Indy VA employees upset by Trump's transgender policies on hospital bathrooms, LGBTQ+ care
This article was originally published by Mirror Indy and is republished through our partnership with Free Press Indiana.
The Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center in Indianapolis is removing gender-neutral bathrooms and requiring employees to erase pronouns from their email signatures and documentation, Mirror Indy has learned.
Now, some employees believe the VA health system in Indiana will soon end all LGBTQ+ health programs for veterans, including an Indianapolis clinic that provides gender-affirming care.
'I just filled my testosterone and picked it up before they say I can't have it,' said one employee, who is transgender and has been receiving hormones at the clinic for years. 'I do not want to go back. I would rather die than go back.'
The employee is one of two who shared concerns about the Indiana VA's abrupt changes with Mirror Indy, which is not naming them because they are not authorized to speak and fear retaliation from their employer.
The changes in Indianapolis stem from an executive order from President Donald Trump, who directed the federal government on his first day in office to only recognize 'two biological sexes' and to end federal programs that 'promote gender ideology.' They come as part of a larger wave of policy changes and legislation by politicians, who are mostly Republican, targeting people who are transgender. Indiana lawmakers, for example, banned gender-affirming care for minors in 2023.
Thomas Hossfeld, the assistant director for VA Indiana health care, informed employees about the new policies during a Jan. 30 staff meeting. Mirror Indy obtained an audio recording of the meeting. The employees confirmed its authenticity.
'We have to review all agency programs, contracts, grants and terminate any that promote gender ideology,' Hossfeld said at the meeting.
Staff expressed confusion, and at times, anger, about the changes coming to their workplace.
'I know it's part of the effort of this whole thing of getting us to resign and be so confused and flustered that we can't take it anymore,' said one employee who said they work with transgender veterans. 'It ain't going to work on me, I'm here till the end but I do need guidance.'
Another staff member asked about bathrooms.
'What we know is there will be a restroom for men and for women,' Hossfeld said. 'That's how we have to identify them.'
Hossfeld said he did not know how care for transgender veterans would be affected. At one point during the call, he reminded staff that the orders came directly from the president.
'Whether we like (executive orders), don't like them, it's not up for debate,' Hossfeld said. 'Once they come out, it's up for execution.'
Hossfeld has not responded through a spokesperson to a Mirror Indy request for an interview.
Mark Turney, a spokesperson for Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, said he did not know if gender-affirming care would be affected by Trump's executive order.
Turney noted that staff has 120 days to implement the order, and they are waiting for more information from the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs.
'We haven't gotten any guidance,' Turney said. 'We don't know what this will look like.'
A spokesperson for the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs did not answer Mirror Indy's questions about gender-affirming care, but said the department will 'fully, faithfully and thoughtfully execute' Trump's order.
Changes to veterans services won't come until a formal order from the VA's Office of the Secretary, the spokesperson said.
It's unclear if VA health systems in other states are on a similar timeline, but the changes already appear to be happening in Indianapolis. An employee told Mirror Indy that staffers were no longer using gender-neutral bathrooms or displaying their pronouns.
'Employees are stressed to the max and worried about their safety here now,' the person said, referring to concerns such as potentially losing their jobs, experiencing harassment or being required to use a bathroom that does not match their gender identity.
The Indiana VA policy changes would align with a U.S. Office of Personnel Management memo that instructs federal agencies to place employees whose positions promote 'gender ideology' on administrative leave, update agency forms to only list 'male and female' as identity options and eliminate gender neutral bathrooms.
So far, Indiana Republicans in Washington have not weighed in on how the executive order will affect veterans in their home state. U.S. Sen. Todd Young, a Marine Corps veteran, declined to comment Jan. 31 through a spokesperson. U.S. Sen. Jim Banks, who served in the Navy Reserve, did not respond to requests for comment — though he has previously pushed to ban transgender people from military service.
Separately, Trump also recently signed an executive order banning transgender people from the military. Six transgender service members are suing to block the order and be re-enlisted under equal protection.
The VA health care system has been providing gender-affirming care since 2011. Ten years later, the agency allowed service members who were discharged based on their sexual orientation or gender identity to receive veteran benefits, including health care.
Gender-affirming care, which can include surgery and hormone therapy, helps people transition when their sex assigned at birth does not match their gender identity. It is supported by virtually every major health care organization, including the American Medical Association.
Cutting off access to health care would hurt transgender veterans, said Dr. Hannah Locke, an OB-GYN who has provided gender-affirming care in Indianapolis.
'As physicians, we are being asked to go against best practices,' she said. 'Gender-affirming care reduces suicide, anxiety and depression. Taking that away is going to increase all of those things.'
One of the employees interviewed by Mirror Indy said their diagnosis and treatment for gender dysmorphia happened at the VA. The employee is devastated by what's happening.
'I am everything the VA made me and now it's a problem for me to exist,' the employee said. 'And that's all I'm literally asking to do.'
Mirror Indy reporter Mary Claire Molloy covers health. Reach her at 317-721-7648 or email maryclaire.molloy@mirrorindy.org. Follow her on X @mcmolloy7.
