
Paris court finds eight guilty in the 2016 robbery of Kim Kardashian
A Paris court found the ringleader and seven other people guilty in the 2016 armed robbery of Kim Kardashian, but did not impose any additional time behind bars for their roles in what the US celebrity described as "the most terrifying experience of my life".
The chief judge, David De Pas, said that the defendants' ages — six are in their 60s and 70s — and their health issues weighed on the court's decision to impose sentences that he said, "aren't very severe".
He said that the nine years between the robbery and the trial — long even by the standards of France's famously deliberate legal system — were also taken into account in not imposing harsher sentences. The court acquitted two of the 10 defendants.
Aomar Aït Khedache, 69, the ringleader, got the stiffest sentence, eight years imprisonment but five of those are suspended. Three others got seven years, five of them suspended. Three more got prison sentences ranging from five to three years, mostly or completely suspended, and an eighth person was found guilty on a weapons charge and fined.
With time already served in pretrial detention, none of those found guilty will go to prison. The trial was heard by a three-judge panel and six jurors.
Still, the chief judge said that Kardashian had been traumatised by the October 2, 2016, jewel heist in her hotel during Fashion Week.
"You caused harm,' he said. "You caused fear."
Kardashian, who wasn't present for the verdict, issued a statement after the ruling was announced that she was "deeply grateful to the French authorities for pursuing justice in this case".
"The crime was the most terrifying experience of my life, leaving a lasting impact on me and my family. While I'll never forget what happened, I believe in the power of growth and accountability and pray for healing for all. I remain committed to advocating for justice, and promoting a fair legal system," said the celebrity who is working to become a lawyer.
A separate statement from her legal team said that "Kim appreciates the court's decision."
"It has been a long journey from that terrible night," it said. "She looks forward to putting this tragic episode behind her."
Khedache arrived at court walking with a stick, his face hidden from cameras. His DNA, found on the bands used to bind Kardashian, was a key breakthrough that helped crack open the case.
Wiretaps captured him giving orders, recruiting accomplices and arranging to sell the diamonds in Belgium. A diamond-encrusted cross, dropped during the escape, was the only piece of jewelry ever recovered.
The men made off with more than US$6 million (NZ$10 million) in jewelry, including a diamond ring she'd worn that night to a Givenchy show. They also took a watch her late father had given her when she graduated high school.
Two of the robbers, dressed as police, forced their way into her suite in the glamorous Hôtel de Pourtalès and bound Kardashian with zip ties and tape.
The theft subsequently forced celebrities to rethink how they live and protect themselves.
Because of their ages, the accused became known in France as "les papys braqueurs," or the grandpa robbers. They faced charges including armed robbery, kidnapping and gang association.
Kardashian's testimony earlier this month was the emotional high point. In a packed courtroom, she recounted how she was thrown onto a bed, zip-tied, and had a gun pressed to her on the night of October 2, 2016.
"I absolutely did think I was going to die," she said. "I have babies. I have to make it home. They can take everything. I just have to make it home."
She was dragged into a marble bathroom and told to stay silent. When the robbers fled, she freed herself by scraping the tape on her wrists off against the sink, then hid with her friend, shaking and barefoot.
She said that Paris had once been her sanctuary — a city she would wander at 3am, window shopping, stopping for hot chocolate. That illusion was shattered.
Khedache says he was only a foot soldier. He blamed a mysterious "X" or "Ben" — someone prosecutors say never existed.
His lawyer pleaded for clemency, pointing to one of the trial's most visceral moments — Kardashian's earlier courtroom encounter with the man accused of orchestrating her ordeal. Though she wasn't present, her words — and the memory of that moment — still echoed.
"She looked at him when she came, she listened to the letter he had written to her, and then she forgave him," lawyer Franck Berton told The Associated Press.
Kardashian, typically shielded by security and spectacle, had locked eyes with Khedache as the letter was read aloud.
"I do appreciate the letter, I forgive you," she said. "But it doesn't change the feelings and the trauma and the fact that my life was forever changed." A tabloid crime had become something raw and human.
Khedache asked for "a thousand pardons," communicated via a written note in court. Other defendants also used their final words to express remorse.
The robbery echoed far beyond the City of Light. It forced a recalibration of celebrity behavior in the age of Instagram. For years, Kardashian had curated her life like a showroom: geo-tagged, diamond-lit, public by design. But this was the moment the showroom turned into a crime scene. In her words, 'People were watching … They knew where I was.'
