logo
Trump administration proposes to slash emission limits on power plants

Trump administration proposes to slash emission limits on power plants

USA Todaya day ago

Trump administration proposes to slash emission limits on power plants
Show Caption
Hide Caption
What do Lee Zeldin's EPA rollbacks mean for Americans?
Lee Zeldin announced the Environmental Protection agency would roll back regulations aimed fighting climate change and pollution.
The Environmental Protection Agency announced Wednesday two major proposals that would repeal greenhouse gas emissions regulations and weaken mercury pollution standards for fossil-fuel power plants, part of the Trump administration's effort to revive coal.
The proposals include the repeal of all greenhouse gas standards and a separate one to roll back Biden-era limits on mercury and soot from the country's dirtiest coal plants. Greenhouse gases contribute to climate change, while mercury toxins can cause brain impairment.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, joined at the press conference by several Republican lawmakers and Navajo Nation President Buu Nygren, justified the moves by citing the country's ambition for energy dominance and the rising power demand from artificial intelligence data centers.
'Data centers that support AI alone will eat up 10% of U.S. energy supply within 10 years,' Zeldin said. 'Right now, it's about 3 to 4% of total U.S. electricity demand.'
He also said that the administration is removing these Obama- and Biden-era rules to relieve fossil-fuel power plants from regulatory burdens, directly attacking the central piece of the Biden administration's climate policy, including stricter pollution limits on mercury and particulate matter pollution.
A public comment period will follow the proposed repeals, after which the EPA will revise and finalize the rule. However, legal challenges could complicate that process.
Critics of the Trump administration's energy policy say they're concerned because it doesn't factor in the health impacts on local communities, which are often low-income families who live closer to the power plants.
This move also comes at a time when decades-long progress to clean up air is facing a threat from frequent, raging wildfires blanketing cities and towns in smoke.
'Rolling back this lifesaving update would be a grave mistake that would expose people to toxic pollution proven to harm brain development, trigger asthma attacks, and cause cancer and premature death,' American Lung Association President and CEO Harold Wimmer said in a statement.
EPA data shows that power plants are the second-largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, after vehicle exhaust. Power plants released nearly 1.5 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide in 2023, according to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. The agency did not release a complete count of all emissions for 2023. But 2022 data show the electric power sector made up a quarter of all U.S. emissions that year.
'Any government that was acting in good faith to meet the challenge of climate change would look to reductions from power plants as a first step,' Joseph Goffman, a former assistant administrator at the EPA office overseeing air pollution rules, told USA TODAY over email.
'But this administration is not a good faith actor and is certainly not acting to protect Americans,' Goffman said.
USA TODAY previously reported that President Donald Trump granted exemptions to over 60 power plants that delayed when they would have to meet the more stringent Mercury and Air Toxics Standards by two years.
Under the proposals made on June 11, the plants would never have to comply with the Biden-updated pollution limits. Zeldin pointed out that the limits on mercury pollution in effect since 2012 would remain.
Emissions from power plants have been declining over the past decade, thanks in part to EPA regulations. But experts say the administration's move could put that progress at risk.
During Trump's inauguration, the president declared a national energy emergency and later in April signed an executive order to boost the coal industry amid increased demand for electricity for artificial intelligence data centers.
The revival efforts are happening as fossil fuels, particularly coal, are being phased out due to the decreasing costs of renewables and their ability to reduce harmful emissions.
Search the coal plant closest to you below. Includes facilities beyond the ones exempted from the EPA rule.
A recent report from the International Energy Agency projected that 'electricity demand from data centers worldwide is set to more than double by 2030.' Artificial intelligence will be the most significant driver, the report said.
In May, the Department of Energy ordered two fossil-fuel plants to continue operating through the summer despite their earlier plans to shut down last month.
J.H. Campbell, a coal-fired plant in Michigan, was expected to retire in May. Eddystone Generating Station in Pennsylvania was planning to shut down its gas units in May.
The Department of Energy's orders require the operators to keep them running for 90 days to 'minimizing the risk of generation shortfall.'
Earlier this year, the U.S. Energy Information Administration said in a report that the country's electricity prices in 2024 were already cheaper and less volatile than before.
The proposed repeal of greenhouse gas limits and updated Mercury and Air Toxics Standard would save power generators $1.2 billion and $120 million per year, respectively, in regulatory costs, according to the EPA.
'American families will pay the cost of these rollbacks in higher health care bills from emergency room visits, missed workdays and missed school days,' said Michelle Roos, executive director of Environmental Protection Network, a group of former EPA staff.
'The only people who benefit from these rollbacks are the biggest emitters of toxic pollution who don't want to install cleaner technologies,' Roos said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump moves to merge wildland firefighting into single force, despite ex-officials warning of chaos
Trump moves to merge wildland firefighting into single force, despite ex-officials warning of chaos

