Australian watchdog issues warning to Elon Musk's satellite internet service Starlink
Elon Musk 's Starlink has been put on notice by the Australian communications watchdog.
The controversial billionaire's satellite internet service received a warning from the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) over complaints record-keeping.
Telecommunications companies with more than 30,000 active services are required to file complaints reports with the authority no later than 30 days after each quarter.
But Starlink failed to do so on four occasions between October 2023 and July 2024.
'Starlink's failure to submit the required complaints reports in a timely way hampered the ACMA in its role of monitoring whether Starlink is meeting its obligations towards consumers,' authority member Samantha Yorke said.
The company has since provided the outstanding complaints reports and cooperated throughout the investigation.
The Starlink satellite service has increased in popularity in parts of regional Australia, where internet is provided through the slower copper network instead of fibre-optic cables.
Some say it could compete with Australia's National Broadband Network as thousands across the country are now believed to use the service in their homes.
However, there are lingering concerns about the risks it could pose.
In December, a regional telecommunications review found the foreign ownership of systems such as Starlink raises questions about data security and sovereign risks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Virgin to unveil direct Australia to Qatar flights
Virgin Australia will unveil its first long-haul flight to Qatar since COVID-19 on Friday. Services between Sydney to Doha will start first, with Brisbane and Perth routes to follow later this month. 'It's also great for the Australian economy, these new flights are going to generate more than $3 billion of economic impact for Australia, and create hundreds of new jobs,' Virgin Australia CEO Dave Emerson said.
7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
INSIDE MEDIA: AI ads set to make Netflix unwatchable
It seems the big streaming services want more revenue and they're finding new ways to fleece us, the consumer. Netflix has revealed plans to start showing AI-generated content to its ad-tier subscribers. These AI ads are slated to begin rolling out in 2026. While full details are yet to be released, it means viewers might see an ad that blends in with the show you're watching. The Verge reports Netflix says advertisers can insert this new ad format in the middle of a show or put them on the screen when you hit pause. They could contain an overlay or call to action when they roll out by the end of this year. Ads when you hit pause is not a new thing, it happens on other streaming services and doesn't detract from the program, but the big issue will be how Netflix integrates the AI generated commercials into the content. The streamers have discovered they can get two bites of the cherry by making the ad-free tier of their services expensive and forcing consumers into watching ads. The advertising model is reaping big profits and it's just a matter of time before we're all forced to watch ads. It'll be just like watching free to air tv all over again (except we never had to pay for that). REPORTERS UNDER FIRE It can be a tough gig being a news reporter. While most people are leaving the scene of riots, natural disasters or any number of events, news reporters are heading towards them. But, it would be difficult for any reporter to imagine they'd be fired upon in Los Angeles by authorities. Yes, that is exactly what happened to Lauren Tomasi this past week when an LA police officer shot her in the leg with a rubber bullet. While some critics have claimed she should have been wearing a helmet and a press jacket, that makes no sense to me. First, she was not in some third world war-torn country and second, she was obviously a reporter posing no threat. No, this was the result of a trigger-happy police officer who, for some reason, decided to fire upon a reporter doing their job in a democratic country. 'It is a target-specific munition. That's not to say that it always hits the intended target, particularly in a dynamic situation,' LAPD Chief McDonnell responded to a question about the incident during a press conference. 'We saw that, we're very concerned about it, and we're looking into that.' It's not the first time Australian journalists have been treated badly by law enforcement in the USA, including here at 7NEWS when a journalist and camera operator were attacked in Washington DC. There have been more examples over the past few days of journalists being treated like the enemy during the. A reporter from The New York Post was hit in the forehead after being fired upon and a journalist from CNN was handcuffed and detained. You can see vision of these instances in the video player above. Reporters risk their lives every day to tell stories of events happening around the world. They often work on very little sleep and trying conditions so that we can be informed of what is happening in our world. It's worth remembering that when you're sitting at home watching the nightly news. WHAT WENT WRONG FOR THE PROJECT AND Q&A I've been asked over the past few days where it all went wrong for The Project and Q&A, two shows that have been cancelled this week. So, here's my take; QandA was never the same when Tony Jones left at the same time as creator and founding executive producer Peter McEvoy. The two had developed a strong identity of the show which made it compelling viewing. Jones was replaced as host by Hamish MacDonald and McEvoy by Insiders and News Breakfast EP, Erin Vincent. It was a disaster despite this claim from ABC Head of Investigative and In-Depth Journalism John Lyons: 'Hamish's energy and ability to draw from people their real concerns will further strengthen Q&A as a forum for reflecting the views of Australians and seeking ideas for the future.' The new team thought they knew better and ratings quickly started to drop. Things got so bad MacDonald made a quick exit after just 18 months. It also didn't help that Q&A stopped using audience feedback from Twitter/X, an element that had made live viewing a necessity. The final straw for me though was when Stan Grant ejected a pro-Putin audience member for changing the question on their card. I always thought the idea of Q&A was to have a discussion about differing views. Apparently not. As for The Project, things started to go downhill when the makers started to believe they needed to teach Australians the 'right' was to think. The show went from comedy take on the day's events to woke and preachy. Despite claims the show had balance because they included Steve Price once a week, the show favoured left-leaning issues and admonished any guest who disagreed with the wok values of the show. In fact, the show became so obsessed with its need to 'educate' the audience we weren't allowed to have an opinion until we heard the latest editorial from Waleed in his 'Something we should talk about' segments. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for opinion pieces and panel shows (I host my own opinion show on Saturday night's), but there was something about how seriously the show took Aly's opinions that was very off-putting. It was like he was the judge and jury of how we should all be thinking. And I don't necessarily mean this was coming from the man himself, but more from the way the show treated his opinions like they were more important than anyone else's. Both shows will now join the long list of Australian TV shows that have come and gone over the past 69 years but there's no doubt both had a cultural impact. WILL 10'S NEW 6PM NEWS WORK? No. I guess you want more than that. We now have official details on what 10 is planning to replace The Project with and I have to say the signs are not looking good. While there have been some genuinely good signings in Denham Hitchcock and Amelia Brace, among others, the show looks set to be a retelling of the news of the day, albeit in a longer form show. 10NEWS+ (terrible name) will air from Sunday – Friday at 6pm, followed by Deal Or No Deal at 7pm. '10 NEWS+ aims to redefine evening news by providing comprehensive analysis, trusted reporting, and long-form investigative journalism. The program will offer a fresh perspective on critical local and global stories, tailored for an engaged audience seeking in-depth news coverage', according to the press release. All that is fine, but the network hasn't asked itself the most fundamental questions: why are we making this show? I get they want a cheaper option to The Project, I've covered that previously HERE and HERE, but what is the driving force of this additional news service? 10 must believe they can hold onto the 5pm news audience by delivering more news-based programming. It's an idea with merit except for the fact every bit of research I have seen over my 30+ years in media says viewers who watch 10 NEWS at 5pm will flick over to 7 or 9 at 6pm to see what else is happening. There are viewers of 10 NEWS who want more news, they just don't want it from 10. Putting this new show on at 6pm is a massive mistake. They would have been better putting it on at 6.30pm and offering viewers who only watch the first 20 mins of the nightly news on 7 and 9 somewhere to go. So, here's my prediction: This show will do nothing to erode the audiences watching 7NEWS and 9NEWS at 6pm. In sx months time 10 might find themselves making the smarter decision and moving it to 6.30, or they might just end up dropping the show altogether.
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
'Virtually no oversight' of suburban poker machine dens
A scathing report has found regulators of Australia's biggest poker machine network have failed harm minimisation efforts. In what gambling reform advocates label "the worst kept secret", the NSW auditor-general found regulators were not reviewing licensing conditions once granted and did little to force venues to take meaningful actions when problem gambling was noticed. Some 21 venues in NSW have more than 400 machines, but just two have had their licensing conditions reviewed since July 2019 - when applying for operations changes. Four of the five most-profitable gaming venues were in high-risk gambling harm areas but have not had their risk or harm minimisation measures reviewed in at least a decade, the report said. Premier Chris Minns campaigned on gambling reform at the 2023 election, but the number of poker machines has increased in NSW to 87,749. Profits meanwhile hit all-time highs of $8.4 billion in the 2023/24 financial year. That delivered $2.3 billion in tax revenue, a figure tipped to increase to $2.9 billion by 2027/28. Alliance for Gambling Reform CEO Martin Thomas said the government was not concerned about reducing gambling harm, shown by the regulator "failing to do its job". "NSW already has more poker machines than any other jurisdiction, more than almost any other part of the world," Mr Thomas told AAP. "So it is appalling that the numbers of machines is still increasing despite the rhetoric about reducing the number of machines." NSW had half of all Australian pokies in 2022/23 - with three times as many machines per capita than Victoria. Defending Labor's record, Gaming Minister David Harris pointed to measures including reducing cash input limits, banning external gaming-related signage and introducing responsible gambling officers for venues with more than 20 pokies. But the report found some of the measures, including gradually reducing the number of machines based on forfeiture rates, had not worked. Greens MP Cate Faehrmann said the report, combined with the forecast growth in taxes from pokies losses, showed NSW was "addicted to poker machine revenue". "Gambling harm reduction advocates have been warning for a long time that the gambling industry has been allowed to operate with virtually no government oversight," she said. "And the report confirms this." Venues in western Sydney, including in the Canterbury-Bankstown, Fairfield and Cumberland council areas, had the highest pokies losses, with those three combining to lose $1.9 billion in the year to June 2024. That is almost a quarter (22 per cent) of the state's total losses, despite containing 10 per cent of the NSW population. "In western Sydney, entire salaries are disappearing into poker machines," Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said. An independent panel last year recommended statewide account-based systems by 2028 to prevent money laundering and reduce problem gambling. The recommendation echoed a 2022 crime commission report that lifted the lid on the billions of dollars of dirty money being funnelled through pokies. The former coalition government went to the 2023 state election promising mandatory cashless gaming.