This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Indy VA hospital ends gender-neutral bathrooms, transgender care
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, U.S. Appeals court decides
By Dietrich Knauth (Reuters) -A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the appeals play out. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 12 U.S. states. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their assets. Trump is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit. The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed. Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati


Fox News
26 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump-backed Jack Ciattarelli captures GOP nomination for New Jersey governor
HOLMDEL, N.J. - The candidate President Donald Trump recently endorsed in New Jersey has won the state's Republican gubernatorial primary, in the 2025 race to succeed term-limited Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy. The Associated Press projects that Jack Ciattarelli, a former GOP state lawmaker who is making his third bid for New Jersey governor, will capture the Republican nomination, topping four rivals in Tuesday's primary in a race that for months had been a battle for Trump's support. Among those Cittarelli defeated were former businessman and popular conservative talk radio host Bill Spadea and state Sen. Jon Bramnick, a lawyer who served for a decade as state Assembly GOP leader. Ciattarelli and Spadea spent months trading fire over which of them was a bigger Trump supporter. But last month the president endorsed Cittarelli, who ran unsuccessfully for the GOP nomination in 2017, but four years later he captured the nomination and overperformed in the general election, coming close to ousting Murphy. "I'm asking you to get out and vote for a true champion for the people of your state – Jack Ciattarelli. He's been a friend of mine, and he's been a real success story," Trump told supporters a week ago, as he dialed into a tele-rally on the eve of the kick-off of early voting in New Jersey. Trump's grip over the GOP is stronger than ever following his convincing White House re-election victory last November, and Cittarrelli, in a Fox News Digtal interview last week, said the president's endorsement was "a really big deal" and added "the president's doing very, very well in New Jersey." Spadea said that not landing Trump's endorsement "was certainly disappointing." "I mean, we made no bones about this. We absolutely wanted the president's endorsement. Unfortunately, the president endorsed a poll and not a plan," Spadea told Fox News Digital last week. "I have been a supporter of President Trump since he came down the escalator," as he referenced Trump's announcement in 2015 of his first presidential campaign. "There is no question that I am the common-sense conservative. I am the actual Republican in this primary," Spadea claimed. And Spadea questioned Ciattarelli's support for Trump, arguing that his rival "has disrespected him [Trump] for the better part of the last eight years…We thought that that endorsement would have been better served with me." Four years ago, after he won the GOP gubernatorial nomination, Ciattarelli, when asked if he was seeking the then-former president's endorsement, told Fox News Digital "there's only one endorsement I seek, and that's the endorsement of the voters of New Jersey. That's the only one that matters." Fast-forward to 2025, and Ciattarelli emphasized that "people really appreciate what he [Trump] is doing for New Jerseyans. He's put a temporary hold on the wind farms off the Jersey Shore. He's beating up on the New York Democrats over congestion pricing. He supports a quadrupling of the SALT [state and local tax] deduction on our federal tax returns. Those are big deals to New Jersey, and that's why he's got so much great support here. And I'm honored to have his endorsement." Asked why Trump endorsed him rather than Spadea, Ciattarelli said that "the president wants to win. He knows that I provide the best opportunity to win in November." "He knows we're going to raise the necessary money. We've raised more money than the other five Republican gubernatorial candidates combined," added Ciattarelli, a certified public accountant who started a medical publishing company before getting into politics. Ciattarelli's fundraising allowed him to dominate the GOP primary ad wars. The Democratic Governors Association, pointing to the rush to embrace Trump by the top two candidates, long described the 2025 Republican showdown as a "MAGA battle" and argued that there's "extremism in the GOP primary." While New Jersey has long leaned toward the Democrats, Republicans have had success in gubernatorial elections. "It's not a blue state when it comes to governor races, Republicans have won six of the last 11. That's better than 50%," Ciattarelli said. Trump, who for years has spent summer weekends at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, held a very large campaign rally last year in Wildwood, N.J. And he improved from a 16-point loss in the state in the 2020 election to a 6-point deficit last November. Ciattarelli, looking ahead to the general election campaign, said he's "really looking forward" to Trump's "active participation…I think New Jerseyans are anxious to have him on the campaign trail with me and help deliver a win for us in November."

NBC Sports
26 minutes ago
- NBC Sports
Stephen A. Smith: Failure to buy Bills sparked Donald Trump's first presidential run
Nearly 10 years ago to the day, a certain someone took a certain ride down a certain golden escalator and most certainly upended American politics. As Stephen A. Smith told it on Monday night's edition of The Daily Show, the rise of Donald Trump the politician is tied directly to his inability to buy the Buffalo Bills a year before he threw his hat in the presidential ring. 'In 2014, he wanted to purchase the NFL's Buffalo Bills,' Smith told Jon Stewart. 'The price tag was $1.4 billion. . . . My sources tell me he had $1.1 [billion]. . . . He literally called me in 2014 and he said, 'Stephen, I'm going to tell you this right now' — and this is a quote — 'if them mutherfuckers get in my way, I'm gonna get them all back. I'm gonna run for president.' Those are his exact words. 'And so the NFL often jokes with me, 'So it's our fault' when I tell them that story. And I say, 'Yeah.'' This prompted Stewart to make a direct plea to the camera: 'People of Buffalo. Give him the fucking team. Save us.' Smith explained Trump's viewpoint on the matter. 'He was putting the word out that if this doesn't happen — he wanted to do it, and this should happen, I'm Donald Trump, I'm very popular and well known, I'm worth over a billion dollars, I should be able to purchase an NFL team if I want it,' Smith said. 'And if I can't get it, it's because they're getting in my way. That was his position. Their position was, 'You didn't have enough money.'' And he didn't. Because at the end of the day that's all it takes to buy an NFL team: Come up with the best offer. Terry and Kim Pegula came up with a better offer than the twice future president. But, yes, there's an alternate universe in which Trump owns the Bills and he isn't the president and he calls in to PFT Live on a regular basis to complain that the league office is being very unfair.