Afterward, she stopped posting her location in real time. She stripped her social media feed of lavish gifts and vanished from Paris for years. Other stars followed suit.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Whangārei man found guilty of 31 charges, including rape and assault
By Shannon Pitman, Open Justice reporter of All of the women gave evidence that the man demanded sex daily. Photo: Supplied/123/RF WARNING: This article discusses sexual assault and may be upsetting to some readers. A man, whose five ex-partners testified he raped, beat and sexually assaulted them, remained steadfast in his denial, despite the judge handing down 31 guilty verdicts. "For your information, I didn't do this," he said, before being told to sit down in the courtroom dock. On Friday, Justice Rebecca Edwards convicted the 43-year-old man on 31 charges, including rape, threats to kill, assault, and sexual violation, after hearing testimony from five women in a recent judge-alone trial in the Whangārei High Court. The offending spanned a 15-year period, during which the victims had been in relationships with the man, which resulted in seven children. Some of the women described being "love-bombed" and drawn into serious relationships within weeks, only for the man, who cannot be named, to become controlling and abusive soon afterwards. They said he demanded sex daily and when they did not agree, they would be worn down to the point of sleep deprivation, until they gave in. One woman described juggling childcare, work and study, while the man slept through the day, only to then endure his relentless sexual demands throughout the night. Another testified that he held her underwater in a bath, until she lost consciousness, while a third recounted the frequent beatings she suffered, particularly to her head. The man was also found guilty of raping two of the women just weeks after they had given birth to his children. In the Crown's closings, Geraldine Kelly laid out the rules of the law around sexual consent. Kelly said true consent had to be freely given. "Reluctant consent is still consent, but not if free will has been removed," she said. "It is not reluctant consent, if she has been left to feel she has no choice - that is submission." Kelly submitted that the defendant overpowered them and, at times, physically restrained some of the women, taking away their will to refuse. "Each and every one of those women has stood strong and consistent throughout, they are telling the truth," Kelly closed. Throughout the trial, defence lawyers Martin Hislop and Connor Taylor alleged the women had banded together in the "ex-wives' club", as they were aggrieved that he moved on in relationships quickly and had no contact with his children. "It was unhappiness about this man spreading his seed and moving on, and not taking responsibility as a father," Hislop alleged. Hislop claimed that at no stage did he have sex with any of the women without their consent. Following the closings, Justice Edwards reserved her decision, to deliver her verdicts on Friday. After finding the man guilty on 31 of the 33 charges he faced, she said the not-guilty verdicts on the two charges had nothing to do with the victim's honesty. Immediately after the verdicts were read out, the man interjected. "Thank you, your honour, but for your information, I didn't do this," he said. "No, take a seat," Justice Edwards warned him. "I didn't do it," he responded. Discussions were held around the interim suppression order in place, with a permanent order to be argued by the man's counsel at his sentencing in August. The women have automatic name suppression. The man was remanded into custody and did not stand for Justice Edwards, as she retired from the courtroom. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .

RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Attempted murderer Ian Dallison to be released on parole and live in Marlborough
Ian Dallison. Photo: The Press Disgraced Christchurch eye surgeon Ian Dallison will live in Marlborough following his release from prison on parole. In August 2022, after being declared bankrupt, Dallison stormed the Lyttelton home of his former business landlord Alberto Ceccarelli and tried to shoot the man while he dined with his wife. Dallison fired a Ruger semi-automatic pistol at Ceccarelli with the bullet narrowly missing his head and lodging in the doorframe over his right shoulder. Ceccarelli and his wife then rushed Dallison, sparking a violent scuffle, during which Dallison gouged the man's eye. He was jailed for almost seven years in April 2023 after pleading guilty to attempted murder and other charges. However, the Parole Board said there was evidence of a significant shift in Dallison's thinking. "He had proactively addressed the issues raised by the Board in its last decision," panel convenor Neville Trendle said. "He had a strong support network who participated in a reintegration meeting and who are well aware of the warning signs should Mr Dallison indicate signs of being unable to manage stress. "Mr Dallison told us of the changes he had made and some of the background to his thinking that led him to go down what he described as a 'rabbit hole' with respect to his victim. "We have considered a significant amount of information and have reached the point that we are satisfied Mr Dallison's risk can be managed in the community until his sentence ends with the support available to him and on the basis of his compliance with the conditions we intend imposing." Dallison would be subject to electronic monitoring upon his release from jail and was not to enter Canterbury, without permission from his probation officer. Those conditions would be in place for the remainder of his sentence. Dallison would be released early next month and would reappear before the Parole Board for a monitoring hearing later this year. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Firefighters Union calls for independent inquiry into FENZ's complaints process
FENZ chief executive & national commander Kerry Gregory. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi The Professional Firefighters' Union is calling for independent inquiry by the Auditor General into Fire and Emergency New Zealand's complaints process. Fire and Emergency New Zealand (FENZ) has apologised unreservedly to a former volunteer firefighter for failing to properly investigate a series of complaints. It has been nearly 10 years since Sarah Hullah made her first complaint to FENZ about sexual harassment. Now an 111-page independent report by Simon Mount KC, released on Wednesday, details 33 failings by FENZ over the way it handled her initial complaint, and several after that. These include failure to comply with its own processes, conflicts of interest, unreasonable delays, and a failure to learn from at least two previous, highly critical external reviews. FENZ chief executive and national commander Kerry Gregory said significant changes to the way complaints were managed had been made, including introducing an independent service that specialises in conflict resolution and complaint management. However, The Professional Firefighters Union secretary Wattie Watson told Nine to Noon that nothing had changed and Fire and Emergency's complaints system was neither independent, nor fair. "Many, many, many of those 33 findings of that report are still occurring today," she said. She said the Union was now calling for a proper inquiry into what has occurred. "The report into Sarah's case is a very good springboard for that because it shows - particularly from 2019 onwards - no matter what FENZ has put in place it has not worked, and it has not changed the fairness in the workplace whatsoever," she said. The Union wanted something similar to an Auditor General Inquiry. "There needs to be a really robust inquiry, I'd be interested to know what FENZ has spent on trying to not deal with Sarah's case. "We need an inquiry because this is utter mismanagement. The CEO and the Board need to be held to account, and the staff and volunteers at FENZ deserve a fair process to have their matters addressed," she said. National Secretary of the Professional Fire Fighters' Union Wattie Watson. Photo: Supplied/ Nudo Group The union had previously believed that FENZ could manage its own complaints process, but Watson said this report confirmed they could not and should not. "We now believe it has to be a completely independent external body to handle that process, and mainly because of the protections that are going on in management," Watson said. Watson said one of the key problems was that many of those working at FENZ were inexperienced because the bulk of employees were firefighters. "We have cases currently where the head of finance is going to be making a decision on whether the actions of someone in a hot fire situation acted appropriately in how they interacted with someone else at the scene," she said. Watson said the Union has no faith in FENZ and if an employee or volunteer makes a complaint against someone in higher management or high leadership, then they won't have a fair and proper process. "We have experience where there are managers that are subject to repeated complaints and are never investigated, in fact they are protected. "We have situations where management have coerced, pressured or put unreasonable restriction in place - particularly by a refusal to manage conflicts of interest, to make sure those complaints don't go anywhere else. "We've got examples where people have complained about the behaviours of managers, relatively high level managers, and yet they've ended up with disciplinary action against them," Watson said. FENZ chief executive and national commander Kerry Gregory said he apologised "publicly and unreservedly to Ms Hullah for the failure to properly investigate". He said FENZ had accepted all 33 findings, and separately, reached a resolution with Hullah. The organisation continued to work on a programme to change its culture, "to create a safer, more positive and inclusive environment for all our people. We are striving to become a different organisation". Already, significant changes had been made to how complaints were managed, including introducing an independent service that specialises in conflict resolution and complaint management. "Bullying, harassment and victimisation have no place in Fire and Emergency, and we take all allegations of any such behaviour very seriously. I am committed to creating an environment where everyone feels safe, and that any complaints are handled appropriately," he said. "I am confident that if complaints like those addressed in the review occurred today, they would be handled through a more robust and transparent process." He would not be drawn on whether people found at fault, whose names had been redacted from the report, had been moved out of their positions within FENZ. "The people involved haven't been given the tools to do it well, and the process didn't support them to do that well, so anyone who was involved through the 10-year period who may or may not still be in the organisation, wasn't necessarily well supported by the organisation as a whole." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.