Tony Blair: The ordinary dad who was all things to all voters
This article is published as part of The Telegraph's Greatest Interviews series, which revisits the most significant, informative and entertaining conversations with notable figures over our 170 year history. The below interview is introduced by Philip Johnston. It appears as it was originally published.
Given the fickle nature of the modern voter it is hard to believe that there was a time when a new prime minister nearly two years into his term of office remained hugely popular in the country. Tony Blair had arrived in Downing Street as the harbinger of Cool Britannia after 17 years of Conservative rule, the first occupant of No 10 in modern times to have a young family. His chameleon-like qualities are well observed by Tom Baldwin, The Sunday Telegraph's then political editor, telling Islington types he likes pasta while assuring his northern constituents his favourite meal was fish and chips. But that was his rare talent – to be all things to all voters.
He was in the throes of ejecting most hereditary peers from the Lords, a task about to be completed by Sir Keir Starmer, and finding it hard to get anything done against the obduracy of the Whitehall machine. Nothing changes. Iraq, which would come to define his premiership, was not even a speck on the horizon. – Philip Johnston
The Prime Minister was sitting on a small stool surrounded by three year-old-children listening to the story of Mr Wiggle and Mr Waggle, when he was suddenly faced with a question far trickier than any fired at him in the Commons.
'Let's ask Mr Blair,' said the teacher, 'what Mr Wiggle and Mr Waggle did together before they went to sleep?' Panic flashed in Tony Blair's eyes as he glanced towards the photographers in front of him.
What indeed? What did that poster say on the wall? What was the message on the lapel badge he had just been given? The cloud lifted. 'Er . . . they read a book!' shouted Mr Blair triumphantly.
The children smiled on in innocence and the adults laughed with relief. After all, he was visiting the Newton Aycliffe Early Learning Centre in his own seat of Sedgefield in County Durham. But that moment of doubt – and its resolution – summed up Mr Blair's message last week: whatever the cynics think, New Labour is, in fact, wholesome, decent and, above all, normal.
The Government acknowledges that the rash of resignations and reports of 'junketing', as well as the exposure of some of the more lurid details of ministers' private lives, have all tarnished Labour's reputation.
However, in an exclusive interview with The Sunday Telegraph as he travelled to the North East on Friday, Mr Blair voiced his frustration at what he sees as the failure of the Conservative Party – and possibly the media as well – to raise its sights.
'The questions I'm asked by the Tories are things like travel costs, the number of times I've spoken to Peter Mandelson recently, how long it takes me to get to an airport – you don't know whether to laugh or cry.'
As a matter of fact, as he was speaking, it was taking very little time to get to the airport. Motorcycle outriders cleared a path for the Prime Ministerial Daimler through the morning traffic on the way to Heathrow for his flight to the North East.
But it was not until he had put what he regards as a trivia-obsessed 'Westminster village' far behind him that he began to unwind and explain how he would 'seek new ways' to speak directly to the public about his 'vision for this country' and the issues which really affect them such as health, education, welfare, crime.
However, that does not mean eschewing personality politics – far from it. Much of what New Labour stands for on these issues, as well as the future of the Government, is now tightly bound to the image of Mr Blair himself and that of his family. When he arrived at a shopping centre in his constituency he was treated like the pop star he once wanted to be. A pair of Trotskyists stood for a minute at the edge of the crowd, forlornly waving a copy of Socialist Worker, before walking away with heads bowed. There was no point in heckling, it just did not seem like a political event.
'You were just like Mick Jagger,' a woman in the crowd told him. 'Come on, let's not exaggerate,' said the Prime Minister. He was similarly keen to play down his image as head of a British 'first family' which at times has been portrayed as an almost idealised vision of domestic bliss.
'Believe me, I don't hold my family out as better than that of anyone else, we are just a normal family. We have our share of ups and downs like everyone else,' he said.
Indeed, it is the Prime Minister's claims to ordinariness which are at the heart of his appeal. He is seen as just about normal enough to understand the rest of us. Cherie, goes out to work – albeit as a highly successful barrister – their children are at state schools, they like watching television together, they discuss rock music, support football clubs.
Like many other middle class parents, the Blairs have sought the best possible schools for their children. But a recent story in a Sunday newspaper suggesting that their daughter, Kathyrn, received 'special treatment' in winning a place at her school, prompted an immediate letter to the Press Complaints Commission. He had to draw a line, he said, at a story which was 'untrue and unfair'.
The Prime Minister conceded that living in the public eye, protected by armed policemen, at the very heart of government, might be regarded as a touch unusual by some people: 'If you are basically quite a normal family, which we are, it's quite a strange life sometimes.'
But unlike that experienced by members of the Royal Family, he knows it will not last forever and is warning his children not to get too used to it: they will find that there comes a time when he is no longer Prime Minister and they will have to 'make their own way in life'. Friends are encouraged to come round after school, just like with any other family. 'We've known a lot of them for some time and they certainly don't treat me as Prime Minister, I can tell you that.'