Hamilton Spectator

time23 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Trump moves to merge wildland firefighting into single force, despite ex-officials warning of chaos

BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) — President Donald Trump on Thursday ordered government agencies to consolidate their wildland firefighting into a single program, despite warnings from former federal officials that it could be costly and increase the risk of catastrophic blazes. The order aims to centralize firefighting efforts now split among five agencies and two Cabinet departments. Trump's proposed budget for next year calls for the creation of a new Federal Wildland Fire Service under the U.S. Interior Department. That would mean shifting thousands of personnel from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Forest Service — where most federal firefighters now work — with fire season already underway . The administration has not disclosed how much the change could cost or save. Trump in his order cited the devastating Los Angeles wildfires in January as highlighting a need for a quicker response to wildfires. 'Wildfires threaten every region, yet many local government entities continue to disregard commonsense preventive measures,' the order said. The Trump administration in its first months temporarily cut off money for wildfire prevention work and reduced the ranks of federal government firefighters through layoffs and retirement. The order makes no mention of climate change, which Trump has downplayed even as warming temperatures help stoke bigger and more destructive wildfires that churn out massive amounts of harmful pollution. More than 65,000 wildfires across the U.S. burned almost 9 million acres (3.6 million hectares) last year. Organizations representing firefighters and former Forest Service officials say it would be costly to restructure firefighting efforts and cause major disruptions in the midst of fire season. A group that includes several former Forest Service chiefs said in a recent letter to lawmakers that consolidation of firefighting work could 'actually increase the likelihood of more large catastrophic fires, putting more communities, firefighters and resources at risk.' Another destructive fire season is expected this year, driven by above-normal temperatures for most of the country, according to federal officials. A prior proposal to merge the Forest Service and Interior to improve firefighting was found to have significant drawbacks by the Congressional Research Service in a 2008 report. But the idea more recently got bipartisan support, with California Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla and Montana Republican Sen. Tim Sheehy sponsoring legislation that is similar to Trump's plan. Before his election last year, Sheehy founded an aerial firefighting company that relies heavily on federal contracts. In a separate action aimed at wildfires, the Trump administration last month rolled back environmental safeguards around future logging projects on more than half U.S. national forests. The emergency designation covers 176,000 square miles (455,000 square kilometers) of terrain primarily in the West but also in the South, around the Great Lakes and in New England. Most of those forests are considered to have high wildfire risk, and many are in decline because of insects and disease .

Alex Padilla Tears Up Recounting His Kristi Noem Detainment on MSNBC: ‘It's All BS Coming From Trump'
Alex Padilla Tears Up Recounting His Kristi Noem Detainment on MSNBC: ‘It's All BS Coming From Trump'

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Alex Padilla Tears Up Recounting His Kristi Noem Detainment on MSNBC: ‘It's All BS Coming From Trump'

