin, Mellody Hobson, Molly Coors

Former Denver Bronco quarterback and NFL Hall of Famer Peyton Manning has joined the ownership group of Denver NWSL, the still unnamed professional women's soccer team set to start playing next year, Manning and the team announced on Tuesday. He joined a group led by controlling owner Rob Cohen, which includes investors such as Jon-Erik Borgen, Kaia Borgen Moritz, Neelima Joshi, Dhiren Jhaveri, Mellody Hobson, Molly Coors, and Mikaela Shiffrin. Together, they aim to build the most inclusive and community-rooted club in professional soccer. "It's a real honor to be part of something so meaningful to the Colorado community," Manning said in the announcement. "I'm proud to support the growth of women's sports and excited to help build a club that our city and our state can rally behind." In January, the National Women's Soccer League officially announced that Denver would be getting the league's next team and in March, the league announced that a new 12,000-seat stadium would be built for the team. This will be the league's 16th team and they will start playing in 2026. "Peyton's legacy as a champion and a leader is second to none," Cohen said. "His impact on Colorado sports is unmatched, and we're incredibly proud to have him as a partner. He brings passion, insight, and deep local roots - all of which will help us shape the future of Denver NWSL." The soccer team, which doesn't yet have a name or any players, is Colorado's first professional women's soccer team. As the community, the team, and the league prepare for next season, the city of Centennial could be home to a new women's soccer training facility.

COVID-related agreement continues to shield some on Georgia's death row from execution
COVID-related agreement continues to shield some on Georgia's death row from execution

Associated Press

time36 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

COVID-related agreement continues to shield some on Georgia's death row from execution

ATLANTA (AP) — The fact that the COVID-19 vaccine is not available for newborn babies is shielding a group of prisoners on Georgia's death row from execution. Executions in Georgia were halted during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the state attorney general's office entered into an agreement with lawyers for people on death row to set the terms under which they could resume for a specific group of prisoners. At least one of those conditions, having to do with the availability of the COVID-19 vaccine, has not been met, and seeking an execution date for a prisoner covered by the agreement would breach the agreement, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Shukura Ingram ruled. The agreement includes three conditions that had to be met before executions could be set for the affected prisoners: the expiration of the state's COVID-19 judicial emergency, the resumption of normal visitation at state prisons and the availability of a COVID-19 vaccine 'to all members of the public.' Once those conditions were met, the state agreed to give three months' notice before pursuing an execution warrant for one of the prisoners covered by the agreement and six months' notice for the rest. The state has argued that the agreement should no longer apply, contending the conditions have been met. But defense attorneys say it's still valid because the vaccine isn't yet available to infants under 6 months old, and visitation at state prisons has not returned to normal. Ingram's ruling, issued Friday, addressed only the vaccination question. She plans to handle the visitation issue separately. Ingram wrote that the state's arguments 'all boil down to an attempt to rewrite the Agreement.' The state is '(u)nhappy with the language it drafted' and wants to change it so that the condition would be satisfied once vaccines are available to 'most members of the public.' 'But courts cannot rewrite contracts to relieve a party of their regrets,' she wrote. She ruled that the agreement is 'binding and enforceable,' that the vaccination condition hasn't been met and that seeking an execution warrant before the requirements have been met would breach the agreement. The state attorney general's office plans to appeal, a spokesperson said Tuesday. Ingram noted that the Food and Drug Administration has approved clinical trials for infants under 6 months old, and newborns receive other vaccines. That shows it is possible for the COVID-19 vaccine to ultimately be available for that age group, and the state should have foreseen that that could take years, she wrote. Experts for both sides had testified that it was probable that the COVID-19 vaccine would eventually become available to babies under the age of 6 months, Ingram wrote. That was before Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was appointed U.S. health secretary. Kennedy last week announced that COVID-19 vaccines are no longer recommended for healthy children and pregnant women. A few days later, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's website, which had said those groups should get the shots, was revised to say the vaccinations 'may' be given to those groups. The agreement covers fewer than 10 of the 34 people currently on Georgia's death row. While Georgia stopped carrying out executions during the pandemic, death penalty cases continued to wind their way through the court system, and as people exhausted their appeals, they became eligible for execution. A committee of a judicial task force on COVID-19 in early 2021 instructed lawyers for people on death row and the state attorney general's office to come up with terms under which executions could safely resume. The two sides reached the agreement in April 2021. The agreement only applied to people on death row whose requests to have their appeals reheard were denied by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals while the judicial emergency was in place. The agreement was to remain in effect through Aug. 1, 2022, or one year from the date on which the conditions were met — whichever was later. The legal fight arose from a lawsuit filed when officials set a May 2022 execution date for Virgil Delano Presnell Jr. The Federal Defender Program, which represents Presnell, said the state had violated the agreement because the conditions hadn't all been met. Based on that argument, a Fulton County Superior Court judge halted the execution less than 24 hours before it was to take place, and the Georgia Supreme Court ruled in December 2022 that the agreement was a binding contract. People on death row who are not covered by the agreement have since become eligible for execution. One of them, Willie James Pye, was put to death in March 2024.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store