'How ATC is different from military court'
Constitutional Bench member Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail remarked on Tuesday that it was not necessary for the court to rely solely on the arguments of any party; rather, the court could exercise its powers to deliver "complete justice."
Sitting on a seven-member Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court, led by Justice Aminuddin Khan, Justice Mandokhail questioned why an anti-terrorism court was handling the trial in the case of the attack on Parliament, while a military court was tasked with the trial for the attack on military installations.
The court was hearing an intra-court appeal against a previous verdict by the apex court that barred military courts from trying civilians. During the hearing, the over-50-year-old FB Ali case was also referenced.
FB Ali, a retired brigadier, was tried and convicted by a military court in 1975 for attempting to overthrow then-Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. His appeal was dismissed by a five-member Supreme Court bench, led by Chief Justice Hamoodur Rahman.
Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan, sitting on the bench, observed that the FB Ali case was decided under the 1962 Constitution, meaning it could not be viewed through the lens of the 1973 Constitution.
Defence Ministry lawyer Khawaja Haris noted that in the FB Ali case, it was stated that military trials were justified. Justice Mandokhail responded, pointing out that it was argued in the FB Ali case that Article 6(3)A of the 1962 Constitution had been discussed, though Haris replied that it had not been discussed in that case.
Justice Mandokhail then asked the lawyer to review the case again. Haris, reacting to the remarks, stated that he had come only to assist the court. Justice Mandokhail apologized if his words had offended Haris, who acknowledged that it was commendable the court was carefully considering the case.
Justice Mandokhail emphasized the significance of the case, stating, "The most respected institution for us is Parliament. If there is an attack on Parliament, the trial is held in the anti-terrorism court, but if the attack is on a military installation, why is the trial held in a military court? Under what principle is this distinction made?"
The hearing was adjourned until Wednesday morning, with Khawaja Haris set to resume his arguments.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Budget lacks essential pro-business reforms: PBF
KARACHI: The Pakistan Business Forum (PBF) has raised serious concerns over the recently announced Federal Budget 2025, calling it a missed opportunity to stimulate economic growth and restore investor confidence. Senior Vice President of PBF, Ms Amna Awan, stated that the budget, as presented, lacks the essential pro-business reforms required to build momentum in a stabilizing economy. 'While Pakistan's economy is showing early signs of stabilization, the current budget does not provide the business community with the tools or confidence necessary to drive export-led growth,' said Amna Awan. 'We urge the government to reconsider anti-business tax provisions and to incorporate a more investment-friendly fiscal framework before the Finance Bill is passed by Parliament.' PBF leadership highlighted the sweeping discretionary powers proposed for tax authorities, warning that such measures would discourage investment, breed harassment, and exacerbate corruption and maladministration. Malik Khuda Baksh, President of PBF's Karachi Region, described the budget as 'deeply disappointing,' noting that it fails to address the real needs of the industrial sector or meet the expectations of citizens. 'The burden of fiscal adjustment has once again been shifted to the industrial sector, with no adequate relief to counteract rising costs of production,' said Malik. 'At a time when investor trust is fragile, the lack of meaningful incentives or reforms undermines the country's economic potential.' He also criticized the lack of emphasis on digitalization and one-window operational reforms, describing these as critical tools to improve the ease of doing business. Furthermore, PBF expressed concern that the government has not broadened the tax base, yet has set overly ambitious revenue targets that could harm compliant taxpayers and formal businesses. With the government projecting GDP growth of 4.2% for FY 2025 up from the current 2.7% PBF stressed that structural flaws within the budget must be addressed to meet these targets realistically. The Pakistan Business Forum has called for urgent consultations between the government and key business stakeholders to ensure the final Finance Bill supports sustainable economic growth, transparency, and private sector participation. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
IHCBA to hold jurists confab on 26th Amendment
The Islamabad High Court Bar Association (IHCBA) has announced to organise a jurists conference for an open debate on the advantages and disadvantages of the 26th Constitutional Amendment and invited the Insaf Lawyers Forum to suggest names of its two jurists for the conference. IHCBA President Wajid Ali Gilani wrote a letter to Ali Bukhari of the Insaf Lawyers Forum — which is linked to the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf — in response to his critical letter. Gilani said that the 26th Amendment was passed by parliament and the lawyers would uphold the Constitution. "Lawyers are not legislators, our mandate is to defend the constitutional structure not to hold protest marches against legislation," Gilani said. Two parliamentarians from your party, Barrister Gohar Ali Khan and Senator Ali Zafar, were present during its [26th Amendment] passage." He further said that IHCBA would convene a Jurist Conference for an open debate on the advantages and disadvantages of the 26th Amendment, adding that eminent jurists from all political parties would be invited. "You should nominate two jurists from your party to participate in the Jurist Conference."
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Aurangzeb tells Senate body: Govt plans foreclosure laws to boost housing finance
ISLAMABAD: In a diplomatic embarrassment for India again, this time the World Bank Board approved $700 million for Reko Diq project – a game changer, which is expected to generate exports worth $2.8 billion by 2028. This was stated by Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb while briefing the Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue. Aurangzeb also announced that government will introduce foreclosure laws to encourage bank-led financing in the housing sector, besides a new mechanism will be developed to eliminate non-filers to document the cash economy. Housing scheme with SBP's help: Rs5bn set aside for mark-up subsidy The committee commenced its first session to deliberate on the Finance Bill, 2025, including the Annual Budget Statement presented in the House, in accordance with Article 73 of the Constitution. The committee meeting chaired by Saleem Mandviwalla, here on Friday. Aurangzeb said that India tried again like it attempted in creating hurdles in the approval of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) loan. This time again India failed. This approval of $700 million which will be provided by the IFC was granted during a World Bank Board meeting in Washington. It is a significant economic diplomatic victory for Pakistan and a major setback for India, which had actively lobbied against the funding. Aurangzeb delivered an overview of the budget, economic progress, and the geopolitical headwinds confronting Pakistan. 'We have not imposed any new tax in the budget. Instead, we have taken new tax measures worth Rs312 billion through compliance and enforcement', said the minister, and confirmed that these steps were endorsed by the IMF under tax enforcement commitments. The finance minister shared economic data remarking that exports have increased by 7.8 percent in the current fiscal year. Last year's exports were $29 billion, this year we have already hit $30 billion in 11 months, he added. He said that there are no longer obstacles to opening Letters of Credit (LCs), and anyone saying otherwise is spreading misinformation. Facing questions on privatisation, Aurangzeb admitted, 'It must be accepted that privatisation targets were not achieved.' However, he reassured the committee that 'PIA has now been brought back into the privatisation stream.' Responding to the long-standing debate on agricultural taxation, he asserted, 'Earlier it was said agriculture tax can never be imposed. Now, they say it can't be collected. We will collect it—just give us the chance.' Provinces are set to begin agricultural income tax collection from July 1, 2025, he added. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