California Sen. Alex Padilla appeared on MSNBC's 'The Beat' for his first interview following his forceful removal from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's Los Angeles press conference Thursday, giving correspondents a glimpse behind the viral moment. Padilla was forcefully removed by FBI agents and other plainclothes officials from the event after attempting to ask Noem a question about the Trump administrations ICE actions in L.A. Video footage shows the senator being pushed out of the room, pinned to the ground and being placed in handcuffs. NBC correspondent Jacob Soboroff pressed the senator on what made him particularly emotional speaking with the press pool outside after the incident. The Padilla came from a family of day laborers in the San Fernando Valley, and said this administration's target on immigrants, especially in L.A., feels personal. 'I understand their plight. I understand their struggle. I understand their sacrifice to just find the American dream, a good opportunity, maybe a good job, the ability to raise a family, and have the next generation have it a little bit better than you did,' Padilla told MSNBC with tears in his eyes. 'All the talk about immigration, you know, the — the misinformation, disinformation about, you know, invasions and insurrections, it's all B.S. coming from Trump.' Soboroff noted that the senator was raised by a father, who was a short order cook, and a mother, who was a housekeeper. After studying at MIT, Padilla returned to his hometown to rise the ranks in the public sector and serve his community. He told MSNBC that the Trump administration's targeting of immigrants is misguided. 'If all they were going to do is target violent, dangerous criminals, true threats to our national security, that'd be one thing. Nobody has a disagreement there,' he said. 'What's happening in practice is so many — yes, undocumented — immigrants, but who are otherwise law-abiding, peaceful and hardworking, to think this administration changed policy for federal agents to enter schools, houses of worship, let alone workplaces? If immigrants are that bad, why is that where you're looking for them?' The senator also responded to Noem's claims that he 'lunged' at her during the press conference. 'That's ridiculous. It's a lie, but par for the course for this administration, right?' he said. Padilla was down the hall in the federal building waiting for a scheduled briefing that had been pushed back because of the Secretary of Homeland Security's press conference, he said. The senator said he was escorted into the conference room to listen, but he had to speak up. 'At one point, it was just too much to take,' he said. 'This notion that Donald Trump and Kristi Noem have to come in and rescue the people of Los Angeles from Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass? It was too much. And so I spoke up. I introduced myself and said I had a question.' Padilla also told Soboroff and MSNBC host Ari Melber that he had an opportunity to speak with Noem, but he did not get an answer to his question or an apology. 'If this can happen to a United States senator for having the audacity to ask a question of the secretary of homeland security,' he explained, 'then just imagine what can happen to anybody in the country.' Watch the full interview below: The post Alex Padilla Tears Up Recounting His Kristi Noem Detainment on MSNBC: 'It's All BS Coming From Trump' | Video appeared first on TheWrap.

Judge invokes monarchy talk while mulling Trump's National Guard deployment
Judge invokes monarchy talk while mulling Trump's National Guard deployment

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Judge invokes monarchy talk while mulling Trump's National Guard deployment

A federal judge warned at a Thursday hearing that accepting the Trump administration's assertion he has no authority to review the president's National Guard deployment in Los Angeles is a slippery slope. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said he hoped to rule later in the day on California Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) request to immediately restrict the troops' power on the ground, suggesting federal law at minimum required President Trump to alert the governor. The judge repeatedly emphasized that Trump is exercising presidential authority — not a king's — and the role comes with limitations. 'That's the difference between a constitutional government and King George,' Breyer said. 'It's not that a leader can simply say something and then it becomes it. It's a question of is a leader, a president or the governor, following the law as set forth in both the Constitution and statutes,' he continued. 'That's what a president, a governor or any leader must act under. Otherwise, they become something other than a constitutional officer.' Breyer seemed willing to agree with Newsom that Trump's deployment was legally defective, but it's still a question as to whether the judge will enjoin the president's directive or give the administration a chance to institute it the proper way. At the same time, Breyer appeared skeptical of blocking at this stage the 700 Marines sent to assist the several thousand guard members deployed. The Trump administration argues Breyer has no authority to review Trump's deployment of the National Guard because it is in the president's sole discretion. Justice Department attorney Brett Shumate argued that Trump was not required to seek approval from Newsom in mobilizing the guard, calling the governor 'merely a conduit.' The president does not have to call up a governor and 'invite them to Camp David' for a negotiation summit to call up the National Guard in their state, he said. 'There is one commander in chief of the armed forces, and when the president makes a decision, the states are subservient to the president's decision,' Shumate said. Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) contend that Trump was required to receive Newsom's consent before deploying the National Guard. 'They suggest, your honor, that there are no guardrails,' Nicholas Green, a lawyer for the state, said. Amid the legal battle, Trump said Thursday that he 'doesn't feel like a king.' He was responding to questions about 'No Kings' demonstrations expected around the country this weekend, which are set to coincide with a military parade marking the U.S. Army's 250th birthday. 'I have to go through hell to get stuff approved,' Trump said. Breyer during the hearing kept returning to monarchy talk, trying to determine how he could side with Trump without giving him unchecked power. 'What makes America great, different, is our Constitution and our robust discussion of views of the citizens,' the judge said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store