He insists that his regular anecdotes about family life are prompted by inquiries from the media. 'If people are talking about children's learning at school it is difficult not to say whether or not I read to my kids – as Prime Minister my family is inevitably in the public eye.'
However, in Sedgefield last week, Mr Blair was not slow to volunteer references to his family. As he was presented with a Chinese New Year card, he remarked that his brother was married to a 'Chinese lady'. Later, leaning on a bannister at a parenting class, he came over all dreamy at the memory of the birth of his first baby. 'You know, I find it just amazing at how different all our children turn out to be.'
It is what Mr Blair is best at, talking and listening to people about their shared experiences in a way which does not end in party sloganising. He does not seem like a politician – certainly not a Labour one – because he did not grow up in the party. He can reach out not just to supporters of rival parties but to their leaders as well.
Mr Blair confirmed to The Sunday Telegraph that he had considered offering Paddy Ashdown a seat in the Cabinet if Labour had secured only a small majority at the last election.
Would he do so again? 'I have no plans for coalition government,' he said, but added: 'There is a limit to how far you can read the future. I believe that in today's politics, tribalism holds back progress.'
Does he have more in common with Mr Ashdown than with some of his own members? 'It depends which members you're talking about.'
The Prime Minister uses similarly equivocal words on his policy towards Europe and Britain's likely entry into the single currency – while making his ultimate intentions similarly transparent.
Although he will not budge from the Government's declared position – which is to prepare for entry but to delay a decision on whether or not to call a referendum on joining until after the next election – he is under pressure to do so from pro-euro businesses, EU partners and government colleagues.
Will he firm up the language closer to the election, will he say it is a question of 'when, not if'? 'No,' he replied, 'it is a long way until the next election.'
But just minutes later, as he discussed the prospect of Kenneth Clarke joining a cross-party, pro-euro referendum campaign, he said: 'We will wait and see when that happens.'
He then called on Mr Clarke, the former Chancellor, to stay in the Conservative Party for the sake of the 'national interest' and save it from the clutches of Right-wing Euro-sceptics who, he warned, were controlling Tory policy.
'I am sure that William Hague does not need my help or advice, but it is obvious that the Conservative Party has a fundamental division [on Europe] and they are not confronting it.'
Mr Blair must be the only Labour leader in history who could, in the 'national interest', give Tory politicians advice on how to run their party and keep a straight face.
But his definition of the political centreground on which he has positioned himself, shifts constantly. Mr Blair can condemn hereditary peers in one breath for being unrepresentative because half of them went to Eton, and then add in the next that he has 'nothing against people attending Eton, don't get me wrong'.
Mr Hague believes such statements show that the Prime Minister is trying to be 'all things to all men' and stretching his credibility too far. The Tory leader has ridiculed Mr Blair for telling an Islington recipe book that his favourite dish was pasta and sun dried tomatoes – while telling his constituents back in the North East that it could only be fish and chips.
However, as soon as the Prime Minister got back to his constituency home in Trimdon on Friday he had his jacket and tie off and was cramming fish and chips into his mouth with true passion. Such were his powers that The Sunday Telegraph even agreed to pay for them.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
SNP's wish to ‘throw open our borders' would risk security
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has claimed the Scottish Government's stance on immigration would risk the country's security. Writing in the Daily Mail ahead of the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh, Mrs Badenoch said the SNP's position 'is not remotely serious'. The Scottish Government is much more liberal than both the UK Labour Government and the Tories on immigration, repeatedly calling for more people to be allowed to come to Scotland, but Holyrood does not have the powers to make changes. Ministers have pushed for a shift in the system on a number of occasions, going so far as to propose a separate Scottish visa in 2020 under Nicola Sturgeon – a pitch which was quickly rejected by the Conservative-led government of the time. Mrs Badenoch wrote: 'We need a new, sustainable system that only admits a strict number of people who come here legally, do the right thing, and who contribute to society. 'That means we must introduce a strict numerical cap on legal migration, ensure there is zero-tolerance for foreign criminals, and pass the Deportation Bill to remove those who should not be here. 'The left-wing parties at Holyrood – not just the SNP, but also Labour and the Lib Dems – don't believe tougher action is necessary. Scottish Conservative Party Conference is now in full swing. Follow along to see how @RussellFindlay1 is bringing common sense to Scottish politics 🏴🇬🇧#SCC25 — Scottish Conservatives (@ScotTories) June 13, 2025 'On immigration, those parties have policies student politicians would be ashamed of. 'The SNP's stance, in particular, is not remotely serious. 'If they ever got their way, they would put our citizens' security at risk. It's the nationalists' view that we should just throw open our borders, without any checks or limitations on who comes into the country.' The Scottish Government has been contacted for comment.


Hamilton Spectator
9 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Very proud to be Canadian? That's less likely now for supporters of one party, survey suggests
OTTAWA — With U.S President Donald Trump making economic and expansionist threats against his northern neighbours, a new survey suggests that pride in being Canadian has increased among supporters of all federal parties — except Conservatives. The number of Canadians who feel proud of their country has rebounded overall, according to research shared exclusively with the Star from the Environics Institute, with 62 per cent now indicating that they are very proud to be Canadian, compared to 53 per cent who said the same last September. 'This change marks the first time that this measure has increased by more than a few percentage points from one survey to the next, since our tracking first began in 1985,' a report outlining the survey's findings notes. But when the results are broken down by federal party support, Conservative voters bucked the trend posted by Liberal, NDP and Bloc Québécois supporters, who all showed increased pride in their national identity. Seventy-seven per cent of Liberal supporters now say they are very proud to be Canadian, up five points from last fall, while the proportion of NDP supporters who felt the same way grew from 61 to 68 per cent. The number of Bloc supporters who felt very proud of being Canadian, meanwhile, grew from 30 per cent to 42 per cent, although the report notes that the finding should be treated with caution due to a smaller number of responses from those who backed the traditionally separatist party. By contrast, fewer Conservative voters said they were very proud of being Canadian compared to last fall, dropping from 46 to 43 per cent. The current number is the lowest level logged by Conservative-leaning supporters since the research institute first began tracking this question in 1985. The Environics Institute launched the survey after this spring's federal election, which followed a campaign defined by how parties platformed Canada's strengths against the backdrop of Trump's aggression. The institute released the results of a companion survey last week, which suggested that Canadian public sentiment toward the U.S. had plunged to new lows. The new survey was conducted via telephone with 2,000 Canadians from May 5 to 18, with a sample of this size producing a margin of error within plus or minus 2.2 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. Andrew Parkin, the institute's executive director, said pride in Canada has seen the steepest decline overall among Conservative backers. 'The Conservatives today are about half as likely as Conservatives in 2010 to have strong pride in being Canadian,' Parkin said. But he added that the results aren't necessarily surprising, because supporters within the blue tent are contending with an election result for which they don't have much enthusiasm. 'The things that they think are wrong about the direction that the country was heading (in) are not going to change because the government didn't change, or at least the party in government didn't change,' Parkin said. Parkin said a result he did find surprising was that while pride in being Canadian remains lowest in Quebec, the province is the only part of the country where the proportion of Canadians who feel very proud of their country is higher, not lower, than it was in 2010. Compared to 2024, strong pride in being Canadian jumped eight points in Quebec. Alberta, where secessionist sentiment has recently surfaced in some quarters, had a seven-point increase. Also of note, Parkin said, was how strong pride in Canadian identity saw a resurgence in every region of the country, aside from Atlantic Canada, which dropped from 64 per cent in 2024 to 62 per cent now. 'The fact that it's not the highest in Atlantic Canada, where traditionally, going back, it would have been among the highest, I think (is) worth noticing,' he said.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
South African president to brave second meeting with Trump following Oval Office mauling
Cyril Ramaphosa has said he will meet Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit next week, less than a month after the South African president was ambushed in the Oval Office. Mr Ramaphosa said his main aim was to reset relations with the White House during the summit in Canada. 'I am going there to have bilaterals with the chancellor of Germany, the prime minister of Canada and, of course, I will also be meeting President Trump, who we met at the White House,' he told reporters in Pretoria. He had the merest hint of a smile before addressing one of the reporters directly and breaking into laughter: 'You were there when they started dimming the lights...' Once the lights were dimmed, that White House meeting became a video screening about violent crime in South Africa, with the president holding aloft a sheaf of news cuttings about the persecution of white farmers in Mr Ramaphosa's country. The Trump administration has welcomed families of Afrikaner farmers to the US as refugees. And Mr Trump used the visit of his South African counterpart to make the case that they were the victims of racist violence. 'We have many people that feel they're being persecuted, and they're coming to the United States,' he said. 'So we take from many ... locations, if we feel there's persecution or genocide going on.' He screened a video showing rows of opposition leaders making incendiary speeches and rows of white crosses which Mr Trump claimed were the graves of murdered white South Africans. He also brandished printouts of news stories describing violence and murder in South Africa, although some eagle eyed observers noticed that a picture supposedly showing a burial site was actually from a report about women being killed in the Democratic Republic of Congo. However, Mr Ramaphosa told reporters the meeting had been a success and that he wanted to use his trip to Canada to discuss trade relations. 'It's important for us to reposition ourselves in the turbulent geopolitical architecture,' he said. World leaders from the world's most developed economies are due to begin arriving in Alberta on Sunday. Mr Trump and his trade policies will cast a long shadow over the two days of meetings. Mr Ramaphosa is due to host world leaders at the G20 later in the year and has invited the American president to attend. 'We are going to use it as a platform to begin to consolidate what we want to achieve in November, when the G20 leaders' summit takes place here,' he said. 'I am hoping that when we meet with the various other leaders of various countries who are part of the G7, we will be able to interact meaningfully with them.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.